Objective:To investigate the application value of self-pulling and latter transection (SPLT) technique in double anti-reflux double-tract reconstruction of totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopatholo-gical data of 103 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction in clinical stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ who were admitted to Shanxi Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were collected. There were 65 males and 38 females, aged from 45 to 79 years, with a median age of 59 years. Of 103 patients, 49 cases undergoing totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction of SPLT were assigned into the SPLT group, 54 cases undergoing totally laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with conventional double-tract reconstruction were assigned into the traditional group. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) follow-up. Follow-up was conducted by outpatient examination and telephone inter-view to detect postoperative reflux esophagitis of patients up to December 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and the t test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range) or M( Q1, Q3), and the Wilcoxon test was used for comparison between groups. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the non-parameter rank sum test. Results:(1) Intraoperative situations: the operation time, digestive tract reconstruction time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, the number of inferior mediastinal lymph nodes dissected, cases with auxiliary incisions for the SPLT group were (261±48)minutes, (26±4)minutes, (114±42)mL, 8.0(6.5,9.5), 1, respectively. The above indicators were (244±42)minutes, (30±6)minutes, (118±46)mL, 5.5(4.0,8.0), 9 for the traditional group, respectively. There were significant differences in the digestive tract reconstruction time, the number of inferior mediastinal lymph nodes dissected and cases with auxiliary incisions between the two groups ( t=-3.34, Z=-4.05, χ2=4.72, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time or volume of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( t=1.87, -0.47, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: duration of postopera-tive hospital stay and cases with postoperative complications were (11.5±2.7)days and 4 for the SPLT group, versus (12.5±4.3)days and 9 for the traditional group, showing no significant difference between the two groups ( t=-1.47, χ2=1.68, P>0.05). There were 13 of 103 patients with postopera-tive complications, including 5 cases of left pleural effusion, 4 cases of anastomotic leakage, 2 cases of mild pneumonia, 1 case of incision infection, 1 case of chylous leakage. Four patients had anasto-motic leakage at the esophagojejunostomy, the abdominal esophagus of whom was invaded by more than 1 cm. During the operation, mediastinal drainage tubes were placed through the abdominal wall. The 4 patients were cured after enteral and parenteral nutrition support and adequate drainage, and the remaining patients with complications were cured after symptomatic treatment. (3) Follow-up: of 49 patients in the SPLT group, 43 cases were followed up for (18±4)months. During the follow-up, 1 case showed reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy, with the incidence of 2.33%(1/43). Of 54 patients in the traditional group, 53 cases were followed up for (17±4)months. During the follow-up, 4 cases showed reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy, with the incidence of 7.55%(4/53). There was no significant difference in the incidence of reflux esophagitis between the two groups ( χ2=0.47, P>0.05). Conclusions:SPLT technology is feasible for double anti-reflux double-tract reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy. Compared with traditional double-tract reconstruction of totally laparos-copic proximal gastrectomy, SPLT technology can reduce the auxiliary incisions, increase the number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes dissected, and shorten the digestive tract reconstruction time.

Along with the changes in the epidemiology of gastric cancer in China, the early diagnosis and treatment rate of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction has elevated signifi-cantly, while its surgical methods have also altered and become a hotspot. Total gastrectomy has become the primary surgical allocation for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. In recent years, a series of studies on proximal gastrectomy and digestive reconstruction after distal stomach preserving have been explored due to recent concept of functional preservation. The main concern about this surgical method is the efficacy of anti-reflux and its influence on nutritional prognosis. Interpositioned jejunum and double tract reconstruction have curative effects. However, they become obstacles for total laparoscopic surgery due to the complexity of surgical operation. Thus there is increasing concern to explor the way to reduce the reflux rate and improve the nutritional status of patients. Baesd on related research at home and abroad, combined with their own experiences, the authors comprehensively analyze and illustrate self-palling and latter transection with esophagojejunostomy and double anti-reflux double tract reconstruction of total laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

There are still many controversies in the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction tumors in terms of surgical approach, cleaning range, and resection scope. The reason is the confusion about the scope of the esophagogastric junction. The previous domestic and foreign anatomy descriptions of this part are not enough to solve the current problems. Based on a large number of basic anatomy and clinical operations, this article proposes that the esophagogastric junction may be wrapped by a complete and separate esophagogastric junction membrane with independent anatomy other than infracardiac bursa. The structure of the transitional tissue, mainly from the distribution of submucosal veins, explained the relationship and significance of tissue transitional changes and clinical operations, and made a reasonable analysis of the current controversy based on the anatomical characteristics, which is worthy of further investigation.

There are still many controversies in the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction tumors in terms of surgical approach, cleaning range, and resection scope. The reason is the confusion about the scope of the esophagogastric junction. The previous domestic and foreign anatomy descriptions of this part are not enough to solve the current problems. Based on a large number of basic anatomy and clinical operations, this article proposes that the esophagogastric junction may be wrapped by a complete and separate esophagogastric junction membrane with independent anatomy other than infracardiac bursa. The structure of the transitional tissue, mainly from the distribution of submucosal veins, explained the relationship and significance of tissue transitional changes and clinical operations, and made a reasonable analysis of the current controversy based on the anatomical characteristics, which is worthy of further investigation.

Objective:To explore the effects of magnanimous therapy on the magnanimous and enterprising traits of lung cancer patients and the analysis of related factors.Methods:Totally 197 patients with lung cancer were divided into individual group ( n=62), team group ( n=75) and control group ( n=60). Comparison and correlation analysis were applied to the data before and after the electroencephalogram and the magnanimous questionnaire, the cancer response questionnaire, the T-type psychological scale, the cancer heart state questionnaire and the cancer patient's life function index scale. t test, analysis of variance and Pearson correlation analysis were processed by SPSS 23.0. Results:After treatment, the " enterprising" dimension and " magnanimous" dimension of individual group and the " enterprising" dimension of the team group ((3.035±0.309), (3.041±0.265), (3.173±0.371)) were higher than that before treatment((2.934±0.326), (2.908±0.315), (3.130±0.387), all P<0.05). There was negative correlation between " magnanimous" dimension of the magnanimous questionnaire and " subconscious" dimension of the T-type psychological scale in individual group( r=-0.280, P<0.05). In team group, the " enterprising" dimension of the magnanimous questionnaire was negatively correlated with " Psychological" and " Yield" dimension of the cancer heart state questionnaire( r=-0.279, -0.285, P<0.05), and positively correlated with " Facing" of the cancer response questionnaire, " Good physical condition and ability" and " Psychological well-being" dimension of the cancer patient's life function index scale( r=0.367, 0.402, 0.379, P<0.05). There was a negative correlation between the " enterprising" dimension of the magnanimous questionnaire and the beta wave value in individual group. Conclusion:The magnanimous therapy can improve enterprising and magnanimous level of patients with lung cancer, and the effects are related with the above-mentioned psychosomatic factors.

Objective:To understand the perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy (PG) and digestive tract reconstruction.Methods:A cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Selection of subjects: (1) Domestic public grade IIIA (provincial and prefecture-level) tumor hospitals or general hospitals possessing the diagnosis and treatment qualifications for gastric cancer.(2) Surgeons with senior attending physician, associate chief physician and chief physician. The "Questionnaire Star" platform was used to design a questionnaire about cognition, attitude and treatment choice of "proximal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction". The questionnaire contained 32 questions, such as the basic information of surgeons, the current status of gastric cancer surgery, the selection and management of surgical methods and related details for proximal gastric cancer, the choice of proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract, the related complications and nutritional status monitoring after proximal gastrectomy. A total of 76 questionnaires were linked to the respondents via WeChat between July 29 and August 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables.Results:A total of 47 grade IIIA hospitals were included, and 76 questionnaires were sent out. The proportions of recovered and valid questionnaires were both 100%. For early and middle stage adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially those smaller than 4 cm, 72.37% (55/76) of surgeons preferred proximal gastrectomy, while 22.37% (17/76) of surgeons chose total gastrectomy. For early AEG, 90.79% (69/76) of surgeons thought that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or proximal gastrectomy could be considered. For AEG below T3 stage and shorter than 4 cm, 60.53% (46/76) of surgeons gave priority to proximal gastrectomy, and 60.53% (46/76) of the surgeons believed that the advanced AEG with a higher radical cure should be treated with proximal gastrectomy, and the residual stomach should not be less than half stomach. Considering anti-reflux effect, postoperative weight recovery, clinical efficacy, wide application and easy popularization, surgeons preferred double-tract reconstruction. The surgeons in tumor hospitals had a higher approval rate for the application of proximal gastrectomy and the fact that the Kamikawa anastomosis was the most difficult to promote than the surgeons in provincial/municipal general hospitals. The surgeons with an annual surgical volume of more than 200 were more likely to choose proximal gastrectomy for early and middle stage AEG patients and the proportion was as high as 8/9. From the perspective of good clinical results, wide range of application, and easy popularization, the surgeons with a higher ratio (60.00%, 15/25) of double-tract reconstruction were those surgeons with 50-100 operations per year.Conclusions:The general level of cognition and acceptability of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract is suboptimal. In the future, it is urgent to promote the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy" so as to guide and optimize treatment in proximal gastric cancer.

Objective:To understand the perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy (PG) and digestive tract reconstruction.Methods:A cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Selection of subjects: (1) Domestic public grade IIIA (provincial and prefecture-level) tumor hospitals or general hospitals possessing the diagnosis and treatment qualifications for gastric cancer.(2) Surgeons with senior attending physician, associate chief physician and chief physician. The "Questionnaire Star" platform was used to design a questionnaire about cognition, attitude and treatment choice of "proximal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction". The questionnaire contained 32 questions, such as the basic information of surgeons, the current status of gastric cancer surgery, the selection and management of surgical methods and related details for proximal gastric cancer, the choice of proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract, the related complications and nutritional status monitoring after proximal gastrectomy. A total of 76 questionnaires were linked to the respondents via WeChat between July 29 and August 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables.Results:A total of 47 grade IIIA hospitals were included, and 76 questionnaires were sent out. The proportions of recovered and valid questionnaires were both 100%. For early and middle stage adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially those smaller than 4 cm, 72.37% (55/76) of surgeons preferred proximal gastrectomy, while 22.37% (17/76) of surgeons chose total gastrectomy. For early AEG, 90.79% (69/76) of surgeons thought that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or proximal gastrectomy could be considered. For AEG below T3 stage and shorter than 4 cm, 60.53% (46/76) of surgeons gave priority to proximal gastrectomy, and 60.53% (46/76) of the surgeons believed that the advanced AEG with a higher radical cure should be treated with proximal gastrectomy, and the residual stomach should not be less than half stomach. Considering anti-reflux effect, postoperative weight recovery, clinical efficacy, wide application and easy popularization, surgeons preferred double-tract reconstruction. The surgeons in tumor hospitals had a higher approval rate for the application of proximal gastrectomy and the fact that the Kamikawa anastomosis was the most difficult to promote than the surgeons in provincial/municipal general hospitals. The surgeons with an annual surgical volume of more than 200 were more likely to choose proximal gastrectomy for early and middle stage AEG patients and the proportion was as high as 8/9. From the perspective of good clinical results, wide range of application, and easy popularization, the surgeons with a higher ratio (60.00%, 15/25) of double-tract reconstruction were those surgeons with 50-100 operations per year.Conclusions:The general level of cognition and acceptability of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract is suboptimal. In the future, it is urgent to promote the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy" so as to guide and optimize treatment in proximal gastric cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of two different digestive tract reconstruction methods in the Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal interposition. Methods: A total of 84 patients with Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ AEG who underwent proximal gastrectomy and interposition jejunal anastomosis were enrolled prospectively according to the exclusion criteria, from October 2015 to August 2017 at Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital. There were 61 male and 23 female patients, aged 48-69 years with an average age of 59.7 years. They were divided into single-tract reconstruction group (n=41) and double-tract reconstruction group (n=43) according to random number table. Both groups underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal interposition. After side-to-side anastomosis of the remnant stomach and jejunum was performed in the single-tract group, jejunum 3 cm below the anastomosis was ligated or closed. The jejunum in the double-tract group was not treated during the operation. Relevant nutritional indicators were collected at 3 months and 6 months after operation. The data were analyzed by repeated measurement of variance analysis to determine the nutritional status. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative general condition between single-tract reconstruction group and double-tract reconstruction group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative related indicators (P>0.05). Nutritional indicators in single-channel reconstruction group were higher than those in double-channel reconstruction group (hemoglobin: F=23.374, P=0.000; albumin: F=6.149, P=0.003; total protein: F=18.362, P=0.000; weight: F=74.255, P=0.000). The quality of life was compared half year after operation, there was no significant difference in the incidence of subjective symptoms such as reflux, heart burning, nausea and vomiting, dysphagia and sternum discomfort in the two groups (P>0.05), as well as the results of QLQ-STO22 score (27.0±3.8 vs. 27.6±3.3, t=-0.688, P=0.494). The results of gastroscopy showed that the incidence and degree of the two groups were almost the same whether in the incidence of reflux esophagitis (2/41 vs. 2/43, P=1) or in the contrast of reflux degree (Z=-1.528, P=0.127). Conclusion For patients with type Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal operation, single tract reconstruction is ideal.

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of jejunal interposed single-tract and doubletract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 108 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG who were admitted to the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between August 2013 and November 2016 were collected.All the patients underwent proximal gastrectomy and were allocated into the 2 groups by random number table,including patients using single-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in the single-tract group and patients using double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in the double-tract group.Digestive tract reconstruction:after end-to-side anastomosis between distal jejunum and esophagus and side-to-side anastomosis between posterior wall of the gastric remnant and jejunum,single-tract jejunal reconstruction was done through ligating jejunum at 3 cm below the anastomotic stoma,and then side-to-side anastomosis between proximal jejunum and jejunum was performed in the single-tract group.Patients in the double-tract group used the same digestive tract reconstruction,but jejunum was not ligated.The postoperative pathological examinations showed that patients with positive lymph nodes or tumor invading all layers of gastric wall underwent chemotherapy.Observation indicators:(1) intra-and post-operative situations;(2) follow-up situations.Follow-up using telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative complication,gastrointestinal function and body mass index (BMI) up to November 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as-x± s and comparison between groups was analyzed using t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range),and comparison between groups was analyzed using the nonparametric test.Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA.Comparisons of count data were done using chi-square test.Ordinal data were analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis H test.Results One hundred and eight patients were screened for eligibility,including 55 in the single-tract group and 53 in the double-tract group.(1) Intra-and post-operative situations:total operation time,digestive tract reconstruction time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time to initial anal exsufflation,postoperative complications,cases with gastroesophageal reflux,intestinal obstruction and Visick grading ＞ Ⅱ and duration of postoperative hospital stay were respectively (145±26) minutes,(30±6) minutes,(181±37) mL,(53± 16) hours,1,1,1,(10.0±2.4) days in the singletract group and (139±29)minutes,(26±3)minutes,(176±31)mL,(50±17) hours,3,0,3,(9.4±l.4)days in the double-tract group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.725,0.219,0.162,-0.576,x2 =2.960,5.830,t =-0.993,P＞0.05).Four patients with gastroesophageal reflux received motilium and omeprazole therapy for 2 weeks,and were improved by symptomatic treatment such as increasing the solid food intake.One patient in the single-tract group had internal hernia-induced intestinal obstruction and was cured by reoperation.There was no anastomotic leakage,bleeding,infection,dumping syndrome and gallstone between groups.Of 108 patients,71 underwent 6-cycle SOX chemotherapy,including 67 with perigastric lymph node metastasis and 4 with tumor invading all layers of gastric wall.(2) Follow-up situations:108 patients were followed up for 12.0-48.0 months,with a median time of 28.6 months.During the follow-up,bowel sound in the double-tract group and single-tract group was 8 times / minute (range,5-12 times / minute) and 3 times /minute (range,2-5 times/ minute),with a statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-0.692,P＜0.05).The single food intake,serum gastrin level,ratio of serum pepsinogen Ⅰ and Ⅱ levels and BMI from preoperation to postoperative 12 months were from (1 117± 129)mL to (817± 127)mL,from (12±5)pmol/L to (41±13) pmol/L,from 11.3±2.8 to 5.1±2.2,(65±7)kg to (63±5) kg in the single-tract group and from (1 095±118)mL to (783±80)mL,from (10±4)pmol/L to (40±10)pmol/L,from 12.4±2.9 to 4.2±1.3,from (63±6) kg to (58±6)kg in the double-tract group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference in single food intake,serum gastrin level and ratio of serum pepsinogen Ⅰ and Ⅱ levels between groups (F =0.468,0.108,0.161,P＞0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in changing trend of BMI between groups (F=24.930,P＜0.05).Conclusion Jejunal interposed single-tract and double-tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG have the same surgical safety and don't affect secretion function of gastric remnant,but there are frequent bowel sounds and obvious weight loss.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the feasibility and safety of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction.

METHODSClinical data of 34 gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with the delta-shaped anastomosis for digestive tract reconstruction (delta-shaped group) and 83 gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I( for digestive tract reconstruction (Billroth group) by same surgeon team from July 2013 to July 2015 at the Department of Digestive Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Data of two groups were compared.

RESULTAge, gender, tumor stage were not significantly different between the two groups(all P>0.05). Operation time of the first 15 cases in delta-shaped group was longer than that in Billroth group [(254.7±35.4) min vs. (177.8±33.0) min, t=11.190, P=0.000], while after above 15 cases, the operation time of delta-shaped group was significantly shorter than that of Billroth group [(142.1±14.6) min vs. (177.8±33.0) min, t=-4.109, P=0.001]. Delta-shaped group had less blood loss during operation [(87.1±36.7) ml vs. (194.0±55.1) ml, t=-10.268, P=0.000], and shorter length of incision [(4.1±0.4) cm vs. (6.1±1.0) cm, t=-10.331, P=0.000] than Billroth group. Compared with Billroth group, delta-shaped group presented faster postoperative bowel function return [(2.8±0.6) d vs. (3.3±0.5) d, t=-3.755, P=0.000], earlier liquid food intake [(7.4±1.5) d vs. (8.1±1.7) d, t=-4.135, P=0.000], earlier ambulation [(4.0±1.6) d vs. (6.8±1.4) d, t=-7.197, P=0.000] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(12.6±1.9) d vs.(13.6±2.0) d, t=-20.149, P=0.000]. Morbidity of postoperative complication was 5.9%(2/34) in delta-shaped group, including anastomotic fistula in 1 case and incision infection in 1 case, and 6.0%(5/83) in Billroth group, including anastomotic fistula, incision infection, anastomotic stricture and dumping syndrome, without significant difference(P>0.05). Difference value of total protein and albumin between pre-operation and post-operation, and average decreased value of total protein, albumin, body weight between pre-operation and postoperative 6-month were not significantly different between two groups(all P>0.05). As for patients with BMI > 25 kg/m, compared to Billroth group, delta-shaped group presented less blood loss during operation [(94.1±36.7) ml vs. (203.0±55.1) ml, t=-10.268, P=0.000], lower injective dosage of postoperative analgesics [(1.9±1.1) ampule vs.(3.3±2.0) ampule, t=-2.188, P=0.032], faster intestinal recovery [(2.9±0.7) d vs. (3.2±0.9) d, t=-3.755, P=0.009], shorter hospital stay [(10.5±1.2) d vs. (11.7±1.5) d, t=-2.026, P=0.004], and lower morbidity of postoperative complication [7.1%(1/14) vs. 13.6%(3/22), χ=4.066, P=0.031].

CONCLUSIONIn laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction, the delta-shaped anastomosis is safe and feasible, especially suitable for obese patients.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; methods ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Constriction, Pathologic ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Defecation ; Digestive System Fistula ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Drinking ; Dumping Syndrome ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastroenterostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Postoperative Period ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Surgical Wound ; Surgical Wound Infection ; epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome