1.A modified fixation technique for the treatment of buried penis in children.
Xu CUI ; Bing-Jing GAO ; Liu CHEN ; Wen-Hua HUANG ; Chao-Ming ZHOU
Asian Journal of Andrology 2023;25(1):78-81
For many years, surgical treatment of buried penis in children has been researched by several scholars, and numerous methods exist. This study aimed to explore the clinical effect of a modified fixation technique in treating buried penis in children. Clinical data of 94 patients with buried penis who were treated using the modified penile fixation technique from March 2017 to February 2019 in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital (Fuzhou, China) were retrospectively collected, compared, and analyzed. Clinical data of 107 patients with buried penis who were treated using traditional penile fixation technique from February 2014 to February 2017 were chosen for comparison. The results showed that at 6 months and 12 months after surgery, the penile lengths in the modified penile fixation group were longer than those in the traditional penile fixation group (both P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative skin contracture and penile retraction in the modified penile fixation group was less than that in the traditional penile fixation group (P = 0.034 and P = 0.012, respectively). When the two groups were compared in terms of parents' satisfaction scores, the scores for penile size, penile morphology, and voiding status in the modified penile fixation group were higher than those in the traditional penile fixation group at 2-week, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups after surgery (all P < 0.05). We concluded that the modified penile fixation technique could effectively reduce the incidence of skin contracture and penile retraction and improve the penile length and satisfaction of patients' parents.
Female
;
Pregnancy
;
Male
;
Humans
;
Child
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
;
Penis/surgery*
;
China
;
Contracture
3.Double dartos flap layer in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty to prevent urethrocutaneous fistula in uncircumcised patients with distal hypospadias.
Raed AL-TAHER ; Mohammad NOFAL ; Ali J YOUSEF ; Mohammad RASHDAN ; Amjad TARAWNEH ; Jad ALSMADI ; Eman HASAN ; Dalal ALSHAREEFI ; Danah ALENEZI ; Bashayer ABDULRASOUL
Asian Journal of Andrology 2023;25(1):93-97
Urethrocutaneous fistula may complicate hypospadias repair. We noticed that double-layered preputial dartos flaps added to tubularized incised plate urethroplasty can reduce the risk of urethrocutaneous fistula. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with double-layered preputial dartos flaps to with single-layered local fascial flaps in preventing urethrocutaneous fistula. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2017 and December 2020 at Jordan University Hospital (Amman, Jordan). Boys who were aged between 6 months and 5 years, diagnosed with distal hypospadias, and not circumcised were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of urethrocutaneous fistula in patients who underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with a double-layered fascial flap. The results showed a total of 163 boys with distal hypospadias; among them, 116 patients underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with a single-layered fascial flap, and 47 underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with a double-layered fascial flap. The development of urethrocutaneous fistula was higher in the group receiving tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with a single-layered fascial flap than in the group receiving tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with a double-layered fascial flap after 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months (6.9% vs 0, 10.3% vs 0, and 5.2% vs 0, respectively), and the difference after 6 months was statistically significant (P = 0.02).
Male
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Hypospadias/surgery*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Fistula/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Robotic urologic surgery using the KangDuo-Surgical Robot-01 system: A single-center prospective analysis.
Shengwei XIONG ; Shubo FAN ; Silu CHEN ; Xiang WANG ; Guanpeng HAN ; Zhihua LI ; Wei ZUO ; Zhenyu LI ; Kunlin YANG ; Zhongyuan ZHANG ; Cheng SHEN ; Liqun ZHOU ; Xuesong LI
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(24):2960-2966
BACKGROUND:
The KangDuo-Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system is a new surgical robot recently developed in China. The aim of this study was to present our single-center experience and mid-term outcomes of urological procedures using the KD-SR-01 system.
METHODS:
From August 2020 to April 2023, consecutive urologic procedures were performed at Peking University First Hospital using the KD-SR-01 system. The clinical features, perioperative data, and follow-up outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS:
A total of 110 consecutive patients were recruited. Among these patients, 28 underwent partial nephrectomy (PN), 41 underwent urinary tract reconstruction (26 underwent pyeloplasty, 3 underwent ureteral reconstruction and 12 underwent ureterovesical reimplantation [UR]), and 41 underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). The median operative time for PN was 112.5 min, 157.0 min for pyeloplasty, 151.0 min for ureteral reconstruction, 142.5 min for UR, and 138.0 min for RP. The median intraoperative blood loss was 10 mL for PN, 10 mL for pyeloplasty, 30 mL for ureteral reconstruction, 20 mL for UR, and 50 mL for RP. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion, and there were no major complications in any patient. The median warm ischemia time of PN was 17.3 min, and positive surgical margin was not noted in any patient. The overall positive surgical margin rate of RP was 39% (16/41), and no biochemical recurrence was observed in any RP patient during the median follow-up of 11.0 months. The surgical success rates of pyeloplasty and UR were 96% (25/26) and 92% (11/12) during the median follow-up of 29.5 months and 11.5 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The KD-SR-01 system appears feasible, safe, and effective for most urological procedures, based on our single-center experience.
Male
;
Humans
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Robotics
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ureter/surgery*
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods*
;
Laparoscopy/methods*
6.A comparative study of two single-stage oral mucosal substitution urethroplasty (Kulkarni and Asopa) in the surgical treatments of lichen sclerosus urethral strictures.
Xiang WAN ; Hai-Jun YAO ; Min-Kai XIE ; Jian-Shu NI ; Da-Jun GAO ; Zhong WANG ; Bin XU ; Da-Chao ZHENG
Asian Journal of Andrology 2023;25(6):719-724
Long-segment lichen sclerosus (LS) urethral stricture is a challenge for urologists. Limited data are available for surgeons to make a surgical decision between Kulkarni and Asopa urethroplasty. In this retrospective study, we investigated the outcomes of these two procedures in patients with LS urethral stricture. Between January 2015 and December 2020, 77 patients with LS urethral stricture underwent Kulkarni and Asopa procedures for urethroplasty in the Department of Urology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China). Of the 77 patients, 42 (54.5%) underwent the Asopa procedure and 35 (45.5%) underwent the Kulkarni procedure. The overall complication rate was 34.2% in the Kulkarni group and 19.0% in the Asopa group, and no difference was observed ( P = 0.105). Among the complications, no statistical difference was observed in the incidence of urethral stricture recurrence ( P = 0.724) or glans dehiscence ( P = 0.246) except for postoperative meatus stenosis ( P = 0.020). However, the recurrence-free survival rate between the two procedures was significantly different ( P = 0.016). Cox survival analysis showed that antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy use ( P = 0.020), diabetes ( P = 0.003), current/former smoking ( P = 0.019), coronary heart disease ( P < 0.001), and stricture length ( P = 0.028) may lead to a higher hazard ratio of complications. Even so, these two techniques can still provide acceptable results with their own advantages in the surgical treatment of LS urethral strictures. The surgical alternative should be considered comprehensively according to the patient characteristics and surgeon preferences. Moreover, our results showed that antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy use, diabetes, coronary heart disease, current/former smoking, and stricture length may be contributing factors of complications. Therefore, patients with LS are advised to undergo early interventions for better therapeutic effects.
Male
;
Humans
;
Urethral Stricture/etiology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Constriction, Pathologic/surgery*
;
Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
;
China
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Mouth Mucosa
;
Diabetes Mellitus/etiology*
;
Anticoagulants
;
Coronary Disease
7.Urethroplasty technological changes for the treatment of male urethral stricture.
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(11):981-986
Urethroplasty is an important method to treat male urethral stricture. Nowadays, urethroplasty mainly includes two types: anastomotic urethroplasty and substitution urethroplasty. Anastomotic urethroplasty mainly includes primary anastomosis urethroplasty and non-transecting anastomotic urethroplasty. Substitution of urethroplasty mainly includes staged urethroplasty and one-stage urethroplasty. Substitution materials always are chosen by pedicle skin flap and free mucosal graft. Anastomosis urethroplasty has shown good results in short bulbar urethral stricture and posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture. Among them, non-transecting anastomosis urethroplasty has become a new surgical method for iatrogenic, single, short or non-occluded stenosis. At present, the one-stage substitution urethroplasty is the most widely used. However, there are still many complicated cases that must be solved by staged urethroplasty. Pedicle skin flap and oral mucosa are widely used as substitutes at present. How to select the best surgical procedure and substitute materials individually would be the problem worthy of attention in the future. Accumulating more long-term follow-up data is helpful for objective comparison of various surgical procedures and grafts.
Humans
;
Male
;
Mouth Mucosa/transplantation*
;
Surgical Flaps
;
Urethral Stricture/surgery*
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome
8.Application of the Mathieu combined tunnel technique for repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair.
Qi-Gen XIE ; Kai XIA ; Xiang-Ping LI ; Peng LUO ; Zuo-Qing LI ; Cheng SU ; Chun-Hua DENG
Asian Journal of Andrology 2022;24(3):311-316
Repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair is challenging for pediatric surgeons. Here, we introduced and evaluated a newly modified Mathieu technique, Mathieu combined tunnel (MCT), which involves multiple custom-designed flaps for the shortage of flap source material after repeated operations; we also constructed a tunnel to avoid the glans incision that may carry new risks of dehiscence. This retrospective study included 26 patients who were consecutively admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China) for glans dehiscence repair after failed hypospadias repair from October 2014 to October 2020; sixteen patients underwent surgery using the MCT (MCT group) and ten patients underwent surgery using the tubularized incised plate (TIP) technique (TIP group). The operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, normal urethral meatus rate, success rate, and Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) score were compared between the two groups. The MCT group achieved an overall satisfactory penile appearance and voiding function, with a higher rate of normal urethral meatus (15/16, 93.8%) and a lower rate of glans dehiscence (1/16, 6.2%), compared with the TIP group (70.0% and 30.0%, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant, possibly because of the limited number of patients (all P > 0.05). Mean postoperative HOPE scores were similar in the MCT group (mean ± standard deviation: 8.83 ± 0. 89) and TIP group (8.94 ± 0.57) (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of blood loss and success rate, nor in the rates of various complications (e.g., fistula, urethral stricture, and glans dehiscence). In conclusion, the MCT technique appears to be feasible and reliable for repairing glans dehiscence after failed hypospadias repair.
Child
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hypospadias/surgery*
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Urethra/surgery*
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
9.Trends in upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery over a decade based on a multi-center database.
Wei ZUO ; Fei GAO ; Chang Wei YUAN ; Sheng Wei XIONG ; Zhi Hua LI ; Lei ZHANG ; Kun Lin YANG ; Xin Fei LI ; Liang LIU ; Lai WEI ; Peng ZHANG ; Bing WANG ; Ya Ming GU ; Hong Jian ZHU ; Zheng ZHAO ; Xue Song LI
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2022;54(4):692-698
OBJECTIVE:
To study the trend of surgical type, surgical procedure and etiological distribution of upper urinary tract repair in recent 10 years.
METHODS:
The preoperative and perioperative variables and follow-up data of upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery in RECUTTER (Reconstruction of Urinary Tract: Technology, Epidemiology and Result) database from 2010 to 2021 were searched, collected and analyzed. The surgical type, surgical procedure, duration of hospitalization, time of operation, incidence of short-term complications, and proportion of the patients undergoing reoperations were compared between the two groups of 2010-2017 period and 2018-2021 period.
RESULTS:
A total of 1 072 patients were included in the RECUTTER database. Congenital factors and iatrogenic injuries were the main causes of upper urinary tract repair. Among them, 129 (12.0%) patients had open operation, 403 (37.6%) patients had laparoscopic surgery, 322 (30.0%) patients had robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and 218 (20.3%) patients had endourological procedure. In the last decade, the total number of surgeries showed a noticeable increasing annual trend and the proportion of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in 2018-2021 was significantly higher than that in 2010-2017 (P < 0.001). The 1 072 patients included 124 (11.6%) cases of ileal ureter replacements, 440 (41.1%) cases of pyeloplasty, 229 (21.4%) cases of balloon dilation, 109 (10.2%) cases of ureteral reimplantation, 49 (4.6%) cases of boari flap-Psoas hitch surgery, 60 (5.6%) cases of uretero-ureteral anastomosis, 61 (5.7%) cases of lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasty or appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasty. Pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation had been the main types of surgery, while the proportion of lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasty plus appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasty had increased significantly in recent years (P < 0.05). In addition, the time of operation was significantly increased (P < 0.05) after 2018, which was considered to be related to the sharp increase in the proportion of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. We found that minimally invasive surgery (endourological procedure and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery) as an independent risk factor (P=0.050, OR=0.472) could reduce the incidence of short-term post-operative complications.
CONCLUSION
We have justified the value of the RECUTTER database, created by the Institute of Urology, Peking University in data support for clinical research work, and provided valuable experience for the construction of other multi-center databases at home and abroad. In recent 10 years, we have observed that, in upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery, the surgery type tends to be minimally invasive and the surgery procedure tends to be complicated, suggesting the superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Humans
;
Laparoscopy/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Robotic Surgical Procedures
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ureter/surgery*
;
Ureteral Obstruction/surgery*
;
Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods*

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail