BACKGROUND

Anxiety and depression are prevalent during pregnancy. There is significant evidence that antenatal anxiety and depression are risk factors for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression among pregnant women who undergo ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies in the Department of Maternal and Fetal Medicine of University of the Philippines–Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines, for a 13-month period.

METHODS

The study utilized a comparative cross-sectional study design comparing those who underwent congenital anomaly scan (CAS) with those who just underwent routine biometry. There were 177 research respondents for each group. The Filipino version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-P) was used. The psychiatric interview was based on the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) particularly on the Major Depressive DIsorder and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

RESULTS

The results showed that the mean pre-diagnostics anxiety score of women who underwent CAS was significantly higher than the mean pre-diagnostics anxiety score of women who had biometry. The mean post-diagnostics depression score of women who underwent CAS was significantly higher than the mean post-diagnostics depression score of women who had biometry. However, all pregnant women had normal HADS-P score before and after CAS and biometry. Psychiatric evaluation showed that none was diagnosed to have generalized anxiety disorder or major depression in the conduct of the diagnostic tests.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that generalized anxiety and depression among pregnant patients subjected to routine biometry and congenital scan were not problems in this tertiary hospital. Knowledge of CAS and awareness of risk factors for congenital anomalies are important for providing care and counseling pregnant women.

Human ; Anxiety ; Depression

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is still a problem in our country for the past 2 years. The pandemic severely affected the immunocompromised and high-risk group of patients, such as the pregnant and lactating women. Research shows that this group has higher risk of being critically ill as well as dying. However, there are only a few studies on how COVID-19 vaccine is perceived among this vulnerable group. Hence, this study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices on COVID-19 vaccine among high-risk pregnant and lactating women. Moreover, the results will be used in crafting health policies that affect this specific group of patients.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on high-risk pregnant and lactating women who sought antenatal consults at the High-Risk Clinic in a tertiary training hospital for a 1-month period. Participants were asked to answer a validated questionnaire assessing their knowledge, attitudes, and practices on COVID-19 vaccine. They were also asked about their sociodemographic characteristics, co-morbidities, history of COVID-19 infection, and vaccination status, as well as the source of their information regarding the vaccine. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize in this study. In addition, frequency and proportion were used for nominal variables, median and range for ordinal variables, and mean and standard deviation for interval or ratio variables. MINITAB 20 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 323 high-risk pregnant and lactating women were enrolled in the study with an average age of 29 years old. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants showed that they were high-school graduate, single, mostly financially disadvantaged, and resides in Cavite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal and Quezon area. The majority have diabetes mellitus as their co-morbidity, were not infected with COVID-19 and had already been vaccinated. The significant source of information of vaccine information was mainly from social media. The study presented that more than 90% were aware that COVID-19 vaccine was recommended by professional organizations, however, only 55%–59% only agree that it is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The result also conveyed a positive attitude toward vaccination as the pregnancy progresses, as well as during lactation. As to practices, 80% of the participants were told by their health care providers to get vaccinated and 72% of them reported vaccine side effects. Furthermore, 58% of the participants would recommend vaccination during pregnancy while only 54% will recommend it while breastfeeding.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of COVID-19 vaccine among high-risk pregnant and lactating women gave an understanding on how a vulnerable population perceives vaccination. In general, this research study presented high percentage COVID-19 vaccine awareness and acceptance; however, it can also be seen that there is a mixed perception regarding vaccine safety during pregnancy and lactation. Strategies to improve health literacy which are evidenced based that can be carried out by a health care provider could be established to achieve maximum vaccination coverage among high-risk group of patients.

Human ; Female ; Coronavirus ; Covid-19 ; Vaccines ; Pandemics

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic has affected education systems worldwide. The disruption in education systems has impacted over 90% of the student population of the world (UNESCO, 2020). Electronic learning (e‑learning), a form of teaching which involves electronic equipment and tools permits interaction between people involved in the education process. An example of which is the webinars. Webinars allow large groups of participants to engage in online discussions or training events and share audio, documents, or slides. Objective: We aim to assess the perception of resident physicians on the use of webinars to support learning during COVID‑19. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study. An adequately powered paper survey was conducted among 123 resident physicians of St. Luke’s Medical Center Global City. A 5‑point Likert Scale was used for each of the questions in the questionnaire patterned after that of Nagar (2020). Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Results: Majority of the respondents gave favorable answers to questions on pace of learning/ flexibility (91.5%), cost (95.1%), convenience and comfort (95.1%), motivation (76.1%), ease of access (96.1%), visual perception (87.5%), visual difficulty (79.9%), audio perception (83.7%), Internet connection (61.8%), and navigation (83.7%), while Internet connection (28.5%) was seen with the highest disagreement. Conclusion: Our data support the acceptability of webinars among resident physicians in a tertiary private hospital as an alternative learning tool in this COVID‑19 era where face‑to‑face interaction or traditional learning is less likely to be employed. Recommendations We recommend future studies that can focus on the efficacy of the webinars in the improvement of knowledge and practice of medicine by doing pre- and posttests. We also recommend doing a similar study in government hospitals where facilities may not be on par with private hospitals.
COVID‑19 ; Perception ; Physicians