1.Effect of Video-based Educational Intervention Combined with Maternal Presence on Perioperative Adverse Outcomes in Preschool Children under General Anesthesia
Jiayu TAN ; Fengqiu GONG ; Wenqi HUANG ; Xia FENG ; Qiongfang ZHU ; Yubo KANG ; Wenyan WU ; Xiuhong LI
Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences) 2025;46(3):519-527
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of video-based educational intervention combined with maternal presence on perioperative adverse outcomes in preschool children undergoing general anesthesia, including cooperation in anesthesia induction, perioperative anxiety, pain and agitation during recovery. MethodsA total of 300 preschool children scheduled for general anesthesia in our hospital from June to December 2023 were randomly assigned to control group (n=150) and intervention group (n=150). The control group received routine recovery care. For the intervention group, in addition to routine recovery care, a preoperative visit was scheduled one day before surgery. During this visit, mothers were guided to watch anesthesia videos with their children. During the waiting period in the operating room and 30 minutes after awakening, the mothers were guided to accompany the children for more than 30 minutes. Recovery conditions were recorded using the surgical anesthesia information system, and the children’s anesthetic induction compliance, perioperative anxiety, pain, and agitation were evaluated and recorded using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS), the Induction Compliance Scale (ICC), the Children’s Pain Behavior Scale (FLACC), and the Pediatric Agitation and Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED). ResultsOn the preoperative visit day, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). For perioperative anxiety, the m-YPAS scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group, both when entering the operating room waiting area (35.27±6.48 vs. 41.79±6.68, P < 0.05) and 30 minutes after postoperative recovery (20.13±7.05 vs. 35.75±9.51, P < 0.05). In terms of anesthesia induction cooperation, the ICC scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group (1.84±0.95 vs. 3.17±0.62, P < 0.05), and the proportion of good induction cooperation was significantly higher than that of the control group (24.00% vs. 12.67%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in awakening duration between the two groups, but the intervention group had a significantly shorter length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit than the control group (0.90±0.29 hours vs. 1.29±0.42 hours, P < 0.001). For perioperative agitation, the PAED scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group (entering in the operating room waiting area: 8.5 vs. 9.2, P < 0.05; 30 minutes after postoperative recovery: 4.2 vs. 7.8, P < 0.05). In terms of pain scores, the FLACC scores of the intervention group were also significantly lower than those of the control group, both when entering the operating room waiting area ( 5.3 vs. 6.7, P < 0.05; 30 minutes after postoperative recovery: 2.1 vs. 4.9, P < 0.05). ConclusionsVideo-based educational intervention combined with maternal presence reduces the perioperative anxiety, pain and agitation of preschool children undergoing general anesthesia, and improved the compliance of anesthesia induction. It is recommended to promote this intervention measure in clinical practice. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Wenqi FAN ; Chao DENG ; Ruoyao XU ; Zhenqi LIU ; Richard David LESLIE ; Zhiguang ZHOU ; Xia LI
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):235-251
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems studies are upsurging, half of which were published in the last 5 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AID systems in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until August 31, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that compared AID systems with other insulin-based treatments in patients with T1DM were considered eligible. Studies characteristics and glycemic metrics was extracted by three researchers independently. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Sixty-five trials (3,623 patients) were included. The percentage of time in range (TIR) was 11.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.37 to 14.12; P<0.001) higher with AID systems compared with control treatments. Patients on AID systems had more pronounced improvement of time below range when diabetes duration was more than 20 years (–1.80% vs. –0.86%, P=0.031) and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin lower than 7.5% (–1.93% vs. –0.87%, P=0.033). Dual-hormone full closed-loop systems revealed a greater improvement in TIR compared with hybrid closed-loop systems (–19.64% vs. –10.87%). Notably, glycemia risk index (GRI) (–3.74; 95% CI, –6.34 to –1.14; P<0.01) was also improved with AID therapy. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			AID systems showed significant advantages compared to other insulin-based treatments in improving glucose control represented by TIR and GRI in patients with T1DM, with more favorable effect in euglycemia by dual-hormone full closedloop systems as well as less hypoglycemia for patients who are within target for glycemic control and have longer diabetes duration. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Wenqi FAN ; Chao DENG ; Ruoyao XU ; Zhenqi LIU ; Richard David LESLIE ; Zhiguang ZHOU ; Xia LI
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):235-251
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems studies are upsurging, half of which were published in the last 5 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AID systems in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until August 31, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that compared AID systems with other insulin-based treatments in patients with T1DM were considered eligible. Studies characteristics and glycemic metrics was extracted by three researchers independently. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Sixty-five trials (3,623 patients) were included. The percentage of time in range (TIR) was 11.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.37 to 14.12; P<0.001) higher with AID systems compared with control treatments. Patients on AID systems had more pronounced improvement of time below range when diabetes duration was more than 20 years (–1.80% vs. –0.86%, P=0.031) and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin lower than 7.5% (–1.93% vs. –0.87%, P=0.033). Dual-hormone full closed-loop systems revealed a greater improvement in TIR compared with hybrid closed-loop systems (–19.64% vs. –10.87%). Notably, glycemia risk index (GRI) (–3.74; 95% CI, –6.34 to –1.14; P<0.01) was also improved with AID therapy. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			AID systems showed significant advantages compared to other insulin-based treatments in improving glucose control represented by TIR and GRI in patients with T1DM, with more favorable effect in euglycemia by dual-hormone full closedloop systems as well as less hypoglycemia for patients who are within target for glycemic control and have longer diabetes duration. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Wenqi FAN ; Chao DENG ; Ruoyao XU ; Zhenqi LIU ; Richard David LESLIE ; Zhiguang ZHOU ; Xia LI
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):235-251
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems studies are upsurging, half of which were published in the last 5 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AID systems in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until August 31, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that compared AID systems with other insulin-based treatments in patients with T1DM were considered eligible. Studies characteristics and glycemic metrics was extracted by three researchers independently. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Sixty-five trials (3,623 patients) were included. The percentage of time in range (TIR) was 11.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.37 to 14.12; P<0.001) higher with AID systems compared with control treatments. Patients on AID systems had more pronounced improvement of time below range when diabetes duration was more than 20 years (–1.80% vs. –0.86%, P=0.031) and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin lower than 7.5% (–1.93% vs. –0.87%, P=0.033). Dual-hormone full closed-loop systems revealed a greater improvement in TIR compared with hybrid closed-loop systems (–19.64% vs. –10.87%). Notably, glycemia risk index (GRI) (–3.74; 95% CI, –6.34 to –1.14; P<0.01) was also improved with AID therapy. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			AID systems showed significant advantages compared to other insulin-based treatments in improving glucose control represented by TIR and GRI in patients with T1DM, with more favorable effect in euglycemia by dual-hormone full closedloop systems as well as less hypoglycemia for patients who are within target for glycemic control and have longer diabetes duration. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Wenqi FAN ; Chao DENG ; Ruoyao XU ; Zhenqi LIU ; Richard David LESLIE ; Zhiguang ZHOU ; Xia LI
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):235-251
		                        		
		                        			 Background:
		                        			Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems studies are upsurging, half of which were published in the last 5 years. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AID systems in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). 
		                        		
		                        			Methods:
		                        			We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until August 31, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that compared AID systems with other insulin-based treatments in patients with T1DM were considered eligible. Studies characteristics and glycemic metrics was extracted by three researchers independently. 
		                        		
		                        			Results:
		                        			Sixty-five trials (3,623 patients) were included. The percentage of time in range (TIR) was 11.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.37 to 14.12; P<0.001) higher with AID systems compared with control treatments. Patients on AID systems had more pronounced improvement of time below range when diabetes duration was more than 20 years (–1.80% vs. –0.86%, P=0.031) and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin lower than 7.5% (–1.93% vs. –0.87%, P=0.033). Dual-hormone full closed-loop systems revealed a greater improvement in TIR compared with hybrid closed-loop systems (–19.64% vs. –10.87%). Notably, glycemia risk index (GRI) (–3.74; 95% CI, –6.34 to –1.14; P<0.01) was also improved with AID therapy. 
		                        		
		                        			Conclusion
		                        			AID systems showed significant advantages compared to other insulin-based treatments in improving glucose control represented by TIR and GRI in patients with T1DM, with more favorable effect in euglycemia by dual-hormone full closedloop systems as well as less hypoglycemia for patients who are within target for glycemic control and have longer diabetes duration. 
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Protective effect of 10-HDA on acute cadmium chloride-induced kidney damage and autophagy protein expression
Linwei LI ; Mingxuan HUANG ; Siyu LU ; Wenqi HUANG ; Yuan GONG ; Jie CHANG
Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine 2024;41(2):133-138
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Background Acute cadmium (Cd) exposure can cause damage to multiple tissues, with the kidney being the primary target organ. The development of Cd-induced acute kidney injury involves complex mechanisms, in which autophagy and oxidative stress play crucial roles. Objective To investigate the effect of 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA) on kidney injury in mice exposed to cadmium, and provide experimental basis for studying the pathogenesis and prevention of Cd poisoning. Methods Thirty-five male C57BL/6 mice were divided into 7 groups (each of 5 mice): control group (normal saline, intraperitoneal injection), CdCl2 group (4 mg·kg−1, intraperitoneal injection), intervention groups ( 4 mg·kg−1 CdCl2, intraperitoneal Injection + 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg·kg−1 10-HDA, oral gavage), and 10-HDA group (150 mg·kg−1, oral gavage). All treatments were given for 14 d. Twenty-four hours after the last infection, physiological indicators [blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)], histopathological indicators, autophagy-related proteins (Atg7, Atg5, Beclin-1, and LC3), and mitochondrial autophagy-related proteins (PINK1 and Parkin) were detected to examine the effect of 10-HDA on kidney injury caused by CdCl2. Results Compared with the control group, the body weight of mice in the CdCl2 group was significantly reduced (P<0.01); compared with the CdCl2 group, the body weight of mice after intervention with different concentrations of 10-HDA was significantly increased (P<0.01). CdCl2 significantly increased BUN and CRE in the serum samples compared with the control group (P<0.01), which was significantly reduced to varying degrees after 100, 150, and 200 mg·kg−1 10-HDA intervention (P<0.01). MDA significantly increased and SOD significantly decreased in the renal cortex following CdCl2 administration compared with the control group (P<0.01), which was resolved following 10-HDA administration at different concentrations (P<0.01). In histopathological studies, 10-HDA restored injured kidney tissues induced by CdCl2. The expression levels of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3-II/I were significantly increased (P<0.05), and the expression level of Beclin-1 was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in the CdCl2 group compared with the control group. The expression levels of Atg7 were reduced to varying degrees after treatment with designed concentrations of 10-HDA, the expression levels of LC3-II/I were also reduced in the 50, 150, and 200 mg·kg−1 10-HDA intervention groups, and the expression levels of Beclin-1 were increased in the 50, 100, and 150 mg·kg−1 10-HDA intervention groups (P<0.05). The expression levels of PINK1 and Parkin in the CdCl2 group and the 50 mg·kg−1 10-HDA intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.01). Compared with the CdCl2 group, the expression levels of PINK1 increased to varying degrees after 100, 150, and 200 mg·kg−1 10-HDA intervention, and the expression levels of Parkin increased in all 10-HDA intervention groups (P<0.01). Conclusion The intervention using 10-HDA can lessen acute kidney injury caused by CdCl2, reduce the expression of autophagy-related proteins, and increase the expression of mitochondrial autophagy-related proteins.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail