The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.

The close relationship between gastric cancer (GC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has garnered significant attention. On one hand, T2DM may play a role in the development and progression of GC, correlating with poor patient outcomes. On the other hand, after radical surgery for GC, T2DM can be effectively managed, potentially improving tumor prognosis. In recent years, bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has revolutionized T2DM treatment for obese and overweight patients. Comparative analyses reveal similarities between surgical approaches for gastric cancer and BMS, leading to the emergence of the onco-metabolic surgery (OMS) concept, which suggests that radical tumor resection and T2DM remission in GC patients can be potentially achieved through a single procedure. However, there are notable differences between OMS and BMS, including target populations, surgical details, and perioperative management. Therefore, optimizing the application of the OMS concept in GC patients holds significant clinical importance. This article provides a review to facilitate the better implementation of this concept in practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial evidence is limited to identify better topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for treating knee osteoarthritis (OA). We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of flurbiprofen cataplasms (FPC) with loxoprofen sodium cataplasms (LSC) in treating patients with knee OA. METHODS: This is an open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial conducted at Peking University Shougang Hospital. Overall, 250 patients with knee OA admitted from October 2021 to April 2022 were randomly assigned to FPC and LSC treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. Both medications were administered to patients for 28 days. The primary outcome was the change of pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to day 28 (range, 0-10 points; higher score indicates worse pain; non-inferiority margin: 1 point; superiority margin: 0 point). There were four secondary outcomes, including the extent of pain relief, the change trends of VAS scores, joint function scores measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and adverse events. RESULTS: Among 250 randomized patients (One patient without complete baseline record in the flurbiprofen cataplasms was excluded; age, 62.8 ± 10.5 years; 61.4% [153/249] women), 234 (93.6%) finally completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the decline of the VAS score for the 24-h most intense pain in the FPC group was non-inferior, and also superior to that in the LSC group (differences and 95% confidence interval, 0.414 (0.147-0.681); P <0.001 for non-inferiority; P = 0.001 for superiority). Similar results were observed of the VAS scores for the current pain and pain during exercise. WOMAC scores were also lower in the FPC group at week 4 (12.50 [8.00-22.50] vs . 16.00 [11.00-27.00], P = 0.010), mainly driven by the dimension of daily activity difficulty. In addition, the FPC group experienced a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (5.6% [7/124] vs . 33.6% [42/125], P <0.001), including irritation, rash and pain of the skin, and sticky hair uncovering pain. CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that FPC is superior to LSC for treating patients with knee OA in pain relief, joint function improvement, and safety profile.
Humans ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy* ; Flurbiprofen/therapeutic use* ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use* ; Pain/drug therapy* ; Treatment Outcome ; Double-Blind Method

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common sports injury that has a significant impact on knee function and patients′ mobility. With the popularity of national fitness campaign in China, the incidence of ACL injury is increasing year by year. Currently, there still lacks clinical standards or guidelines on how to choose appropriate treatment methods, surgical plans and rehabilitation protocols for ACL injury. In order to timely reflect the new treatment concept of ACL injury, standardize its diagnosis and treatment and improve the curative effect, the Sports Medicine Society of Chinese Research Hospital Association and the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Trauma organized domestic orthopedic and sports medicine experts to formulate the "clinical evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury (2022 version)" based on the level of evidence-based medicine and in compliance with the principle of scientificity, practicability and advancement. The present guideline includes 12 recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of ACL injury in order to provide guidance and assistance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of ACL injury in China.

Objective:To compare the short-term efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty(TKA) in the treatment of medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 197 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee treated by the same group of doctors from January 2015 to December 2018.There were 86 males and 111 females, aged (67.7±10.5) years (range: 46 to 92 years), among which 101 cases received UKA and 96 cases received TKA.The UKA and TKA patients were matched by the propensity score matching method, and a total of 41 pairs of patients were successfully matched.The difference of short-term outcomes between the two groups were compared by t test, χ 2 test or Fisher exact probability methods. Results:Compared with TKA group, the postoperative reduction of hemogloblin in the UKA group was lower ((15.3±6.4) g/L vs. (20.1±7.5) g/L, t=-3.117, P<0.01), opioid dosage was lower ((160.5±29.3) mg vs. (186.1±46.8) mg, t=-2.969, P<0.01), and the length of hospital stay was shorter ((7.0±2.0)d vs. (10.0±2.5)d, t=-6.000, P<0.01). Forgotten joint score of UKA group was higher ( (65.1±7.6) vs. (58.3±13.9) , t=2.732, P<0.01), the incidence of knee clunk or crepitus was lower ( P=0.03) . There was no significant difference in the time of surgical tourniquet, range of motion, American knee society clinical score and incidence of deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities between the two groups.No complications such as surgical site infection, prosthesis loosening and dislocation occurred in the two groups. Conclusion:The early effect of UKA is similar to that of TKA, and it is better than TKA in the aspects of knee clunk or crepitus, forgotten joint score, blood loss, opioid dosage and postoperative hospital stay.

Bearing dislocation is a special complication of mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty, caused by many factors, such as imbalance of the flexion and extension gap, malposition of components, impingement by the remaining osteophytes and cement, damage or delayed chronic laxity of medial collateral ligament, traumatic accident and habitual high knee flexion. It can be reduced by strictly controlling the operation indications before operation, osteotomy and implanting the prosthesis accurately while protecting the medial collateral ligament during operation, actively guiding the appropriate rehabilitation actions and activity intensity of patients after operation. Treatment should be individualized according to the causes and individual conditions of patients.

Objective:To compare the short-term efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty(TKA) in the treatment of medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 197 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee treated by the same group of doctors from January 2015 to December 2018.There were 86 males and 111 females, aged (67.7±10.5) years (range: 46 to 92 years), among which 101 cases received UKA and 96 cases received TKA.The UKA and TKA patients were matched by the propensity score matching method, and a total of 41 pairs of patients were successfully matched.The difference of short-term outcomes between the two groups were compared by t test, χ 2 test or Fisher exact probability methods. Results:Compared with TKA group, the postoperative reduction of hemogloblin in the UKA group was lower ((15.3±6.4) g/L vs. (20.1±7.5) g/L, t=-3.117, P<0.01), opioid dosage was lower ((160.5±29.3) mg vs. (186.1±46.8) mg, t=-2.969, P<0.01), and the length of hospital stay was shorter ((7.0±2.0)d vs. (10.0±2.5)d, t=-6.000, P<0.01). Forgotten joint score of UKA group was higher ( (65.1±7.6) vs. (58.3±13.9) , t=2.732, P<0.01), the incidence of knee clunk or crepitus was lower ( P=0.03) . There was no significant difference in the time of surgical tourniquet, range of motion, American knee society clinical score and incidence of deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities between the two groups.No complications such as surgical site infection, prosthesis loosening and dislocation occurred in the two groups. Conclusion:The early effect of UKA is similar to that of TKA, and it is better than TKA in the aspects of knee clunk or crepitus, forgotten joint score, blood loss, opioid dosage and postoperative hospital stay.

Bearing dislocation is a special complication of mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty, caused by many factors, such as imbalance of the flexion and extension gap, malposition of components, impingement by the remaining osteophytes and cement, damage or delayed chronic laxity of medial collateral ligament, traumatic accident and habitual high knee flexion. It can be reduced by strictly controlling the operation indications before operation, osteotomy and implanting the prosthesis accurately while protecting the medial collateral ligament during operation, actively guiding the appropriate rehabilitation actions and activity intensity of patients after operation. Treatment should be individualized according to the causes and individual conditions of patients.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), an alternative technology that has been prevailed upon Orthopedics which was proven by time that it's not only an effective treatment for patients with anterior medial knee osteoarthritis, additionally, it plays an important role in the staged treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The advantage of UKA is that patients would receive minimal invasion and faster recovery and it is more suitable for elderly patients. Nevertheless, UKA was also an advisable choice of young patients due to its maximum retention of the knee joint sensation, with a reflect on higher post operation score on FJS (forgetting joint score) . The ideal clinical efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is relied on the improvements on the latest artificial joint design and surgical skill approaches, and as a consequence, indications and contraindications for UKA have renovated. A subset of patients who were previously thought to be contraindicated to perform UKA (such as medial patellofemoral joint mild arthritis) can be reassessed and performed UKA today which called relative contraindications or Non-essential contraindications. The main objective of this article is to provide a new concept of UKA to surgeons, and to provide the best treatment options for patients with different complications according to the latest preoperative evaluation criteria. According to our experience, it is recommended that surgeons should accumulate a certain amount of total joint replacement experience and then to carry out UKA surgery, which will achieve better results.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods: All literatures of OLIF performed in lumbar degenerative diseases were searched in recognized databases including Pubmed, OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, springer, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases. Methodological Indexfor Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to evaluate the quality of the literatures. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.0 statistical software. Results: A total of 35 literatures were included, including 22 English literatures and 13 Chinese literatures. There were 3 630 patients with 45.2% of males, aged from 14 to 89 years old (mean, 62.6 years). The average of length of stay (LOS), operation time (OT) and blood loss (BL) of OLIF procedure were 6.7 days, 117 minutes, and 128 ml, respectively. The VAS scores of low back pain of postoperative and final follow-up decreased by 4.33 and 4.70, respectively. The VAS scores of leg pain decreased by 4.57 points and 5.31, respectively. Compared with preoperative, the postoperative JOA score increased by 7.58 and the postoperative ODI were also improved by 33.89%. All the postoperative imaging data were significantly different from those before surgery. The surgical level intervertebral heightincreased 4.14 mm, and the intervertebral foramen height and intervertebral foramen area increased by 3.54 mm, 53.96 mm², while the dura sac cross-sectional area increased by 36.61 mm², and the overall lumbar lordosis increased by 13.78° with the local segmental lordosis increased by 4.62°. The overall incidence of complications of OLIF was 32%, with a 95% confidence interval of 25%-38%. Conclusion OLIF is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. OLIF has a simply procedure and short learning curve, with short LOS and operation time, less blood loss. OLIF can effectively open the narrow intervertebral space and increase the spinal canal and nerve root canal, significantly improve the symptoms, while the complication rate is low, so OLIF is worthy of widespread clinical application.