Health Policy ; Health ; Policy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

First responders must be physically and mentally healthy to ensure effective emergency response. However, literature showed that Filipino first responders continue to have elevated levels of stress and increased risk for post-traumatic stress and other mental health problems months after their deployment. The “Mi Salud” app was created to help Filipino first responders, their team leaders, and their agencies monitor and manage the responders’ real-time stress levels before, during, and after their deployment more effectively.

The “Mi Salud” app was pretested with Filipino first responders (n=30) to establish convergent validity using existing validated scales measuring the same construct. Participants also completed a Likert scale and questionnaire to assess user experience and app recommendations. During the rollout, first responders (n=32) tested the app and completed a survey on user experience and app recommendations. A focus group discussion (n=11; FGD) was conducted to further explore their experiences with the app. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, while FGD data were examined through thematic analysis.

Results from the online survey showed that the app was generally found to be helpful and that the recommendations within the app were useful. The emerging themes from the FGD corroborated many of the themes from the survey, particularly the benefits of using the app and the app’s ease of use. Positive effects were observed both on the responders and on the responders’ team leader and teammates, which further established the value of the “Mi Salud” app.

The findings show that the “Mi Salud” stress check-app may serve as a useful tool for monitoring and managing the stress levels, a critical aspect for Filipino first responders to maintain optimal functioning during deployments and daily activities.

BACKGROUND

The Philippines faces a challenge in addressing the mental health needs of internally displaced persons (IDPs) following disasters. The lack of an integrated mental health triage system within evacuation centers and the shortage of specialists trained in post-traumatic stress triaging have hindered effective emergency response. Existing interventions primarily focus on traditional trauma and psychiatric symptoms, often lacking standardized mental health triage classifications and leading to data gaps, complicating resource allocation decisions.

To develop a culturally relevant mental health triage system, this study proposes the "Unahon Tool" to meet the needs of Filipino IDPs. Integrating with existing medical triage protocols equips frontline responders to identify stress-related concerns, enables informed decision-making for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) allocation, and optimizes resource utilization.

The study involved key informants, including disaster responders, mental health specialists, and government officials, who participated in interviews and focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was used to identify behavioral aspects affecting IDP communities. The Unahon Tool development incorporated disaster response frameworks, mental health interventions, and other existing triage tools. A red-yellow-green categorization system was employed based on the severity and urgency of observed behaviors. Stakeholder consultations and expert reviews guided tool refinement.

The final Unahon Tool includes 17 behaviors categorized into red (urgent), yellow (moderate), and green (low) severity levels. It provides corresponding recommended interventions to aid responders. During direct observations, yellow-category behaviors like shouting and cursing were prevalent. Responders focused on reminders for peace and order in response to these behaviors. The tool's "Notes" section was identified as a potential area for contextual information inclusion.

The Unahon Tool fills a crucial gap in the Philippine disaster response infrastructure by offering a behavior-based mental health triage system. It enables responders to prioritize mental health resources effectively, reducing the burden on specialists and enhancing overall disaster response effectiveness. Future directions   include expanding tool adoption beyond Metro Manila, translating it into regional languages, and developing a version for children and teenagers. Collaboration with other regions and age groups will ensure broader applicability and effectiveness in addressing mental health needs among diverse IDP populations.

OBJECTIVES

The burden of oral diseases is high in the Philippines. The global burden of disease study in 2019 estimated that 44 million Filipinos are affected by oral disorder. More specifically, 29 million Filipinos have untreated dental caries. Outpatients' dental health services are not covered by PhilHealth benefit package. There is a need to include key oral health interventions such as basic prevention and treatment in PhilHealth benefit package to be delivered at the primary health care settings (WHO TSA 153980). The study aimed to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a set of oral health care services to be delivered at different levels of health care within a comprehensive PhilHealth benefit package.

This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of including basic oral health services in the PhilHealth benefit package using a Markov modelling approach. The target population consists of Filipino adults and children at risk for dental diseases who are potential beneficiaries of PhilHealth. The intervention under consideration includes dental consultation, oral prophylaxis, topical fluoride application, silver diamine fluoride application, dental filling, and tooth extraction. The comparator is the current standard of care, which involves out-of-pocket payments for oral health services or limited access to subsidized dental care. The primary outcomes assessed include the incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A Markov model was constructed with a time horizon of 50 years to simulate the lifespan of Filipinos up to the average life expectancy of 70 years old, using a cycle length of one year to reflect disease progression and treatment effects overtime. Model parameters were derived from literature and expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, were conducted to assess uncertainty in model inputs. The analysis was carried out from a societal perspective incorporating direct medical and non-medical costs, and indirect costs.

A Markov model showed that a subsidized package is a cost-effective approach compared to the current situation of no subsidy, with an ICER of PhP 75,636 (1,535.76 USD) per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted. The computed ICER was considered good value for money as it was below 2021 GDP per capita of the Philippines of PhP 174,286 (3,538.80 USD). One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of preventive treatment had the most significant impact on the model, and a price threshold of greater than PhP 3,062 (62.17 USD) for preventive treatment will render the subsidized package no longer cost-effective. The budget impact analysis showed a 1.63% increase in budget annually with the current situation of no subsidy. Rolling out a subsidized oral health package will entail a significant increase in government expenses during the first year but a decreasing trend of 1-2% annually for the following years as the program takes its effect.

A subsidized oral health package is a costeffective approach from a societal perspective. It will entail a significant increase in government expenditure during the start of its roll out but will eventually result in a decreasing trend of expenses as the years progress.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) represents a multifaceted social intervention designed to tackle issues related to access, equity, and service quality. Within the framework of CBR, participation stands as a pivotal principle, albeit one that frequently goes unnoticed, particularly concerning children with disabilities. Consequently, this realist synthesis embarks on an exploration of the present landscape, participation mechanisms, and resulting outcomes within CBR initiatives tailored for children with disabilities in low and low-middle-income countries.

The realist approach is utilized to explain the causal mechanisms and explore the context, mechanism, and outcome of participation in CBR programs. A systematic search was conducted across ten databases up to April 2021. Studies were included if they involved children with disabilities aged 17 years and below, were implemented in World Bank-classified low-income or low-middle-income countries, discussed implementation mechanisms and community participation, and described outcomes. No language restrictions or publication type limitations were applied. The search process employed double screening of title, abstract, and full-text levels, followed by a snowballing technique. Quality assessment followed the RAMESES standards for realist reviews. Data extraction and analysis yielded context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Thirteen articles were included in the synthesis, from which three context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified: (1) family-facilitated intervention through training in the immediate environment of children with disabilities leads to knowledge translation of caregivers, (2) inaccessible healthcare services require establishing a referral system and augmenting human resource to ensure the system’s capacity to accommodate the magnified need, and (3) established collaboration of researcher, professionals, and community with stakeholder involvement in the CBR management leads to program adoption and documented effectiveness. Both training and establishing referral systems as implementation mechanisms pose sustainability challenges due to dependency on funding. Overall, participation as a form of agency is more often an implied concept. Training is a common mechanism of implementation, where women play a critical role as proxies of children with disabilities, being their caregivers and advocates. Positive and negative outcomes focus on the condition of children with disabilities and the trainees’ knowledge and awareness.

A critical analysis of children's and community's participation in the context, mechanism, and outcome unravels the non-participation of children with disabilities and tokenism of the community stakeholders in the CBR programs. Maximizing the contribution of children with disabilities and community stakeholders is called for, aligned with the ladder of participation, toward their democratic participation. Study limitations include the paucity of published CBR programs reporting participation mechanisms in low and low-middle-income countries and the exclusion of studies from economically disadvantaged communities in high-income countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are medical conditions that are associated with long durations, slow progress, and lifetime medications. This study aimed to assess the household out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures on NCDs in a 4th class municipality.

This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the characteristics of the households and household heads, healthcare needs, expenditures on medicines, health, and household, and alternative coping strategies to avail healthcare needs.

This study surveyed 200 households from all ten barangays of Ternate, Cavite. Top NCDs recorded include hypertension, diabetes, heart diseases, and asthma, while top NCDs medicines recorded were Losartan, Amlodipine, Metformin, and Glimepiride. Blood tests were the most needed medical laboratory service, while X-ray was the most needed diagnostic imaging service. Although more than half of the households have a member with only one NCD— the most prevalent being hypertensive disease, diabetes mellitus and other metabolic diseases—it is also common to have household members taking medicines for two to three NCDs.

This study highlights the need to address issues with lack of access and availability of essential medicines for NCDs especially in the primary health care setting. This study provides evidence on the minimal financial risk protection provided for medicines with data suggesting that it is the primary cause of CHEs for NCDs. Households covered by the Primary Care Benefit Packages were excluded from the study, thus, the estimates derived from the sample may be an overestimate of the true prevalence of CHE in the municipality. Therefore, there is a need to have mechanisms in place to expand insurance coverage and increase government programs catering to certain population groups to reduce the financial burden of medicines for NCDs.

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes in the Philippines. Diabetic foot complications represent a prevalent and significant chronic concern for individuals with type 2 diabetes. This poses an immediate community health concern, as diabetic complications may threaten an individual's well-being.

This study intends to cross-culturally adapt the Diabetic Foot Knowledge Subscale (DFKS) and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale (FSCBS) questionnaires into the Filipino language as an assessment tool among Filipinos with diabetes.

The study employed a psychometric research design, where it entailed Phase A and Phase B. Phase A involved the forward translation of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires, followed by the synthesis of the translations and backward translation. Subsequently, an expert committee reviewed the translations and concluded the final version. The final translated versions of the questionnaires ensured that it can be understood by an individual who has a Grade 6 level of reading proficiency. Phase B entailed the validity testing with the evaluation of the expert committee, and reliability testing of the said questionnaires with a sample size of 30 participants. A wash-out period of 24 hours was given for the test-retest reliability, followed by data analysis. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were measured using the item and scale content validity indices and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively, to ensure their accuracy and appropriateness. The content validity of the questionnaires was evaluated individually by the experts using a Likert scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest meaning the item was very relevant and succinct. Scores per item were between 3 and 4, which indicate that the translated version of the items were relevant and succinct or were relevant but needed minor revisions.

The validity scores for the translated DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires were obtained using the Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI) with a score of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Moreover, all items in the questionnaires obtained an Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.88-1.00. The DFKS also has an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72, while the FSCBS has a good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The test-retest reliability shows an acceptable Spearman’s correlation at 0.76 for the DFKS and a strong positive Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.73 for the FSCBS.

The validity of the two questionnaires was acceptable and the test-retest reliability showed a strong positive correlation among the items thereby making the cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires successful. The Filipino versions of the DFKS and FSCBS questionnaires accurately measure the knowledge and behavior of individuals with type 2 diabetes, respectively.

BACKGROUND

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, schools had to switch online. The sudden transition to blended teaching and learning (BTL) poses challenges for students and teachers, especially for health science programs that require hands-on practical experience. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these self-report questionnaires (SRQs) should be established to ensure the accuracy of the results as intended by the SRQ.

This study critically appraised, compared, and summarized the psychometric properties of SRQ evaluating BTL among health science university students. This review determined the SRQ’s reliability, internal consistency, various forms of validity (content, criterion, construct), and responsiveness.

Following a 10-step procedure based on COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of SRQs used by health science university students to evaluate blended teaching and learning. Studies were eligible if they reported psychometric properties of SRQs related to blended learning among university health science students; exclusions included studies focusing on perceptions, attitudes, self-efficacy, and satisfaction, as well as articles such as biographies, editorials, and conference materials. Searches covered multiple electronic databases until April 26, 2023, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE (OVID), PsycInfo, CINAHL, EBSCOHOST, ERIC, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, JSTOR, Acta Medica Philippina, Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development, and HERDIN, managed through Zotero. Two independent reviewers performed database searches, title and abstract screening, and full-text evaluations, with a third reviewer resolving any disputes. The COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist was employed to evaluate included studies on the development and various measurement properties of SRQs. The reviewers assessed SRQ standards, including validity, reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, responsiveness, interpretability, and feasibility. Data extraction and result tabulation were independently completed, with content comparison by two health education experts. This evaluation categorized the SRQs into three quality and validity levels.

The study examined five articles; four were rated as 'doubtful' and one as 'inadequate' in the overall development of SRQ. All four 'doubtful' studies demonstrated questionable content validity when university students were asked about the questionnaire's relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Only half of these studies achieved an 'adequate' rating for content validity based on expert opinions on relevance and comprehensiveness. All but one study scored from 'very good' to 'adequate' in structural validity. Three out of the four studies scored a very good rating for internal consistency, while one was deemed 'inadequate' in internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and reliability. Three out of four studies scored 'very good' on construct validity, but all overlooked criterion validity and responsiveness. Conducted in various locations, including Australia, Romania, Turkey, and Taiwan, these studies highlighted both common characteristics and limitations in questionnaire development according to the COSMIN guidelines. Four studies were deemed reliable and valid for BTL constructs (Category A); Wu et al. requires further validation (Category B). Study limitations included heterogeneity in populations, settings, and questionnaire versions, potential subjective bias in SRQ content comparison, and the evolving nature of SRQs in blended learning contexts.

The systematic review reports the development and evaluation of SRQs for BTL while identifying gaps in their applicability to health science programs. The Blended Learning Scale (BLS) of Lazar et al. and the Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) of Ballouk et al. showed an ‘adequate' rating for content validity. BLS revealed very good structural validity, internal consistency, and adequate content validation. Although the BLQ lacked Confirmatory Factor Analysis, it yielded valuable constructs for evaluating health sciences students' experiences in BTL. Both tools require improvements on recall period, completion time, interpretability, and feasibility. The review underscores the necessity for cont inuous assessment and enhancement of such instruments in BTL, advocating a rigorous scale development process. Furthermore, it encourages the customization of teaching and learning evaluation tools to suit specific institutional contexts while promoting further validation of these questionnaires across different populations in future research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Filipino farmers face unique occupational challenges that increase the risk of mental health issues, particularly anxiety. This study aims to determine the different personal, environmental, socioeconomic, occupational, and psychosocial factors associated with anxiety symptoms among Filipino farmers in Central Luzon.

Chain referral sampling method was used to recruit participants for the study, who underwent screening based on the eligibility criteria. Eligible participants were then asked about anxiety symptoms using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), while the validated, researcher-constructed Data Collection Tool for Factors Associated with Anxiety Symptoms (DCFAAS) was used to determine the farmers’ exposure to a variety of factors. Microsoft Excel was utilized in computing for frequency and percent distribution of participants, in each factor. Binary logistic regression was used to compute crude and adjusted odds ratio of each factor thru IBM SPSS Statistics®.

Among the 113 eligible farmers enrolled in the study, only 19 (16.8%) experienced anxiety symptoms, with excessive worrying, which was seen among 45 participants (39.8%). The mental health of Filipino farmers was significantly affected by the presence of physical illness (OR = 10.70 [95% CI 1.367, 83.773]) and having relatives affecting work completion (OR = 6.45 [95% CI 1.346, 30.896]). 

Despite the low prevalence of anxiety symptoms in this study, the findings suggest government policies to improve mental health service access to farmers, to integrate psychosocial support into agricultural programs, and to address family-related work pressures. By addressing these factors, it can improve farmer productivity and promote overall well-being, putting emphasis on the mental health of the Filipino farmers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university students, categorically focusing on effective coping strategies adopted.

The researcher used a descriptive cross-sectional design and a pseudo-random number sampling method with an inversion technique to randomly select 548 health science students who participated fully out of the sum of 4,140 students from each department. The initial goal was to include 572 students in the sample. This ensured a fair representation of students from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN). The researcher evaluated these students using the COVID-19 Student Stress Questionnaire and Brief-Cope Scales.

Findings showed that 58.8% of the respondents were females, 34.7% were enrolled in the nursing program, and 59.7% chose to live with their parents. Most of the students experienced moderate stress, with 45.25% and 5.47% experiencing extremely stressful or distressing situations, in terms of relationships and academic life, respectively. There were no significant differences in fear of contagion, regardless of the students' gender. and social isolation between students who lived with and without their parents. In terms of relationships and academic life among the students, there was no significant difference in relation to the demographic characteristics. Results also showed that 26.6% of the students used problem-focused coping “a little bit," and there was no significant difference as to their developmental characteristics for those using problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, or avoidant coping. However, the results indicated a greater tendency towards avoidant coping strategies, with no significant differences observed. Students disproportionately adopted problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant coping strategies. Students reported a weakly significant positive correlation between emotionfocused coping and problem-focused coping, and a large negative association between fear of contagion and problem-focused coping strategies. They also reported a slightly positive correlation between relationships, academic life, and social isolation.

The study revealed that most students experience moderate stress, which gradually escalates into extremely stressful situations, particularly in relationships and academics. The researcher found no significant differences in fear of contagion or social isolation. However, avoidant coping was more prevalent compared to problem-focused and emotion-focused strategies. There were weak positive correlations between emotion-focused and problem-focused coping. Policy reform in the health and academic systems will strategically improve students' mental health.