1.Prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism for gynecologic malignancies with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism: GOTIC-VTE trial
Yoshifumi TAKAHASHI ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Kouji YAMAMOTO ; Masashi TAKANO ; Morikazu MIYAMOTO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Maiko MIWA ; Toyomi SATOH ; Hiroya ITAGAKI ; Takashi HIRAKAWA ; Mayuyo MORI-UCHINO ; Tomonori NAGAI ; Yoshinobu HAMADA ; Soichi YAMASHITA ; Hiroko YANO ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Mitsuaki SUZUKI ; On behalf of the GOTIC-VTE Trial Investigators
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(4):e37-
Objective:
In Japan, perioperative prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in gynecologic cancer patients with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been well established yet. The GOTIC-VTE trial was a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical trial to investigate the prevention of postoperative symptomatic PE onset by seamless anticoagulant therapy from the preoperative period to 4 weeks after surgery instead of using intermittent pneumatic compression.
Methods:
Anticoagulant therapy was started immediately after asymptomatic VTE diagnosis and stopped preoperatively according to the rules of each institution. Unfractionated heparin administration was resumed within 12 hours postoperatively, and this was followed by the switch to low-molecular-weight heparin and subsequently, edoxaban; this cycle was continued for 28 days. Primary outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic PE in 28 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of VTE-related events in 28 days and 6 months postoperatively and protocol-related adverse events.
Results:
Between February 2018 and September 2020, 99 patients were enrolled; of these, 82patients were assessed as the full analysis set, including 58 for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer; 21 for endometrial cancer; and 3 for cervical cancer. No symptomatic PE was observed within 28 days postoperatively; two patients had bleeding events (major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and three had grade 3 adverse events (increased alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, or gamma-glutamyl transferase).
Conclusion
The multifaceted perioperative management for gynecologic malignancies with asymptomatic VTE effectively prevented postoperative symptomatic PE.Trial Registration: JRCT Identifier: jRCTs031180124
2.Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer
Kan YONEMORI ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Mayu YUNOKAWA ; Kimio USHIJIMA ; Shiro SUZUKI ; Ayumi SHIKAMA ; Shinichiro MINOBE ; Tomoka USAMI ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Byoung-Gie KIM ; Peng-Hui WANG ; Ting-Chang CHANG ; Keiko YAMAMOTO ; Shirong HAN ; Jodi MCKENZIE ; Robert J. ORLOWSKI ; Takuma MIURA ; Vicky MAKKER ; Yong Man KIM
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(2):e40-
Objective:
In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis.
Methods:
Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/ adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis.
Results:
Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1–43.0) months.Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49–1.10) and 0.64 (0.44–0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45–1.02) and 0.61 (0.41–0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3–5, 74% and 72%), respectively.
Conclusion
Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC.
3.Prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism for gynecologic malignancies with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism: GOTIC-VTE trial
Yoshifumi TAKAHASHI ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Kouji YAMAMOTO ; Masashi TAKANO ; Morikazu MIYAMOTO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Maiko MIWA ; Toyomi SATOH ; Hiroya ITAGAKI ; Takashi HIRAKAWA ; Mayuyo MORI-UCHINO ; Tomonori NAGAI ; Yoshinobu HAMADA ; Soichi YAMASHITA ; Hiroko YANO ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Mitsuaki SUZUKI ; On behalf of the GOTIC-VTE Trial Investigators
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(4):e37-
Objective:
In Japan, perioperative prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in gynecologic cancer patients with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been well established yet. The GOTIC-VTE trial was a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical trial to investigate the prevention of postoperative symptomatic PE onset by seamless anticoagulant therapy from the preoperative period to 4 weeks after surgery instead of using intermittent pneumatic compression.
Methods:
Anticoagulant therapy was started immediately after asymptomatic VTE diagnosis and stopped preoperatively according to the rules of each institution. Unfractionated heparin administration was resumed within 12 hours postoperatively, and this was followed by the switch to low-molecular-weight heparin and subsequently, edoxaban; this cycle was continued for 28 days. Primary outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic PE in 28 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of VTE-related events in 28 days and 6 months postoperatively and protocol-related adverse events.
Results:
Between February 2018 and September 2020, 99 patients were enrolled; of these, 82patients were assessed as the full analysis set, including 58 for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer; 21 for endometrial cancer; and 3 for cervical cancer. No symptomatic PE was observed within 28 days postoperatively; two patients had bleeding events (major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and three had grade 3 adverse events (increased alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, or gamma-glutamyl transferase).
Conclusion
The multifaceted perioperative management for gynecologic malignancies with asymptomatic VTE effectively prevented postoperative symptomatic PE.Trial Registration: JRCT Identifier: jRCTs031180124
4.Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer
Kan YONEMORI ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Mayu YUNOKAWA ; Kimio USHIJIMA ; Shiro SUZUKI ; Ayumi SHIKAMA ; Shinichiro MINOBE ; Tomoka USAMI ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Byoung-Gie KIM ; Peng-Hui WANG ; Ting-Chang CHANG ; Keiko YAMAMOTO ; Shirong HAN ; Jodi MCKENZIE ; Robert J. ORLOWSKI ; Takuma MIURA ; Vicky MAKKER ; Yong Man KIM
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(2):e40-
Objective:
In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis.
Methods:
Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/ adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis.
Results:
Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1–43.0) months.Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49–1.10) and 0.64 (0.44–0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45–1.02) and 0.61 (0.41–0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3–5, 74% and 72%), respectively.
Conclusion
Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC.
5.Prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism for gynecologic malignancies with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism: GOTIC-VTE trial
Yoshifumi TAKAHASHI ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Kouji YAMAMOTO ; Masashi TAKANO ; Morikazu MIYAMOTO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Maiko MIWA ; Toyomi SATOH ; Hiroya ITAGAKI ; Takashi HIRAKAWA ; Mayuyo MORI-UCHINO ; Tomonori NAGAI ; Yoshinobu HAMADA ; Soichi YAMASHITA ; Hiroko YANO ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Mitsuaki SUZUKI ; On behalf of the GOTIC-VTE Trial Investigators
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(4):e37-
Objective:
In Japan, perioperative prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in gynecologic cancer patients with preoperative asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been well established yet. The GOTIC-VTE trial was a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical trial to investigate the prevention of postoperative symptomatic PE onset by seamless anticoagulant therapy from the preoperative period to 4 weeks after surgery instead of using intermittent pneumatic compression.
Methods:
Anticoagulant therapy was started immediately after asymptomatic VTE diagnosis and stopped preoperatively according to the rules of each institution. Unfractionated heparin administration was resumed within 12 hours postoperatively, and this was followed by the switch to low-molecular-weight heparin and subsequently, edoxaban; this cycle was continued for 28 days. Primary outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic PE in 28 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of VTE-related events in 28 days and 6 months postoperatively and protocol-related adverse events.
Results:
Between February 2018 and September 2020, 99 patients were enrolled; of these, 82patients were assessed as the full analysis set, including 58 for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer; 21 for endometrial cancer; and 3 for cervical cancer. No symptomatic PE was observed within 28 days postoperatively; two patients had bleeding events (major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and three had grade 3 adverse events (increased alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, or gamma-glutamyl transferase).
Conclusion
The multifaceted perioperative management for gynecologic malignancies with asymptomatic VTE effectively prevented postoperative symptomatic PE.Trial Registration: JRCT Identifier: jRCTs031180124
6.Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer
Kan YONEMORI ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Mayu YUNOKAWA ; Kimio USHIJIMA ; Shiro SUZUKI ; Ayumi SHIKAMA ; Shinichiro MINOBE ; Tomoka USAMI ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Byoung-Gie KIM ; Peng-Hui WANG ; Ting-Chang CHANG ; Keiko YAMAMOTO ; Shirong HAN ; Jodi MCKENZIE ; Robert J. ORLOWSKI ; Takuma MIURA ; Vicky MAKKER ; Yong Man KIM
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024;35(2):e40-
Objective:
In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis.
Methods:
Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/ adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis.
Results:
Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1–43.0) months.Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49–1.10) and 0.64 (0.44–0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45–1.02) and 0.61 (0.41–0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3–5, 74% and 72%), respectively.
Conclusion
Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC.
7.The Asia-Pacific Gynecologic Oncology Trials Group (APGOT): building a Pan-Asian and Oceania women’s cancer research organization
David TAN ; Noriko FUJIWARA ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Philip BEALE ; Jae-Weon KIM ; Joseph NG ; Se Ik KIM ; Alison EVANS ; Byoung-Gie KIM ;
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2023;34(2):e33-
8.Randomized phase III trial comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) at 50 mg/m2 versus 40 mg/m2 in patients with platinum-refractory and -resistant ovarian carcinoma:the JGOG 3018 Trial
Takashi MOTOHASHI ; Akira YABUNO ; Hiroshi MICHIMAE ; Tetsuro OHISHI ; Miwa NONAKA ; Masashi TAKANO ; Shin NISHIO ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Keiichi KEIICHI ; Eiji KONDO ; Toru SUGIYAMA ; Tsutomu TABATA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2021;32(1):e9-
Objective:
The standard dose for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. While 40 mg/m2 has recently been used in clinical practice, evidence supporting this use remains lacking.
Methods:
This phase III randomized, non-inferiority study compared progressionfree survival (PFS) for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma between an experimental arm (40 mg/m2 PLD) and a standard arm (50 mg/m2 PLD) until 10 courses, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients had received ≤2 prior lines.Stratification was by performance status and PFS of prior chemotherapy (<3 months versus ≥3 months). The primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity profile, clinical response and tolerability. The total number of patients was 470.
Results:
The trial was prematurely closed due to slow recruitment, with 272 patients randomized to the experimental arm (n=137) and standard arm (n=135). Final analysis was performed with 234 deaths and 269 events for PFS. In the experimental arm vs. standard arm, median PFS was 4.0 months vs. 4.0 months (hazard ratio [HR]=1.065; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.830–1.366) and median OS was 14.0 months vs. 14.0 months (HR=1.078; 95% CI=0.831–1.397). Hematologic toxicity and oral cavity mucositis (≥grade 2) were more frequent in the standard arm than in the experimental arm, but no difference was seen in ≥grade 2 hand-foot skin reaction.
Conclusion
Non-inferiority of 2 PLD dosing schedule was not confirmed because the trial was closed prematurely. However, recommendation of dose reduction of PLD should be based both on efficacy and safety.
9.Olaparib plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Japan subset from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial
Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Hiroyuki FUJIWARA ; Hiroyuki YOSHIDA ; Toyomi SATOH ; Kan YONEMORI ; Shoji NAGAO ; Takashi MATSUMOTO ; Hiroaki KOBAYASHI ; Hughes BOURGEOIS ; Philipp HARTER ; Anna Maria MOSCONI ; Isabel Palacio VAZQUEZ ; Alexander REINTHALLER ; Tomoko FUJITA ; Philip ROWE ; Eric PUJADE-LAURAINE ; Isabelle RAY-COQUARD
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2021;32(5):e82-
Objective:
The addition of maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer in the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644). We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in the Japan subset of PAOLA-1.
Methods:
PAOLA-1 was a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. Patients received maintenance olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily or placebo twice daily for up to 24 months, plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total. This prespecified subgroup analysis evaluated investigator-assessed PFS (primary endpoint).
Results:
Of 24 randomized Japanese patients, 15 were assigned to olaparib and 9 to placebo. After a median follow-up for PFS of 27.7 months for olaparib plus bevacizumab and 24.0 months for placebo plus bevacizumab, median PFS was 27.4 versus 19.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]=0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.11–1.00). In patients with tumors positive for homologous recombination deficiency, the HR for PFS was 0.57 (95% CI=0.16–2.09). Adverse events in the Japan subset were generally consistent with those of the PAOLA-1 overall population and with the established safety and tolerability profiles of olaparib and bevacizumab.
Conclusion:
Results
in the Japan subset of PAOLA-1 support the overall conclusion of the PAOLA-1 trial demonstrating that the addition of maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provides a PFS benefit in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer.
10.Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA or KRAS Mutations
Aiko OGASAWARA ; Taro HIHARA ; Daisuke SHINTANI ; Akira YABUNO ; Yuji IKEDA ; Kenji TAI ; Keiichi FUJIWARA ; Keisuke WATANABE ; Kosei HASEGAWA
Cancer Research and Treatment 2020;52(4):1219-1228
Purpose:
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive source for liquid biopsy to understand molecular phenotypes of a tumor non-invasively, which is also expected to be both a diagnostic and prognostic marker. PIK3CA and KRAS are among the most frequently mutated genes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In addition, their hotspot mutations have already been identified and are ready for a highly sensitive analysis. Our aim is to clarify the significance of PIK3CA and KRAS mutations in the plasma of EOC patients as tumor-informed ctDNA.
Methods:
We screened 306 patients with ovarian tumors for somatic PIK3CA or KRAS mutations. A total of 85 EOC patients had somatic PIK3CA and/or KRAS mutations, and the corresponding mutations were subsequently analyzed using a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in their plasma.
Results:
The detection rates for ctDNA were 27% in EOC patients. Advanced stage and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with higher frequency of ctDNA detection. Preoperative ctDNA detection was found to be an indicator of outcomes, and multivariate analysis revealed that ctDNA remained an independent risk factor for recurrence (p=0.010). Moreover, we assessed the mutation frequency in matched plasma before surgery and at recurrence from 17 patients, and found six patients had higher mutation rates in cell-free DNA at recurrence compared to that at primary diagnosis.
Conclusion
The presence of ctDNA at diagnosis was an indicator for recurrence, which suggests potential tumor spread even when tumors were localized at the time of diagnosis.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail