A 53-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis had been suffering from right thumb deformity for a couple of months. Due to this, she was unable to perform the pinch movement. There were surgical options to treat the deformity, but the patient declined surgery. We therefore surmised whether we could correct the deformity with a splint. In 2012, we then proposed the use of a finger splint. The patient's finger function improved, and as of 2021, she was still using the finger splint without any problems. Thus, it is recommended to use a finger splint for thumb deformity because it is easier and less invasive than surgery.

A 53-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis had been suffering from right thumb deformity for a couple of months. Due to this, she was unable to perform the pinch movement. There were surgical options to treat the deformity, but the patient declined surgery. We therefore surmised whether we could correct the deformity with a splint. In 2012, we then proposed the use of a finger splint. The patient's finger function improved, and as of 2021, she was still using the finger splint without any problems. Thus, it is recommended to use a finger splint for thumb deformity because it is easier and less invasive than surgery.

Purposes: We prospectively examined the effects of “instruction for near death” by doctors to improve communication and difficulty in end-of-life care in acute general wards. Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the communication between pre-treatment group and the group with and without the “instruction for near death” in the end-of-life period by Japanese version of Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J). We also compared the difficulty of end-of-life care before and after the trial. Results: The “communication between professionals” in STAS-J was 0.46±0.53 in pre-treatment group (n=71), 0.18±0.39 in the instruction group (n=34) and 0.66±0.48 in the non-instruction group (n=44) (p<0.001). The “family anxiety”, the “family insight”, “communication between patient and family” and “communication professional to patient and family” in STAS-J were not significantly different between the groups. The questionnaire of difficulty of end-of-life care showed no change in both doctors and nurses. Conclusions: The “communication between professionals” was improved in the group with the “instruction for near death”. The difficulty of end-of-life care was not reduced, and it did not contribute to family anxiety and communications.

Objective: We retrospectively studied the adaptation and limits of applying Biological Prognostic Score Version-2 composed only of blood test results to prognostic prediction in end-of-life non-cancer patients. Methods: The prognostic score was calculated from the cholinesterase, blood urea nitrogen, and white blood cell counts of hospitalized end-of-life non-cancer patients, divided into three groups with cutoff values, and prediction accuracy analysis, survival analysis, and simple regression analysis were performed. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of 204 non-cancer patients at the same cut-off value and predicted survival time as cancer was 79% accurate at 3 weeks survival and 63% at 9 weeks. Specificity and negative predictive value were highly accurate, sensitivity and positive predictive value were low. In the survival analysis, the discrimination between the 3 groups was significant (p<0.05), but the regression coefficient in the regression analysis was not significant (p=0.43). Conclusion: The prognostic prediction using this score for non-cancer patients has high prediction accuracy in the case of good prognosis. It is suggested that clinical use of this score is also possible if used cautiously.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of the palliative care provided by long-term care unit that was established together with palliative care unit (PCU). Methods: Self-reported questionnaires were administered to long-term care unit administrators at 24 facilities that was established together with PCU. Questions included: managing the use of narcotic drugs, situation about receiving cancer patients, situation about cooperation with PCU, and difficulty with palliative care. Results: Eighteen (75%) facilities responded to the questionnaire. Fourteen facilities of respondents reported that narcotic drugs were available and usable in long-term care unit, and ten facilities reported that the narcotic drugs could be used in the same way as PCU could. Ten facilities reported that they had doctor(s) knowledgeable about palliative care or prescribing narcotic drugs, and 11 facilities reported that they had nurse(s) experienced about palliative care. Cancer patients were accepted in all 18 long-term care units. Transferring from long-term care unit to PCU due to medical condition changes after hospitalization had been carried out in 17 facilities. Unit administrator’s perceived difficulty lack of staffing, lack of staff expertise and education, and issues surrounding narcotic drug management. Conclusion: These long-term care units were providing palliative care for cancer patients in cooperation with PCU. The survey results indicated the need for solving human resource, educational, and administrative problems.

Purpose: We investigated the benefits and problem of the palliative care provided by long-term care unit through a survey of staff in palliative care units (PCU) and long-term care units. Methods: Self-reported questionnaires were administered to staff who engaged in PCU and long-term care units. Questions included: awareness of WHO palliative care definition, and, the general idea on palliative care, possibility of cooperation with PCU, advantages / disadvantages, and idea for non-cancer palliative care in long-term care unit. Results: We got responses from 248 medical and nursing-care staff. The percentage of “knowing” the WHO definition was 76.5% in medical staff / 32.3% in care worker, 87.6% in PCU experience / 46.5% in non-experience. Categories of responses are good, advantageous, problematic, difficult requirement, difficulty, etc. The main answers were the difficulty of care, problems of knowledge and technique, and points of problems related to personnel shortage. Medical staff or PCU experienced staff pointed out needs of palliative care and improvement of knowledge and skills. Conclusion: Opinions acknowledging the benefits and necessities for palliative care of long-term care units and a number of problems were revealed.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the palliative care for cancer patients provided by a long-term care unit. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 194 patients who hospitalized in our long-term care unit between April 2010 and December 2014. The patients shared with a group of two, narcotic drugs non-use period (previous group; until March 2012) and narcotics use period (later group; in April 2012 or later), and it was compared with a background, hospitalization period, result on discharge, narcotic drug administration, symptom relief. And it was surveyed hospitalization dynamics of our palliative care unit for comparison. Result: Cancer patients were 16 (22%) in previous group of 74 patients and were 79 (66%) in later group of 120. The proportion of cancer patients in later group increased to three times (p<0.001). In later group, the average hospital stay was shortened to half (144 days, p<0.01) and the mortality discharge rates increased (78%, p<0.05). Narcotic drugs were administered to more than half (57%) of cancer patients in later group, and pain relief was significantly better. In the period of later group, number of hospitalized patients in palliative care unit was also increased. Conclusion: It was suggested that the long-term unit can perform palliative care for cancer patients in cooperation with the palliative care unit.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PURPOSE: To determine whether kissing spine is a risk factor for recurrence of sciatica after lumbar posterior decompression using a spinous process floating approach. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Kissing spine is defined by apposition and sclerotic change of the facing spinous processes as shown in X-ray images, and is often accompanied by marked disc degeneration and decrement of disc height. If kissing spine significantly contributes to weight bearing and the stability of the lumbar spine, trauma to the spinous process might induce a breakdown of lumbar spine stability after posterior decompression surgery in cases of kissing spine. METHODS: The present study included 161 patients who had undergone posterior decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis using a spinous process floating approaches. We defined recurrence of sciatica as that resolved after initial surgery and then recurred. Kissing spine was defined as sclerotic change and the apposition of the spinous process in a plain radiogram. Preoperative foraminal stenosis was determined by the decrease of perineural fat intensity detected by parasagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Preoperative percentage slip, segmental range of motion, and segmental scoliosis were analyzed in preoperative radiographs. Univariate analysis followed by stepwise logistic regression analysis determined factors independently associated with recurrence of sciatica. RESULTS: Stepwise logistic regression revealed kissing spine (p=0.024; odds ratio, 3.80) and foraminal stenosis (p<0.01; odds ratio, 17.89) as independent risk factors for the recurrence of sciatica after posterior lumbar spinal decompression with spinous process floating procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: When a patient shows kissing spine and concomitant subclinical foraminal stenosis at the affected level, we should sufficiently discuss the selection of an appropriate surgical procedure.
Case-Control Studies ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Decompression ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Logistic Models ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Odds Ratio ; Postoperative Complications ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sciatica* ; Scoliosis ; Spinal Canal ; Spine ; Weight-Bearing

Purpose：We evaluated that the current state from which a palliative care unit receives emergency admission of cancer patients at home. Methods：We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 393 cancer patients who hospitalized in our unit between January 2013 and December 2014. The patients were shared with a group of two, schedule admission (schedule group) and emergency admission (emergency group), and it was compared with a result on discharge and with a hospitalization period. We investigated admission process, the date and time of admission, and reason for admission in emergency group. Results：The number of patients was 224 of schedule group and 169 of emergency group. The mortality rates were 81% in schedule group and 78% in emergency group (not significant). An emergency group for an average of 24.3 days was shorter for 9 days than schedule groups in a hospitalization period of dead leaving patients (p<0.05). In emergency group, admission process included 128 completed-interviews with the hospitalization, 11 incompleted-interviews before admission and 30 first visits, and 129 patients (76％) admitted within the weekday daytime. Many patients had a complaint of severe pain, appetite loss and oral absorption difficulty, and so much. Conclusions：An emergency group admitted the various processes and the much symptom. There were a lot of cases of early hospital death, but also admitted return at home, and our unit played the role of emergency admission.

Objective: To develop and confirm the validity of a Biological Prognostic Score using only blood test results for prediction of prognosis in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We conducted parametric survival time analysis using blood test results, age, sex, and primary diagnosis as independent variables, and event of death as a dependent variable, among patients in a palliative care unit (a development cohort). We then developed the Biological Prognostic Score (BPS). Thereafter, we confirmed the accuracy of the BPS and the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) prospectively among patients, who withdrew or withheld further curative or life-prolonging therapies, in other facilities (a validation cohort). Results: We developed the BPS, which consists of cholinesterase, blood urea nitrogen, and total iron-binding capacity, from 122 patients in a development cohort. We then examined 195 patients in a validation cohort and found that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 1-9 week survival prediction was BPS=0.76-0.86 and PPI=0.69-0.73. Discussion: Our results suggest that the BPS was valid. It will be necessary to perform further examinations in multiple facilities and to explore more generalized parameters that could replace total iron-binding capacity in our BPS.