OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare ectasia and pseudoectasia in post-myopic LASIK patients presenting with corneal topographic changes indicative of ectasia using the Ectasia Risk Factor Score System (ERFSS).

Single-center retrospective comparative case series of a consecutive chart review of cases in 18 years who underwent bilateral myopic-LASIK and showed topographic changes indicative of ectasia.

Four patients were included. Group 1: pseudoectasia eyes, consisting of two patients with bilateral pseudoectasia, and Group 2: ectasia eyes, consisting of two patients with unilateral ectasia. The clinical course of the cases was discussed and compared based on the ERFSS parameters: topography pattern, residual stromal bed thickness, age, preop thinnest cornea, and pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) manifest refraction (MR). Group 1 scored zero to low risk for developing ectasia while Group 2-eyes with ectasia scored moderate risk. The predictive value of the ERFSS was 1 in this study.

The ERFSS is a good measure in deciding the suited treatment plan for patient undergoing refractive procedure. Knowing the clinical course of ectasia and pseudoectasia is helpful in the therapeutic approach since pseudoectasia is reversible when identified and managed early as seen in this study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the refractive absolute error when axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and keratometry (K) are sourced from different measuring devices (IOL Master vs a combination of automated keratometer and A-scan) and inputted into the Barrett Universal II or SRK/T formula.

This was a retrospective study. Medical charts of eyes that underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with in-the-bag implantation of Envista or multifocal FineVision IOL were reviewed. The results of manifest refraction at 1 month after surgery were collected. The predicted refraction corresponding to the IOL power implanted was collected from 4 IOL sheets: using the SRK/T with AL, ACD, and K from IOL Master (Group A); SRK/T formula with AL and ACD from A-scan and K from the automated keratometer (Group B); Barrett formula with AL, ACD and K from IOL Master (Group C); and Barrett formula using with AL, ACD from A-scan and K from automated keratometer. For each group, the absolute error, prediction error, and variances of prediction error were computed.

A total of 132 eyes were included in the study: 56 in the monofocal group and 76 in the multifocal group. The means of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) were 0.06 ± 0.38 D and –0.08 ± 0.31 D in the monofocal and multifocal groups, respectively. When AL and K were obtained from various sources and entered into the Barrett formula, the mean absolute error difference in both the monofocal (p = 0.70) and multifocal (p = 0.10) groups did not reach statistical significance. If the SRK/T formula was used, similar outcomes were observed (monofocal p = 0.97; multifocal p = 0.37). When compared to A-scan groups, the prediction error variances are significantly smaller in the groups that used the IOL Master as their data source. Among the four groups, the Barrett group using IOL Master as the data source showed the lowest overall variation of prediction error (monofocal F = 0.04; multifocal F = 0.03).

Though the refractive outcomes may not be statistically different, using the IOL Master as the source of AL and K makes the refractive outcomes more consistent and predictable. Combining the AL and K from the IOL Master with the Barrett Universal II formula further increases the predictability of refractive outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare ectasia and pseudoectasia in post-myopic LASIK patients presenting with corneal topographic changes indicative of ectasia using the Ectasia Risk Factor Score System (ERFSS). Methods: Single-center retrospective comparative case series of a consecutive chart review of cases in 18 years who underwent bilateral myopic-LASIK and showed topographic changes indicative of ectasia. Results: Four patients were included. Group 1: pseudoectasia eyes, consisting of two patients with bilateral pseudoectasia, and Group 2: ectasia eyes, consisting of two patients with unilateral ectasia. The clinical course of the cases was discussed and compared based on the ERFSS parameters: topography pattern, residual stromal bed thickness, age, preop thinnest cornea, and pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) manifest refraction (MR). Group 1 scored zero to low risk for developing ectasia while Group 2-eyes with ectasia scored moderate risk. The predictive value of the ERFSS was 1 in this study. Conclusion The ERFSS is a good measure in deciding the suited treatment plan for patient undergoing refractive procedure. Knowing the clinical course of ectasia and pseudoectasia is helpful in the therapeutic approach since pseudoectasia is reversible when identified and managed early as seen in this study.
Dilatation, Pathologic

Objective: To compare the visual performance and patient-reported outcomes of three types of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) with different asphericities. Methods: This cross-sectional, comparative study comprised of 62 pseudophakic eyes divided into three groups corresponding to the IOL that they were previously implanted with (Tecnis ZCB00 negative aspheric IOL, EnVista MX60 neutral aspheric IOL and Akreos Adapt spheric IOL). Mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), best-corrected far visual acuity (BCVA), spherical aberration (SA), contrast sensitivity (SC), halo and starburst, and responses to a qualitative questionnaire (NEI-RQL) were measured. Results: There was no significant difference in MRSE (P=0.74) and BCVA (P=0.52) among the three groups. There was a statistically significant difference (P=0.00) in mean internal (lens) SA, measured through a 5mm pupil, among Tecnis (-0.150 μm), EnVista (+0.022 μm) and Akreos Adapt (+0.094 μm). Compared to the Akreos Adapt, the Tecnis and EnVista groups had significantly better CS at 6 CPD and 12 CPD under mesopic testing without glare (P= 0.01) and at 6 CPD mesopic testing with glare (P=0.04). Halo scores were insignificant among the three groups. However, starburst scores were significantly worse in the Akreos Adapt IOL than the Tecnis and EnVista (P=0.01). There was no difference in questionnaire responses among the three groups. Conclusion The negative aspheric and neutral aspheric lenses showed significantly lower SA resulting in better CS in mesopic conditions and better starburst scores. MRSE, BCVA and subjective satisfaction were statistically similar regardless of the type of monofocal intraocular lens
Contrast Sensitivity

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes of eyes implanted with one of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, comparative, non-interventional study wherein subjects implanted with FineVision Micro F, AT LISA tri 839MP or AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal IOL after phacoemulsification were recruited. Manifest refraction, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity (VA) at distance, intermediate and near vision, contrast sensitivity, modulated transfer function (MTF) values and questionnaire answers were compared among the 3 groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Fifty-seven (57) eyes were included in the study: 21 eyes with FineVision (group A), 21 eyes with LISA tri (group B), and 15 eyes with PanOptix IOL (group C). The post-operative mean manifest spherical equivalent was -0.01D, -0.07D, and 0.05D, respectively (p=0.083). Uncorrected distance VA and best-corrected distance VA were similar among the groups. Groups A and C had better uncorrected and corrected intermediate VA at 80 cm and at 60 cm compared to group B. Group A had significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity than groups B and C (p=0.032). Mesopic contrast sensitivity testing showed group C had higher contrast sensitivities without glare in at the spatial frequency of 6 CPD (p=0.038) and with glare at 3 CPD (p=0.039) and at 12 CPD (p=0.009). MTF average height analysis showed that the group A had significantly superior resolution in far targets compared to groups B and C (p=0.001). At near targets, groups A and C had better resolutions compared to group B (p=0.017). There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction for far, intermediate and near VA among the groups. CONCLUSION: Eyes implanted with any of the 3 trifocal IOL designs achieved excellent uncorrected and bestcorrected distance, intermediate and near vision. FineVision and PanOptix provided significantly better intermediate vision than LISA tri at both 80 cm and 60 cm testing distance. FineVision had better near visual outcomes than PanOptix and LISA tri. Patient satisfaction was high in all 3 trifocal IOLS
Lenses, Intraocular ; Vision, Ocular

Objectives: To do report the incidence of capsular changes in Crystalens-implanted eyes and analyze the indications and outcomes of yag capsulotomy. Methods: We reviewed the records of 411 eyes of 258 patients implanted with the Crystalens IOL. Capsular change indications for yag capsulotomy were posterior capsular opacification (PCO), lens tilt, and capsular striae. Eyes in each indication were further subdivided into therapeutic yag (TY) and prophylactic yag (PY) groups. Outcomes before and after yag capsulotomy were analyzed. Results: Ninety of 411 crystalens-implanted eyes (22%) had undergone yag capsulotomy. Sixty-one eyes had PCO, 12 had lens tilt, and 17 had striae. Twenty-seven eyes belonged to the therapeutic (TY) and 63 eyes to the prophylactic (PY) yag subgroups. The mean interval between phacoemulsification and yag capsulotomy was 10 months. In the TY PCO subgroup, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) changed from 20/40 pre-yag to 20/25 post-yag, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) from J3 to J2, manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) from -0.43D to -0.2D. In the TY tilt subgroup, UDVA changed from 20/50 to 20/30, UNVA was unchanged at J2, and MRSE from -1.21D to -0.89D. In the TY striae group, UDVA changed from 20/50 to 20/30, UNVA from J3 to J2, and MRSE from 0.62D to -0.4D. In the PY PCO subgroup, UDVA was unchanged at 20/25, UNVA unchanged at J2, and MRSE changed from -0.52D to -0.47D. In the PY tilt subgroup, UDVA changed from 20/25 to 20/20, UNVA unchanged at J2, and MRSE changed from -0.87D to -0.45D. In the PY striae subgroup, UDVA was unchanged at 20/30, UNVA changed from J3 to J2, and MRSE changed from -0.62D to -0.7D. Conclusion Capsular changes occurred after Crystalens implantation that necessitated yag capsulotomy. Once vision has deteriorated, a therapeutic yag treatment can help improve vision. If capsular changes have occurred but vision has not deteriorated, a prophylactic yag capsulotomy can stabilize visual and refractive outcomes.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses ; YAG capsulotomy

Objective: To determine if vitamin supplementation can prevent the development of color vision abnormalities in patients taking ethambutol as part of DOTS for tuberculosis (TB). Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted among newly diagnosed category-1 TB patients enrolled in DOTS health centers in the third district of Manila from June 2011 to August 2012. Before starting therapy, the participants underwent a complete eye evaluation including baseline color vision tests using the Ishihara Color Vision Plates (Ishihara), Farnsworth Panel D-15 (FD 15), and Lanthony Desaturated D-15. Only subjects who passed the three color vision tests were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group A received vitamin supplementation and Group B received a placebo. Follow-up color vision testing was done monthly for 3 months. Results: There were 105 patients included in the study, 77 males and 28 females, age ranging from 16 to 68 years with a mean of 37 years. Forty three (43) patients received vitamin supplementation (group A) and 62 received placebo (group B). After one month of DOTS, 5 of 43 patients (11. 6%) in group A and 10 of 62 patients (16.1%) in group B developed color vision abnormalities, detected only with the Lanthony Desaturated test. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) of color vision abnormalities by vitamin supplementation was 4.5%, with the number needed to treat (NNT) of 23. After the second month of therapy, ARR was 7.4% and NNT was 14. ARR was highest in the third month at 8.3%, with a corresponding decreased NNT of 12. Among patients who developed color vision abnormalities, reversal of the abnormalities was observed in 80% of 5 subjects in group A, and 40% of 10 patients in group B. By the third month of treatment, all in group A already had normal color vision, while 40% in group B still showed abnormal color vision. Conclusion This study showed that vitamin supplementation was effective in reducing the risk of, and in reversing cases of, color vision abnormalities among patients undergoing DOTS therapy for tuberculosis.
Tuberculosis ; Ethambutol ; Color Vision ; Optic Neuritis

Objective: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of eyes implanted with the Crystalens HD and the Crystalens AO intraocular lens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 159 eyes of 100 patients implanted with the Crystalens HD IOL and 108 eyes of 66 patients implanted with the Crystalens AO IOL. Visual and refractive outcomes preoperatively and postoperatively were assessed and compared between the lenses. Results: At 1 year, uncorrected distance VA was 20/30 in 78% of eyes in the HD and 76% of eyes in the AO groups. Uncorrected intermediate VA was 20/30 in 90% of eyes in both groups. Uncorrected near VA was J3 in 92% in the HD and 90% in the AO groups. Comparing the two groups, the difference in uncorrected distance (p=0.60), intermediate (p=0.77), and near (p=0.64) vision was not statistically significant. Spherical equivalent was -0.42D +/-0.51D in the HD and -0.6 +/-0.48D in the AO groups (p=0.10). Conclusion Refractive outcomes were similar between the Crystalens HD and AO groups. Mild myopic refractive outcomes were targeted and achieved in both lens groups. These refractive outcomes provided good uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near vision postoperatively.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Objective: To compare the predictability of flap thickness, visual and refractive outcomes, and higher order aberrations in eyes that underwent myopic LASIK using either a Technolas femtosecond laser or a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome for flap creation. Methods: The study involved a total of 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent LASIK. Flap creation was randomized to using the Technolas femtosecond laser in one eye and Zyoptix XP microkeratome in the contralateral eye. Flap thickness was measured intraoperatively using ultrasonic pachymetry and postoperatively using the Visante ASOCT. Refractive outcome, visual acuity (VA), higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were compared between the two groups. Results: Twenty-two patients had LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism. Using ultrasonic pachymetry intraoperatively, the mean flap thickness was 134 (±10) um and 124 (±23) um in the femtosecond (FS) and microkeratome (MK) groups respectively. Comparing the deviation of the actual from the intended flap thickness, the FS group had statistically lower standard deviation compared to the MK group (p=0.04). Using the AS-OCT, the mean flap thickness at 3 months postoperatively was 119 (±10.82) um and 123 (±15.77) um in the FS and MK groups respectively. The difference in standard deviation between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (p=0.19). The mean spherical equivalent at 3 months was -0.45D (±0.42) and -0.13D (±0.16) respectively. Eightynine percent (89%) of eyes had uncorrected VA of 20/20 or better in both groups. All eyes attained best corrected VA of 20/20 or better in both groups. Differences in total higher order aberrations (p=0.09) and contrast sensitivity scores (p=0.47) were not statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion Flap thickness predictability was better using the Technolas femtosecond laser compared to the XP microkeratome blade. Visual and refractive outcomes, higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were comparable between the 2 groups.
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; Lasers, Excimer

Objective: We compared the efficacy, safety, refractive and visual outcomes, and aberrometry results of wavefront-guided aspheric treatment (WTA) versus wavefront-guided treatment (WT). Methods: This prospective, contralateral, comparative study included 60 eyes of 30 patients who underwent myopic LASIK. One eye of each patient was randomized to either WTA or WT. Patients were followed up for 3 months postoperatively. Two-tailed paired t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Results: At 3 months, 93% of eyes in the WTA group and 83% in the WT group had high-contrast uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20, while 87% in both groups achieved low-contrast UDVA of 20/40 or better. Sixty-four percent in the WTA gained 1 or more lines of low-contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) compared to 50% in the WT group. The mean sphere was 0.17D in the WTA and 0.14D in the WT (p = 0.63). The mean spherical equivalent was –0.04D for WTA and –0.03D for WT (p = 0.88). All eyes in both groups were within ±1.00D of the target emmetropia. The mean change in total higher-order aberration (HOA) was 0.07 μm in the WTA compared to 0.15 μm in the WT group (p = 0.04). The mean change in spherical aberration was –0.01 μm in the WTA and 0.18 μm in the WT group (p < 0.001). The mean change in Q value was significantly lower in the WTA (0.31) than in the WT group (0.63) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Wavefront aspheric LASIK (WTA) is a safe and effective treatment for myopic astigmatism. Refractive and visual outcomes were similar for both groups. WTA had less induction of higher-order aberration, lower spherical aberration, and better preservation of corneal asphericity (Q value). This translated to more lines of low-contrast vision gained compared to WT. Keywords: LASIK, Wavefront-guided, Aspheric, Spherical aberration, higher-order aberration, Corneal curvature
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ