Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.

Objective:To gain an in-depth understanding of the communication needs of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mechanical ventilation patients during the mechanical ventilation process.Methods:This study was a descriptive qualitative study. From January to June 2022, purposive sampling was used to select 15 awake ICU patients with mechanical ventilation at Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University as the research objects, and in-depth interviews were conducted. The content analysis method was used to analyze interview data, summarize and generalize themes.Results:Two themes and ten sub-themes were extracted, namely the multiple needs during mechanical ventilation (physiological needs, communication and physical expression, constraints and activities, longing for family companionship, discomfort to the ICU environment), complex feelings and experiences during mechanical ventilation (pain caused by mechanical ventilation, fear of awakening from sedation, anxiety and concern about the condition, unpleasant communication and nursing experiences, negative emotions) .Conclusions:Medical and nursing staff should promptly identify the communication needs of ICU mechanical ventilation patients, apply intelligent communication tools, provide personalized intervention measures, and meet the communication needs of patients.

Objective:To establish the normal values of water-perfused high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM)(GAP-36A) at resting period, water swallowing, semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing in Chinese population.Methods:From September 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020, 91 healthy volunteers receiving water-perfused HREM (GAP-36A) at resting period, water swallowing, semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing were selected from 9 hospitals (Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University; the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University; the Second Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University; the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University; the First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China; Aviation General Hospital of China Medical University; the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University and the First People′s Hospital of Yichang). Parameters included the position of the upper and lower edges of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the length of the LES and UES, the position of the pressure inversion point (PIP), the resting pressure of UES and LES and swallow-related parameters such as the distal contraction integral (DCI), 4 s integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL) and UES residual pressure. One-way analysis of variance, post-hoc test and sum rank test were used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 87 healthy volunteers were enrolled, including 40 males and 47 females, aged (38.5±14.2) years old (ranged from 19 to 65 years old). The position of the upper and lower edges of the LES was (42.7±2.8) and (45.6±2.8) cm, respectively, the length of the LES was (2.9±0.4) cm, and the position of PIP was (43.3±2.8) cm. The position of the upper and lower edges of the UES was (18.1±3.0) and (22.6±2.0) cm, respectively, and the length of the UES was (4.8±1.0) cm. The resting pressure of LES and UES was (17.4±10.7) and (84.1±61.1) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), respectively. The DCI value at solid swallowing was higher than those at water swallowing and semisolid swallowing ((2 512.4±1 448.0) mmHg·s·cm vs. (2 183.2±1 441.2) and (2 150.8±1 244.8) mmHg·s·cm), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=-4.30 and -3.74, both P<0.001). The values of 4 s IRP at semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing were lower than that at water swallowing ((4.6±4.1) and (4.9±3.9) mmHg vs. (5.4±3.9) mmHg), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=3.38 and 2.09, P=0.001 and 0.037). The DL at water swallowing was shorter than those at semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing ((8.5±1.8) s vs. (9.8±2.2) and (10.6±2.8) s), and the DL at semisolid swallowing was shorter than that at solid swallowing, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=-10.21, -13.91 and -4.68, all P<0.001). The UES residual pressure at water swallowing was higher than those at semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing (9.5 mmHg, 6.5 to 12.3 mmHg vs. 8.0 mmHg, 4.5 to 11.7 mmHg and 5.5 mmHg, 2.0 to 9.3 mmHg), and the UES residual pressure at semisolid swallowing was higher than that at solid swallowing, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=3.48, 10.30 and 6.35, all P<0.001). Conclusions:The normal values of water-perfused HREM (GAP-36A) in Chinese population at resting period, water swallowing, semisolid swallowing and solid swallowing can provide a reference basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment for patients receiving water-perfused HREM examination.

Background/Aims: Lyon consensus differentiates acid exposure time (AET) as physiological, borderline, and pathological. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWi) are believed to increase diagnostic yield of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and correlate with symptom outcome of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. We aim to explore the clinical characteristics and the correlation of pH-impedance parameters with PPI response in Chinese patients with different AET levels. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 177 patients with typical reflux symptoms who received esophageal function tests. The demographics, GERD questionnaire scores, the proportion of esophagitis and PPI responders, and manometric and pH-impedance parameters were compared among patients with AET < 4%, 4-6%, and > 6%. In patients with AET ≥ 4%, manometric and pH-impedance parameters were compared between PPI responders and non-responders. Results: Among 177 patients, 69 (39.0%) had AET 4-6%, and 53 (29.9%) had AET > 6%. The demographics, esophagogastric junction type, and occurrence of ineffective esophageal motility were similar between patients with AET 4-6% and > 6%, but different from AET < 4%. MNBI and PSPWi were different among different AET levels, but similar between PPI responders and non-responders in patientswith AET ≥ 4%. Conclusions It is reasonable to set 4% as a threshold to define pathological AET in Chinese patients. MNBI and PSPWi could identify GERD patients, but may not correlate with PPI response of Chinese GERD patients.

Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods:From January 23, 2020 to February 29, 2020, the medical records of 251 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the West Campus of the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, were collected. The proportion of the patients with gastrointestinal symptoms including anorexia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain were analyzed respectively. The patients were divided into common type (76 cases), severe type (65 cases) and critical type (110 cases). The incidence of liver function injury and the changes of liver function parameters such as total bilirubin (TBil), direct bilirubin (DBil), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin and globulin of the patients with different clinical types and with or without gastrointestinal symptoms were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square test and Fisher′s exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The main gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with COVID-19 were anorexia (33.9%, 85/251), diarrhea (12.0%, 30/251), nausea and vomiting (7.6%, 19/251) and abdominal pain (1.2%, 3/251). 143 patients (57.0%) had liver function injury, the rate of liver function injury in critical type patients was 75.5% (83/110), which was higher than that of common type patients (40.8%, 31/76) and severe type patients (44.6%, 29/65), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=22.765 and 16.865, both P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with liver function injury between common type and severe type patients ( P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of liver function injury between patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and those without gastrointestinal symptoms (57.8%(67/116) vs. 56.3%(76/135), P>0.05). The median values of TBil, DBil, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, LDH and globulin level of critical type patients were 13.5 μmol/L, 4.9 μmol/L, 44.5 U/L, 50.0 U/L, 64.0 U/L, 41.0 U/L, 527.0 U/L and 33.6 g/L respectively. The proportions of critical type patients with TBil level >34.2 μmol/L, DBil level>13.6 μmol/L, ALT level>80 U/L and AST level>80 U/L were 7.3% (8/110), 7.3% (8/110), 17.3% (19/110) and 17.3% (19/110), respectively. These results were all higher than those of common type patients (9.5 μmol/L, 2.9 μmol/L, 28.5 U/L, 28.5 U/L, 54.0 U/L, 25.5 U/L, 225.5 U/L, 30.1 g/L, 0, 0, 6.6% (5/76) and 2.6% (2/76) ) and severe type patients (10.4 μmol/L, 3.4 μmol/L, 30.0 U/L, 31.0 U/L, 49.0 U/L, 25.0 U/L, 284.0 U/L, 30.7 g/L, 0, 0, 6.2% (4/65) and 1.5% (1/65)), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-4.264, -5.507, -4.000, -6.558, -3.112, -4.333, -4.858, -3.873, Fisher′s exact test, Fisher′s exact test, χ2=4.574, 9.620; Z=-3.060, -3.850, -3.923, -5.005, -9.495, -7.651, -3.853, -2.725, Fisher′s exact test, Fisher′s exact test, χ2=4.425, 10.169; all P<0.01). The median values of pre-albumin level, albumin level and the albumin to globulin ratio of critical type patients were 85.3 g/L, 28.2 g/L and 0.8, which were all lower than those of common type patients (157.3 g/L, 32.3 g/L and 1.1, respectively) and severe type patients (133.6 g/L, 31.6 g/L and 1.1, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-6.631, -3.647, -4.924, -4.503, -5.283 and -3.903, all P<0.01). The median albumin level of patients with diarrhea was lower than that of patients without diarrhea (28.2 g/L vs. 30.5 g/L), the proportion of diarrhea patients whose TBil level >20.0 to 34.2 μmol/L was higher than that of patients without diarrhea (70.0%, 21/30 vs. 10.9%, 24/221), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-2.182, χ2 =62.788; both P<0.05). Conclusions:Anorexia is the most common digestive symptom in COVID-19 patients, and the incidences of abdominal pain is low. The incidence of liver function injury of critical type patients is high. There is no significant correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury, and patients with diarrhea have lower albumin levels.

The study was to investigate whether the application of checklist during ward rounds could improve the prognosis of critical ill patients.The results suggested that the checklist used during ward rounds could not improve the inhospital mortality of critically ill patients, but it increased the proportion of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and shortened prophylaxis treatment of gastric stress ulcer.

Objective Pancreatic enzymes may spread into the injured intestine, bloodstream,and cause the cascade of inflammatory reactions. Our objective was to explore trypsin expression in serum and vital organs in septic rats. Methods Trypsin levels in serum, heart, lung and jejunum were tested and compared between Escherichia coli endotoxin injected rats(SS), SS treated with a protease inhibitor (ulinastatin) and control group(SHAM). The correlations between serum trypsin, intestinal proteins and inflammation indices were assessed.Two components of mucosal barrier, i.e. mucin-2 and E-cadherin,were measured to evaluate the intestinal mucosal barrier function. The levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-6(IL-6) and neutrophil elastase(NE) were measured to determine the inflammation indices.Results Compared to SHAM group, trypsin levels in serum[(73.71±9.14) ng/ml vs. (12.12±2.36) ng/ml],heart[(51.60±15.06) ng/ml vs. (6.39±3.53) ng/ml],lung [(54.73±5.57) ng/ml vs. (5.24±3.08) ng/ml] and jejunum(1.19 ± 0.48 vs. 0.40 ± 0.12) were significantly higher in SS group (all P<0.05). The level of serum trypsin had negative correlation with mucin-2 and E-cadherin, and positive correlation with TNFα, IL-6 and NE (all P<0.05). In rats treated with ulinastatin, trypsin levels were significantly decreased compared with those in SS group including in serum [(65.79±4.88)ng/ml]], heart [(26.33±12.03)ng/ml], lung [(28.73±14.46) ng/ml] and jejunum (0.80±0.20) (all P<0.05).Serum TNFα[ (247.34±16.97)ng/L vs. (178.78±40.81)ng/L] revealed similar changes in ulinastatin and SS group, whereas mucin-2(0.58 ± 0.14 vs. 0.89 ± 0.17)and E-cadherin(0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.23 ± 0.06)were both significantly elevated after administration of ulinastatin (both P<0.05). Conclusion Serum and tissue trypsin is elevated in septic rats. Protease inhibitor ulinastatin protects intestinal function by reducing inflammatory reaction.

Objective To investigate the symptom,esophageal motility characteristics and the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)in patients with typeⅠ,Ⅱand Ⅲ gastroesophageal junction (EGJ)diagnosed by high resolution esophageal manometry(HREM).Methods From 6th January to 27th December in 2012,the clinical data of 171 patients with reflux symptoms and received HREM were retrospectively analyzed.According to the Chicago classification V.3.0,the patients were divided into EGJ type Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups.The age,body mass index(BMI),GERD related symptoms,esophageal motility parameters and the incidence of GERD were compared among the three groups.Chi-square test, t test and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.Relationship between EGJ types and other variables were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation.Results In 171 patients,136 cases(79.5%)with type Ⅰ EGJ,22 cases(12.9%)with type Ⅱ EGJ and 13 cases(7.6%)with type Ⅲ EGJ.The age of patients with type Ⅱ EGJ was significantly older than that of patients with type Ⅰ EGJ((56.5 ± 2.3) years vs(48.6 ± 1.0)years,t=2.992,P=0.003),however the differences were not statisticant when compared with type Ⅲ EGJ patients((51.2 ± 3.8)years,P> 0.05).The BMI of patients with typeⅢ EGJ was higher than that of typeⅠand typeⅡEGJ patients((26.0 ± 1.3)kg/m2vs(21.9 ± 0.3)kg/m2and (23.5 ± 0.6)kg/m2),and the difference was statistically significant(t=4.082 and 2.108,both P<0.05). The resting pressure of lower esophageal sphincter(LES)of patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ were lower than that of typeⅠEGJ((10.6 ± 1.5)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)and(3.4 ± 0.7)mmHg vs(17.1 ± 0.7)mmHg),and the resting pressure of LES of type Ⅲ EGJ was lower than that of type Ⅱ EGJ((3.4 ± 0.7)mmHg vs(10.6 ± 1.5)mmHg),and the differences were all statistically significant(t= -3.882,-6.411 and -2.769,all P< 0.01).The amplitude of contraction at 11 cm above LES and distal contractile integral(DCI)of patients with type Ⅲ EGJ were both lower than those of patients with typeⅠ EGJ((32.2 ± 5.4)mmHg vs(48.5 ± 2.5)mmHg,and(392.0 ± 94.1)mmHg·s·cm vs(805.1 ± 61.4)mmHg·s·cm),and the differences were statistically significant(t= -2.580 and -2.041,both P<0.05).The incidences of GERD in patients with type Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ were 68.4%(93/136), 77.3%(17/22)and 10/13,respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(χ2 =1.021, P=0.600).EGJ types were positively correlated with age and BMI(r= 0.214 and 0.290,both P<0.01).However,EGJ types were negatively correlated with the LES resting pressure,contraction amplitudes at 7 cm and 11 cm above the LES,and DCI(r= -0.474,-0.182,-0.333 and -0.191,all P<0.05).Conclusions Aging,overweight and obesity are risk factors of the LES and crural diaphragm separation.EGJ types are not predictable based on symptoms.The esophageal motility seems to decrease in patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ,the incidence of GERD in patients with type Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ EGJ are all high.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy of the BiRd regimen, a combination of clarithromycin, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) . Methods: Patients with RRMM treated with BiRd between September 11, 2013 and August 1, 2016 at six centers were included to evaluate overall survival rate (ORR) , clinical benefit rate (CBR) , progression-free survival (PFS) , overall survival (OS) , as well as adverse events. Results: Of 30 patients with RRMM, 27 patients were evaluable, and ORR and CBR were 51.9% (14/27) and 66.7% (18/27) respectively, including 1 sCR (3.7%) , 3 CR (11.1%) , 3 VGPR (11.1%) , and 7 PR (25.6%) . In 13 patients with prior Rd, ORR and CBR were 38.5% (5/13) and 61.5% (8/13) respectively, of which 5 patients with ≥MR carried high-risk cytogenetic[ (e.g.17p- or t (4;14) ] together with at least one of other adverse-prognostic cytogenetic (e.g.13q- and/or 1q21+) . In 24 patients with prior bortezomib-based therapy, ORR and CBR were 45.8 and 62.5%, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 14.9 (range 1.0-33.8) months, the median PFS and OS were 12.0 (95%CI 11.6-12.4) and 27.6 (95%CI 15.1-40.1) months, respectively. The BiRd regimen was well tolerated. Conclusion The BiRd regimen is an effective and safety protocol for RRMM, including those carrying high-risk cytogenetic markers.

Objective To study the salt intake of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and explore their knowledge and behaviour. Methods The patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were offered salt spoon and soy sauce cup. Their diaries on home meals for 3 consecutive days were collected to calculate their salt intake. Meanwhile, a one to one interview was done to evaluate the accuracy of patient′s diet diary and the knowledge and behavior of low salt diet and find out related factors of salt intake. Results The average salt intake was (6.49 ± 1.64)g/d. The average composition rate in the low salt diet knowledge in low salt diet behavior was 51.00% and 47.00% respectively. Age and education level were the influencing factors of salt intake. Conclusions The average salt intake is much higher than the standard for the patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Their low salt diet knowledge is in the middle level and their low salt diet behavior is in the middle or lower level. The related factors include age and education among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.