Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection for right colon cancer.Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted.The clinical data of 85 patients with right colon cancer who were admitted to the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University from August 2013 to February 2019 were collected.There were 56 males and 29 females,aged from 29 to 84 years,with an average age of 60 years.All patients underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer,named right hemicolon D3 + complete mesocolic excision,and received infection prevention and total parenteral nutrition treatment after surgery.According to clinical pathological staging of guideline issued by National Comprehensive Cancer Network,patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy within 1 year after surgery.Observation indicators:(1) treatment status;(2) postoperative pathological examination;(3) follow-up.Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination,telephone interview and mail every 3 months within 1 year after surgery,every 6 months from 1 to 3 years after surgery,and once a year from 3 to 5 years after surgery up to March 2019.The postoperative tumor metastasis and survival of patients were obtained.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Count data were expressed as absolute number.Survival rates were calculated using life-table method.Results (1) Treatment status:85 patients underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted right hemicolon D3 + complete mesocolic excision successfully.The operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time for postoperative outof-bed activities,time to recovery of gastrointestinal function,time to liquid diet intake were (178±28) minutes,(85±33) mL,(2.9± 1.8) days,(3.1 ± 2.7) days,(3.9± 1.9) days,respectively.There was no perioperative death.Eleven patients had postoperative complications including 5 of anastomotic leakage,2 of anastomotic bleeding,2 of pulmonary infection,1 of gastric emptying disorder and 1 of incomplete intestinal obstruction;they were cured and discharged after conservative treatment.All the 85 patients received postoperative infection prevention and total parenteral nutrition support,including 64 receiving systemic intravenous chemotherapy with 6 -8 cycles of FOLFOX or XELOX,7 receiving 6-8 cycles of oral capecitabine,and 14 receiving no chemotherapy.(2) Postoperative pathological examination:the number of harvested lymph nodes was 20± 11 and 25 had lymph node metastasis.The length of proximal and distal cutting edge of the specimens was (16±5) cm and (9±5)cm,respectively.There was no cancerous cell on the cutting edge.High-differentiated adenocarcinoma,moderatedifferentiated adenocarcinoma,moderate-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma,low-differentiated adenocarcinoma,mucinous adenocarcinoma,tubular combined with mucinous adenocarcinoma were detected in 2,40,14,16,9,4 patients,respectively.There were 8,28,24,5,12,8 patients in Ⅰ stage,Ⅱ A stage,Ⅱ B stage,Ⅱ C stage,ⅢB stage,Ⅲ C stage of TNM staging,respectively.(3) Follow-up:85 patients were followed up for 1-67 months,with a median follow-up time of 19 months.During the follow-up,1 of 85 patients had liver metastasis at 14 months after surgery and had survived after radiofrequency ablation treatment up to the end of follow-up.Three cases died of abdominal tumor metastases,1 of which in Ⅱ C stage died at 32 months after surgery,1 in Ⅲ B stage died at 4 months after surgery and 1 in Ⅲ B stage died at 16 months after surgery.The 1-,3-year overall survival rates were 97.1％ and 94.0％,respectively.Conclusion Da Vinci robot-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer is safe and feasible,with good short-and long-term outcomes.

Da Vinci robotic surgery for gastric cancer has been performed and accepted gradually in domestic and abroad,due to the advantages of defibrillation,three dimensional (3D) view and flexible,precise,stable operation.However,its indication is controversy,surgical process,lymphadenectomy,digestive reconstruction need to be further regulated.There is lack of prospective case-control study of large sample on short and long term efficacy.Therefore,problems and strategies in the Da Vinci robotic surgery for gastric cancer should be analyzed and evidence-based researches should be strengthened to provide tangible and credible evidence for the Da Vinci robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Objective: To explore the technical characteristics and short-term clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) for patients with low rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) rigid colonoscopy showed lower margin of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge; (2) preoperative rectal MRI or endorectal ultrasound revealed staging T1-2, or T3 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy; (3) patients less than 70 years old with good function of anal sphincter before surgery; (4) no synchronous multiple primary carcinoma, and no distant metastasis; (5) the method of operation was agreed by the patient. Exclusion criteria: (1) T4 stage tumors; (2) sphincter dysfunction before operation; (3) recurrent tumors; (4) lower edge of tumors beyond the dentate line; (5) death due to non-rectal cancer during follow-up and unsatisfactory follow-up data. The clinical data of 21 patients with low rectal cancer meeting inclusion criteria undergoing robotic-assisted ISR at our department from January 2015 to June 2018 were collected. Parameters during and after operation were observed. Anorectal manometry was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, and anal function was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after the closure of the stoma by Kirwan classification and Wexner fecal incontinence score. The key steps of the operation are as follows: according to the principle of total mesorectal excision, the robot continued to enter into the levator ani hiatusdistally, and dissectin the sphincter space; according to the scope of sphincter resection, ISRwas divided into partial ISR, subtotal ISR, and total ISR; subtotal and total ISR usually needed to be combined with transanal pathway. The reconstruction of digestive tract was performed by double stapler anastomosis under laparoscope orhand-sewnanastomosis under direct vision, and preventive ileostomy was completed in the right lower abdomen. Results: Of 21 patients, 13 were male and 8 were female with mean age of (57.5±16.3) years. All the patients successfully completed the operation without conversion to laparotomy. Fourteen cases (66.7%) adopted partial ISR through complete transabdominal approach, 6 cases (28.6%) adopted the subtotal ISR through combined transabdominal and transanal approachs, and 1 case (4.8%) adopted the total ISR through the combined transabdominal and transanal approachs. The total operation time was (213.1±56.3) minutes, including (27.3±5.4) minutes for mechanical arm installation and (175.7±51.6) minutes for robotic operation. The amount of intraoperative hemorrhage was (62.8±23.2) ml, and no blood transfusion was performed in any patient. All patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and the stoma was closed 3-6 months after the operation. Except one case of anastomotic leakage, all other stomas were closed successfully. The postoperative hospitalization time was (7.6±2.2) days, and time to fluid intake was (3.3±0.9) days. One case of anastomotic leakage, one case of anastomotic stenosis, one case of inflammatory external hemorrhoids and one case of urinary retention occurred after surgery,and all of them were cured by conservative treatment. The mean diameter of tumors was (2.9±1.2) cm, and the number of harvested lymph node was 12.8 ± 3.3. In the whole group, the circumcision margin was negative, the proximal margin was (12.2 ± 2.1) cm, the distal margin was (1.1 ± 0.4) with all negative, and the R0 resection rate was 100%. The results of anorectal manometry showed that the preoperative rest pressure, rectal maximum squeeze pressure, initial sensory volume and maximum tolerated volume were (45.19±8.46) mmHg, (128.18±18.80) mmHg, (44.33±10.11) ml and (119.00±19.28) ml, respectively;these parameters reduced significantly 3 months after operation and they were (23.44±5.54) mmHg, (93.72±12.15) mmHg, (17.72±5.32) ml and (70.44±10.9) ml, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). The resting pressure and the rectal maximum squeeze pressure returned to preoperative levels 12 months after operation, which were (39.33±6.64) mmHg and (120.58±16.47) mmHg, respectively (both P>0.05), while the initial sensory volume and the maximum tolerated volume failed to reach the preoperative state, which were (30.67±7.45) ml and (92.25±10.32) ml, respectively (both P<0.05). The patients were followed up for (22.1±10.6) months without local recurrence and distant metastasis. Eighteen patients were evaluated for anal function: Kirwan classification was grade I for 6 cases, grade II for 7 cases, grade III for 4 cases, and grade IV for 1 case; Wexner incontinence score was 8.6±0.8; 14 cases had good defecation control. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of ISR with Da Vinci robot in the treatment of low rectal cancer is satisfactory.

Objective To explore the technical characteristics and short?term clinical efficacy of robotic ? assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) for patients with low rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) rigid colonoscopy showed lower margin of the tumor≤5 cm from the anal verge; (2) preoperative rectal MRI or endorectal ultrasound revealed staging T1?2, or T3 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy; (3) patients less than 70 years old with good function of anal sphincter before surgery; (4) no synchronous multiple primary carcinoma, and no distant metastasis; (5) the method of operation was agreed by the patient. Exclusion criteria: (1) T4 stage tumors;(2) sphincter dysfunction before operation; (3) recurrent tumors; (4) lower edge of tumors beyond the dentate line; (5) death due to non?rectal cancer during follow?up and unsatisfactory follow?up data. The clinical data of 21 patients with low rectal cancer meeting inclusion criteria undergoing robotic?assisted ISR at our department from January 2015 to June 2018 were collected. Parameters during and after operation were observed. Anorectal manometry was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, and anal function was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after the closure of the stoma by Kirwan classification and Wexner fecal incontinence score. The key steps of the operation are as follows: according to the principle of total mesorectal excision, the robot continued to enter into the levator ani hiatusdistally, and dissectin the sphincter space; according to the scope of sphincter resection, ISRwas divided into partial ISR, subtotal ISR, and total ISR; subtotal and total ISR usually needed to be combined with transanal pathway. The reconstruction of digestive tract was performed by double stapler anastomosis under laparoscope orhand?sewnanastomosis under direct vision, and preventive ileostomy was completed in the right lower abdomen. Results Of 21 patients, 13 were male and 8 were female with mean age of (57.5 ± 16.3) years. All the patients successfully completed the operation without conversion to laparotomy. Fourteen cases (66.7%) adopted partial ISR through complete transabdominal approach, 6 cases (28.6%) adopted the subtotal ISR through combined transabdominal and transanal approachs, and 1 case (4.8%) adopted the total ISR through the combined transabdominal and transanal approachs. The total operation time was (213.1±56.3) minutes, including (27.3±5.4) minutes for mechanical arm installation and (175.7±51.6) minutes for robotic operation. The amount of intraoperative hemorrhage was (62.8 ± 23.2) ml, and no blood transfusion was performed in any patient. All patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and the stoma was closed 3?6 months after the operation. Except one case of anastomotic leakage, all other stomas were closed successfully. The postoperative hospitalization time was (7.6±2.2) days, and time to fluid intake was (3.3± 0.9) days. One case of anastomotic leakage, one case of anastomotic stenosis, one case of inflammatory external hemorrhoids and one case of urinary retention occurred after surgery,and all of them were cured by conservative treatment. The mean diameter of tumors was (2.9±1.2) cm, and the number of harvested lymph node was 12.8 ± 3.3. In the whole group, the circumcision margin was negative, the proximal margin was (12.2 ± 2.1) cm, the distal margin was (1.1 ± 0.4) with all negative, and the R0 resection rate was 100%. The results of anorectal manometry showed that the preoperative rest pressure, rectal maximum squeeze pressure, initial sensory volume and maximum tolerated volume were (45.19±8.46) mmHg, (128.18±18.80) mmHg, (44.33±10.11) ml and (119.00±19.28) ml, respectively;these parameters reduced significantly 3 months after operation and they were (23.44±5.54) mmHg, (93.72±12.15) mmHg, (17.72±5.32) ml and (70.44 ± 10.9) ml, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). The resting pressure and the rectal maximum squeeze pressure returned to preoperative levels 12 months after operation, which were (39.33±6.64) mmHg and (120.58±16.47) mmHg, respectively (both P>0.05), while the initial sensory volume and the maximum tolerated volume failed to reach the preoperative state, which were (30.67±7.45) ml and (92.25±10.32) ml, respectively (both P<0.05). The patients were followed up for (22.1±10.6) months without local recurrence and distant metastasis. Eighteen patients were evaluated for anal function: Kirwan classification was grade I for 6 cases, grade II for 7 cases, grade III for 4 cases, and grade IV for 1 case; Wexner incontinence score was 8.6 ± 0.8; 14 cases had good defecation control. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of ISR with Da Vinci robot in the treatment of low rectal cancer is satisfactory.

Objective To explore the technical characteristics and short?term clinical efficacy of robotic ? assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) for patients with low rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) rigid colonoscopy showed lower margin of the tumor≤5 cm from the anal verge; (2) preoperative rectal MRI or endorectal ultrasound revealed staging T1?2, or T3 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy; (3) patients less than 70 years old with good function of anal sphincter before surgery; (4) no synchronous multiple primary carcinoma, and no distant metastasis; (5) the method of operation was agreed by the patient. Exclusion criteria: (1) T4 stage tumors;(2) sphincter dysfunction before operation; (3) recurrent tumors; (4) lower edge of tumors beyond the dentate line; (5) death due to non?rectal cancer during follow?up and unsatisfactory follow?up data. The clinical data of 21 patients with low rectal cancer meeting inclusion criteria undergoing robotic?assisted ISR at our department from January 2015 to June 2018 were collected. Parameters during and after operation were observed. Anorectal manometry was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, and anal function was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after the closure of the stoma by Kirwan classification and Wexner fecal incontinence score. The key steps of the operation are as follows: according to the principle of total mesorectal excision, the robot continued to enter into the levator ani hiatusdistally, and dissectin the sphincter space; according to the scope of sphincter resection, ISRwas divided into partial ISR, subtotal ISR, and total ISR; subtotal and total ISR usually needed to be combined with transanal pathway. The reconstruction of digestive tract was performed by double stapler anastomosis under laparoscope orhand?sewnanastomosis under direct vision, and preventive ileostomy was completed in the right lower abdomen. Results Of 21 patients, 13 were male and 8 were female with mean age of (57.5 ± 16.3) years. All the patients successfully completed the operation without conversion to laparotomy. Fourteen cases (66.7%) adopted partial ISR through complete transabdominal approach, 6 cases (28.6%) adopted the subtotal ISR through combined transabdominal and transanal approachs, and 1 case (4.8%) adopted the total ISR through the combined transabdominal and transanal approachs. The total operation time was (213.1±56.3) minutes, including (27.3±5.4) minutes for mechanical arm installation and (175.7±51.6) minutes for robotic operation. The amount of intraoperative hemorrhage was (62.8 ± 23.2) ml, and no blood transfusion was performed in any patient. All patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and the stoma was closed 3?6 months after the operation. Except one case of anastomotic leakage, all other stomas were closed successfully. The postoperative hospitalization time was (7.6±2.2) days, and time to fluid intake was (3.3± 0.9) days. One case of anastomotic leakage, one case of anastomotic stenosis, one case of inflammatory external hemorrhoids and one case of urinary retention occurred after surgery,and all of them were cured by conservative treatment. The mean diameter of tumors was (2.9±1.2) cm, and the number of harvested lymph node was 12.8 ± 3.3. In the whole group, the circumcision margin was negative, the proximal margin was (12.2 ± 2.1) cm, the distal margin was (1.1 ± 0.4) with all negative, and the R0 resection rate was 100%. The results of anorectal manometry showed that the preoperative rest pressure, rectal maximum squeeze pressure, initial sensory volume and maximum tolerated volume were (45.19±8.46) mmHg, (128.18±18.80) mmHg, (44.33±10.11) ml and (119.00±19.28) ml, respectively;these parameters reduced significantly 3 months after operation and they were (23.44±5.54) mmHg, (93.72±12.15) mmHg, (17.72±5.32) ml and (70.44 ± 10.9) ml, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). The resting pressure and the rectal maximum squeeze pressure returned to preoperative levels 12 months after operation, which were (39.33±6.64) mmHg and (120.58±16.47) mmHg, respectively (both P>0.05), while the initial sensory volume and the maximum tolerated volume failed to reach the preoperative state, which were (30.67±7.45) ml and (92.25±10.32) ml, respectively (both P<0.05). The patients were followed up for (22.1±10.6) months without local recurrence and distant metastasis. Eighteen patients were evaluated for anal function: Kirwan classification was grade I for 6 cases, grade II for 7 cases, grade III for 4 cases, and grade IV for 1 case; Wexner incontinence score was 8.6 ± 0.8; 14 cases had good defecation control. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of ISR with Da Vinci robot in the treatment of low rectal cancer is satisfactory.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 377 cases of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and 301 cases of open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection at the Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University from January 2004 to June 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were followed up until September 2015. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications and long-term survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSCompared with conventional open group, laparoscopic group was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss [(125±89) ml vs. (290±161) ml, t=-15.942, P=0.000], shorter time to oral intake [(2.9±0.7) days vs. (4.1±1.6) days, t=-12.120, P=0.000], quicker bowel function retum[(2.7±1.4) days vs. (3.6±1.6) days, t=-7.804, P=0.000], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(7.7±3.6) days vs. (10.1±4.1) days, t=-8.107, P=0.000]. In addition, there were no significant differences in the operative time[(207±57) minutes vs. (202±43) minutes, P>0.05], number of retrieved lymph nodes(33±13 vs. 31±15, P>0.05), resection margin length(P>0.05) between two groups. The postoperative complication morbidity in laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in open group[7.2%(22/377) vs. 12.6%(38/301), χ(2)=5.762, P=0.016]. Within perioperative period, 7 patients underwent operation again due to complication and 1 case died of peritoneal bleeding in laparoscopic group; 6 patients underwent re-operation and 2 cases died of peritoneal infection with hepatic failure and lung infection with respiratory failure. During the median follow-up of 86 months (range from 3-140 months), relapse occurred in 171(45.4%) patients and 183(48.5%, among them, 156 cases died of primary disease) patients died in laparoscopic group; relapse occurred in 140(46.5%) patients and 151(50.2%, among them, 127 cases died of primary disease) patients died in open group. The difference in overall 5-year survival rate between two groups was not statistically significant (51.5% vs. 49.8%, χ(2)=0.142, P=0.706). No significant difference was seen in 5-year disease-free survival rate (49.1% vs. 47.8%, χ(2)=0.062, P=0.803). Stratified analysis based on TNM stage also showed no significant difference in 5-year overall or disease-free survival rate(both P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer has better short-term efficacy and similar long-tern efficacy as compared to open surgery.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Defecation ; Disease-Free Survival ; Gastrectomy ; methods ; Gastroenterostomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Node Excision ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

Da Vinci robotic surgical system have some advantages of defibrillation,three-dimensional (3D) view and flexible operation,and it has been gradually applied in radical gastrectomy,colorectal cancer radical resection,complex hepatic resection,biliary tract surgery,partial resection of pancreas and pancreaticoduodenectomy in the fiell of digestive surgery,with satisfactory clinical efficacy.Compared with traditional laparoscopic and open operations,Da Vinci robotic surgical system is more precise and flexible,with advantages of minimal invasion and good application value,however,longer operation time,expensive surgery cost and indefinite long-term efficacy of malignant tumor need to be further improved.

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer with the advantages of slight pain,micro-invasive trauma and fast recovery has been accepted gradually by most surgeons and increasingly used in the field of surgery.However,how to establish a standardized laparoscopic surgery procedure for gastric cancer and improve the operation skills need to be solved urgently.Meanwhile,a reliable technical support of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer should be provided by controlling strictly the operation indications,standardizing surgical procedures,building a standardized training system,improving perioperative management and applying enhanced recovery program in patients with gastric cancer,and it will provide greater benefits to more and more patients.

OBJECTIVETo assess the effect of radical laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy(LG) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODSClinical data of 340 gastric cancer patients with COPD undergoing radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University between January 2010 and October 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes for the 262 patients with COPD who underwent LG(LG group) were compared with those of 78 patients with COPD who underwent open gastrectomy(OG group). During LG, pneumoperitoneum was maintained at an insuffiation pressure of 8 mmHg to 10 mmHg. The primary endpoint was postoperative pulmonary complication(PPC). To predict factors related to PPC, univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were carried out.

RESULTSIntraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LG group [(131.2±14.7) ml] than in the OG group [(246.7±49.0) ml; t=-13.445, P=0.000], but operation time was significantly longer [(220.4±19.1) min vs. (194.2±31.5) min; t=6.877, P=0.000]. The findings showed PPC to be significantly less frequent in the LG group(5.3%,14/262) than in the OG group (15.4%, 12/78)(χ(2)=8.581, P=0.003). The severity of COPD was independent risk factor for PPC(P=0.031, HR=1.456, 95%CI:1.306-1.789). No independent predictor of PPCs was found in type of operative approach (open vs laparoscopic; P=0.126).

CONCLUSIONThe LG procedure with insuffiation pressure of pneumoperitoneum is tolerated for gastric cancer patients with mild or moderate COPD.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Feasibility Studies ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ; complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery

Objective To assess the effect of radical laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LG) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Clinical data of 340 gastric cancer patients with COPD undergoing radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University between January 2010 and October 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes for the 262 patients with COPD who underwent LG (LG group) were compared with those of 78 patients with COPD who underwent open gastrectomy (OG group). During LG, pneumoperitoneum was maintained at an insuffiation pressure of 8 mmHg to 10 mmHg. The primary endpoint was postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC). To predict factors related to PPC, univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were carried out. Results Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the LG group [(131.2±14.7) ml] than in the OG group [(246.7±49.0) ml;t=-13.445, P=0.000], but operation time was significantly longer [(220.4±19.1) min vs. (194.2±31.5) min;t=6.877, P=0.000]. The findings showed PPC to be significantly less frequent in the LG group(5.3%,14/262) than in the OG group (15.4%, 12/78)( X2=8.581, P=0.003). The severity of COPD was independent risk factor for PPC(P=0.031, HR=1.456, 95%CI:1.306-1.789). No independent predictor of PPCs was found in type of operative approach (open vs laparoscopic; P=0.126). Conclusion The LG procedure with insuffiation pressure of pneumoperitoneum is tolerated for gastric cancer patients with mild or moderate COPD.