2.Using 2-mSv Appendiceal CT in Usual Practice for Adolescents and Young Adults: Willingness Survey of 579 Radiologists, Emergency Physicians, and Surgeons from 20 Hospitals
Hyuk Jung KIM ; Kyoung Ho LEE ; Min-Jeong KIM ; Sung Bin PARK ; Yousun KO ;
Korean Journal of Radiology 2020;21(1):68-76
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			patient recruitment, we surveyed whether the hospitals were using 2-mSv CT in usual practice.RESULTS: The analyses included responses from 579 participants (203 attendings and 376 trainees; 221 radiologists, 196 emergency physicians, and 162 surgeons). Regarding the willingness to immediately change their standard practice to 2-mSv CT, 158 (27.3%), 375 (64.8%), and 46 (7.9%) participants responded as “yes” (consistently), “partly” (selectively), and “no”, respectively. Willingness varied considerably across the hospitals, but only slightly across the participants' departments or job titles. Willingness was significantly associated with attendings (p = 0.004), intention to maintain the dedicated appendiceal CT protocol (p < 0.001), belief in compelling evidence on the carcinogenic risk of conventional-dose CT radiation (p = 0.028), and hospitals having more than 1000 beds (p = 0.031). Fourteen of the 20 hospitals kept using 2-mSv appendiceal CT in usual practice after the trial.CONCLUSION: Despite the extensive efforts over the years of this clinical trial, many care providers were willing to use 2-mSv CT selectively or not willing to use.]]>
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Adolescent
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Appendicitis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Emergencies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Intention
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Logistic Models
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Pragmatic Clinical Trial
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prospective Studies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Radiation Dosage
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surgeons
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surveys and Questionnaires
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Young Adult
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
3.Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives
Sun Min LIM ; Min Hee HONG ; Hye Ryun KIM
Immune Network 2020;20(1):10-
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable benefit in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have emerged as an effective treatment option even in the first-line setting. ICIs can block inhibitory pathways that restrain the immune response against cancer, restoring and sustaining antitumor immunity. Currently, there are 4 PD-1/PD-L1 blocking agents available in clinics, and immunotherapy-based regimen alone or in combination with chemotherapy is now preferred option. Combination trials assessing combination of ICIs with chemotherapy, targeted therapy and other immunotherapy are ongoing. Controversies remain regarding the use of ICIs in targetable oncogene-addicted subpopulations, but their initial treatment recommendations remained unchanged, with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors as the choice. For the majority of patients without targetable driver oncogenes, deciding between therapeutic options can be difficult due to lack of direct cross-comparison studies. There are continuous efforts to find predictive biomarkers to find those who respond better to ICIs. PD-L1 protein expressions by immunohistochemistry and tumor mutational burden have emerged as most well-validated biomarkers in multiple clinical trials. However, there still is a need to improve patient selection, and to establish the most effective concurrent or sequential combination therapies in different NSCLC clinical settings. In this review, we will introduce currently used ICIs in NSCLC and analyze most recent trials, and finally discuss how, when and for whom ICIs can be used to provide promising avenues for lung cancer treatment.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Biomarkers
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Immunohistochemistry
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Immunotherapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Lung Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Oncogenes
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
4.Impact of COVID-19 on Clinical Operations and Management of Patients in a Singapore Immunodermatology Unit during the 'Circuit-Breaker' Period and Beyond.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2020;49(11):919-921
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Allergy and Immunology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Ambulatory Care
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Autoimmune Diseases/therapy*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			COVID-19
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Communicable Disease Control
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Connective Tissue Diseases/therapy*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Delivery of Health Care/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Dermatology
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			SARS-CoV-2
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Singapore
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/therapy*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Telemedicine/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tertiary Care Centers
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Vasculitis/therapy*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
5.Risk profiling in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation.
Linda M HUYNH ; Mohamad M OSMAN ; Faysal A YAFI
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020;22(1):8-14
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Penile prosthesis implantation is the gold standard of surgical therapy for patients with medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. However, this umbrella definition includes significant heterogeneity and associated risk profiles that should be candidly discussed and addressed perioperatively. Factors associated with operative success and patient satisfaction are often surgery specific; however, risk profiling via patient selection, preoperative optimization, proper device selection, and intraoperative consideration are highly correlated. Some examples of common risk profiles include comorbidity(ies) such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, prior abdominal surgery, Peyronie's disease, and psychological risk factors. Similarly, integration of surgeon- and patient-amenable characteristics is key to decreasing risk of infection, complication, and need for revision. Finally, patient risk profiling provides a unique context for proper device selection and evidence-based intraoperative considerations.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Comorbidity
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Erectile Dysfunction/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Mental Disorders/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Satisfaction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Penile Implantation/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Penile Induration/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Penile Prosthesis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Reoperation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Risk Assessment
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
6.The modern testicular prosthesis: patient selection and counseling, surgical technique, and outcomes.
Solomon HAYON ; Jamie MICHAEL ; R Matthew COWARD
Asian Journal of Andrology 2020;22(1):64-69
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			The testicular prosthesis can be an afterthought for providers when performing an orchiectomy for testicular cancer, torsion, atrophic testis, or trauma. However, data suggest that patients find the offer of a testicular prosthesis and counseling regarding placement to be extremely important from both a pragmatic and a psychosocial perspective. Only two-thirds of men undergoing orchiectomy are offered an implant at the time of orchiectomy and of those offered about one-third move forward with prosthesis placement. The relatively low acceptance rate is in stark contrast with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates for those who undergo the procedure. The most common postoperative patient concerns are minor and involve implant positioning, size, and weight. Herein, we provide an up-to-date review of modern preoperative evaluation, patient selection, expectation management, surgical technique, and expected outcomes for testicular prostheses.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Counseling
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Gonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XY/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Male
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Orchiectomy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Satisfaction
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prosthesis Implantation/methods*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Spermatic Cord Torsion/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Testicular Diseases/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Testicular Neoplasms/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Testis/surgery*
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods*
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
7.Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device
Yu Rim SHIN ; Young Hwan PARK ; Han Ki PARK
Korean Circulation Journal 2019;49(8):678-690
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			There have been great advances in ventricular assist device (VAD) treatment for pediatric patients with advanced heart failure. VAD support provides more time for the patient in the heart transplant waiting list. Augmented cardiac output improves heart failure symptoms, end-organ function, and general condition, and consequently provides beneficial effects on post-transplant outcomes. Miniaturized continuous flow devices are more widely adopted for pediatric patient with promising results. For infants and small children, still paracorporeal pulsatile device is the only option for long-term support. Younger age, congenital heart disease, biventricular support, patient's status and end-organ dysfunction at the time of implantation are risks for poor outcomes. Patient selection, timing of implantation, and selection of device for each patient are critical for optimal clinical outcomes.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Cardiac Output
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Child
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart Defects, Congenital
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart Failure
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart Transplantation
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Heart-Assist Devices
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Infant
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Waiting Lists
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
8.A Systematic Review of Outcomes Research in the Hospital Pharmacists' Interventions in South Korea
Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2019;29(3):193-201
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since the introduction of hospital pharmacy residency programs in 1983, hospital pharmacists in South Korea have been expected to expand their roles. However, their services and the outcomes have not been fully understood. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of Korean hospital pharmacist-provided interventions with regard to intervention type, intervention consequences, and target patient groups. METHODS: A literature search of the following databases was performed: Embase, PubMed, Medline, KoreaMed, RISS, KMbase, KISS, NDSL, and KISTI. The search words were “hospital pharmacist”, “clinical pharmacist”, and “Korea”. Articles reporting clinical or economic outcome measures that resulted from hospital pharmacist interventions were considered. Numeric measures for the acceptance rate of pharmacist recommendations were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1,683 articles searched, 44 met the inclusion selection criteria. Most articles were published after 2000 (81.8%) and focused on clinical outcomes. Economic outcomes had been published since 2011. The interventions were classified as patient education, multidisciplinary team work, medication assessment, and guideline development. The outcome measures were physicians’ prescription changes, clinical outcomes, patient adherence, economic outcomes, and quality of life. The acceptance rate was 80.5% (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Studies on pharmacist interventions have increased and showed increased patient health benefits and reduced medical costs at Korean hospital sites. Because pharmacists' professional competency would be recognized if the economic outcomes of their work were confirmed and justified, studies on their clinical performance should also include their economic impact.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Insurance Benefits
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Korea
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Compliance
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Education as Topic
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Pharmacists
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Pharmacy Residencies
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prescriptions
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Quality of Life
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
9.Short-term Outcomes After Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Curative Surgery in Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Comparison With Upfront Surgery Patients
Myung Hyun HAN ; Youn Young PARK ; Shiva PRATAP ; Yoon Dae HAN ; Min Soo CHO ; Hyuk HUR ; Byung Soh MIN ; Kang Young LEE ; Nam Kyu KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(6):327-334
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			PURPOSE: Upfront systemic chemotherapy with target agents has been recommended for patients with stage IV colon cancer. Some with partial response are considered for curative resection. There is high risk of developing postoperative complications following upfront systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate short-term perioperative outcomes of curative surgery after upfront chemotherapy in comparison with upfront surgery in patients with metastatic colon cancer.METHODS: Between January 2010 and October 2015, 146 patients (80 in the surgery first group, 66 in the upfront chemotherapy group) who underwent surgical resection before or after systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer were included in the present study. All decisions for treatment were made through a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed to compare the groups.RESULTS: There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes. Overall complication rates were not different between the groups (surgery first group: 46.3% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 60.6%; P = 0.084). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo method, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of major complications (grade 3 or more) (surgery first group: 18.9% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 27.5%; P = 0.374).CONCLUSION: There was no significant increase in major postoperative complications in metastatic colon cancer patients who received upfront chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Careful patient selection and treatment planning are important.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Antineoplastic Agents
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colon
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Colonic Neoplasms
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Drug Therapy
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Methods
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neoplasm Metastasis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Postoperative Complications
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
10.Diagnostic Neuroimaging in Headache Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ye Eun JANG ; Eun Young CHO ; Hee Yea CHOI ; Sun Mi KIM ; Hye Youn PARK
Psychiatry Investigation 2019;16(6):407-417
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			OBJECTIVE: Neuroimaging in headache patients identifies clinically significant neurological abnormalities and plays an important role in excluding secondary headache diagnoses. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing guidelines and studies surrounding neuroimaging in headache patients. METHODS: The research question involved determining the prevalence of detecting clinically significant neurological abnormalities using neuroimaging in patients suspected of primary headache. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were conducted on English-language studies published from 1991 to 2016, and the reference lists of the retrieved articles were also checked manually. All headache subtypes and patients aged ≥15 years were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Ten studies met the selection criteria. The pooled prevalence of detecting clinically significant abnormalities in the neuroimaging of headache patients was 8.86% (95% confidence interval: 5.12–15.33%). Subsequently, diverse subgroup analyses were performed based on the detection method, headache type, study type, study region, age group, and disease type. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that limited neuroimaging methods should be carefully considered for headache diagnostic purposes when there are red flag symptoms. Limitations and suggested directions for future studies on neuroimaging in headache patients are described.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        			Diagnosis
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Headache
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Humans
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Magnetic Resonance Imaging
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Methods
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Neuroimaging
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Patient Selection
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Prevalence
		                        			;
		                        		
		                        			Tomography, X-Ray Computed
		                        			
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail