1.Clinical efficacy and feasibility of locking plate and intramedullary nail internal fixation with early rehabilitation in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures
Xinzuo HAN ; Pan QI ; Taoran JIN ; Kemin LIU ; Sihai LIU
Journal of China Medical University 2024;53(6):525-530
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and feasibility of locking plate and intramedullary nail internal fixation with early rehabilitation in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures,including 25 and 20 persons receiving locking plate and intramedullary nail internal fixation(groups A and B),respectively.We compared the operation situation,length of hospital stay,fracture healing time,postoperative complica-tion incidence,postoperative serum inflammatory cytokine levels,postoperative pain score,shoulder joint function score,and quality of life score between the two groups.All patients received early rehabilitation after surgery.Results The operation time,length of hospital stay,fracture healing time,and intraoperative blood loss in group B were significantly shorter than those in group A(P<0.05).The C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels on postoperative days 1 to 3 in group B were significantly lower than those in group A(P<0.05).The pain score 12 to 48 hours after the operation in group B was significantly lower than that in group A(P<0.05).The shoulder joint function and quality of life scores after the operation were significantly higher than those before the operation in both groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Locking plate and intramedullary nail internal fixation with early rehabilitation could effectively improve shoulder joint function in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
2.Factors related to re-falling of knee range of motion after arthrolysis for post-traumatic knee stiffness
Zhigang CUI ; Taoran JIN ; Sihai LIU ; Fei WANG ; Kemin LIU ; Jianjun LI
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 2024;30(5):565-569
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To observe the temporary loss(re-falling)of knee range of motion(ROM)during rehabilitation after arthroly-sis for post-traumatic knee stiffness,and analyze the factors related to it. Methods From July,2016 to September,2019,64 patients(68 knees)in Beijing Bo'ai Hospital accepted minimally inva-sive arthrolysis for post-traumatic knee stiffness,and were followed up for twelve months.ROM of flexion and extension of knee was measured before operation,and one,six and twelve weeks,and six and twelve months af-ter operation;while they were asssessed with Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score(HSS).Multivariate Logis-tic regression was performed on re-falling. Results The ROM and HSS score improved as a whole after operation;however,HSS score improved constantly,but ROM decreased six weeks after operation compared with that one weeks after operation,involving 46 knees of 44 cases.Arthrolysis longer than 12 months from primary injuries,multiple complicated fracture and history of infection were the risk factors for re-falling(OR>8.058,P<0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive arthrolysis is effective on knee function after arthrolysis for post-traumatic knee stiff-ness.However,re-falling of ROM may happen during rehabilitation.Delay of operation,multiple complicated fracture and history of infection may increase the risk of re-falling.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
3.Predictors of early recurrence and long-term survival in patients after resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases with a low-risk on clinical risk score
Quan BAO ; Kun WANG ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery 2020;26(7):514-517
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:To study the related factors of early recurrence and long-term survival after hepatectomy for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) with a low-risk on clinical risk score (CRS).Methods:The clinicopathological data of 983 consecutive patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection at Department of Hepatopanereatobiliary Surgery Ⅰ, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute between January 2000 and November 2018 were studied retrospectively. A total of 420 patients with a CRS of 0-2 met the inclusion criteria of this study. There were 272 males and 148 females, aged from 21 to 83 years, with a median age 59 years. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the related factors associated with early recurrence. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.Results:Of 420 patients, 272(64.8%) patients developed recurrence, with 163 patients developing early recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed synchronous liver metastasis ( OR=1.587, 95% CI: 1.021-2.467), number of liver metastases ≥3( OR=1.904, 95% CI: 1.091-3.324) and RAS mutation ( OR=1.774, 95% CI: 1.157-2.270) were independent risk factors of early recurrence. The 5-year overall survival of patients with early recurrence was significantly lower than those with non-early recurrence (33.4% vs 71.1%, P<0.05). For the 163 patients with early recurrence, 41(25.2%) underwent repeat liver resection. When compared with the remaining 122(74.8%) patients who underwent non-resectional treatment, these 41 patients had a significantly higher 5-year overall survival rate (63.5% vs 21.1%, P<0.05). Conclusions:In patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases with a low risk on CRS, the independent risk factors for early recurrence were synchronous liver metastasis, number of liver metastases ≥3, and RAS mutation. Re-resection of early recurrent disease achieved better survival outcomes.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
4.Prognosis and risk factors after surgical treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases
Xiaoluan YAN ; Kun WANG ; Quan BAO ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery 2020;26(7):508-513
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:To study the impact of surgical treatment on long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, and to identify the associated risk factors.Methods:The clinical, pathological, and follow-up data were prospectively collected from 781 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases at Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department Ⅰ, Peking Cancer Hospital from Jan 2000 to Nov 2018. There were 497 males and 284 females. The average age was 56.7 years (range 19 to 83 years). The tumor recurrence and survival outcomes on follow-up were analyzed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kplan-Meier mothod. Parametric survival analysis was used to identify predictors of cancer-specific survival.Results:The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 91.6%, 57.3%, 45.2% and 27.6%, respectively. The median survival was 46 months. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 45.3%, 26.0%, 22.9%, and 19.5%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 11 months. On multivariate analysis, 5 risk factors were found to be independent predictors of poor survival: RAS/BRAF gene mutation ( HR=1.650, 95% CI: 1.302-2.089), right-sided colonic primary ( HR=1.361, 95% CI: 1.151-1.667), node-positive primary ( HR=1.660, 95% CI: 1.284-2.146), largest hepatic tumor ≥3 cm ( HR=1.473, 95% CI: 1.157-1.874), and extrahepatic disease ( HR=1.610, 95% CI: 1.294-2.003). Conclusion:Surgery is the key to long-term survival for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Right colonic primary, RAS/BRAF gene mutation, primary lymph node metastasis, hepatic metastasis with a maximum diameter ≥3 cm and extrahepatic metastasis were factors associated with poor prognosis.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
5.Clinical efficacy of liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis in the elderly and prognosis factor analysis
Quan BAO ; Kun WANG ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2020;39(11):1327-1330
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases(CRLM)in elderly patients and to analyze factors influencing prognosis.Methods:Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 476 CRLM patients undergone liver resection at our department between January 2000 and August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into two groups according their ages: the elderly group(n=112, aged 65 years or older)and the young and middle-aged group(n=364, aged less than 65 years). The safety of the surgical treatment and long-term survival were compared between the two groups.Results:The overall postoperative complication rate was 30.3%.There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates between the elderly group and the young and middle-aged group(32.1% vs. 29.7%, P=0.618). The mortality within 90 days after surgery was 0.9% in the elderly group and 0.5% in the young and middle-aged group( P=0.688). The 5-year survival rates after surgery were similar between the elderly group and the young and middle-aged group(42.4% vs.44.3%, P=0.672). Multivariate analysis revealed that clinical risk score(CRS)≥3 and RAS mutation were independent risk factors for prognosis. Conclusions:Liver resection is safe in carefully selected elderly CRLM patients and can achieve good long-term outcomes.The CRS and RAS genotype can help predict prognosis in elderly CRLM patients.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
6.Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases—a propensity score matching analysis
Quan BAO ; Kun WANG ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(10):976-983
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:Liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Currently, surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) still remains the most curative therapeutic option which is associated with long-term survival. However, the outcome of CRLM patients with bilobar multiple lesions has been reported to be extremely poor due to the complex techniques of the surgery and the difficulties to achieve a negative resection margin. In this study, postoperative long-term outcome in patients with bilobar versus unilobar multiple CRLM undergoing surgical resection were compared and the prognostic factors of CRLM were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed. The clinicopathological data were collected retrospectively from patients with multiple CRLM who received liver resection between January 2002 and November 2018 at our department. Inclusion criteria: (1) All CRLM lesions were confirmed by preoperative enhanced CT or MRI and enhanced ultrasonography. (2) All CRLM lesions were resectable either initially or converted by systemic treatments. The CRLM patients were considered as resectable, if their extrahepatic diseases were able to be completely removed. (3) Sufficient remnant liver volume was required to maintain normal liver function, which was defined by the ratio of remnant liver volume to total liver volume (RLV-TLV), of greater than 30% in general or 40% for the patients undergoing chemotherapy. (4) Medical records and follow-up information were intact. Those undergoing multiple operations after recurrence, with R2 resection, or with a single CRLM lesion were excluded. Patients were divided into bilobar and unilobar group according to tumor distribution. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the covariates between the bilobar group and unilobar group. After PSM, the differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups were compared.Results:A total of 491 patients met the inclusion criteria, 344 (69.6%) with bilobar and 147 (30.4%) with unilobar CRLM. In the propensity-score-matched population (bilobar, 143; unilobar, 143), baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the bilobar group were 91.6%, 52.1%, and 35.3% respectively, compared with 93.7%, 56.8%, and 43.8% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.204). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the bilobar group were 45.7%, 33.7%, and 33.7% respectively, compared with 62.5%, 44.1%, and 42.1% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.075). No significant difference was found in liver-only recurrence (45.6% in bilobar vs. 53.3% in unilobar, P=0.543). Univariate analysis showed that N stage of primary tumor, diameter of the largest liver metastases, carcinoembyonic antigen level, RAS gene status and clinical risk score (CRS) were significantly associated with the prognosis of CRLM (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that diameter of largest liver metastases > 5 cm (HR=1.888, 95% CI: 1.251-2.848, P=0.002), CRS≥3 (HR=1.552,95% CI:1.050-2.294, P=0.027) and RAS gene mutation (HR=1.561, 95% CI: 1.102-2.212, P=0.012) were independent risk factors of poor overall survival after hepatectomy. Conclusions:Tumor distribution may not affect the prognosis of multiple CRLM after resection. Surgical removal in patients with bilobar multiple CRLM provides comparable long-term survival to unilobar multiple CRLM.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
7.Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases—a propensity score matching analysis
Quan BAO ; Kun WANG ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;23(10):976-983
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:Liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Currently, surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) still remains the most curative therapeutic option which is associated with long-term survival. However, the outcome of CRLM patients with bilobar multiple lesions has been reported to be extremely poor due to the complex techniques of the surgery and the difficulties to achieve a negative resection margin. In this study, postoperative long-term outcome in patients with bilobar versus unilobar multiple CRLM undergoing surgical resection were compared and the prognostic factors of CRLM were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed. The clinicopathological data were collected retrospectively from patients with multiple CRLM who received liver resection between January 2002 and November 2018 at our department. Inclusion criteria: (1) All CRLM lesions were confirmed by preoperative enhanced CT or MRI and enhanced ultrasonography. (2) All CRLM lesions were resectable either initially or converted by systemic treatments. The CRLM patients were considered as resectable, if their extrahepatic diseases were able to be completely removed. (3) Sufficient remnant liver volume was required to maintain normal liver function, which was defined by the ratio of remnant liver volume to total liver volume (RLV-TLV), of greater than 30% in general or 40% for the patients undergoing chemotherapy. (4) Medical records and follow-up information were intact. Those undergoing multiple operations after recurrence, with R2 resection, or with a single CRLM lesion were excluded. Patients were divided into bilobar and unilobar group according to tumor distribution. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the covariates between the bilobar group and unilobar group. After PSM, the differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups were compared.Results:A total of 491 patients met the inclusion criteria, 344 (69.6%) with bilobar and 147 (30.4%) with unilobar CRLM. In the propensity-score-matched population (bilobar, 143; unilobar, 143), baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the bilobar group were 91.6%, 52.1%, and 35.3% respectively, compared with 93.7%, 56.8%, and 43.8% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.204). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the bilobar group were 45.7%, 33.7%, and 33.7% respectively, compared with 62.5%, 44.1%, and 42.1% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.075). No significant difference was found in liver-only recurrence (45.6% in bilobar vs. 53.3% in unilobar, P=0.543). Univariate analysis showed that N stage of primary tumor, diameter of the largest liver metastases, carcinoembyonic antigen level, RAS gene status and clinical risk score (CRS) were significantly associated with the prognosis of CRLM (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that diameter of largest liver metastases > 5 cm (HR=1.888, 95% CI: 1.251-2.848, P=0.002), CRS≥3 (HR=1.552,95% CI:1.050-2.294, P=0.027) and RAS gene mutation (HR=1.561, 95% CI: 1.102-2.212, P=0.012) were independent risk factors of poor overall survival after hepatectomy. Conclusions:Tumor distribution may not affect the prognosis of multiple CRLM after resection. Surgical removal in patients with bilobar multiple CRLM provides comparable long-term survival to unilobar multiple CRLM.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
8.Histomorphometryof the vertebra and its correlations with MRI signal intensity in rabbits with fluoride treatment
Haifeng XU ; Jin QI ; Jinshen WANG ; Xiangyang XU ; Qi ZHOU ; Zhenguo ZHAO ; Yong LU ; Kemin CHEN ; Yongli ZHANG ; Lianfu DENG
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics 2018;38(19):1195-1203
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To analyze histomorphometrical characteristics of the bone and bone marrow tissues of the lumbar vertebrae in rabbits with fluoride treatment,and its correlation with signal intensity of MRI.Methods Forty New Zealand albino rabbits aged three months old were randomly divided into fluoride exposure of 30 cases and control of 10 cases,male and female,half each.One hundred milligrams of sodium fluoride were added to the municipal water each liter (fluoride content 100 mg/L) as drinking waterto fluorine for 180 days.Twenty-four of 30 cases with fluoride exposure had complete data (male10 casesand female14 cases).The same municipal water was used as control drinking water (fluoride content < 0.9 mg/L).Eight of 10 cases with control had complete data (male andfemale in half).Twenty-four cases with fluoride treatment and complete data were classified into sensitive and resistant type according to the MRI signal intensity of the lumbar vertebra.Histomorphometrics of the vertebra and its correlation with the MRI signal intensity,and sensitivity in early diagnosis of osteofluorosis and feasibility of susceptibility to osteofluorosis detected with MRI were analyzed.Results Theratios of trabecular bone volume (BV),hematopoietic cell volume (HV) and fluid volume (FV) in bone marrow tissue to total cavernous tissue volume (TT) in group with fluoride treatment were 18.3%±2.6%,45.2%±6.0% and 10.4%±5.7% respectively.These were 14.5%±2.8%,36.3%±7.3% and 6.2%±2.1% in control group respectively.These parameters in fluoride group were significantly increased compared to control group.The ratio 26.0%± 8.0% of adipocyte volume (AV) to TV in fluoride group was significantly lower than that 43.3%±5.6% in control group.Two of 24 cases with fluoride exposure (8.3%,2/24) were sensitive and the remaining 22 (91.7%,22/24) were in resistance.The valuesof BV/TT,HV/TV and FV/TV were considered to be sensitive,resistant and control from large to small,while AV/TV value were opposite.A comparison resuhs of signal intensity in MRI showed that vertebra T1WI contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in the sensitive was the minimum (3.0±0.8),followed by resistance (21.3±3.8) andmaximum in the control (28.3±3.1),but CNR of FsT2WIwas opposite.There were positive associations between T1WI and AV/TV,FV/TV and BV/TV,and between FsT2WI and FV/TV and BV/ TV.There were inverse associationsbetween FsT2WI and AV/TV.Theoptimal threshold value of the vertebra T1WI CNR was 23.2 or lessin early diagnosis of skeletal fluorosis,with sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 100%.FsT2WI was 5.7 or more,with sensitivity of 45.8% and specificity of 100%.Conclusion The pathogenesis of osteofluorosis is relative to changes in bone marrow microenvironment and cells number in bone marrow tissue,and is correlated to MRI signal intensity.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
9.Effect of tumor number on the survival of patients of colorectal cancer liver metastases undergoing hepatic resection
Ming LIU ; Kun WANG ; Quan BAO ; Hongwei WANG ; Kemin JIN ; Xiaoluan YAN ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2018;33(1):34-37
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective To analyze the effect of tumor number on the survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing hepatic resection and the definition of oligometastases.Methods Clinicopathological data of patients with colorectal liver-only metastases undergoing liver resection from our database were retrospectively analyzed.Results Of all 377 patients,the median number of hepatic tumor was 2.The 5-year disease free survival rate was 24.1%.The 5-year overall survival rate was 39.8%.Survival of oligometastatic patients was not significantly different from non-oligometastatic patients (x2 =3.037,P =0.081).Survival of patients with 6-10 hepatic tumors was similar to patients with 1-5 tumors.However,survival of patients with more than 10 tumors was significantly worse than patients with liver tumor less than 10(x2 =5.386,P =0.020).In multivariate analysis,number of liver tumor,primary node status,largest hepatic tumor and gender are independent predictors of overall survival.Conclusions The number of liver tumor was an independent predictor of overall survival.The cut-off number of oligometastatic disease should be 10.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
10.Analysis of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy in surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases
LIU MING ; WANG KUN ; BAO QUAN ; WANG HONGWEI ; JIN KEMIN ; YAN XIAOLUAN ; XING BAOCAI
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017;44(23):1179-1183
		                        		
		                        			
		                        			Objective:To analyze the role of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) in surgical treatment of colorectal liver metasta-ses (CRLM). Methods:All CRLM patients registered in our database who underwent liver resection were assigned into two groups:the PSH group and the major hepatectomy (MH) group. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes, survival time, and recurrence were compared between the two groups. Results:A total of 377 patients were enrolled. Except for tumor num-bers, no significant difference was found in patient demographics and tumor characteristics between the 2 groups. The rate of PSH in-creased over the study period. Short-term surgical outcomes were better in the PSH group than in the MH group. Surgery time was sig-nificantly shorter (177.5 min vs. 220 min, P=0.000), blood loss was significantly reduced (150 mL vs. 300 mL, P=0.000), and morbidity was significantly reduced (47.4%vs. 64.8%, P=0.008). No significant difference was found in overall survival (OS) time (43 m vs. 41 m, P=0.750) between the 2 groups. Hepatic recurrence-free survival time (21 m vs. 13 m, P=0.344) was similar between the 2 groups. However, local treatment was more frequently performed in the PSH group (42.8%vs. 25.6%, P=0.040) when disease recurred. The 5-year OS was significantly better in patients undergoing local treatment than in those without undergoing local treatment (58 m vs. 24 m, P=0.000), for hepatic recurrence. Conclusion:PSH did not increase hepatic recurrence but improve salvage ability in case of recur-rence with a better short-term surgical outcome. PSH should be the recommended approach at initial hepatectomy.
		                        		
		                        		
		                        		
		                        	
            
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail