BACKGROUND:For elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures,the related factors of prognosis are very complex,and the integrity of the lateral wall is one of the influencing factors.It is of important clinical value to understand the effect of lateral wall injury on the prognosis of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relationship between the integrity of the lateral wall and hip functional recovery and other outcomes in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS:Totally 82 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were screened and all patients received proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation.According to the thickness of the lateral wall,the patients were divided into the lateral wall intact group(n=31)and lateral wall risk group(n=51).The perioperative indexes,weight-bearing time,fracture healing time,hip joint function and range of motion,postoperative pain and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)The time of hospitalization and the number of fluoroscopies during operation in the lateral wall intact group were significantly lower than those in the lateral wall risk group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in other perioperative indexes.(2)Both groups were able to get down to the ground early after surgery and finally complete weight-bearing,but in the lateral wall risk group,the time of fracture healing was longer;the time of complete weight-bearing was significantly delayed;the Harris score of the last follow-up was lower;the range of motion of hip extension and flexion and neck trunk angle on the affected side were smaller(P<0.05).(3)There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups,but the overall incidence of complications in the lateral wall intact group was significantly lower(P<0.05).(4)In summary,after internal fixation of proximal femoral nail antirotation,patients with the intact lateral wall had a relatively better prognosis than those with risk lateral wall.

Objective To compare the efficacy of triangular anchor reduction forceps and towel forceps in the treatment of long oblique or spiral distal tibial fractures.Methods The data of 58 patients admitted to the Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics in Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2019 to March 2021 were analyzed prospectively.According to the reduction methods during operation,they were divided into point reduction forceps group(n=26)and triangle anchor reduction forceps group(n=32).The operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative fracture reduction quality,hospital stay,fracture healing time,American orthopedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS)score,curative effect and com-plications at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results All patients participated in the follow-up for more than one year.There was no significant difference in age,sex,basic diseases and injury mechanism between the two groups.The operation time and fluoroscopy times of patients in triangle anchor reduction group were significantly lower than those in point reduction forceps group(P<0.05),while the quality of fracture reduc-tion was higher than that in point reduction forceps group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in other perioperative indexes.The fracture healing time of patients in triangle anchor reduction group was shorter,and the ankle joint function was better than that in point reduction forceps group(P<0.05).There was no signifi-cant difference in the incidence of various complications between the two groups,but the overall incidence of complications in the triangle anchor reduction group was significantly lower(P<0.05).Conclusion Triangular anchor reduction forceps can improve the quality of fracture reduction,shorten the healing time of fracture,reduce the occurrence of complications,reduce the operation time and the number of fluoroscopy during operation,and there is no obvious increase in local infection.It is an effective and reliable reduction method.

Objective To compare the efficacy of percutaneous double external fixators (EF) and EF combined with volar locking plate (VLP) in the treatment of AO C1,C2 and C3 type distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods The data of 108 patients with AO C-type DRF from 2019 to 2022 were reviewed. Fifty-one patients were treated with double EF (a no-bridging cemented-pin frame and a conventional wrist-bridging EF) and 57 patients were treated with EF (a conventional wrist-bridging EF) combined with VLP. The imaging parameters (palmar tilt,radial inclination,radial height,ulnar variance,etc.),wrist motion and grip strength were measured. Wrist pain intensity was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The whole function of the upper limb was assessed by disability of arm shoulder and hand scale (DASH),the wrist function was evaluated by Mayo wrist score (MWS),and the patient satisfaction was evaluated by short assessment of patient satisfaction (SAPS). The incidence of complications was evaluated according to the patient's chief complaint and the surgeon's comprehensive judgement. Results There were no significant differences in age,gender,injury cause,AO types or operation time between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). The time from injury to operation,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the double EF group were superior to those in the EF combined with VLP group (all P<0.001). The patients were followed up for 24 to 33 months. There were no significant differences in palmar tilt,radial inclination,radial height or ulnar variance at the last follow-up (all P>0.05);the VAS score (P=0.025) and SAPS score (P=0.015) in the double EF group were significantly better than those in the EF combined with VLP group. There were no significant differences in the range of motion (flexion,extension,radial deviation,ulnar deviation,pronation or supination),grip strength,MWS or DASH scores between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). The overall complication rate of the double EF group was 13.73％ (7/51),which was lower than that of the EF combined with VLP group (28.07％) (16/57) (P<0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous double EF is easy to operate and relatively safe,with few complications and satisfactory follow-up results. It can be a treatment option for OA C-type DRF.

Chronic refractory wound (CRW) is one of the most challengeable issues in clinic due to complex pathogenesis, long course of disease and poor prognosis. Experts need to conduct systematic summary for the diagnosis and treatment of CRW due to complex pathogenesis and poor prognosis, and standard guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of CRW should be created. The Guideline forthe diagnosis and treatment of chronic refractory wounds in orthopedic trauma patients ( version 2023) was created by the expert group organized by the Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, Chinese Orthopedic Association, Chinese Society of Traumatology, and Trauma Orthopedics and Multiple Traumatology Group of Emergency Resuscitation Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association after the clinical problems were chosen based on demand-driven principles and principles of evidence-based medicine. The guideline systematically elaborated CRW from aspects of the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, postoperative management, complication prevention and comorbidity management, and rehabilitation and health education, and 9 recommendations were finally proposed to provide a reliable clinical reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CRW.

Objective:To investigate the application of combined distractor in the treatment of refractory distal radius fractures.Methods:From March 2018 to February 2020, the data of 32 patients with refractory distal radius fractures treated with combined distractor-assisted reduction were retrospectively analyzed. The propensity score matching method was used to establish a non-distractor group according to 1∶1 matching, with a total of 32 patients. In the distractor group, there were 15 males and 17 females, age 54.9 ±15.8 years (range, 18-77). According to AO classification, 3 cases were A3, 3 cases were B3, 16 cases were C2, 10 cases were C3. In the non-distractor group, there were 12 males and 20 females, age 59.7±14.8 years, 4 cases were A3, 5 cases were B3, 12 cases were C2 and 11 cases were C3. Main measures: surgical time, radial height, palm inclination, ulnar deviation, range of motion of the wrist, visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional assessment using disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS).Results:A total of 64 patients were included in this study, and all patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 12-54 months, with an average of 17.8 months. The operative time of the distractor group was 91.2±14.6 min, which was significantly lower than that of the non-distractor group 137.6±27.3 min, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=8.48, P<0.001); the radial height in the distractor group 11.5±1.4 mm was significantly higher than that in the non-distractor group 10.6±1.3 mm, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.59, P=0.012). At the last follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in the palm inclination 7.9°±4.4° vs. 7.5°±3.5°, ulnar deviation 23.3°±5.7° vs. 22.3°±4.5°, wrist flexion 63.2°±15.3° vs. 62.6°±11.1°, dorsiflexion 63.5°±10.7° vs. 62.4°±15.2°, pronation 69.2°±11.8° vs. 67.0°±11.0°, supination 73.1°±10.4° vs. 72.0°±8.7°, VAS 0.8±0.5 points vs. 0.9±0.7 points, DASH score 12.9±6.6 points vs. 13.4±7.0 points amd MMWS 84.1±5.8 points vs. 83.5±6.2 points ( P>0.05). One patient in the distractor group had symptoms of extensor muscle irritation, and the symptoms disappeared after the internal fixation was removed; 2 patients in the non-spreader group developed carpal tunnel syndrome, which improved after incision and decompression treatment. Conclusion:For refractory distal radius fractures, the use of combined distractor can achieve better radius height recovery and shorten the operation time, and has a satisfactory postoperative effect.

Objective:To compare short-term clinical efficacy between femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults.Methods:Retrospectively analyzed were the data of 94 patients with femoral neck fracture who had been admitted to Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital to University of Science and Technology of China, Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital to Anhui Medical University and Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Anhui Medical University from October 2019 to October 2020. They were divided into 2 groups according to their modes of internal fixation: a FNS group ( n=47) and a CCS group ( n=47). In the FNS group there were 30 males and 17 females with a mean age of (47.8±9.8) years; in the CCS group there were 26 males and 21 females with a mean age of (43.7±13.1) years. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, weight-bearing time, Harris hip score and complications. Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative general data or follow-up duration between the 2 groups, showing comparability between groups ( P>0.05). In the FNS group, operation time [(47.7±9.4) min] was significantly shorter than that in the CCS group [(66.1±3.8) min], postoperative partial and full weight-bearing time [2.0 (2.0, 3.0) weeks, (6.4±2.1) weeks] significantly earlier than that in the CCS group [8.0 (3.0, 9.0), (10.1±3.4) weeks], fracture healing time [3.0(3.0, 4.0) months] significantly shorter than that in the CCS group [3.0(3.0, 4.0) months], Harris hip score at the last follow-up [95.0 (93.0, 95.0) points] significantly higher than that in the CCS group [90.0 (88.0, 95.0) points], incidence of lateral thigh irritation [0% (0/47)] significantly lower than that in the CCS group [31.9% (15/47)], and neck shortening length (4.3±3.9 mm) significantly shorter than that in the CCS group (6.9±4.5 mm) (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of avascular necrosis of the femoral head or rate of internal fixation failure between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults, compared with CCS fixation, FNS fixation can shorten operation time and fracture healing time, allow patients to ambulate early after surgery, which is beneficial to maintenance of femoral neck length and to functional recovery of the hip.

Fiber photometry is a recently-developed method that indirectly measures neural activity by monitoring Ca

Objective:To compare of the efficacy of Steinman pin-assisted and manual reduction for the treatment of distal femoral fracture with anterograde intramedullary nail.Methods:From January 2014 to August 2018, data of 54 patients with distal femoral fracture were retrospectively analyzed. According to the fracture reduction methods, patients were divided into two groups: bare-handed reduction group and Steinman pin-assisted reduction group (referred to Steinman pin group). There were 16 males and 10 females in bare-handed reduction group, with age of 37.5±9.2 years (range, 21-59 years). According to AO/OTA classification, 16 cases were type 32-A, 7 type 32-B, 3 type 32-C. There were 19 males and 9 females in Steinman pin reduction group, with age of 36.4±9.8 years (range, 18-55 years). According to AO/OTA classification, 19 cases were type 32-A, 7 type 32-B, 2 type 32-C. The reduction time, fluoroscopy times, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and knee joint function score of American hospital for special surgery (HSS) were compared between the two groups.Results:The amount of blood loss during operation was 142.78±29.76 ml in the bare-handed group, and 94.81±17.71 ml in the Steinman pin group. The reduction time of fracture was 14.19±2.50 min in the bare-handed group and 5.02±1.69 min in the Steinman pin group. The times of fluoroscopy during reduction was 12.56 ±2.01 in the bare-handed group and 5.01±1.51 in the Steinman pin group. There were significant differences in the above indexes ( t=12.19, 4.02, 5.47; all P < 0.05). All 54 patients were followed up for 12-51 months, with an average of 23.4 months. All the fractures healed, and there was no delayed union or nonunion. The healing time was 7.01±1.15 months in the bare-handed group and 5.99±0.97 months in the Steinman pin group. There were no significant difference. The HSS score of knee joint function was 23.7±4.1 before operation, 61.3±4.5 at 1 month after operation, 70.2±4.2 at 2 months after operation, 78.9±5.9 at 3 months after operation, 87.9±4.6 at 6 months after operation, and 93.1±5.8 at 12 months after operation, in the bare-handed group. Meanwhile, in the Steinman pin group, 22.5±3.8 before operation, 62.2±5.1 at 1 month after operation, 69.1±4.7 at 2 months after operation, 79.2±4.3 at 3 months after operation, 88.6±5.3 at 6 months after operation, and 92.3±6.1 at 12 months after operation. There were no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.113, 0.689, 0.908, 0.212, 0.519, 0.494, P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups at each time point before and after operation ( F=716.42, 815.52, P < 0.001). There were no complications such as injection point infection, vascular and nerve injury, failure of internal fixation and so on. Conclusion:Both groups had good functional recovery after operation. However, compared with bare-handed reduction, Steinman pin groupreduction has less intraoperative blood loss, shorter reduction time and less fluoroscopy times, which is a safer reduction method.

Objective:To explore the clinical effects of the flap pedicled with superior malleolus perforator of anterior tibial artery in reconstruction of the soft defects in foot and ankle.Methods:A retrospective study was carried out to analyze 19 patients with soft tissue defects in foot and ankle. Ninteen patients, which were 11 males and 8 females and aged 21-75 (mean, 39) years, received the surgery between April, 2018 and June, 2019. According to the anatomy of superior malleolus perforating flaps and the size and shape of the soft tissue defects in foot and ankle, flaps were designed and harvested in the anterolateral side of the shank. The sizes of flaps were 6.0 cm×5.0 cm-14.0 cm ×8.0 cm. Evaluation of clinical effects included flap survival, infection control, the elasticity, color, appearance and scars of the donor sites, skin sensations and patient satisfaction. The swelling of flap was also took into an account.Results:All 19 flaps survived after the surgery. The soft tissue defects and exposure of tendon, bone and steel plate were repaired very well. Both the donor and recipient sites healed at stage I. Duration of out-patient clinic followed-up was 2-16 months. All flaps survived very well with good shape, and the color and elasticity were very close to the nearby normal skin. Scars at donor sites were small and the functions of ankle and foot were satisfactory.Conclusion:The flap pedicled with superior malleolus perforator of anterior tibial artery in reconstruction of the soft tissue defect in foot and ankle delivered satisfactory clinical effects. This flap has reliable perforating blood vessels hence reliable blood supply with high survival rate of flaps. It is one of the simple, safe and optimal methods to repair soft tissue defects in foot and ankle.

Objective:To explore the short-term therapeutic outcomes of femoral neck fractures fixated by Femoral Neck System (FNS).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 16 patients with femoral neck fracture who had been admitted to the Department of Traumatology & Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital to Anhui Medical University from January to December 2019. They were 6 males and 10 females, aged from 24 to 69 years (average, 47.5 years). According to the Garden Classification, there were 3 cases of type Ⅱ, 7 cases of type Ⅲ, and 6 cases of type Ⅳ. All the 16 patients were fixated with FNS. Recorded were operation time, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, quality of postoperative fracture reduction, hospital stay, fracture healing time, and efficacy and complications at the last follow-up.Results:The 16 patients were followed up for 5 to 16 months after operation (average, 9.3 months). According to the Garden indexes, fracture reduction was evaluated as satisfactory in all the 16 patients. The operation time in this group ranged from 25 to 115 min with an average of 41.5 min, the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy from 14 to 47 times with an average of 26 times, the intraoperative blood loss from 35 to 210 mL with an average of 76 mL, the hospital stay from 3 to 9 days with an average of 4.6 days, and the fracture healing time from 3 to 6 months with an average of 4.5 months. By the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up, the function of the affected hip was rated as excellent in 10 cases, good in 5 and fair in one. Follow-ups revealed no complications like infection or implant loosening.Conclusions:The FNS is a new type of simple, reliable, safe and minimally invasive internal fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. The plate, bolt, anti-rotation screws and locking screws in FNS can be inserted through a single minimally invasive incision, leading to reliable fixation, limited irritation to the lateral muscular soft tissues, and fine short-term outcomes.