Objective To analyze the disease burden and change trend of breast cancer mortality among Chinese women from 2013 to 2021.Methods The indicators of breast cancer-related mortality (MR),age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR),deaths,and urban-rural deaths in the Chinese Cause of Death Surveil-lance Dataset from 2013 to 2021 were collected and collated,and the trend changes of MR,ASMR,and years lost in life of premature death (YLL) were analyzed,annual percentage change (APC) was used for trend a-nalysis,and Fisher substitution test was used to compare APC in different regions.Results From 2013 to 2021,a total of 88112 cases of breast cancer died,with an average annual MR of 7.56/100000 and an ASMR of 6.34/100000.From 2013 to 2021,the MR rate of breast cancer (APC=2.12%,t=5.414,P<0.001),MR in rural areas (APC=2.84%,t=7.581,P<0.001),and YLL in rural areas (APC=1.61%,t=3.588,P=0.009) showed an upward trend in China.MR at 40-<45 years old showed a downward trend (APC=-2.76%,t=-4.689,P=0.002),and at 70-<75 years old (APC=1.41%,t=2.494,P=0.041),75-<80 years old (APC=3.05%,t=3.690,P=0.008),and 80-<85 years old (APC=1.82%,t=2.909,P=0.023).There was a statistically significant difference in APC between MR and ASMR in urban and rural areas (P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the trend of other indicators (P>0.05).Conclusion From 2013 to 2021,the disease burden of breast cancer mortality in Chinese women showed an upward trend,and the comprehensive prevention and treatment of breast cancer should be strengthened to reduce the risk of breast cancer death.

Objective:To explore and analyze the predictive value of EuroSCORE Ⅱ and SYNTAX Ⅱ scores for clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.Methods:A total of 500 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who underwent CABG in Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital from April 2014 to July 2023 were selected as the study subjects, all patients were given EuroSCORE Ⅱand SYNTAX Ⅱ scores to evaluate the predictive value of EuroSCOREⅡfor perioperative mortality and SYNTAX Ⅱ for 4-year mortality. Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis were employed to analyze the independent risk factors for perioperative and 4-year mortality.Results:There were 3 deaths during the perioperative period, with a mortality rate of 0.60%, the predicted mortality rate of EuroSCOREⅡwas 1.71%; there were 21 deaths at 4 years after surgery, with a mortality rate of 4.23% and the predicted mortality rate of SYNTAX Ⅱwas 9.02%. Logistic regression analysis showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was the only independent protective factor for perioperative mortality, and advanced age was the only independent risk factor for 4-year postoperative mortality in patients ( P<0.05). The analysis of the working characteristic curve of the subjects found that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ( ROC) of EuroSCORE Ⅱ for perioperative mortality was 0.782, and the area under ROC curve of SYNTAX Ⅱfor postoperative 4-year mortality was 0.743. Conclusion:Both EuroSCORE Ⅱand SYNTAX Ⅱhave certain predictive value for perioperative mortality and postoperative 4-year mortality in patients undergoing CABG, respectively, but the predicted mortality rate is relatively higher.

Objective:To study the dynamic evaluation value of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in cerebral circulation and brain function of sepsis patients and its predictive value of the prognosis.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 98 sepsis patients admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 who were divided into the survival group (56 cases) and death group (42 cases) according to the 28-day prognosis. The general clinical data of the patients, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), delirium assessment scale (CAM-ICU), and TCD parameters PSV, Vm, EDV, PI, RI on the first day and the third day of admission were collected, and the differences of TCD parameters at different time points were analyzed between the two groups, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and evaluating their predictive value of sepsis outcome was evaluated.Results:APACHE Ⅱscore and the number of patients with sepsis encephalopathy were significantly higher in the death group than those in the survival group ( P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in PSV, Vm and EDV between the two groups on the first day and the third day. The PI and RI of the survival group were significantly lower than those of the death group ( P<0.01). In the survival group, PI and RI on the third day decreased significantly compared with those on the first day ( P < 0.05), while in the death group, PI and RI on the first day and the third day did not change significantly. ROC survival curves showed that Day1PI, Day3PI, Day1PI - Day3PI, Day1RI, Day3RI, Day1RI - Day3RI and APACHEⅡ predicted AUC of the prognosis of sepsis patients were 0.657, 0.835, 0.730, 0.707, 0.826, 0.705, and 0.815 ( P < 0.01). When PI cutoff value on the third day became 1.02, the sensitivity was 85.7% and the specificity was 61.3%. When RI cutoff value on the third day became 0.62, the sensitivity was 78.6% and the specificity was 71.4%. Conclusions:TCD parameters, PI and RI, are of certain value in the dynamic evaluation of cerebral circulation and brain function in sepsis patients. PI and RI on the first day and the third day and the differences between them are all valuable in predicting the prognosis, and PI and RI on the third day have greater predictive value.

Extramedullary plasmacytoma is a localized plasmacytoma originating from tissues other than bone marrow, and epididymal affecting is rare. This paper summarizes a case of this tumor admitted to our hospital in recent years, with the purpose of improving the further understanding and treatment of this tumor and avoiding misdiagnosis.

Objective:To investigate the manifestations of liver injury in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), to investigate the prognosis indicators of the disease, and to provide the reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods:From January 10 to February 14, 2020, at Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, the data of 333 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were collected. The changes of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil), direct bilirubin (DBil), indirect bilirubin (IBil) and albumin of the first liver function test after admission and the reexaminations of liver function test during hospitalization period in patients with liver injury were retrospectively analyzed. Student t test and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:Liver injury occurred in 39.6% (132/333) of COVID-19 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of liver injury between patients in intensive care unit (ICU) and in general ward (45.6%, 26/57 vs. 38.4%, 106/276; χ2=1.026, P>0.05). 67.4% (89/132) of COVID-19 patients with liver injury presented with increased ALT or AST level on admission. During hospitalization, the level of ALT was higher than that of the first examination after admission ((60.28±50.44) U/L vs. (42.25±32.21) U/L), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-3.230, P<0.05). The levels of ALT and AST of 71.2% (94/132) patients were both <80 U/L, which indicated that most of the patients showed mild liver injury. The patients with elevated level of TBil, DBil and IBil accounted for 3.9% (13/333), 5.4% (18/333) and 2.4% (8/333) of the COVID-19 patients, respectively. The albumin level of COVID-19 patients with liver injury during hospitalization was lower than that of the first examination after admission ((31.8±5.1) g/L vs. (33.7±5.4) g/L), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.712, P<0.05). The albumin levels at first examination on admission and reexamination during hospitalization of patients in ICU were both significantly lower than those of patients in general ward ((29.3±3.7) g/L vs. (34.8±5.1) g/L and (27.6±2.8) g/L vs. (32.9±5.1) g/L), and the differences were statistically significant ( t=4.928 and 4.783, both P<0.05). Conclusions:The incidence of liver injury in COVID-19 patients is high. A slight increase in aminotransferase levels is particularly common. Bilirubin abnormality is relatively rare and mild. The level of albumin may be one of the indicators for the severity and prognosis of COVID-19.

Background: Phototherapy is an important method to treatvitiligo. However, it is unclear how phototherapy affectsmelanocyte precursors and skin neural crest stem cells. Objective: To investigate the underlying mechanisms of narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) induced melanocyte lineagedifferentiated from human scalp-derived neural creststem cells (HS-NCSCs). Methods: HS-NCSCs were expandedfrom scalp hair follicles. The c-Kit−/CD57− HS-NCSCs wereisolated by cell sorting. Different doses of NB-UVB wereused to irradiate these HS-NCSCs. Cell ultrastructure was examinedby transmission electron microscope. Melanocytemarker expression was analyzed by Quantitative RT-PCRand Western blot. Cell proliferation and migration were alsoevaluated. Results: The c-Kit−/CD57− HS-NCSCs expressedembryonic NCSC biomarkers. NB-UVB at a dose of 100 mJof NB-UVB had little effect on the cell proliferation of differentiatedmelanocytes from c-Kit−/CD57− HS-NCSCs, while700 mJ inhibited cell proliferation significantly. The dendriticprocesses of differentiated melanocytes increased afterradiation. The tyrosinase and Melanocortin 1 receptor (Mc1R)expression of differentiated melanocytes increased after NB-UVB exposure. The effect of NB-UVB on tyrosinase expressionwas modulated by signaling inhibitors H89 andPD98059 as well as Mc1R level in the cells. The migrationability of differentiated melanocytes was enhanced under100 mJ exposure. Conclusion These data demonstrate thatNB-UVB facilitates melanocytic differentiation of the HSNCSCsand enhances migration of these cells. Mc1R andcAMP pathway play a critical role in NB-UVB induced melanocyticdifferentiation.

Objective: To study the role of virtual gastroscopy simulator in the examination of clinical practice skills of gastrointestinal specialists. Methods: A multi-center empirical study was carried out. In June 2018, ninety participants from three tertiary care teaching hospitals in China, including Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Tongji Hospital and Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, took part in the examination. Participants were selected as follows: 30 specialists without any experience of gastroscopy exams, 30 with basic knowledge (gastroscopy exams <500 cases) and 30 with good skill (gastroscopy exams ≥500 cases). These 90 students participated in this empirical study after theoretical study and simulator training. Among them, 50 (55.6%) were undergraduates, 25 (27.8%) masters, and 15 (16.7%) doctors; 42 (46.7%) were residents, 39 (43.3%) attending physicians, and 9 (10.0%) deputy chief physicians. The assessment was divided into two parts. The first part was to use the simulator (GI mentor II) for ballooning within 10 minutes, with a total score of 40 points. The second part was a complete gastroscopy exam on the simulator, including preparation before gastroscopy exam, gastroscopy exam, post - exam management and related knowledge quiz. The difficulty and discrimination of the assessment plan were evaluated by the extreme grouping method parameters (difficulty P definition: <0.3 was difficult, 0.3 to 0.7 was medium, ≥0.7 was easy; discrimination degree D definition: <0 was poor, 0 to 0.2 was medium, ≥0.2 was good), and by comparing the virtual gastroscopy assessment scores of different experience, academic, and professional title groups. The score analysis of the student group was expressed using the mastering rate (the average score divided by the total score). The data of the normal distribution was represented by (mean±SD) (range), and the data of the nonnormal distribution was represented by M (P25, P75). Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used for comparison between groups. Results: The total score of 90 students was (82.9±10.9) (55.8 to 99.0), and the mastering rate was 82.9%. The overall difficulty of the first and the second parts were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively, and the difficulty level was easy. The overall discrimination of the first and the second parts were 0.70 and 0.67, respectively, and the discrimination was good. The stratified analysis was performed according to the professional title. The median score was 83.2 (75.5, 89.0) in the residents, 82.5 (71.7, 93.6) in the attending physicians, and 93.5 (88.5, 99.0) in the deputy chief physicians, and the difference was statistically significant (H=6.213, P=0.045). According to the stratification analysis of academic qualifications, the median score was 81.7 (73.0, 87.5) in participants with undergraduate degree, 91.0 (79.0, 95.0) in those with master degree and 88.0 (81.7, 93.5) in those with doctor degree, whose difference was statistically significant (H=9.233, P=0.010). The stratified analysis of the second part showed that the median scores of the "operational process" part of the low, medium and high basis group were 33.0 (30.5, 36.5), 34.0 (32.0, 36.0) and 37.0 (35.0, 37.5), respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=7.603, P=0.022). The median scores of the "operational process" section of the resident, attending physician, and deputy chief physician were 33.0 (30.5, 35.0) points, 36.0 (34.0, 37.5) points and 37.0 (37.0, 37.5) points, respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=18.563, P=0.001). Conclusions The virtual gastroscopy simulator can reflect the true level of gastroscopy exam skills of the students. The examination questions are moderately difficult, and there is a good discrimination of the exam.

Objective To study the role of virtual gastroscopy simulator in the examination of clinical practice skills of gastrointestinal specialists. Methods A multi?center empirical study was carried out. In June 2018, ninety participants from three tertiary care teaching hospitals in China, including Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Tongji Hospital and Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, took part in the examination. Participants were selected as follows: 30 specialists without any experience of gastroscopy exams, 30 with basic knowledge (gastroscopy exams <500 cases) and 30 with good skill (gastroscopy exams ≥500 cases). These 90 students participated in this empirical study after theoretical study and simulator training. Among them, 50 (55.6%) were undergraduates, 25 (27.8%) masters , and 15 (16.7%) doctors; 42 (46.7%) were residents, 39 (43.3%) attending physicians, and 9 (10.0%) deputy chief physicians. The assessment was divided into two parts. The first part was to use the simulator (GI mentor II) for ballooning within 10 minutes, with a total score of 40 points. The second part was a complete gastroscopy exam on the simulator, including preparation before gastroscopy exam, gastroscopy exam, post ? exam management and related knowledge quiz. The difficulty and discrimination of the assessment plan were evaluated by the extreme grouping method parameters (difficulty P definition: <0.3 was difficult, 0.3 to 0.7 was medium,≥0.7 was easy; discrimination degree D definition: <0 was poor, 0 to 0.2 was medium, ≥0.2 was good), and by comparing the virtual gastroscopy assessment scores of different experience, academic, and professional title groups. The score analysis of the student group was expressed using the mastering rate (the average score divided by the total score). The data of the normal distribution was represented by (mean ± SD) (range), and the data of the nonnormal distribution was represented by M (P25, P75). Kruskal?Wallis non?parametric test was used for comparison between groups. Results The total score of 90 students was (82.9±10.9) (55.8 to 99.0), and the mastering rate was 82.9%. The overall difficulty of the first and the second parts were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively, and the difficulty level was easy. The overall discrimination of the first and the second parts were 0.70 and 0.67, respectively, and the discrimination was good. The stratified analysis was performed according to the professional title. The median score was 83.2 (75.5, 89.0) in the residents, 82.5 (71.7, 93.6) in the attending physicians, and 93.5 (88.5, 99.0) in the deputy chief physicians, and the difference was statistically significant (H=6.213, P=0.045). According to the stratification analysis of academic qualifications, the median score was 81.7 (73.0, 87.5) in participants with undergraduate degree, 91.0 (79.0, 95.0) in those with master degree and 88.0 (81.7, 93.5) in those with doctor degree, whose difference was statistically significant (H=9.233, P=0.010). The stratified analysis of the second part showed that the median scores of the "operational process" part of the low, medium and high basis group were 33.0 (30.5, 36.5), 34.0 (32.0, 36.0) and 37.0 (35.0, 37.5), respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=7.603, P=0.022). The median scores of the "operational process" section of the resident, attending physician, and deputy chief physician were 33.0 (30.5, 35.0) points, 36.0 (34.0, 37.5) points and 37.0 (37.0, 37.5) points, respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=18.563, P=0.001). Conclusions The virtual gastroscopy simulator can reflect the true level of gastroscopy exam skills of the students. The examination questions are moderately difficult, and there is a good discrimination of the exam.

Objective To study the role of virtual gastroscopy simulator in the examination of clinical practice skills of gastrointestinal specialists. Methods A multi?center empirical study was carried out. In June 2018, ninety participants from three tertiary care teaching hospitals in China, including Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Tongji Hospital and Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, took part in the examination. Participants were selected as follows: 30 specialists without any experience of gastroscopy exams, 30 with basic knowledge (gastroscopy exams <500 cases) and 30 with good skill (gastroscopy exams ≥500 cases). These 90 students participated in this empirical study after theoretical study and simulator training. Among them, 50 (55.6%) were undergraduates, 25 (27.8%) masters , and 15 (16.7%) doctors; 42 (46.7%) were residents, 39 (43.3%) attending physicians, and 9 (10.0%) deputy chief physicians. The assessment was divided into two parts. The first part was to use the simulator (GI mentor II) for ballooning within 10 minutes, with a total score of 40 points. The second part was a complete gastroscopy exam on the simulator, including preparation before gastroscopy exam, gastroscopy exam, post ? exam management and related knowledge quiz. The difficulty and discrimination of the assessment plan were evaluated by the extreme grouping method parameters (difficulty P definition: <0.3 was difficult, 0.3 to 0.7 was medium,≥0.7 was easy; discrimination degree D definition: <0 was poor, 0 to 0.2 was medium, ≥0.2 was good), and by comparing the virtual gastroscopy assessment scores of different experience, academic, and professional title groups. The score analysis of the student group was expressed using the mastering rate (the average score divided by the total score). The data of the normal distribution was represented by (mean ± SD) (range), and the data of the nonnormal distribution was represented by M (P25, P75). Kruskal?Wallis non?parametric test was used for comparison between groups. Results The total score of 90 students was (82.9±10.9) (55.8 to 99.0), and the mastering rate was 82.9%. The overall difficulty of the first and the second parts were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively, and the difficulty level was easy. The overall discrimination of the first and the second parts were 0.70 and 0.67, respectively, and the discrimination was good. The stratified analysis was performed according to the professional title. The median score was 83.2 (75.5, 89.0) in the residents, 82.5 (71.7, 93.6) in the attending physicians, and 93.5 (88.5, 99.0) in the deputy chief physicians, and the difference was statistically significant (H=6.213, P=0.045). According to the stratification analysis of academic qualifications, the median score was 81.7 (73.0, 87.5) in participants with undergraduate degree, 91.0 (79.0, 95.0) in those with master degree and 88.0 (81.7, 93.5) in those with doctor degree, whose difference was statistically significant (H=9.233, P=0.010). The stratified analysis of the second part showed that the median scores of the "operational process" part of the low, medium and high basis group were 33.0 (30.5, 36.5), 34.0 (32.0, 36.0) and 37.0 (35.0, 37.5), respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=7.603, P=0.022). The median scores of the "operational process" section of the resident, attending physician, and deputy chief physician were 33.0 (30.5, 35.0) points, 36.0 (34.0, 37.5) points and 37.0 (37.0, 37.5) points, respectively, whose difference was statistically significant (H=18.563, P=0.001). Conclusions The virtual gastroscopy simulator can reflect the true level of gastroscopy exam skills of the students. The examination questions are moderately difficult, and there is a good discrimination of the exam.

Adenine ; Animals ; Gene Editing ; Mice ; Zygote ; metabolism