OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of the combined anteversion angle technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS) affecting the hip joint. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 73 patients with AS affecting the hip joint who underwent THA between August 2018 and August 2021. According to whether the combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA, the patients were divided into study group (37 cases, combined anteversion angle technique was used in THA) and control group (36 cases, traditional THA). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, range of motion (ROM), acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral anteversion angle, and combined anteversion angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The Harris score and hip ROM were compared between the two groups before operation, at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, acetabular component abduction angle, and component combined anteversion angle were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: The operation time in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no intraoperative complication such as acetabular and proximal femoral fractures, neurovascular injuries in both groups, and the incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2-3 years, with an average of 2.4 years; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as hip dislocation, wound infection, delayed wound healing, deep venous thrombosis, and hip dislocation in both groups. The hip Harris score and ROM of the two groups gradually increased with time after operation, and the differences were significant when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); the above two indicators of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group at each time point after operation ( P<0.05). Extensive bone ingrowth on the surface of the components could be observed in the anteroposterior X-ray films of the hip joint of the two groups at 12 months after operation, and the acetabular components was stable without femoral stem subsidence, osteolysis around the components, and heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, the acetabular component anteversion angle, femoral component anteversion angle, and component combined anteversion angle in the study group were significantly superior to those in the control group ( P<0.05), except that there was no significant difference in the acetabular component abduction angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION For patients with AS affecting the hip joint, the use of the combined anteversion angle technique during THA effectively promotes the recovery of hip joint function and enhances the postoperative quality of life of patients when compared to traditional THA.
Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods* ; Hip Dislocation/surgery* ; Spondylitis, Ankylosing/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome ; Hip Joint/surgery* ; Hip Prosthesis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the single Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with anterograde channel screw technique for the treatment of acetabular transverse and posterior wall fractures. METHODS: Between March 2020 and October 2022, 17 cases of acetabular transverse and posterior wall fractures were treated with the single Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with anterograde channel screw technique. There were 11 males and 6 females, with an average age of 53.6 years (range, 42-64 years). Causes of injury included traffic accident in 12 cases, and falling from height in 5 cases. The time from injury to operation ranged from 4 to 16 days with an average of 8.8 days. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy frequency were recorded; X-ray films were reviewed regularly after operation to observe the fracture healing, and postoperative complications were recorded. At last follow-up, Matta score was used to evaluate the reduction of fracture, Harris score and modified Merle D'Aubigné-Postel scores system were used to evaluate the hip joint function. RESULTS: The operation time was 150-230 minutes (mean, 185.9 minutes), the intraoperative blood loss was 385-520 mL (mean, 446.2 mL), and the fluoroscopy frequency was 18-34 times (mean, 27.5 times). Postoperative fat liquefaction occurred in 1 case and the other incisions healed by first intention; 3 cases had limb numbness after operation, and the symptoms disappeared after active symptomatic treatment; no urogenital system and intestinal injury occurred. All patients were followed up 12-28 months (mean, 19.9 months). Bone union was achieved in all cases with an average healing time of 10.8 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). There was no complication such as loosening and breakage of internal fixators. At last follow-up, according to Matta score, 12 cases achieved anatomic reduction, 3 satisfactory reduction, and 2 fair reduction, the satisfactory rate was 88.2%; according to Harris hip function score, 12 cases were excellent, 3 good, and 2 fair, the excellent and good rate was 88.2%; according to the modified Merle D'Aubign Aubigné-Postel scoring system, the results were excellent in 11 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 3 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 82.4%. CONCLUSION The single Kocher-Langenbeck approach combined with anterograde channel screw technique is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of acetabular transverse and posterior wall fractures with less complications, simple operation, and satisfactory effectiveness.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Fractures, Bone/surgery* ; Acetabulum/injuries* ; Bone Screws ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Humans ; Acetabulum ; Consensus ; Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/therapy* ; Hip Joint ; Treatment Outcome ; China

Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Surgical Wound Infection/etiology* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology*

Humans ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Recovery of Function

INTRODUCTION: A significant treatment gap has been observed in patients with osteoporosis. Our previous audit found a 31.5% rate of anti-osteoporosis medication initiation after fragility fractures at one year. We piloted the use of telecarers to monitor osteoporosis treatment and compliance. METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2018, all hip fracture patients at Changi General Hospital, Singapore, were automatically enrolled into the Health Management Unit valued care hip fracture programme. Telecarer calls were scheduled at discharge, 3, 6 and 12 months. We assessed the acceptability, completion and treatment rates of patients enrolled in this programme. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients with a hip fracture were enrolled in the telecarer programme over one year. Their average age was 79.8 ± 8.23 years, and 63.1% of them were female. A total of 341 patients completed 12 months of follow-up, of which 251 (73.6%) patients were on treatment at 12 months. The most common cause of lack of initiation of secondary osteoporosis treatment was patient or family rejection (34.4%), followed by physician failure to prescribe (24.4%) and renal impairment (24.4%). 16.7% of patients were deemed to have advanced dementia with a life-limiting illness and were, thus, deemed unsuitable for treatment. CONCLUSION Telecarers may be a useful adjunct in the monitoring of osteoporosis treatment after hip fractures in an elderly population. The main limitations are patient or family rejection and physician inertia. Further studies should focus on a combination of interventions for both patients and physicians to increase awareness of secondary fracture prevention.
Humans ; Female ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Male ; Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy* ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use* ; Osteoporosis/drug therapy* ; Hip Fractures/etiology* ; Secondary Prevention

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative day 1 (POD 1) mobilisation is a key clinical indicator for the fragility hip fracture surgery population. This study aimed to evaluate the current trends of POD 1 mobilisation at our institution and to review the relationships between early mobilisation and outcomes of early functional recovery, length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination. METHODS: In this preliminary observational study, data pertaining to demographics, premorbid function, health status, injury and surgical factors, POD 1 mobilisation status and clinical outcomes of interest were retrieved from eligible patients. Patients who attained POD 1 ambulation formed the early ambulation (EA) group, while the remaining patients formed the delayed ambulation (DA) group. Data were analysed for any significant difference between the groups. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The rate of patients achieving at least sitting out of bed on POD 1 was 80.0% (n=92), which was comparable to the data available from international hip fracture audit databases. There were 55 (47.8%) patients in the EA group and 60 (52.5%) patients in the DA group. The EA group was approximately nine times more likely to achieve independence in ambulation at discharge compared to the DA group (adjusted odds ratio 9.20, 95% confidence interval 1.50-56.45; P = 0.016). There were observed trends of shorter LOS and more proportion of home discharge in the EA group compared to the DA group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION This is the first local study to offer benchmark of the POD 1 mobilisation status for this population. Patients who attained POD 1 ambulation had better early functional recovery.
Humans ; Early Ambulation ; Patient Discharge ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Hip Fractures/surgery* ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Length of Stay

Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery* ; Risk Factors ; Patients ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects*

Humans ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects* ; Reoperation ; Prosthesis-Related Infections ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To explore the related factors of femoral stem anteversion (FSA) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), so as to provide reference for clinical design of FSA before operation and reduce the risk of hip dislocation after arthroplasty. METHODS: Ninty-three patients (103 hips) who underwent THA between October 2021 and September 2022 and met the selection criteria were selected as the study subjects. Among them, there were 48 males and 45 females with an average age of 58.5 years (range, 25-88 years). Body mass index was 18.00-37.84 kg/m ², with an average of 24.92 kg/m ². There were 51 cases (57 hips) of osteonecrosis of femoral head, 35 cases (39 hips) of hip osteoarthritis, and 7 cases (7 hips) of congenital hip dysplasia. Based on CT images, the following indicators were measured: preoperative femoral neck anteversion (FNA), preoperative femoral rotation angle (FRA), preoperative acetabular anteversion (AA), and preoperative combined anteversion (CA; the sum of preoperative FNA and AA); postoperative FSA and the change in femoral anteversion angle (the difference between postoperative FSA and preoperative FNA). Based on preoperative X-ray films, the following indicators were measured: femoral cortical thickness index (CTI) and canal flare index (CFI), the proximal femoral medullary cavity was classified according to Noble classification (champagne cup type, normal type, chimney type), neck-shaft angle (NSA), and femoral offset (FO). Pearson correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and Point-biserial correlation analysis were used to investigate the correlation between postoperative FSA, postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle, and patient diagnosis, proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy type, gender, age, as well as preoperative FNA, FRA, AA, CA, NSA, FO, CTI, and CFI. FSA was used as the dependent variable and the independent variables that may be related to it were included for multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Based on CT image measurement, preoperative FNA was (15.96±10.01)°, FRA (3.36±10.87)°, AA (12.94±8.83)°, CA (28.9±12.6)°, postoperative FSA (16.18±11.01)°, and postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle was (0.22±9.98)°. Based on preoperative X-ray films measurements, the CTI was 0.586±0.081; the CFI was 4.135±1.125, with 23 hips classified as champagne cup type, 68 hips as normal type, and 12 hips as chimney type in the proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy; NSA was (132.87±7.83)°; FO was (40.53±10.11) mm. There was no significant difference between preoperative FNA and postoperative FSA ( t=-0.227, P=0.821). Pearson correlation analysis showed that postoperative FSA was positively correlated with preoperative FNA, preoperative CA, postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle, and age ( P<0.05), while negatively correlated with preoperative FRA ( P<0.05). The postoperative change in femoral anteversion angle were positively correlated with preoperative FRA and postoperative FSA ( P<0.05), and negatively correlated with preoperative CA and FNA ( P<0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis showed that the above two indicators were not correlated with diagnosis and the proximal femoral medullary cavity anatomy type ( P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a linear correlation between FSA and FNA, CA, age, and FRA ( F=10.998, P<0.001), and the best fit model was FSA=0.48×FNA-2.551. CONCLUSION The factors related to FSA after THA include patient's age, preoperative FNA, CA, FRA and postoperative femoral anteversion, of which preoperative FNA is the most closely related. When designing a surgical plan before surgery, attention should be paid to the patient's preoperative FNA, and if necessary, CT around the hip joint should be scanned to gain a detailed understanding of the proximal femoral anatomical structure.
Female ; Male ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Femur/diagnostic imaging* ; Femur Neck ; Femur Head ; Hip Joint