Objective:To investigate the efficacy of different laparoscopic surgeries for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of gastric cardia and fundus.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 251 patients with GIST of gastric cardia and fundus who underwent laparoscopic radical resection in 14 medical centers, including Guangdong Provincial People′s Hospital et al, from December 2007 to December 2021 were collected. There were 123 males and 128 females, aged 58(24,87)years. Observation indicators: (1) treatment; (2) clinicopathological data of patients undergoing different laparoscopic surgeries; (3) subgroup analysis for special laparoscopic techniques. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test or ANOVA. Measure-ment data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages. Comparison of ordinal data was conducted using the rank sum test. Results:(1) Treatment. Of the 251 patients,202 cases underwent gastric wedge resection, 26 cases underwent special laparoscopic techniques including 10 cases with serotomy and dissection and 16 cases with transluminal gastrectomy, 23 cases underwent structural gastrectomy including 6 cases with total gastrectomy and 17 cases with proximal partial gastrectomy. There were 24 patients had postoperative complications after surgery. (2) Clinicopathological data of patients undergoing different laparoscopic surgeries. The gender (male, female), age, tumor diameter, operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, time to postoperative initial whole liquid food intake, time to postoperative initial semi-liquid food intake, duration of postoperative hospital stay, cases with perioperative complications, cases with mitotic count as ≤5/50 high power field, 6?10/50 high power field, >10/50 high power field, cases be classified as very low risk, low risk, medium risk, high risk according to the National Institutes of Health risk classification, cases with tumor located at fundus and gastric cardia were 93, 109, (59±11)years, 3.50(0.40,10.00)cm, 88.00(25.00,290.00)minutes,20.00(25.00,290.00)mL, 4.00(2.00,12.00)cm, 3.00(1.00,9.00)days, 4.00(1.00,16.00)days, 5.00(1.00,18.00)days, 14, 164, 31, 7, 47, 83, 50, 22, 30, 172 in patients undergoing gastric wedge resection, respectively. The above indicators were 19, 7, (49±14)years, 2.55(0.20,5.00)cm, 101.00(59.00,330.00)minutes, 27.50(2.00,300.00)mL, 4.50(0,6.00)cm, 2.50(1.00,10.00)days, 4.00(1.00,16.00)days, 6.00(1.00,18.00)days, 3, 20, 5, 1, 15, 5, 2, 4, 24, 2 in patients undergoing special laparos-copic techniques, and 11, 12, (52±10)years, 5.00(0.80,10.00)cm, 187.00(80.00,325.00)minutes, 50.00(10.00,300.00)mL, 6.00(4.00,12.00)cm, 4.00(2.00,8.00)days, 6.00(3.00,14.00)days, 8.00(2.00,18.00)days, 7, 11, 5, 7, 2, 6, 6, 9, 13, 10 in patients undergoing structural gastrectomy. There were significant differences in the above indicators among the three groups of patients ( χ2=6.75, F=10.19, H=17.71, 37.50, 35.54, 24.68, 16.09,20.20, 13.76, χ2=13.32, Z=28.98, 32.17, χ2=82.14, P<0.05). (3) Subgroup analysis for special laparoscopic techniques. The time to postoperative initial whole liquid food intake, time to postoperative initial semi-liquid food intake, classification of tumor location (endophytic type, exophytic type, parietal type) were 4.50(1.00,10.00)days, 8.00(3.00,12.00)days, 0, 8, 2 in patients undergoing serotomy and dissection, versus 2.00(1.00,4.00)days, 3.00(1.00,6.00)days, 16, 0, 0 in patients undergoing transluminal gastrectomy. There were significant differences in time to postoperative initial whole liquid food intake, time to postoperative initial semi-liquid food intake between them ( Z=-2.65, -3.16, P<0.05); and there was a significant difference in classification of tumor location between them ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Gastric wedge resection is the most commonly used laparoscopic technique for GIST of gastric cardia and fundus. The application of special laparoscopic techniques is focused on the GIST of cardia to preserve the function of the cardia.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognostic influencing factors of radical surgery for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 741 duodenal GIST patients who under-went radical surgery in 17 medical centers, including 121 cases in Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 121 cases in Chinese PLA General Hospital, 116 cases in Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 77 cases in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 77 cases in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 31 cases in Guangdong Provincial People′s Hospital, 24 cases in Fujian Cancer Hospital, 22 cases in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 25 cases in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 19 cases in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 23 cases in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 17 cases in Liaoning Cancer Hospital＆Institute, 17 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 15 cases in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 14 cases in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 14 cases in Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University and 8 cases in General Hospital of Chinese People′s Liberation Army Air Force, from January 2010 to April 2020 were collected. There were 346 males and 395 females, aged 55(range, 17?86)years. Observation indicators: (1) neoadjuvant treatment; (2) surgical and postoperative situations; (3) follow-up; (4) stratified analysis. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination or telephone interview. Patients were followed up once every 3?6 months during neoadjuvant therapy and once every 6?12 months after radical surgery to detect tumor recurrence and survival of patient up to April 2022. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison between groups was conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curves and calculate survival rates. Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Propensity score matching was done by the 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method, and the matching tolerance was 0.02. Results:(1) Neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 741 patients, 34 cases received neoadjuvant therapy for 8(range, 3?44)months. Cases assessed as partial response, stable disease and progressive disease before the radical surgery of the 34 cases were 21, 9, 4, respectively. The tumor diameter of the 34 patients before the neoadjuvant therapy and before the radical surgery were 8.0(range, 3.0?26.0)cm and 5.3(range, 3.0?18.0)cm, with the regression rate as 31.9%(range, ?166.7% to 58.3%). (2) Surgical and postoperative situations. Of the 741 patients, 34 cases underwent radical surgery after receiving neoadjuvant therapy, and 707 cases underwent radical surgery directly. All the 741 patients underwent radical surgery successfully, in which 633, 102 and 6 cases received open surgery, laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic treatment, respectively. Of the 633 cases receiving open surgery and the 102 cases receiving laparoscopic surgery, cases with surgical resection range as pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was 238, and cases with surgical resection range as duodenal limited resection, including duodenal wedge resection, distal gastrectomy, segmental duodenal resection, local resection of duodenal tumor or segmental duodenum combined with subtotal gastrectomy, was 497, 226, 55, 204, 12. Of the 741 patients, 131 cases had post-operative complications including 113 cases with grade Ⅰ?Ⅱ complications and 18 cases with ≥ grade Ⅲ complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification. The duration of postoperative hospital stay of the 741 patients was 13(range, 4?120)days. Of the 707 patients receiving direct radical surgery, 371 cases were evaluated as extremely low risk, low risk, medium risk of the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk classification after surgery, and 336 cases were evaluated as high risk in which 205 cases receive postoperative adjuvant imatinib therapy with the treatment time as 24(range, 6?110)months. (3) Follow-up. All the 741 patients were followed up for 58(range, 7?150)months. During the follow-up, 110 patients had tumor recurrence and metastasis. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates and 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival rates of the 741 patients were 100.0%, 98.6%, 94.5% and 98.4%, 90.9%, 84.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates and 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival rates of the 707 patients receiving direct radical surgery were 100.0%, 98.5%, 94.3% and 98.4%, 91.1%, 85.4%, respectively. (4) Stratified analysis. ① Analysis of prognostic factors in patients undergoing radical surgery directly. Results of univariate analysis showed that primary tumor location, tumor diameter, mitotic count, modified NIH risk classification and tumor gene information were related factors affecting the overall survival of 707 patients with primary duodenal GIST who underwent direct radical surgery ( hazard ratio=0.43, 0.18, 0.22, 0.06, 0.29, 95% confidence intervals as 0.20?0.93, 0.09?0.35, 0.10?0.50, 0.03?0.12, 0.09?0.95, P<0.05). The primary tumor location, tumor diameter, mitotic count, modified NIH risk classification were related factors affecting the disease-free survival of 707 patients with primary duodenal GIST who underwent direct radical surgery ( hazard ratio=0.65, 0.25, 0.25, 0.10, 95% confidence intervals as 0.41?1.03, 0.17?0.37, 0.15?0.42, 0.07?0.15, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that primary tumor located at the horizontal segment of duodenum, mitotic count >5/50 high power field, tumor gene KIT exon 9 mutation were independent risk factors affecting the overall survival of 365 patients with primary duodenal GIST after removing 342 patients without tumor gene information who underwent direct radical surgery ( hazard ratio=2.85, 2.73, 3.13, 95% confidence intervals as 1.12?7.20, 1.07?6.94, 1.23?7.93, P<0.05). Tumor diameter >5 cm and mitotic count >5/50 high power field were independent risk factors affecting the disease-free survival of 707 patients with primary duodenal GIST who underwent direct radical surgery ( hazard ratio=3.19, 2.98, 95% confidence intervals as 2.05?4.97, 1.99?4.45, P<0.05). ② Effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on prognosis of high-risk patients of modified NIH risk classification. Of the 336 patients evaluated as high risk of the modified NIH risk classification, the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were 94.6% and 77.3% in the 205 cases with postoperative adjuvant therapy, versus 83.2% and 64.4% in the 131 cases without postoperative adjuvant therapy, showing significant differences between them ( χ2=8.39, 4.44, P<0.05). Of the 205 patients evaluated as high risk of the modified NIH risk classification who received postoperative adjuvant therapy, there were 106 cases receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy <36 months, with the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were 87.1% and 58.7%, and there were 99 cases receiving post-operative adjuvant therapy ≥36 months, with the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were 100.0% and 91.5%. There were significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate between the 106 patients and the 99 patients ( χ2=13.92, 29.61, P<0.05). ③ Comparison of clinical efficacy of patients with different surgical methods. Before propensity score matching, cases with primary tumor located at bulb, descending, horizontal, ascending segment of duodenum, cases with tumor diameter ≤5 cm and >5 cm were 95, 307, 147, 34, 331, 252, in the 583 patients receiving open surgery with complete clinical data, versus 15, 46, 17, 5, 67, 16 in the 83 patients receiving laparoscopic surgery with complete clinical data, showing no significant difference in the primary tumor location ( χ2=0.94, P>0.05), and a significant difference in the tumor diameter ( χ2=17.33, P<0.05) between them. After propensity score matching, the above indicator were 16, 39, 20, 8, 67, 16 in the 83 patients receiving open surgery, versus 15, 46, 17, 5, 67, 16 in the 83 patients receiving laparoscopic surgery, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=1.54, 0.00, P>0.05). Cases with postoperative complications, cases with grade Ⅰ?Ⅱ complica-tions and ≥grade Ⅲ complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification, duration of postoperative hospital stay, the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were 17, 12, 5, 11(range, 5?120)days, 92.0%, 100.0% in the 83 patients receiving open surgery, versus 9, 7, 2, 11(range, 5?41)days, 91.6%, 97.3% in the 83 patients receiving laparoscopic surgery, showing no signi-ficant difference in postoperative complications, duration of postoperative hospital stay, the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate ( χ2=2.91, Z=3 365.50, χ2=3.02, 1.49, P>0.05) between them. There was no significant difference in complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification between them ( P>0.05). ④ Comparison of clinical efficacy of patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent surgery with different surgical resection scopes. Before propensity score matching, cases with tumor diameter ≤5 cm and >5 cm, cases with tumor located at opposite side of mesangium and mesangium were 71, 85, 28, 128 in the 156 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent PD with complete clinical data, versus 92, 41, 120, 13 in the 133 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent duodenal limited resection with complete clinical data, showing significant differences between them ( χ2=16.34, 150.10, P<0.05). After propensity score matching, the above indicator were 28, 13, 16, 25 in the 41 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent PD with complete clinical data, versus 28, 13, 16, 25 in the 41 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent duodenal limited resection with complete clinical data, showing no significant difference between them ( χ2=0.00, 0.00, P>0.05). Cases with postopera-tive complications, cases with grade Ⅰ?Ⅱ complications and ≥grade Ⅲ compli-cations of the Clavien-Dindo classification, duration of postoperative hospital stay, the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were 13, 11, 2, 15(range, 9?62)days, 94.2%, 64.3% in the 41 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent PD with complete clinical data, versus 9, 8, 0, 15(range, 7?40)days, 100.0%, 78.8% in the 41 patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum who underwent duodenal limited resection with complete clinical data, showing no significant difference in post-operative complica-tions, the 5-year overall survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate ( χ2=0.99, 0.34, 1.86, P>0.05) between them. There was no significant difference in complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification ( P>0.05) and there was a significant difference in duration of postopera-tive hospital stay ( Z=614.50, P<0.05) between them. Conclusions:The clinical efficacy of radical surgery for duodenal GIST are ideal. Primary tumor located at the horizontal segment of duodenum, mitotic count >5/50 high power field, tumor gene KIT exon 9 mutation are independent risk factors affec-ting the overall survival of patients undergoing direct radical surgery and tumor diameter >5 cm and mitotic count >5/50 high power field are independent risk factors affecting the disease-free survival of patients. There is no significant difference in the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis between patients undergoing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. For patients with primary tumor located at the descending segment of duodenum, the duration of postoperative hospital stay is longer in patients undergoing PD compared with patients undergoing duodenal limited resection. For patients evaluated as high risk of the modified NIH risk classification, posto-perative adjuvant therapy and treatment time ≥36 months are conducive to improving the prognosis of patients.

Objective:To investigate the safety and prognostic value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.Methods:Clinicopathological data of 25 patients admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital from Jan 2015 to Jun 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with SOX chemotherapy for 3 cycles. D 2 + paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed in patients with stable disease (SD) . After operation, SOX regimen was used for 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Results:After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there were 2 cases with progressive disease, 6 cases of SD and 17 cases of partial remission. There was no treatment-related death. Twenty-three patients underwent surgery, including 19(76%) patients of R 0 resection. Tirty-four out of 128 para aortic lymph nodes were metastatic. Postoperative complications occurred in 5(22%) patients, with no mortality . The median progression free survival time and median overall survival time were 20 and 29 months respectively. The 1, 3-year overall survival rates were 80% and 48%, and the 1-year and 3-year progression free survival rates were 72% and 38%, respectively. For those with para-aortic lymph node metastasis the 1-year and 3-year OS rate were 70% and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is among others an independent prognostic factor affecting the post-op survival of advanced gastric carcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Objective To analyze the risk factor of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and the impact of DGE on prognosis after radical gastrectomy of distal gastric carcinoma.Methods The clinical and pathological data of 1 447 distal gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy from Jul 2007 to Jan 2018 at Fujian Tumour Hospital was analyzed retrospectively.Result DGE was found in 101 patients (7.0％),occurring at a median of (6.0 ± 2.1) d after surgery.It was significantly correlated with age,diabetes,hypoproteinemia,preoperative pyloric obstruction,operation time,surgical mode,anastomotic procedure,postoperative analgesia(all P ＜ 0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that hypoproteinemia,diabetes,pyloric obstruction in preoperative period,surgical mode,postoperative analgesia,anastomotic procedure were independently associated with DGE.The average hospitalization time for DGE was significantly higher than patients with non DGE(16.3 ± 4.2) d vs.(8.1 ± 2.1) d,P ＜ 0.05.The five-year survival of patients with DGE and non DGE were 54.9％ and 54.2％ respectively(P ＞0.05) Conclusion DGE prolonged hospital stay,but did not influence patients' prognosis.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safty and feasibility of the D2 radical resection of omental bursa and No.12p and No.8p for gastric carcinoma (GC).

METHODSClinical data of 1801 GC patients undergoing D2 radical resection of omental bursa and No.12p and No.8p at Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2000 to January 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Inclusion case criteria: (1)age of 18 to 90 years;(2)pathologically diagnosed as GC and receiving D2 radical resection of omental bursa and No.12p and No.8p;(3)complete clinical, pathological and follow-up data; (4)operation performed by same leading surgeon;(5)exclusion of other gastric malignancies, postoperative relapse of GC, and other simultaneous or heterochronous primary malignancies. Surgical procedure points: (1)The outer part of the peritoneum of duodenum descending was cut; the serosa was migrated to the anterior leaf of the gastrointestinal ligament. (2)The posterior lobe of the gastrocolic ligament and the transverse mesocolon were separated bluntly from left side to reach the omentum attaching to the colon portion; incision was made at the edge of the omentum attaching to the transverse colon behind the gastrocolic ligament; the leaves were turned to the anterior mesenteric anterior leaflets, and the entire anterior leaflet of the transverse mesentery was free.(3)The pancreas was separated, and resection of the posterior wall of the omentum sac continued up so that the entire retinal capsule was free; along the edge of the liver the attachment of the omentum was cut to reach the front of esophagus, and transverse incision was made in abdominal peritoneal layer of the esophagus, and then turned to the spleen on the pole; from the obturator to the esophagus incision was performed behind the peritoneum for the net; the uppermost edge of the resection of the capsule was performed as the posterior peritoneal incision to the right edge of the esophagus and was connected with the posterior parietal lobe of the previous resection; the posterior peritoneum was attached along the right edge of the esophagus and descended to the celiac artery; the posterior wall of the omental sac was removed. In the meantime, the liver duodenum ligament was cut, and the portal vein, hepatic artery trilocular was formed. Then the ligament lymph nodes were cleared.(4)The lymph nodes of celiac artery and its major branches were cleared; the envelope in front of pancreas and the part of the pancreas in posterior abdomen were resected; spleen and part of the pancreas tail were free.

RESULTSA total of 1801 cases were enrolled, including 1292 males and 509 females with a ratio of 2.54 with a mean age of(58.9±11.5)(18 to 89) years. The proportion of cases with T1a, T1b, T2, T3, T4a and T4b was 4.8% (87 cases), 6.6% (118 cases), 10.7% (193 cases), 17.5% (315 cases), 55.7% (1003 cases) and 4.7%(85 cases) respectively. All the patients completed operations successfully. The mean number of harvested lymph node was 28.5±13.7(10 to 85). Lymph node metastasis was found in 1439 cases (79.9%), including 180 cases (10.0%) in No.12p and 232 cases(12.9%) in No.8p respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that in T1a, T1b, T2, T3, T4a and T4b stage, the proportion of No.12p was 0, 1.7% (2/118), 5.2%(10/193), 10.5% (33/315), 12.4% (124/1003) and 12.9%(11/85) respectively, and the proportion of No.8p was 0, 0.8%(1/118), 2.1%(4/193), 4.8%(15/315), 18.9%(190/1003), and 25.9%(22/85) respectively. Postoperative complications were found in 195 patients (10.8%), including 63 cases(3.5%) of peritoneal infection, 52 cases (2.9%) of pulmonary infection, 33 cases(1.8%) of pancreatic leakage, 37 cases (2.1%) of anastomotic fistula, 45 cases (2.5%) of intestinal obstruction and 13 cases(0.7%) of gastroplesia. The 5-year overall survival rate was 53.6%.

CONCLUSIOND2 radical resection of omental bursa and No.12p and No.8p is safe and feasible in the treatment of gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVETo analyze the feasibility of No.8p lymphadenectomy for the patients with advanced gastric cancer and to preliminaryly explore its value in improving prognosis.

METHODSClinical data of 1158 patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy plus D2 or above D2 lymphadenectomy (No.8 lymphadenectomy) from July 2003 to July 2013 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital were collected. A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Among 1158 patients, 343 patients from July 2003 to June 2008 only received No.8a lymph node dissection (No.8a group), and 815 patients from July 2008 to July 2013 received No.8a+No.8p lymph node dissection (No.8a+No.8p group). Patients in No.8a group received the dissection of the lymph nodes in the upper margin of the pancreas and the front of total hepatic artery, and those in No.8a+No.8p group, on the basis of No.8a group, received the dissection of lymph nodes in the common hepatic artery and the left lymph nodes behind the hepatic artery and the portal vein. The metastasis degree and metastasis rate of lymph node(No.8a and No.8p), as well as intraoperative and postoperative presentations in both groups were investigated. The prognosis of two groups were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

RESULTSAmong 1158 patients with advanced gastric cancer, 849 were males and 309 were females with aged 17 to 83(58.5 ±11.7) years. Radical distal gastrectomy was performed in 325 cases (28.1%) and radical total gastrectomy in 833 cases(71.9%). All the patients completed operations successfully. A total of 2587 No.8a lymph nodes were removed, and the lymph node metastasis rate and metastasis degree of No.8a were 20.6% (239/1158) and 13.0%(336/2587), respectively. A total of 2170 No.8p lymph nodes were removed, and the lymph node metastasis rate and metastasis degree of No.8p were 10.9%(89/815) and 7.2%(156/2170), respectively. The operation time of the No.8a+No.8p group was longer than that of No.8a group [(180.2±40.3) minutes vs. (168.4±41.8) minutes], and the difference was statistically significant (t=-4.627, P=0.000). However, intraoperative blood loss [(222.8±92.8) ml vs. (215.6±91.1) ml], postoperative 1-day peritoneal drainage volume [(257.7±120.0) ml vs. (270.3±121.0) ml], time to withdraw of gastric tube [(2.1±0.9) days vs. (2.2±0.8) days], time to withdraw of peritoneal tube [(6.8±1.1) days vs. (6.9±1.1) days], time to withdraw of nasal feeding tube[(6.5±1.2) days vs. (6.4±1.1) days], the morbidity of complications [19.8%(68/343) vs. 16.0%(130/815)] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.1±3.0) days vs.(8.3±3.1) days] in No.8a group and No.8a+No.8p group were not significantly different(all P>0.05). The average follow-up period was 41(2 to 144) months. The median postoperative survival was 83.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 90.9%, 78.8% and 56.9% in No.8a group respectively. The median survival was 94.8 months, 1-, 2-, and 5-survival rates were 94.9%, 82.3% and 63.0% in No.8a+No.8p group respectively. The survival rate of No.8a+No.8p group was significantly higher than that of No.8a group (P=0.016). The stratified analysis showed that in stage II patients, the survival rate of No.8a+No.8p lymph node dissection was significantly higher than that of only No.8a lymph node dissection(P=0.021), but difference of survival between two groups was not significantly different in stage I patients(P=0.469) and stage III patients (P=0.820).

CONCLUSIONFor the patients with advanced gastric cancer, the dissection of No.8a+No.8p is safe and feasible, and may improve the prognosis, especially for those with stage II, suggesting that No.8a+No.8p lymphadenectomy should be performed for selected patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Objective To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of gastric stump cancer in relation to serum albumin level.Methods The clinical data of 149 gastric stump cancer patients treated from Jan 1999 to Jun 2015 were analyzed.Patients were divided into normal serum albumin group (＞ 35 g/L,n =81) and group of hypoalbuminemia (≤ 35 g/L,n =68).Results Clinicopathologic characteristics,tumor size,depth of invasion,lymph node status and TNM stage were significantly different between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Univariate analysis showed that factors that influence prognosis were serum albumin level,tumor size,serosal invasion,tumor location and tumor curative resection rate (all P ＜ 0.05).Cox's proportional hazard regression model showed that serum albumin level and tumor curative resection rate were independent prognostic factors for survival,lymph node matastasis(2.2 ±4.3) vs.(4.1 ±4.4)were significantly different between the two groups (P ＜0.05).The overall 5-year survival rate was 44.1％.The 5-year survival rate were 54.0％ for normal albumin group and 32.2％ for hypoalbuminemic group,P =0.011.Conclusion Lower preoperative serum albumin level is associated with poorer prognosis in gastric stump cancer patients.

Objective To explore the application and early efficacy of modified Veil nerve-sparing technique during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP).Methods Fifty-seven modified Veil nerve-sparing during LRP procedures were performed in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer between 2012 and 2016 by the same surgeon.Preoperative PSA level was 10.9 μg/ml,and Gleason score was 6.06(5-8).TNM clinical stage showed cT1 in 39 cases and cT2in 18 cases.All patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography before operation. Prostate volume was 40.2 (26- 99) ml. ECT bone scan excluded bone metastasis.MRI or CT examination showed no obvious prostate invasion and lymph node metastasis. The key technology was anatomical separation of detrusor apron, dorsal vascular complex (DVC) and the level between the prostate capsule, and a complete reservation was accomplished. Measurements: the rates and location of positive surgical margins (PSM) and tumor biochemical recurrence rate as well as functional outcomes were presented.Questionnaires were used to assess urine function and IIEF-5 score was used to estimate sexual function.Results Fifty-seven cases were followed up,and the average follow-up of 27.3(6-65)months.Five cases showed biochemical recurrence after 23 months.Five patients had a PSM(2 patients in apical margins,1 patient in left side,1 patient in right side and 1 patient in the bottom).At catheter removal,49 of 57 patients(86%)were dry(0 pads),and 8 of 57 patients(14%)needed one security pad.After 3 months and 6 months,42%(24 of 57 patients)and 60%(34 of 57 patients)presented an International Index of Erectile Function score>15(with or without phospho-diesterasetype-5inhibitors). Conclusions The modified Veil nerve-sparing technique during LRP can retain the fascia around the prostate more completely and restore postoperative urine and erectile function early.For selective cases, it will not increase the positive rate of surgical margins and biochemical recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVETo explore the risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODSClinicopathological and follow-up data of 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy (including No.8p lymphadenectomy) from October 2003 to October 2013 in Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Associations of No.8p lymph node metastasis with clinicopathological characteristics and metastasis in other regional lymph node were analyzed. Prognostic difference between positive No.8p group and negative No.8p group was examined.

RESULTSPositive No.8p lymph node was found in 93 cases (11.8%) among 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer. Univariate analysis showed that gender [male 9.8%(56/572) vs. female 17.0%(37/218), P=0.005], preoperative CEA level [<5 μg/L 28.0%(61/218) vs. ≥5 μg/L 5.6%(32/572), P=0.005], tumor size[diameter <5 cm 3.8%(13/346) vs. ≥5 cm 18.0%(80/445), P=0.000], tumor location [gastric fundus and cardiac 10.7% (26/244) vs. gastric body 13.5% (30/222) vs. gastric antrum 10.1% (31/308) vs. total gastric 37.5%(6/16), P=0.007], Borrmann staging [type II( 1.9%(4/211) vs. type III( 11.6% (54/464) vs. type IIII( 30.4%(35/115), P=0.000], tumor differentiation [high 0/8 vs. moderate 6.7%(25/372) vs. low 16.6%(68/410), P=0.000], T staging [T2 2.4%(4/170) vs. T3 13.1%(35/267) vs. T4 15.3%(54/353), P=0.000], N staging [N0 0 (0/227) vs. N1 2.2%(5/223) vs. N2 15.2%(26/171) vs. N3 36.7%(62/169), P=0.000] were closely associated with the No.8p lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis that revealed gender (OR=1.762, 95%CI: 1.020-3.043), tumor size (OR=1.107, 95%CI: 1.020-1.203), N staging (OR=4.093, 95%CI: 2.929-5.718), tumor differentiation (OR=1.782, 95%CI:1.042-3.049), and metastasis in No.8a(OR=5.370, 95%CI: 3.425-8.419), No.3(OR=1.127, 95%CI:1.053-1.206), No.6(OR=1.221,95%CI: 1.028-1.450), No.7(OR=2.149, 95%CI: 1.711-2.699), No,11p(OR=2.085, 95%CI: 1.453-2.994), No.14v(OR=2.604, 95%CI: 1.038-6.532) group lymph nodes were the independent risk factors of No.8p lymph node metastasis. One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates in positive No.8p group were 85.7%, 47.5% and 22.6%, and those in negative No.8p group were 96.2%, 82.5% and 70.3% respectively, whose differences were significant (χ=109.767, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMetastasis in Np.8p lymph nodes is an important factor affecting the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. In patients with female gender, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, preoperative late N staging, low tumor differentiation or metastasis in No.8a, No.3, No.6, No.7, No.11p, No.14v group lymph nodes, thorough clean rance of No.8p group lymph node should be considered.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen ; blood ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; Lymph Nodes ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; diagnosis ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Grading ; statistics & numerical data ; Neoplasm Staging ; statistics & numerical data ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sex Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; mortality ; surgery ; Survival Rate

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site.

METHODSClinicopathologic data of 149 patients with gastric stump cancer undergoing operation (radical resection and palliative resection) in our department from January 1999 to June 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Gastric stump cancer was defined as a primary carcinoma detected in the remnant stomach more than 5 years after subtotal gastrectomy for a benign disease(87 cases) or over 10 years after radical subtotal gastrectomy for a malignant disease (62 cases). Patients were divided into the anastomotic site group (72 cases) and the non-anastomotic site group (77 cases) according to tumor sites within the remnant stomach. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative data, lymph node metastasis and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSCompared with non-anastomotic site group, the T stage, N stage and TNM stage were later in the anastomotic site group. Number of case of T1, T2, T3, and T4 stage in anastomotic site group was 1(1.4%), 2 (2.8%), 17(23.6%) and 52(72.2%), while such number in non-anastomotic site group was 8(10.4%), 10(13.0%), 27(35.1%) and 32(41.6%) respectively(χ=17.665, P=0.001). Number of case of N0, N1, N2, and N3 in anastomotic site group was 28 (38.9%), 10 (13.9%), 23 (31.9%) and 11 (15.3%), while such number in non-anastomotic site group was 55 (71.4%), 10 (13.0%), 7 (9.1%) and 5 (6.5%) respectively(χ=19.421, P=0.000). Number of case of stage I(, II(, III( and IIII( in anastomotic site group was 3(4.2%), 10(13.9%), 47(65.3%) and 12(16.7%), while such number in non-anastomotic site group was 16(20.8%), 40 (51.9%), 15(19.5%) and 6(7.8%) respectively(χ=45.294, P=0.000). The histology and Borrmann classification were worse in anastomotic site group. Anastomotic site group had 19 cases(26.4%) of good differentiation and 53 cases(73.6%) of bad differentiation, while non-anastomotic site group had 43 cases (55.8%) of well-differentiated and 34 cases (44.2%) of poorly-differentiated tumors respectively(χ=13.287, P=0.000). Anastomotic site group had 3 cases (4.2%) of Borrmann I(, 17 cases (23.6%) of Borrmann II(, 47 cases(65.3%) of Borrmann III( and 5 cases (6.9%) of Borrmann IIII(, while non-anastomotic site group had 18 cases (23.4%) of Borrmann I(, 16 cases (20.8%) of Borrmann II(, 34 cases (50.6%) of Borrmann III( and 4 cases (5.2%) of Borrmann IIII( respectively(χ=11.445, P=0.010). Compared with non-anastomotic site group, anastomotic site group had a lower curative resection rate [63.9% (46/72) vs. 89.6% (69/77), χ=13.977, P=0.000], a higher combined organ resection rate [33.3% (24/72) vs. 16.9% (13/77), χ=5.394, P=0.020] and a more metastatic lymph nodes (4.3±4.9 vs. 1.9±3.6, t=3.478, P=0.000). The lymph node metastasis rates of No.4, No.10 and jejunal mesentery root lymph node in anastomotic site group and non-anastomotic site group were 15.3% (11/72) and 5.2% (4/77)(χ=4.178, P=0.041), 9.7% (7/72) and 1.3% (1/77) (χ=5.196, P=0.023), and 25.0% (18/72) and 3.9% (3/77)(χ=13.687, P=0.000), respectively. Median followed up of all the patients was 37(2 to 154) months and the overall 5-year survival rate was 44.1%. The 5-year survival rate was 33.1% in anastomotic site group and 55.2% in non-anastomotic site group, and the difference was statistically significant between two groups (P=0.015). In the subgroup analysis according to the histology differentiation, the 5-year survival rate of patients with well-differentiation was not significantly different between two groups (43.7% vs. 56.2%, P=0.872), but the 5-year survival rate of patients with bad differentiation in anastomotic site group was significantly lower than that in non-anastomotic site group(29.8% vs. 53.8%, P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONGastric stump cancer locating in anastomotic site indicates worse differentiation histology, higher lymph node metastasis rate, lower curative resection rate and poorer prognosis.

Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; mortality ; statistics & numerical data ; Carcinoma ; mortality ; pathology ; therapy ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; Gastric Stump ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; statistics & numerical data ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; classification ; mortality ; pathology ; therapy ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome