Objective To predict the radiation impact of discharging wastewater containing uranium within the specified limit generated during the normal operation of a new production line at a nuclear fuel plant on the receiving water body and its downstream, and to provide a reference for the management of radioactive liquid effluent discharge from nuclear facilities. Methods Based on the technical guidelines for environmental impact assessment, literature on radiation environmental impact assessment, and data collected from on-site investigations, appropriate hydrological parameters and prediction models were selected to analyze and predict the variation pattern of radioactive nuclide uranium along the receiving water body and the radiation exposure of nearby residents. Results The maximum increase in uranium concentration in the receiving water body and its downstream caused by the discharge of uranium-containing wastewater was 1.14 μg/L. The maximum predicted concentration was 2.75 μg/L after adding the background data of the water body. The resulting maximum individual annual effective dose for the public was 1.49 × 10⁻⁴ mSv/a. Conclusion The maximum predicted uranium concentration in the receiving water body and its downstream is lower than the uranium concentration limit of 30 μg/L specified in the Standards for Drinking Water Quality (GB 5749-2022). The maximum individual annual effective dose for the public is much lower than the control value of 0.2 mSv/a specified in the Radiation Protection Regulations for Uranium Processing and Fuel and Fuel Manufacturing Facilities (EJ 1056-2018). The radiation impact is acceptable.

Objective:To analyze the effectiveness of radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with an intermediate and high risk of recurrence.Methods:The clinical data of 709 cases of PTC, comprising 226 men and 483 women, who underwent surgical treatment for thyroid cancer at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from Oct. 2010 to Jan. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether RAI treatment was performed after initial surgery or not, they were divided into a RAI group (253 cases with intermediate risk and 209 cases with high risk) and a non-RAI group (147 cases with intermediate risk and 100 cases with high risk), and the relationship between RAI treatment and clinicopathological characteristics such as sex, age, and tumor size for intermediate- and high-risk PTC was analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test and Logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the recurrence-free survival rate. Results:The treatment rate of intermediate-risk PTC RAI was 63.25% (253/400) and that of high-risk PTC RAI was 67.64% (209/309). Univariate analysis of intermediate-risk PTC showed that age, bilateral tumors, lymph node metastasis stage, number of lymph node metastases, and intermediate-risk PTC RAI treatment were closely related (all P values <0.05). Multi-factor regression analysis of intermediate-risk PTC showed that age ≥ 55 ( OR=0.282, P=0.005), lymph node metastasis stage N1b ( OR=19.245, P<0.001), and the number of lymph node metastases ≤ 5 ( OR=0.322, P<0.001) were independent predictors of RAI treatment for intermediate-risk PTC (all P values < 0.05). The recurrence-free survival curve for intermediate-risk PTC showed a lower recurrence-free survival rate in the RAI group than in the non-RAI group, but the difference was borderline significant ( P=0.049). Univariate analysis of high-risk PTC showed that age, multifocal tumors, bilateral tumors, lymph node metastasis stage, number of lymph node metastases and high-risk PTC RAI treatment were strongly associated (all P values <0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis for high-risk PTC showed that age ≥ 55 ( OR=0.382, P=0.020), bilateral tumors ( OR=2.173, P=0.030), lymph node metastasis stage N1b ( OR=11.215, P<0.001), and the number of lymph node metastases ≤5 ( OR=0.389, P=0.004) were independent predictors of RAI treatment for high-risk PTC patients (all P values <0.05). The recurrence-free survival curve for high-risk PTC showed a lower recurrence-free survival rate in the RAI group than in the non-RAI group, however, the difference was not statistically significant ( P=0.07) . Conclusions:No significant benefit was observed with RAI treatment for intermediate- and high-risk PTC and rigorous screening of eligible patients is recommended.

Evoked Potentials ; Social Isolation ; Attention ; Humans

Ultrasonic therapy technology is a research hotspot in the field of biomedicine,and the quality control and regulatory requirements for the ultrasonic physiotherapy equipment are also increasing.Based on this,the working principle and structure of ultrasonic physiotherapy equipment were analyzed,and a calibration method of ultrasonic physiotherapy equipment was proposed from the aspects of ultrasonic output power,effective radiation area and acoustic working frequency,etc.,aiming at its main measurement parameters,so as to provide technical reference for its measurement performance evaluation.Two ultrasonic physiotherapy equipment produced by different manufacturers were selected and tested to analyze the calibration results.The results showed that the calibration results were scientific and reasonable,highly operational,and in line with national standards,which can provide technical reference for metrology technical institutions to carry out related work.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs. Results: The overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Conclusion Using 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs. Results: The overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Conclusion Using 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs. Results: The overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Conclusion Using 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs. Results: The overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Conclusion Using 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs. Results: The overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Conclusion Using 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.

Objective To construct and validate a risk prediction model for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance (FI) in patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage based on machine learning algorithms. Methods The clinical data of 485 patients with cerebral hemorrhage admitted to the neurological intensive care unit of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into training set (n=339) and validation set (n=146) in a 7 to 3 ratio. Five machine learning algorithms were used to construct FI risk prediction models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the model with the best predictive performance was selected based on the area under the curve (AUC). A nomogram model was constructed based on the optimal model. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the calibration and clinical net benefit of the nomogram model. Results The incidence of enteral nutrition FI in patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage was 38.4%(186/485). Among the five machine learning algorithm models, the Logistic regression model had the best predictive performance(AUC=0.88). The analysis results of the Logistic regression model showed that the use of diuretics, mechanical ventilation, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤5, vasoactive drugs, and albumin level<35 g/L were risk factors for enteral nutrition FI in patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage. A nomogram model was further constructed based on these five risk factors. The calibration curve analysis showed that the calibration curve fitted well with the ideal curve, indicating a high calibration degree of the nomogram model. The DCA results showed that when the threshold probability was 5% to 73%, the application of the nomogram model for screening could clinically benefit patients. Conclusion The construction of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of enteral nutrition FI in patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage based on machine learning methods can help to early screen high-risk patients for enteral nutrition FI and timely formulate preventive measures, thereby reducing the incidence of enteral nutrition FI in patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage.