Objective: To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biological forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization, to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments. Methods: Mimics, GeomagicStudio 2017, SolidWorks 2016, and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the following six working conditions: working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews; working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm, 7 mm, 4 mm, and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest, respectively; working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane. Results: On the sagittal axis, miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth. Compared to the control group, in the miniscrew group, the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars. On the vertical axis, the result in the control group was similar to backward bending; the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever, lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars. On the coronal axis, the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group, and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups. The canines were the teeth that were most strongly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height. Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is, the stronger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage. According to the miniscrew placement height, the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed, the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered, and the lateral incisors and canines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biologi-cal forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization,to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments.Methods Mimics,GeomagicStudio 2017,SolidWorks 2016,and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the fol-lowing six working conditions:working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews;working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm,7 mm,4 mm,and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest,respectively;working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane.Results On the sagittal axis,miniscrew anchorage caused distal displacement of all teeth.Compared to the control group,in the miniscrew group,the displacement of the anterior molars exceeded that of the second molars.On the vertical axis,the result in the control group was similar to backward bending;the results in the miniscrew groups resembled the effect of a lever,lowering the lateral incisors and canines and raising the central incisors and first premolars.On the coronal ax-is,the second premolars and the first molars showed lingual displacement in the control group,and only the premolars and first molars showed lingual displacementin the miniscrew groups.The canines were the teeth that were most strong-ly affected by the change in miniscrew placement height.Conclusion The higher the miniscrew position is,the stron-ger the protective effect on the anterior anchorage.According to the miniscrew placement height,the mandibular arch should be properly narrowed,the central incisors and first premolars should be lowered,and the lateral incisors and ca-nines should be raised when designing clinical treatments.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy of mandibular advance clear alig-ners with traditional functional appliances as the control group. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Abstracts Database, China Knowledge Network Database, Wanfang Database, and Weipu Database were used in this study. The two groups of researchers screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria established by PICOS entries, and used the ROBINS-I scale for quality evaluation. Revman 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine clinical controlled trials were included in this study with a total sample size of 283 cases. No significant difference was found in SNA, SNB, ANB, Go-Pog, U1-SN, Overjet, and other aspects between the invisible group and the traditional group in the treatment of skeletal class Ⅱ ma-locclusion patients; there was a 0.90° difference in mandibular plane angle between the two groups; the growth of the mandibular ramus (Co-Go) in the traditional group was 1.10 mm more than that in the invisible group; the lip inclination of the lower teeth in the invisible group was better controlled, 1.94° less than that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS The invisible group can better control the lip inclination of the mandibular anterior teeth when guiding the mandible. Furthermore, the mandibular plane angle (MP-SN) can remain unchanged, but the growth of the mandibular ramus is not as good as the traditional group, and auxiliary measures should be taken to improve it in clinical practice.
Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy* ; Mandibular Advancement ; Orthodontics, Corrective ; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional ; Mandible ; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable ; Cephalometry