Objective:To investigate the changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and its role in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF) before and after implanted a HeartCon left ventricular assist device (LVAD).Methods:The retrospective study included 30 ESHF patients [23 males and 7 females, aged 54.5 (40.8, 60.0) years], who were admitted to TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital from September 15, 2020 to June 20, 2023 to receive treatment with HeartCon LVAD implantation. Their clinical data were analyzed and NT-proBNP concentrations in their blood samples were measured preoperatively and during the follow-up period. Patients were followed regularly and MACEs, including cardiac death and rehospitalization for right heart failure, were recorded within 6 months of discharge; Logistic regression was used for prognostic analysis, and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the adjunctive diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for poor prognosis in LVAD patients. The cut-off values for diagnosing poor prognosis by NT-proBNP were divided into two groups, and survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier and tested by log rank; Cox regression was performed to analyze whether high levels of NT-proBNP at 6 months of follow-up wsa a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with LVAD.Results:The median preoperative NT-proBNP level in 30 ESHF patients successfully implanted with HeartCon LVADs was 3 251.0 (1 544.5, 6 401.5) pg/ml. It decreased significantly 7 days postoperatively (3 251.0 vs. 1 815.0 pg/ml, P<0.05), and then the decreasing trend slowed. It decreased to 1 182.0 (620.0, 3 385.3) pg/ml on the 90th post-operative day. The preoperative NT-proBNP>3 251.0 pg/ml group had a longer postoperative hospital stay (47 d vs 33 d, Z=-2.138, P=0.032). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, only NT-proBNP at 7 days postoperatively was found to predict poor prognosis in LVAD patients, with an OR of 1.001 ( P=0.01); ROC curves were analyzed for the adjunctive diagnostic value of 7-day postoperative NT-proBNP levels for poor prognosis (cut-off value of 2 083.0 pg/ml), with an AUC of 0.833 ( P=0.002); The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the time to MACEs within 6 months was significantly shorter in the group with NT-proBNP>2 083.0 pg/mL on postoperative day 7 than in the group with NT-proBNP≤2 083.0 pg/ml (3.538±0.689 vs. 5.471±0.323 months, P=0.004); Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of MACEs was 4.25 times higher in the 7-day postoperative NT-proBNP>2 083.0 pg/ml group than in the NT-proBNP≤2 083.0 pg/ml group ( HR=4.25, P=0.035). Conclusions:The higher the preoperative NT-proBNP level, the longer the postoperative hospital stay in HeartCon LVAD patients. NT-proBNP levels decrease most significantly on postoperative day 7 and is a risk factor for MACEs. It may be used as a prognostic predictor in ESHF patients with implanted LVADs.

Objective:Preliminary explore the safety and efficacy of using only vitamin K antagonists without antiplatelet therapy after left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation.Methods:This is a cohort study. Patients who underwent HeartCon LVAD implantation in TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital from September 2020 to September 2022 were included. Oral warfarin sodium was given on postoperative days 1 to 2, with the target international standardized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 2.5. Follow-up until September 2022, survival, INR level and occurrence of bleeding and thrombosis were recorded. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method (censored for heart transplantation).Results:A total of 22 patients, including 16 male patients (72.7%), aged (51.0±13.3) years, were included. The duration of HeartCon LVAD support was (458±166) days and the INR during support was 2.28±0.26. One patient underwent the heart transplant at 307 d after implantation. One patient (4.5%) occured cardiac tamponade, two patients (9.1%) occured hemorrhagic stroke, five patients (22.7%) occured gastrointestinal bleeding, four patients (18.2%) occured gingival hemorrhage, two patients (9.1%) occured epistaxis, one patient (4.5%) occurred ischemic stroke, one patient (4.5%) occured pump thrombosis, and one patient (4.5%) occured aortic valve thrombosis. The survival rates were 100%, 95%, 95%, and 95% at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years after implantation respectively.Conclusion:The single antithrombotic strategy using warfarin (target INR 2.0-2.5) without antiplatelet for patients with implantations of HeartCon type LVAD may be safe and effective.

The arrival of the era of precision medicine has opened a new diagnosis and treatment model for heart failure (HF), and the development of various omics technologies has also promoted the research and clinical application of HF precision phenotype. HF patients are affected by many factors such as gender, age, height, weight, drugs, valvular disease, etc. At the same time, its disease course is long and complex, and different HF types and stages also affect the treatment and prognosis of patients. Therefore, a variety of new biomarkers are urgently needed in clinic to meet the needs of individualized HF diagnosis and treatment. With the latest advances in epigenetics, proteomics, metabolomics and microbiology, it provides a beneficial complementary effect of "addition" for the study of HF individual heterogeneity. The existing application problems and limitations of various types of markers are discussed. For the future, the integration of all personalized omics data offers unlimited potential for precision medicine in patients with HF.

Objective:To investigate the association between CITP/MMP-1 ratio and the severity of Myocardial fibrosis (MF) in patients with Chronic Heart failure (CHF) and its diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with MF.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to select 110 cases [86 males, (56.60±11.15) years old;24 females, (60.06±12.02) years old] who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiology, Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital from May 18, 2021 to February 30, 2022 and underwent magnetic magnetic examination. Serum CITP and MMP-1 were detected by enzyme-linked immunoassay and CITP/MMP-1 ratio was calculated. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was detected by automatic chemiluminescence analyzer. Anova and non-parametric test were used to compare the difference of indexes among all groups. Spearman analysis was used to analyze the correlation between serum collagen metabolites and the severity of myocardial fibrosis. Logistic regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis, and ROC curve was used to evaluate the auxiliary diagnostic value of related indexes. Major adverse cardiac events within 1 year after discharge were recorded, including cardiogenic death, HF rehospitalization, malignant arrhythmia, and myocardial infarction. The risk factors of poor prognosis were analyzed by Cox regression. Patients were divided by the median value of CITP/MMP-1 ratio or the median value of CITP/MMP-1 ratio and BNP. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier and Log Rank test was performed.Results:Serum MMP-1 and BNP in LGE (+) group were higher than those in LGE (-) group (1.79 ng/ml > 0.91 ng/ml, Z=-2.924; 503 pg/ml > 367 pg/ml, Z=-1.932; P<0.05); The CITP/MMP-1 ratio in the LGE (+) group was lower than that in the LGE (-) group (3.84 < 10.85, Z=-3.601, P<0.001). MMP-1 in CHF with arrhythmia group was higher than that in CHF group (1.98 ng/ml > 1.25 ng/ml, Z=-2.016), while CITP/MMP-1 ratio was lower than that in CHF group (3.25 < 5.73, Z=-2.751), all P<0.05. CITP/MMP-1 ratio in CHF patients was negatively correlated with the severity of MF ( r=-0.363, P<0.001), and BNP and MMP-1 were positively correlated with the severity of MF ( r=0.267, r=0.264, P<0.05). Serum BNP was positively correlated with collagen metabolite MMP-1 and negatively correlated with CITP/MMP-1 ratio (all P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that only CITP/MMP-1 was a predictor of myocardial fibrosis, with an OR value of 0.624 ( P=0.005). ROC curve was used to evaluate serum BNP, MMP-1 and CITP/MMP-1 ratio in the diagnosis of myocardial fibrosis in HF patients, with AUC of 0.653, 0.696 and 0.754, respectively. The accuracy of CITP/MMP-1 ratio in diagnosing fibrosis was better than that of BNP by comparing their AUC, and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-3.808, P<0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that CITP/MMP-1 ≤3.84 was a risk factor for poor prognosis, OR=2.647 ( P=0.009). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 1-year follow-up showed that the survival rate of the group with lower CITP/MMP-1 ratio was significantly lower than that of the group with higher CITP/MMP-1 ratio ( P=0.014). The survival rate of CITP/MMP-1 increased and BNP decreased group was higher than that of CITP/MMP-1 decreased and BNP increased group ( P=0.011). Conclusions:The ratio of CITP/MMP-1 can be used as a negative correlation indicator of the degree of cross-linking, which is better than BNP in the evaluation of MF, and has a good auxiliary diagnostic value for myocardial fibrosis in patients with chronic heart failure, and is expected to become a protective indicator for patients with chronic heart failure and be used in clinical evaluation of myocardial fibrosis. CITP/MMP-1 ratio is associated with the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, and CITP/MMP-1 ≤3.84 can be used as a predictor of prognostic adverse cardiovascular events in CHF patients.

Objective:To investigate the relationship between peripheral blood sST2 level and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HFpEF) complicated with hypertension with ejection fraction preservation.Methods:A total of 122 patients with HFpEF hospitalized in Teda International Cardiovascular Hospital and Baoding First Central Hospital from May 5, 2021 to March 9, 2023 were selected. According to whether they were combined with hypertension, they were divided into HFpEF combined with hypertension group (73 cases, 32 males, (67.56±12.06) years old). There were 41 females (70.61±9.95 years old) and 49 males (67.00±11.64 years old) in the HFpEF group alone. There were 24 female patients (70.12±7.49 years old). sST2 levels in peripheral blood were compared between the two groups.HFpEF patients with hypertension were grouped by hypertension grade and prognosis, and the difference of sST2 in different groups was compared. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. ROC curve to evaluate the diagnostic value of sST2 in the poor prognosis of HFpEF patients with hypertension. Patients were followed up regularly and major adverse cardiac events were recorded within 6 months after discharge, including cardiogenic death and heart failure re-hospitalization. The critical value of poor prognosis diagnosed by sST2 was divided into two groups, survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier,and the Log Rank test was performed. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether high levels of sST2 were a risk factor for poor prognosis after 6 months of follow-up.Results:There was no significant difference in sST2 in HFpEF combined with hypertension and HFpEF alone ( P>0.05). sST2 was higher in grade 2 and 3 than in grade 1 hypertension (23.83 ng/ml vs. 12.68 ng/ml, Z=-2.778, P=0.005; 22.54 ng/ml vs. 12.68 ng/ml, Z=-2.865, P=0.004); BNP was higher in grade 3 hypertension than in grade 1 hypertension (582.95 pg/ml vs. 154.50 pg/ml, Z=-2.101, P<0.05). sST2 and BNP were higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group (30.10 ng/ml vs. 18.95 ng/ml, Z=-2.803; 685.00 pg/ml vs. 347.50 pg/ml, Z=-2.385), all P<0.05. Logistic regression analysis showed that sST2 was a risk factor for poor prognosis ( OR=1.045, P=0.013). The auxiliary diagnostic value of sST2 level in HFpEF patients with hypertension was analyzed by ROC curve (AUC was 0.721, P<0.05). The incidence of cardiac adverse events in sST2>29.12 group was higher than that in sST2≤29.12 group (44.00% vs. 14.58%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=7.657, P=0.006). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the percentage of patients with no endpoint event in the sST2≤29.12 group was higher than that in the sST2>29.12 group ( P=0.003).Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of endpoint event in sST2>29.12 group was 3.879 times that in sST2≤29.12 group ( OR=3.879, P=0.011). Conclusions:sST2 level can be used as an indicator of poor prognosis in HFpEF patients with hypertension, and can be used to stratify the risk of HFpEF patients. High levels of sST2 are associated with major adverse cardiac events.

Objective:To study the correlation between low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P) with other lipoprotein indexes. To explore the correlation between LDL-P and its subgroup particles(LDL1-P—LDL6-P) with the degree of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease(CHD) combining with the result of coronary arteriography. To explore the value of lipoprotein subgroup granules in preventing the severity of coronary artery stenosis in CHD patients.Methods:Cross-sectional study. A total of 259 patients without lipid-lowering drugs for coronary angiography in the department of cardiology of TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital during 3 months from August 2019 to December 2019 were collected, and 52 healthy subjects were recruited during the same period. The level of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and other biochemical indexes were detected by automatic biochemical analyzer. The level of LDL-P and other biochemical indexes were detected by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy(NMRS). The relation between various biomarkers levels with coronary artery stenosis degree was analyzed. Analysis of variance and nonparametric tests were used to compare the differences of indexes among each group. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation among the measured indexes. Logistic regression was used for multi-factor analysis, ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of related indexes.Results:LDL-P was highly correlated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and total cholesterol (TC) ( r= 0.927, P<0.001; r=0.921, P<0.001; r=0.844, P<0.001). LDL-P, LDL4-P, LDL5-P and LDL6-P in patients with severe coronary stenosis were higher than those in patients with mild coronary stenosis( U=4 172.000, Z=4.256, P<0.001; t=2.573, P=0.011; U=3 995.000, Z=4.621, P<0.001; t=5.223, P<0.001), LDL-P and LDL6-P were higher than those of patients with moderate coronary stenosis ( U=1 159.000, Z=2.294, P=0.022; t=2.075, P=0.041). High levels of hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P were risk factors for the degree of coronary stenosis( OR=1.095, P=0.036; OR=1.015, P=0.046; OR=1.012, P=0.039). ROC analysis showed that the AUC of LDL-P, LDL5-P and LDL6-P on coronary stenosis was 0.67, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively. Hs-CRP combined with LDL5-P and LDL6-P had the greatest effect on the degree of coronary stenosis (AUC= 0.70). Conclusions:LDL-P is highly correlated with LDL-C. The levels of LDL-P and LDL6-P were significantly higher in patients with severe stenosis than in patients with mild and moderate stenosis. hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P can be used as new risk factors for the degree of coronary stenosis and may be further used as risk predictors. The combined detection of hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P is helpful for the diagnosis of the severity of coronary stenosis, and may further become risk predictors.

Objective:To study the correlation between low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P) with other lipoprotein indexes. To explore the correlation between LDL-P and its subgroup particles(LDL1-P—LDL6-P) with the degree of coronary artery stenosis in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease(CHD) combining with the result of coronary arteriography. To explore the value of lipoprotein subgroup granules in preventing the severity of coronary artery stenosis in CHD patients.Methods:Cross-sectional study. A total of 259 patients without lipid-lowering drugs for coronary angiography in the department of cardiology of TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital during 3 months from August 2019 to December 2019 were collected, and 52 healthy subjects were recruited during the same period. The level of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and other biochemical indexes were detected by automatic biochemical analyzer. The level of LDL-P and other biochemical indexes were detected by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy(NMRS). The relation between various biomarkers levels with coronary artery stenosis degree was analyzed. Analysis of variance and nonparametric tests were used to compare the differences of indexes among each group. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation among the measured indexes. Logistic regression was used for multi-factor analysis, ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of related indexes.Results:LDL-P was highly correlated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and total cholesterol (TC) ( r= 0.927, P<0.001; r=0.921, P<0.001; r=0.844, P<0.001). LDL-P, LDL4-P, LDL5-P and LDL6-P in patients with severe coronary stenosis were higher than those in patients with mild coronary stenosis( U=4 172.000, Z=4.256, P<0.001; t=2.573, P=0.011; U=3 995.000, Z=4.621, P<0.001; t=5.223, P<0.001), LDL-P and LDL6-P were higher than those of patients with moderate coronary stenosis ( U=1 159.000, Z=2.294, P=0.022; t=2.075, P=0.041). High levels of hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P were risk factors for the degree of coronary stenosis( OR=1.095, P=0.036; OR=1.015, P=0.046; OR=1.012, P=0.039). ROC analysis showed that the AUC of LDL-P, LDL5-P and LDL6-P on coronary stenosis was 0.67, 0.68 and 0.69, respectively. Hs-CRP combined with LDL5-P and LDL6-P had the greatest effect on the degree of coronary stenosis (AUC= 0.70). Conclusions:LDL-P is highly correlated with LDL-C. The levels of LDL-P and LDL6-P were significantly higher in patients with severe stenosis than in patients with mild and moderate stenosis. hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P can be used as new risk factors for the degree of coronary stenosis and may be further used as risk predictors. The combined detection of hs-CRP, LDL5-P and LDL6-P is helpful for the diagnosis of the severity of coronary stenosis, and may further become risk predictors.

（正）Luketich 等[1]2000 年首次报道了胸腹腔镜联合食管癌微创手术（minimally invasive esophagectomy， MIE）病例。随着近 10 多年的发展，食管癌微创外科已经进入一个技术成熟的阶段，能使广大食管癌患者受益。2009 年美国国立综合癌症网络（NCCN）临床指南[2]已将 MIE 列为标准食管癌术式之一。

Objective: To determine the level of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) in patients with heart failure(HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), and to explore its diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with HF and AF. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out to investigate the data of 185 HF patients who were hospitalized between January 2018 and June 2018 in department of cardiology or department of cardiac care unit in TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital. And according to whether they had atrial fibrillation before admission, we categorized patients into: HF with sinus rhythm (HF-SR, n=90) and HF with AF(HF-AF, n=95). Meanwhile, 40 healthy controls were collected. Baseline data of HF-SR and HF-AF groups and plasma sST2 levels in different ejection fraction groups were compared. Plasma sST2 level was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA). Statistical methods such as nonparametric test and Spearman correlation analysis were used. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to evaluate the diagnostic value of sST2 in HF-SR and HF-AF groups. And by using the COX risk model, Multi-factor COX analysis was used to analyze the prognosis of patients. Results: Compared with healthy controls, the median (P₂₅, P₇₅) of Plasma sST2 levels in HF patients increased remarkably [32.93 (20.31-51.39) ng/mL vs 15.99(7.97-22.69) ng/mL, Z=-4.373, P<0.001]. Patients with HF-AF group had significantly higher test results [39.86 (27.20-59.21)] ng/mL than HF-SR group [24.74 (14.83-44.11)] ng/mL, Z=-6.783, P<0.001].In the HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups, the plasma sST2 level of patients in the HF-AF group was higher than that in the HF-SR group (Z=-2.381, P=0.017; Z=-3.701, P<0.001).Spearman correlation analysis showed that, in HF-AF patients, plasma sST2 level was positively correlated with diastolic blood pressure, Hypertension, New York Association (NYHA) cardiac function classification Ⅲ to Ⅳ, white blood count(WBC), and the level of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Υ-glutamine transaminase (Υ-GT), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (r>0, P<0.05).Also, there is a negative correlation between sST2, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (r<0, P<0.05). At ROC analysis, sST2 showed predictive value in both HF-AF and HF-SR group, with an optimal cut-off value of 25.33 ng/mL(AUC 0.872, 95%CI: 0.805-0.935, P<0.001, sensitivity 81.1%, specificity 87.5%) and 23.34 ng/mL(AUC 0.665, 95%CI: 0.570-0.761, P<0.001, sensitivity 55.6%, specificity 77.5%).The AUC of BNP and sST2 in differential diagnosis of HF-SR and HF-AF was 0.604 and 0.699, respectively, and the AUC of sST2 was higher than that of BNP. Multi-factor COX analysis indicated that plasma sST2 level, BNP, NYHA cardiac function grading could be risk factors for cardiac events in HF patients. Plasma sST2, left atrial diameter (LA-D), and associated cardiomyopathy are risk factors for cardiac events in patients with HF-AF. The incidence of cardiac events in HF patients with sST2≥20.31 ng/mL was significantly higher than that of patients with sST2<20.31 ng/mL (χ²=7.625, P=0.006). The incidence of cardiac events in HF-AF patients with plasma sST2≥39.86 ng/mL was significantly higher than that in patients with sST2<39.86 ng/mL (χ²=4.287, P=0.038). Conclusions The plasma sST2 level in patients with HF-AF is significantly higher than that both in HF-SR and healthy controls. The diagnostic value of plasma sST2 in patients with HF-AF is higher than that in patients with HF-SR. It is suggested that sST2 are more valuable for the differential diagnosis of HF-SR, HF-AF than BNP. HF-AF Patients with plasma sST2 ≥ 39.86 ng/mL are prone to cardiovascular events.

Objective To investigate the diagnosis and prognosis value of plasma microRNA-30d (miR-30d)in acute coronary syndrome(ACS)patients.Methods It retrospectively recruited 170 cases of ACS patients from TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital between September 2011 to February 2012, including 70 STEMI(male 54,female 16), 52 NSTEMI(male 34,female 18),48 UAP(male 29,female 19).At the same time,41 healthy controls(male 24,female 17)were enrolled into the study.Plasma miR-30d levels were determined by real-time quantitative PCR.In order to evaluate the dynamic change of miR-30d and other cardiac biomarkers,20 plasma samples of AMI patients were collected at 0-3 h,4-6 h,7-9 h, 10-12 h after pectoralgia.ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used to investigate clinical value of miR-30d in ACS.Results At 0-3 h after pectoralgia, miR-30d were significant higher in STEMI 7.208(0.170-11 070.735)and NSTEMI 7.989(0.836-151.391)than the controls 1.561(0.044-17.520)（Z1＝-5.792,Z2 ＝-6.113,P＜0.001）, but there were no statistic differences between UAP 1.073 （0.051-11.095）patients and the controls（Z＝-0.325,P＝0.745）.In 20 AMI patients,miR-30d levels peaked at 4-6 h and then dropped following 7-9 h, both earlier than cTnI, and the variation tendency was positive correlated with cTnI（r＝0.402,P＜0.01）.At 0-3 h after pectoralgia, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity of miR-30d for differentiating AMI and UAP were 0.882（95％ CI:0.830-0.935）,0.795（95％CI:0.711-0.861）and 0.854（95％ CI:0.716-0.935）respectively.When combined miR-30d and cTnI, the diagnostic AUC and specificity were 0.937（95％ CI: 0.902-0.972）and 0.937（95％ CI:0.818-0.984）,both enhanced when compared with miR-30d or cTnI alone.Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that there were no significant correlations between the miR-30d levels and MACE in both 30 days and 12 months（χ$lt@span sup=1$gt@2$lt@/span$gt@＝0.506,P＝0.477 and χ$lt@span sup=1$gt@2$lt@/span$gt@＝0.002, P＝0.963 respectively）.Conclusion Plasma miR-30d may be used as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis, but not prognosis in ACS patients.