Objective: In Sweden, primary healthcare centers play an important role in the performance of general practice, education, and clinical research. In Japan, general physicians or general practitioners are expected to be more active in the small-scale hospitals and clinics in rural areas. This study aimed to explore the differences in attitudes toward general practice and clinical research among medical students in Japan and Sweden to present solutions to help doctors stay in rural areas of Japan.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at two medical schools in Japan and Sweden in 2018, using an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire survey that comprised 16 items including 9 items on clinical research.Results: Participants were 154 medical students (response rate: 69.4% for 222 students) in Japan and 56 (27.1% for 201 students) in Sweden. The proportion of medical students who wanted to become general physicians was greater in Japan than in Sweden (Japan:Sweden=36.4%:17.9%; P=0.012). Although fewer Japanese students wanted to conduct research in rural areas than Swedish students (43.5%:57.1%; P<0.001), the positive proportion of Japanese students working in clinical research and/or taking an academic degree in rural areas was greater than that of Swedish students (52.0%:23.2%; P=0.032).Conclusion: As Swedish medical students and young doctors learn considerably from primary healthcare centers, their attitudes toward clinical research are more developed than those of their Japanese counterparts. However, more Japanese medical students than Swedish students wish to become general practitioners, and they are likely to strive to conduct clinical research at small-scale hospitals/clinics in rural areas. Therefore, the improvement of the clinical research environment in small-scale hospitals and clinics in rural areas is needed at the earliest in Japan.

Introduction: Recently, community-based medical education has become widespread in Japanese medical schools, but the current status is not clear on a national level. A second survey of community-based medical education at all Japanese medical schools was conducted. The first survey was done in 2011. Methods: Members of the Council made and distributed a questionnaire to medical schools in order to assess the situation of community-based medical education as of April 2014. Results: A total of eighty schools responded. The number of schools which had community medicine programs was seventy-eight. In the first survey, the number was seventy-three. Seventy-seven schools gave community-based clinical clerkships. Discussion: The number of medical schools that had curriculum about community medicine was more than indicated in the first survey. Further research about the contents or implementation system of community-based clerkships is needed.

Introduction : The appropriate size of the regional coverage area for primary care in Japan has been unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the geographical distribution of primary care clinics for elderly ambulatory diabetic patients.
Methods : Using an insurance claims database, we extracted data of patients aged 75 years and older requiring ambulatory diabetic care in May 2010 in Ibaraki prefecture. The geographical distance from each municipal office to the clinics was analyzed.
Results : A total of 17,717 data points were extracted from the database. Data points that could not be mapped due to coding errors were eliminated, resulting in 17,144 (96.8%) data points that were ultimately analyzed. The median [25th-75th percentile] geographical distance was 5.5 [2.3-9.9] km. The distance was not related to municipal population, aging rate, or area size.
Conclusion : The coverage area for diabetic care in this primary care setting was estimated. For most elderly ambulatory diabetic patients, clinics are distributed within a 10-km radius area. Further investigation is needed to clarify primary care coverage areas that result in the most efficient use of medical resources.

Abstract
Introduction : There are few reports of long-term medical support activities in disaster areas. We analyzed drug-related data using medical records and prescriptions obtained during the long-term medical support of patients impacted by the Great East Japan Earthquake, which occurred on March 11, 2011.
Methods : Using medical records and prescriptions, the dispensing frequency of each drug was calculated and usage trends of the top three most frequently dispensed drugs are described here. All data was collected from March 26, 2011 onwards after the medical support activity commenced.
Results : In the first week of data acquisition, a total of 166 patients visited the medical support team (median 48.5, range 14-166). Following that, the number of patients decreased with a median of 24 people per day (range 0-47). The number of prescriptions for common cold medication was the highest, followed by antihypertensive and anti-allergic medications, respectively. The usage of antihypertensive drugs and common cold medications decreased over time, whereas anti-allergic medications were prescribed on a continuous basis.
Conclusion : Disaster medical support teams should not only be prepared to support the acute phase but also long-term phase, which depends heavily on the restoration of local medical services. The earlier the intervention to provide support, the greater the likelihood that the disaster medical support team will require to provide treatment for both acute and chronic illness.

Objective : To analyze and reveal the contents of medical questionnaires distributed to nationwide general practice outpatients prior to their initial medical consultations.
Method : An observational study was conducted, based on questionnaire format. Sample questionnaires were collected from 85 hospitals registered with the Japan Primary Care Association.
Results : No standard format was found among the samples. A4 size forms (210 mm×297 mm) averaging 19.7 questions were in the majority, accounting for 68%. The distribution frequency of questionnaires reported by research cooperation centers listed 28 items (31.8%) concerning medical history, 19 items (21.6%) related to lifestyle, and 7 items (8.0%) referring to social and reproductive status.
Conclusion : This research assessed the qualitative value of medical questionnaires used in General Practice Clinics in Japan. The results indicate the nature of the medical information required by physicians prior to medical consultation.

Background: When analyzing regional disparities in healthcare resources, hospital accessibility is given little consideration. We surveyed accessibility from residential districts to medical institutions using GIS (Geographic Information System) and estimated Gini coefficient for each hospital distribution.
Methods: The subjects were 2,688 census mesh blocks ( “Cho-cho-aza” ) and 109 hospitals in Tochigi prefecture. The number of hospitals located within the road distances of 5 km, 10 km and 15 km from the geometrical center of each block was calculated using GIS. The Gini coefficient of each hospital per 100 residents was calculated among the regions located within 5 km, 10 km and 15 km from the geometrical center of the census mesh block.
Results: The population of each block was 748±1,067 (mean±SD), and the road distance to the nearest hospital from the center of each block was 4.3±4.5 km. The number of census mesh blocks with distances from the center of each block to the nearest hospital within 5 km, 5-10 km, 10-15 km and more than 15 km were 1909 (71.0%), 561 (20.9%), 139 (5.2%) and 79 (2.9%) respectively. The number of hospitals located within 5 km, 10 km and 15 km were 3.3±4.7, 8.3±8.6 and 14.4±11.4. Gini coefficients were 0.65, 0.52 and 0.43.
Conclusion: When analyzing regional disparities in healthcare resources, it is necessary to take into account not only the number of physicians and beds, but also accessibility. Gini coefficient is useful to estimate geographical distributions, and can be used as an indicator for improvement projects for hospitals.

Background: Physician shortage affects mortality at the city level in Japan. The medical administrative district (MAD) covering the area (town, city, etc.) in which the patients live and is the unit responsible for recruiting doctors. The number of physicians or changes in this number in each MAD varies. The relationship between the number, or the change in number, of physicians and the mortality in each MAD has been unclear.
Methods: We designed a descriptive study using publicly-available national statistics. In all 358 MADs in Japan, we analyzed the relationship between the changes in the number of physicians (total, clinic, and hospital) from 2000 to 2005 and the standardized mortality ratio (all causes of death, cancer, heart disease, and stroke).
Results: In MADs, the number of physicians and mortality are not related, nor are changes in number of physicians and mortality. Further investigation including factors associated with mortality is needed.
Conclusion: In MAD, there is no relationship between the number of physician and the mortality, between the change in number of physician and the mortality. Further investigation is needed including factors associated with mortality.

Objectives : To determine factors related to peoples' preference for visiting home-doctors when experiencing new health problems.
Method : A questionnaire survey was conducted of people receiving annual health checkups in municipalities in the vicinity of Jichi Medical University Hospital. We surveyed personal characteristics, test equipment, having of a home-doctor, and answers to an assumed scenario (asking about willingness to visit a home-doctor in case of getting certain health problems).
According to the responses to the scenario, we divided the subjects into two groups (a home-doctor group: visiting a home-doctor; and a specialist group: not visiting a home-doctor) and statistically compared the two groups.
Results : In the analytic sample of 1,829, the home-doctor group numbered 1,097 individuals (60%) and the specialist group numbered 732 individuals (40%). The home-doctor group statistically had more home-doctors than the specialist group (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 2.47, 2.00-3.05).
More home-doctors in the home-doctor group had test equipment than home-doctors in the specialist group: Gastrointestinal test equipment (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or ultrasonography) (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.39, 1.06-1.83).
Conclusion : We revealed two factors relating to the preference for visiting home-doctors: First, those people had home-doctors, and, second, the home-doctors had test equipment.