Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective To develop and empirically validate the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale to verify its reliability and validity,and to provide a reference for the management practice of organizational resilience in medical and health communities.Methods The health system resilience framework and the dual resilience analysis framework were used as the content framework of this scale,and the initial scale was formed by literature review reference and interviews,and two rounds of correspondence to 21 experts were conducted to form the County Medical and Health Community Organizational Resilience Evaluation Scale.In October-November 2023,the medical staff of six medical and health communities in Zhejiang Province were sampled to conduct the survey,and SPSS 25.0 software was applied to process the data.Results The internal consistency Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.97,and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.67～0.92(P＜0.001);the folded half reliability was 0.95,and the alpha coefficients of the two parts were 0.94.The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO was 0.95,and that each dimension of the constructed Organizational Resilience Scale and the total score of the scale were positively correlated with the total score of the Strategic Flexibility Scale(P＜0.01).Conclusion The Organizational Resilience Measurement Scale designed has good reliability and reference value,and may provide a tool for assessing organizational resilience in county medical and health communities in the future.

Objective:To explore the influencing factors and implementation paths of medical and preventive integration of chronic disease in county medical communities (CMCs), providing references for further promoting the integration of medical and prevention and improving the collaborative mechanism of medical and prevention.Methods:From October to November 2023, based on the principle of geographically balanced sampling, medical staff from 6 leading hospitals and 18 other member units of 6 CMCs in Zhejiang Province were selected as survey subjects. A self-designed survey questionnaire was conducted, mainly including the development and evaluation of chronic disease medical and preventive integration services in CMCs. The service development was designed according to the collaborative symbiosis management model, including 4 dimensions of collaborative symbiosis scenarios, willingness, ability, and process, as well as 11 secondary elements. Using secondary elements as the conditional variables and the integration effect of chronic disease medical and prevention as the outcome variable, a qualitative comparative analysis method was used to explore the relationship between multiple conditional variables and their combinations with high integration effect of chronic disease medical and prevention.Results:571 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective response rate of 96.62%. The consistency of a single secondary element(including conditional non sets) on the high effectiveness of medical and preventive integration was less than 0.9, which cannot constitute a necessary condition for explaining the outcome variable. The configuration analysis results showed that the consistency of the condition combination formed by the interaction of multiple secondary elements was 0.835-0.845, indicating that the condition combination of multiple elements constituted a sufficient non necessary condition for the high integration effect of chronic disease medical and prevention. The configuration path for achieving high integration of medical and preventive effects could be divided into four categories, among which the feature of scenario-process dominance was to create a perfect service scenario and service process as the main focus; The characteristic of the willingness-process dominant type was to stimulate the service willingness of medical staff and improve the service process as the leading factor; The characteristic of the scenario-willingness-ability dominant type was to create a comprehensive service scenario, stimulate the service willingness of medical staff, and enhance service capabilities as the main focus; The characteristic of the willingness-ability-process dominant type was to stimulate the service willingness of medical staff, enhance service capabilities, and improve the service process as the dominant factor. In addition, the four types of configuration paths mentioned above all covered the two secondary elements of endogenous dynamics and professional competence, with a total coverage of 0.626 and a total consistency of 0.821.Conclusions:The configuration path formed through the interaction of multiple elements can effectively achieve the integration of chronic disease medical and prevention. The CMCs should choose the appropriate configuration path based on the actual situation. In addition, special attention should be paid to the endogenous motivation and professional capacity building of medical staff.

Objective:To construct a primary health care institutions performance evaluation index system from the perspective of health value orientation under the background of countywide medical alliances construction.Methods:From May 2021 to February 2022, preliminary screening was made on core performance evaluation indexes via literature review; purposive sampling was used to select the dean/vice dean, persons in charge of medical service, and those in charge of public health service responsible for performance evaluation at the community health service center. Then semi-structured interviews were made on the existing performance evaluation and assessment plans as well as existing problems of primary medical and health institutions. Based on the " input-process-output" performance evaluation model, the thematic framework analysis method was used to analyze the interview data, and combined with literature research results, a preliminary performance evaluation index system for primary medical and health institutions was built under the guidance of health value. From March to May 2022, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to evaluate the importance and operability of indexes. The threshold method was used to screen indexes, and analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of evaluation indexes.Results:The health value oriented performance evaluation index system for primary healthcare institutions included 3 first-level indexes, 9 second-level indexes, and 50 third-level indexes. The first-level indexes were output (0.377 3), input (0.336 3), and process (0.286 4) in descending order of weight. The top three weighted second-level indexes were health manpower(0.177 8), health literacy and health outcomes (0.157 6), as well as responsiveness and satisfaction (0.142 6). The third-level indexes included 17 medical indexes, 16 prevention indexes, and 17 medical prevention integration indexes. The top three weighted indexes for inpatient services were resident satisfaction with medical treatment (0.052 4), medical staff satisfaction (0.050 1), and responsiveness of residents seeking medical treatment (0.040 1); The top three weighted third-level indexes excluding inpatient services were resident satisfaction with medical treatment (0.052 4), medical staff satisfaction (0.050 1), and surplus funds used for personnel incentives (0.045 5).Conclusions:The performance evaluation index system of primary health care institutions built under the health value orientation is scientific, conducive to promoting the health-orientated transformation and improving the efficiency of primary health care services.