Since the International guidelines for groin hernia management were published in 2018,many new evidences have been published.In October 2023,the HerniaSurge Group published Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.It updated eight chapters of the last guidelines,proposed 20 key questions,and 39 new statements and 32 recommendations,of which 16 were strong recommendations.This article combined clinical concerns to sort out and interpret the updated version.

Malnutrition and dehydration are prevalent in the elderly poplulation, and obesity is also a growing problem, which pose a serious challenge to the nutritional management in geriatrics. In order to better guide clinical practice, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) published the practical guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geria-trics on March 5, 2022. This guideline provides 82 recommendations on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics based on clinical practicability, covering basic problems and general prin-ciples, prevention and treatment of malnutrition/nutri-tional risk, prevention and treatment of specific diseases, as well as prevention and treatment of obesity, along with flow-charts, hoping to be convenient for doctors, nutritionists and nurses to use in clinical practice.

Objective:To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer.Methods:The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria: (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliatively resected by laparoscopic or open procedure. Exclusion criteria: (1) no valid data available in the literature; (2) single study sample size ≤20; (3) subjects with colorectal benign disease; (4) metastatic resection or lymph node dissection was performed intraoperatively in an attempt to perform radical surgery; (5) duplicate publication of the literature. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies. In case of disagreement, the evaluation was performed by discussion or a third researcher was invited to participate. The data were extracted from the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.1.0 version software was used for this meta-analysis.Results:Four CCTs with a total of 864 patients were included in this study, including 216 patients in the laparoscopic group and 648 patients in the open group. Compared with the open group, except for longer operation time (WMD=37.60, 95% CI: 26.11 to 49.08, P<0.05), laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-74.89, 95% CI: -144.78 to -5.00, P<0.05), earlier first flatus and food intake after surgery (WMD=-1.00, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.87, P<0.05; WMD=-1.61, 95%CI: -2.16 to -1.06, P<0.05), shorter hospital stay (WMD=-2.01, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.80, P<0.05) and lower morbidity of postoperative complication (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in time to start postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy rate, and mortality ( P > all 0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Objective:To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer.Methods:The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria: (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliatively resected by laparoscopic or open procedure. Exclusion criteria: (1) no valid data available in the literature; (2) single study sample size ≤20; (3) subjects with colorectal benign disease; (4) metastatic resection or lymph node dissection was performed intraoperatively in an attempt to perform radical surgery; (5) duplicate publication of the literature. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies. In case of disagreement, the evaluation was performed by discussion or a third researcher was invited to participate. The data were extracted from the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.1.0 version software was used for this meta-analysis.Results:Four CCTs with a total of 864 patients were included in this study, including 216 patients in the laparoscopic group and 648 patients in the open group. Compared with the open group, except for longer operation time (WMD=37.60, 95% CI: 26.11 to 49.08, P<0.05), laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-74.89, 95% CI: -144.78 to -5.00, P<0.05), earlier first flatus and food intake after surgery (WMD=-1.00, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.87, P<0.05; WMD=-1.61, 95%CI: -2.16 to -1.06, P<0.05), shorter hospital stay (WMD=-2.01, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.80, P<0.05) and lower morbidity of postoperative complication (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in time to start postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy rate, and mortality ( P > all 0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Objective To evaluate the blood clearance,tissue uptake and distribution as well as safety of high dose-40 mg intravenous fish oil/'medium chain triglycerides (FO/MCT:2 ∶ 8,wt/wt) lipid emulsions iu mice by measuriug the contents of triglycerides (TG) and free fatty acids (FFA) level in blood.Methods FO/MCT emulsions were radiolabeled with nondegradable [3H] cholesteryl ether to trace core particle metabolism in C57BL/6J mice following a bolus injection.For high dose,TG was 40 mg,100 times of low dose.Blood samples were obtained within 25 min to analyze TG and FFA concentrations;extracted organs were used to measure the tissue distribution of lipid emulsions.Results No animal in either group died,and no fat overload syndrome evidence was found after high dose injection.Compared with low dose,high dose injection increased the plasma TG and FFA concentrations rapidly;the emulsions were cleared significantly slower during 25 min after administration in mice;blood has a higher uptake ratio in organs,but heart has a lower one;there was no significant difference in liver and lung uptake ratio between the two groups.Conclusions High dose injection of FO/MCT is not fatal in mice.The animals only experience hypertriglyceridemia and high level of free fatty acids during a significant slower blood clearance period compared to low dose.Although blood clearance is slower,the blood uptake rate increases for further metabolism and clearance.Heart and lung functions are not affected as a lower cardiac and pulmonary uptake;blood uptakes more emulsions to further metabolize.FO/MCT may not induce fat overload syndrome in mice when administered with a super high dose.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines and Resolvin D1 (RvD1) and their association with pathological staging of colon cancer. METHODS: Clinical data of 50 colon cancer patients (colon cancer group) admitted to the General Surgery Department of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January to December 2016 and 5 ml of whole blood specimen were collected at admission. During the same period, 50 healthy volunteers were enrolled (healthy volunteer group). Inclusion criteria for the colon cancer group: colon cancer diagnosed by preoperative colonoscopy and pathology; no recent enteral or parenteral nutrition support treatment or use of oral nutrition preparation; age ≤85 years; no surgical contraindications by preoperative evaluation; no history of taking fish oil-related preparations; no radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery. Healthy volunteer group enrollment criteria: no history of malignant tumors; no organ with organic lesions detected by the healthy examination center of our hospital; detection indicators in normal reference range; no administration of fish oil-related preparations; age ≤ 85 years. Serum inflammatory factors(IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α) concentrations were detected by chemiluminescence immunoassay; serum RvD1 concentration was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The levels of inflammatory factors and RvD1 were compared between the two groups, and their associations with TNM staging of colon cancer patients were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender and nutrition-related indicators between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were 31 males and 19 females in the healthy volunteer group with age of (61.8±11.6) years. There were 23 males and 27 females in the colon cancer group with age of (65.4±12.4) years. According to the 7th edition of the American Cancer Society TNM staging criteria, 10 cases were stage I, 13 cases stage II, 17 cases stage III, and 10 cases stage IV. Compared with healthy volunteer group, colon cancer group had higher serum IL-1β [(3.89±0.24)×10 μg/L vs.(1.55±0.37)×10 μg/L, t=37.52, P<0.01], higher IL-6 [(129.14±3.07)×10 μg/L vs.(51.46±3.14)×10 μg/L, t=125.08, P<0.01], higher IL-10 [(100.59±8.69)×103 μg/L vs.(27.57±4.77)×10 μg/L, t=52.09, P<0.01] and higher TNF-α [(114.31±4.43)×10 μg/L vs.(41.04±5.27)×10 μg/L, t=75.25, P<0.01], while lower RvD1 [(34.19±1.93)×10 μg/L vs.(77.76±1.02)×10 μg/L, t=140.56, P<0.01], all the differences were statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed that concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10 and TNF-α gradually increased with the advancement of TNM staging (P<0.01). In stage III, concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 were the highest, TNF-α concentration was the highest in stage IV. RvD1 concentration gradually decreased with the advancement of TNM staging(P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with healthy volunteers, the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines in colon cancer patients increase significantly while the level of RvD1 decreases significantly. Both are associated with higher TNM stage of colon cancer.
Aged ; Colonic Neoplasms ; blood ; immunology ; pathology ; Cytokines ; blood ; Docosahexaenoic Acids ; blood ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged

Objective To investigate the cachexia morbidity among hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.Method By analyzing the clinical data of 5 118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013,we investigated the cachexia morbidity and compared the clinical outcome between cachectic patients and noncachectic patients.Results The overall cachexia morbidity of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7％ (803/5 118).The highest cachexia morbidity was 34.0％ (89/173),found in patients with pancreatic cancer.In cachectic group and non-cachectic group,the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1％ (539/803) and 74.5％ (3 214/4 315),respectively (P =0.000).Compared to the non-cachectic group,the cachetic group had significantly longer postoperative hospital days [(11.5 ±6.2) d vs (9.4 ±4.9) d,P =0.003],slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4 ±0.9) d vs (3.2 ±0.8) d,P =0.013],longer postoperative time to intake semifluid [(4.4 ± 1.5) d vs (3.9 ± 1.3) d,P =0.002],and more postoperative complications in 28 days after surgery [8.9％ (48/539) vs 5.8％ (186/3 214),P=0.006].After surgery,131 patients in the cachectic group were transferred to the ICU,and 646 patients in non-cachectic group transferred to the ICU (24.3％ vs 20.0％,P=0.026).Compared to the non-cachecic group,the reoperation rate [3.2％ (17/539) vs 1.5％ (48/3214)],ventilator support rate [8.0％ (43/539) vs 5.7％ (184/3 214)],and mortality [2.4％ (13/539) vs 1.1％ (35/3 214)] of the cachectic group were all significantly higher (P =0.006,0.042,0.011).Conclusions Cachexia is common in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer,especially in patients with pancreatic cancer.Cachexia has negative impact on the clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVETo investigate cachexia in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODSBy analyzing the clinical data of 5118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013, cachexia was investigated and clinical outcomes between cachexia patients and non-cachexia patients was compared.

RESULTSThe total cachexia rate of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7%(803/5118). The highest rate of cachexia was 34.0%(89/262) in patients with pancreatic cancer followed by gastric cancer 22.4%(261/1164), colon cancer 21.7%(146/672), and rectal cancer 20.1%(117/581). In cachexia group and non-cachexia group, the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1%(539/803) and 74.5%(3214/4315) respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the non-cachexia group, the cachexia group was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay [(11.5±6.2) d vs. (9.4±4.9) d, P<0.05], slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4±0.9) d vs. (3.2±0.8) d, P<0.05], longer postoperative time to intake of semifluid [(4.4±1.5) d vs. (3.9±1.1) d, P<0.05], and more postoperative complications within 28 days after radical surgery [8.9%(48/539) vs. 5.8%(186/3214), P<0.05]. After radical surgery, the ICU admission rate of the cachexia group [24.3%(131/539)] was higher than that of the non-cachexia group [20.1%(646/3214)] with significant difference(P<0.05). Compared to non-cachexia group, the reoperation rate [3.2%(17/539) vs. 1.5%(48/3214), P<0.05], ventilator support rate [8.0%(43/539)vs. 5.7%(184/3214), P<0.05] and mortality [2.4%(13/539) vs. 1.1%(35/3214), P<0.05] in the cachexia group were all significantly higher(all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSCachexia is commen in patients with digestive system cancer. Cachexia has significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer.

Cachexia ; etiology ; Colonic Neoplasms ; complications ; Defecation ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; Reoperation ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery.

METHODSClinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively, and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTSNinety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery(OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216)(P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm(P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm(P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs.(11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1% and 2.3%(P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.

Anal Canal ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Nodes ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery . Methods Clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively , and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results Ninety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery (OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216) (P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm (P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm (P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs. (11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1%and 2.3%(P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.