Objective To investigate the expression of pepsin in vocal cord polyps and vocal cord cancer,and to compare the difference of pepsin expression.Methods From May 2020 to December 2021,27 patients with vocal cord polyp,27 patients with vocal cord cancer and 23 healthy volunteers were selected.RSI and RFS scoring scales were used for scoring,pepsin detection kit was used for saliva pepsin detection,and immunohistochemical methods were used to detect the expression of pepsin in vocal cord tissues of patients with vocal cord polyps and vocal cord cancer.Results The RSI score,RFS score and pepsin test kit results of vocal cord polyp group and vocal cord canc-er group were higher than those of non-vocal cord disease group,and the differences of the three indexes were statis-tically significant(P＜0.05).RSI score,pepsin detection kit results and pepsin immunohistochemistry results of vocal cord polyp group showed no significant difference compared with vocal cord cancer group(P＞0.05).The RFS score of vocal cord polyp group was significantly different from that of vocal cord cancer group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Pepsin may be an important pathogenic factor of vocal cord polyp and vocal cord cancer,and play an im-portant role in the occurrence of these two diseases.The difference of pepsin expression in vocal cord polyp and vo-cal cord cancer suggests that pepsin may have different pathogenesis.

Purpose To investigate the risk factors of severe hypocalcemia after ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for secondary hyperparathyroidism.Materials and Methods A retrospective case-control study was used to study 91 patients with uremia complicated with secondary hyperparathyroidism in the First People's Hospital of Yulin from May 2019 to May 2023.All patients underwent ultrasound-guided thermal ablation and were divided into severe hypocalcemia group(SH)and non-SH group according to postoperative blood calcium levels.The difference of clinical data between the two groups was compared,and the independent risk factors of SH were investigated by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.Results A total of 317 glands were ablated in 49 cases of microwave ablation and 42 cases of radiofrequency ablation.SH occurred in 57 cases(62.64%)after ablation.The comparison of clinical data between the two groups showed that there were significant differences in the preoperative intact parathyroid hormone(iPTH),decline rate of iPTH 1 d,preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase,the proportion of parathyroid glands≥4 and the total gland volume between the two groups(all P<0.05).Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain the best cut-off point of iPTH 1 d decline rate,the result was 74.59%,the area under the curve was 0.866(95%CI 0.787-0.945)(P<0.05),the sensitivity was 84.2%,and the specificity was 78.1%.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative alkaline phosphatase(OR=1.015,95%CI 1.005-1.025,P=0.030)and decline rate of iPTH 1 d≥74.59%(OR=30.423,95%CI 5.938-155.858,P<0.001)and parathyroid glands≥4(OR=4.355,95%CI 1.027-18.469,P=0.046)were independent risk factors for postoperative SH(all P<0.05).Conclusion Preoperative alkaline phosphatase and decline rate of iPTH 1 d≥74.59%and the number of parathyroid glands≥4 are independent risk factors for SH after thermal ablation.

Objective To observe the risk factors of recurrence after ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for treating uremia secondary hyperparathyroidism(SHPT).Methods Totally 59 patients with uremia SHPT who underwent ultrasound-guided thermal ablation were enrolled,including 23 cases with(relapse group)and 36 without SHPT recurrence(non relapsed group).Clinical data were compared between groups,univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to screen independent risk factors of SHPT recurrence.Results There were significant differences of serum free thyroxine(FT4),urea,intact parathyroid hormone(iPTH)1 day after ablation,1 day decrease rate of iPTH,the maximum diameter of the largest nodule,ablation time,total ablation energy,energy to volume ratio and the proportion of 1 day decrease rate of iPTH≤90%between groups(all P＜0.05).Higher urea,lower energy to volume ratio and 1 day decrease rate of iPTH≤90%were all independent risk factors of SHPT recurrence(all P＜0.05).Conclusion Higher urea,lower energy to volume ratio and 1 day decrease rate of iPTH≤90%were independent risk factors of recurrence after ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for treating uremia SHPT.

Objective:To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer.Methods:The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria: (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliatively resected by laparoscopic or open procedure. Exclusion criteria: (1) no valid data available in the literature; (2) single study sample size ≤20; (3) subjects with colorectal benign disease; (4) metastatic resection or lymph node dissection was performed intraoperatively in an attempt to perform radical surgery; (5) duplicate publication of the literature. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies. In case of disagreement, the evaluation was performed by discussion or a third researcher was invited to participate. The data were extracted from the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.1.0 version software was used for this meta-analysis.Results:Four CCTs with a total of 864 patients were included in this study, including 216 patients in the laparoscopic group and 648 patients in the open group. Compared with the open group, except for longer operation time (WMD=37.60, 95% CI: 26.11 to 49.08, P<0.05), laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-74.89, 95% CI: -144.78 to -5.00, P<0.05), earlier first flatus and food intake after surgery (WMD=-1.00, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.87, P<0.05; WMD=-1.61, 95%CI: -2.16 to -1.06, P<0.05), shorter hospital stay (WMD=-2.01, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.80, P<0.05) and lower morbidity of postoperative complication (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in time to start postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy rate, and mortality ( P > all 0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Objective:To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer.Methods:The databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCT) or clinical controlled trials (CCT) comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to May 2019. Chinese search terms included "colorectum/colon/rectum" , "cancer/malignant tumor" , "laparoscopy" , "metastasis" , " IV" ; English search terms included "laparoscop*" , "colo*" , "rect*" , "cancer/tumor/carcinoma/neoplasm" , " IV" , "metasta*" . Inclusion criteria: (1) RCT or CCT, with or without allocation concealment or blinding; (2) patients with stage IV colorectal cancer that was diagnosed preoperatively and would receive resection of the primary tumor; (3) the primary tumor that was palliatively resected by laparoscopic or open procedure. Exclusion criteria: (1) no valid data available in the literature; (2) single study sample size ≤20; (3) subjects with colorectal benign disease; (4) metastatic resection or lymph node dissection was performed intraoperatively in an attempt to perform radical surgery; (5) duplicate publication of the literature. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies. In case of disagreement, the evaluation was performed by discussion or a third researcher was invited to participate. The data were extracted from the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.1.0 version software was used for this meta-analysis.Results:Four CCTs with a total of 864 patients were included in this study, including 216 patients in the laparoscopic group and 648 patients in the open group. Compared with the open group, except for longer operation time (WMD=37.60, 95% CI: 26.11 to 49.08, P<0.05), laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-74.89, 95% CI: -144.78 to -5.00, P<0.05), earlier first flatus and food intake after surgery (WMD=-1.00, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.87, P<0.05; WMD=-1.61, 95%CI: -2.16 to -1.06, P<0.05), shorter hospital stay (WMD=-2.01, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.80, P<0.05) and lower morbidity of postoperative complication (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77, P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in time to start postoperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy rate, and mortality ( P > all 0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor is safe and feasible to enhance recovery after surgery by promoting postoperative bowel function recovery, shortening hospital stay and reducing postoperative complication in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Objective To explore the risk factors of Schistosoma japonicum infection in the residents in Xingzi County,Ji?angxi Province. Methods Six administrative villages from different areas were randomly selected by the cluster sampling meth?od as the study sites in Xingzi Country in 2013,and all the residents aged 5 years or above were investigated epidemiologically, and the schistosome infection was surveyed by Kato?Katz technique. The risk factors of schistosomiasis were analyzed by using the Chi?square test analysis and multivariate Logistic regression model. Results In 2013,there were 2 050 residents received the stool examination and 146 persons were positive,the schistosome infection rate was 7.1%. The Chi?square test showed that gender,age,occupation and education level were associated with the population infection rate(χ2=26.485、16.836、25.700、90.805,all P<0.05). The multivariate Logistic regression mode showed that the probability of schistosomiasis for the male was 3.041 times as much as that for the female;the probability of schistosomiasis for the illiteracy and primary education level crowd was 8.870 times as much as that for the college degree or above crowed;the probability of schistosomiasis for the junior middle school education level crowd was 5.598 times as much as that for the college degree or above crowed;the probability of schistoso?miasis for the high school education level crowd was 2.995 times as much as that for the college degree or above crowed;the probability of infection of fishermen was the highest,which was 3.053 times as much as that for the other professional crowds. Conclusions The risk factors of schistosome infection mainly include gender,occupation and the education level. We should strengthen the health education of schistosomiasis control,protection against the infested water contact,and so on.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery.

METHODSClinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively, and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTSNinety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery(OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216)(P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm(P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm(P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs.(11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1% and 2.3%(P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.

Anal Canal ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Nodes ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate cachexia in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODSBy analyzing the clinical data of 5118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013, cachexia was investigated and clinical outcomes between cachexia patients and non-cachexia patients was compared.

RESULTSThe total cachexia rate of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7%(803/5118). The highest rate of cachexia was 34.0%(89/262) in patients with pancreatic cancer followed by gastric cancer 22.4%(261/1164), colon cancer 21.7%(146/672), and rectal cancer 20.1%(117/581). In cachexia group and non-cachexia group, the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1%(539/803) and 74.5%(3214/4315) respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the non-cachexia group, the cachexia group was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay [(11.5±6.2) d vs. (9.4±4.9) d, P<0.05], slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4±0.9) d vs. (3.2±0.8) d, P<0.05], longer postoperative time to intake of semifluid [(4.4±1.5) d vs. (3.9±1.1) d, P<0.05], and more postoperative complications within 28 days after radical surgery [8.9%(48/539) vs. 5.8%(186/3214), P<0.05]. After radical surgery, the ICU admission rate of the cachexia group [24.3%(131/539)] was higher than that of the non-cachexia group [20.1%(646/3214)] with significant difference(P<0.05). Compared to non-cachexia group, the reoperation rate [3.2%(17/539) vs. 1.5%(48/3214), P<0.05], ventilator support rate [8.0%(43/539)vs. 5.7%(184/3214), P<0.05] and mortality [2.4%(13/539) vs. 1.1%(35/3214), P<0.05] in the cachexia group were all significantly higher(all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSCachexia is commen in patients with digestive system cancer. Cachexia has significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer.

Cachexia ; etiology ; Colonic Neoplasms ; complications ; Defecation ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; Reoperation ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications

Objective To investigate the cachexia morbidity among hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.Method By analyzing the clinical data of 5 118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013,we investigated the cachexia morbidity and compared the clinical outcome between cachectic patients and noncachectic patients.Results The overall cachexia morbidity of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7％ (803/5 118).The highest cachexia morbidity was 34.0％ (89/173),found in patients with pancreatic cancer.In cachectic group and non-cachectic group,the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1％ (539/803) and 74.5％ (3 214/4 315),respectively (P =0.000).Compared to the non-cachectic group,the cachetic group had significantly longer postoperative hospital days [(11.5 ±6.2) d vs (9.4 ±4.9) d,P =0.003],slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4 ±0.9) d vs (3.2 ±0.8) d,P =0.013],longer postoperative time to intake semifluid [(4.4 ± 1.5) d vs (3.9 ± 1.3) d,P =0.002],and more postoperative complications in 28 days after surgery [8.9％ (48/539) vs 5.8％ (186/3 214),P=0.006].After surgery,131 patients in the cachectic group were transferred to the ICU,and 646 patients in non-cachectic group transferred to the ICU (24.3％ vs 20.0％,P=0.026).Compared to the non-cachecic group,the reoperation rate [3.2％ (17/539) vs 1.5％ (48/3214)],ventilator support rate [8.0％ (43/539) vs 5.7％ (184/3 214)],and mortality [2.4％ (13/539) vs 1.1％ (35/3 214)] of the cachectic group were all significantly higher (P =0.006,0.042,0.011).Conclusions Cachexia is common in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer,especially in patients with pancreatic cancer.Cachexia has negative impact on the clinical outcomes.

Objective To evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery . Methods Clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively , and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results Ninety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery (OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P>0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1%(75/96) vs. 75.0%(162/216) (P>0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm (P>0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm (P>0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs.(13.7±6.4)(P>0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P<0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs. (11.6±6.2) d, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[(2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4±0.9) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P<0.05], less postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 25.9%, P<0.05), but longer operative time[(155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P<0.05]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1%and 2.3%(P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.