Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib for the treatment of newly treated and relapsed refractory (R/R) lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) /Waldenstr?m macroglobulinemia (WM) .Methods:Retrospectively collected clinical data of 98 cases of newly treated and R/R LPL/WM patients who received ibrutinib treatment at the Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 2016 to June 2023, and analyzed their efficacy and safety.Results:A total of 98 LPL/WM patients were included, which consisted of 45 newly treated patients and 53 R/R patients. Of these, 74 were males (75.5%) and the cohort had a median age of 64 (42-87) years. Eighty-eight patients were eligible for efficacy evaluation with a median treatment time of 20.8 (2.1-55.0) months, a major remission rate (MRR) of 78.4%, and an overall response rate (ORR) of 85.2%. The MRR and ORR of the newly treated patients were 78.4% and 86.5%, respectively, whereas the MRR and ORR of the R/R patients were 78.4% and 84.3%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in MRR and ORR between the initial treatment and R/R patients (all P values >0.05) . The median follow-up period was 29.1 (2.9-50.3) months and the median overall survival time for newly treated and R/R patients was not reached. The median progression-free survival time was 23.5 (95% CI 10.5-36.5) months and 45.0 (95% CI 34.0-56.0) months, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (all P values >0.05) . There were 25 deceased patients and no deaths were related to ibrutinib treatment. The main adverse reactions of ibrutinib were thrombocytopenia (5.1%) , pneumonia (8.1%) , and hyperuricemia (21.4%) . The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 2.0%. Conclusion:Ibrutinib exhibits good efficacy and safety for newly treated and R/R LPL/WM patients.

Humans ; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia/genetics* ; East Asian People ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Lymphoma

Humans ; Prognosis ; Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis* ; Neoplasm Staging ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies

Objective:To investigate the clinical and pathological features, treatment, and prognosis of gray zone lymphoma (GZL) .Methods:From July 2, 2013, to February 10, 2021, the clinical and pathological features, treatment, and outcomes of five patients with GZL at the Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were studied retrospectively.Results:There were one male and 4 females, with a median age of 28 (16-51) years at diagnosis. Four patients had mediastinal (thymic) involvement, two of which had superior vena cava obstruction syndrome, and 3 patients had extra-nodal involvement. There was one case with a limited Ann Arbor stage and 4 cases with a progressive stage. Three patients had cHL-like pathomorphology with scattered Hodgkin-like cells, strongly positive for CD20, positive for CD30, and CD15 was negative; the other two patients had both cHL and DLBCL morphology, with some areas resembling Hodgkin cells and some areas resembling immunoblasts, strongly positive for CD30, and CD15 but negative CD20. Two patients were treated with cHL-like regimens for induction and achieved only partial remission; after salvage therapy with enhanced DLBCL-like regimens, all achieved complete remission (CR) . Three patients were treated with enhanced DLBCL-like immunochemotherapy regimens for induction, and two patients were effective, one of whom achieved CR. Four patients who did not achieve CR were given second or third-line salvage therapy, and all of them recovered. One patient lost parity, one died of disease progression at 35.9 months after diagnosis, and the remaining three maintained sustained remission.Conclusions:GZL is uncommon, usually affects younger patients, is mediastinal and is diagnosed using path morphology and immunophenotype. Patients with newly diagnosed GZL appear to be more sensitive to DLBCL-like immunochemotherapy regimens; relapsed or refractory patients were tended with non-cross-resistant combination chemotherapy or with new drugs.

Objective:This retrospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, in the management of relapse/refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R cHL) .Methods:A total of 35 patients with R/R cHL who received treatment at the Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College from September 2016 to December 2020 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 17 patients received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PD-1 inhibitor group), while 18 patients received a combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy (PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group). Clinical data and follow-up information were retrospectively analyzed, and survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.Results:The median age of the 35 patients with R/R cHL was 29 years (range: 11-61 years), with 54.3% being male. According to the Ann Arbor staging system, 62.9% of patients presented with advanced (stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ) disease, and 48.6% had extranodal involvement. Before PD-1 inhibitor therapy, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range: 1-3). Objective responses were observed in 28 patients, including 22 complete response (CR) cases, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 80.0% and a CR rate of 62.9%. Specifically, the ORR and CR rates were 64.7% and 58.8%, respectively, in the PD-1 inhibitor group and 94.4% and 66.7%, respectively, in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group. Among the 18 patients who underwent sequential autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) [13 CR and five partial response (PR) cases], eight patients received PD-1 inhibitor therapy after auto-HSCT as consolidation therapy. All patients maintained a CR status after transplantation, and they exhibited significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates compared with those who did not undergo sequential auto-HSCT (4-year PFS rates: 100% vs 53.5% ; P=0.041). The incidence of immune-related adverse events was 29%, with only one patient experiencing grade≥3 adverse reactions, which indicated a favorable safety profile for the treatment approach. Conclusions:PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy demonstrates notable efficacy and sustained response in patients with R/R cHL. PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improve response rates. Additionally, for salvage therapy-sensitive patients, consolidation treatment with PD-1 inhibitors after auto-HSCT exhibits the potential for prolonging PFS.

Objective:To study the clinical, histopathological, and genetic features of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) with IRF4 rearrangement.Methods:Six patients presenting at our center between December 2017 and October 2021 were evaluated by pathological examination, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing. The relevant literature was reviewed.Results:①The study sample included three males and three females with a median age of 33 years. Three tumors were in the tonsils, two in the lymphoid nodes, and one in the dorsal lump. All patients were treated using the RCDOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) regimen. All of them were alive at the time of follow-up in November 2021. ②Microscopic examination showed an entirely follicular pattern in one case and an entirely diffused pattern in 5 cases. The tumor cells were medium to large, and most of the lesions were dilatative with brisk mitotic activity ( n=five cases) and no starry sky pattern ( n=6 cases) . ③Four cases exhibited a GCB phenotype, and the other two exhibited a non-GCB phenotype. All of the cases were positive for CD20, PAX-5, MUM, and BCL6, and negative for CD5. Moreover, CD10, BCL2, and c-MYC were positive in 4, 3, and 2 cases, respectively.④IRF4 gene rearrangement was identified in all cases, BCL6 gene rearrangement was detected in 5 cases, and 2 cases were positive. BCL2 and MYC gene rearrangement were performed in 5 cases, all negative. ⑤Three paraffin tissue samples were used for next-generation sequencing, and lymphoma-related gene mutations such as IRF4, TP53, IGLL5, and MYD88 were detected in 3 cases. Conclusions:LBCL with IRF4 rearrangement is a rare entity with unique clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics. This entity’s pathogenesis, treatment options, and long-term prognosis still need to be explored further.

Objective:The study aims to explore the clinical and biological characteristics of patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) .Methods:The clinical data of 340 patients with LPL admitted to the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College were collected retrospectively, including 23 cases of the non-IgM LPL and 317 cases of the Waldenstr?m's macroglobulinemia (WM) , from July 1993 to August 2020. The clinical and biological characteristics of the two groups were compared.Results:Among 23 patients with the non-IgM type LPL, two patients secreted monoclonal IgA, 14 patients secreted monoclonal IgG, and seven patients did not secrete monoclonal immunoglobulin. The median age of the non-IgM LPL and WM were both 62 (35-81) years old. Compared with the WM group, the proportion of women (56.5% vs 27.3%, P=0.007) , the proportion of splenomegaly (60.1% vs 43.8%, P=0.100) , and the proportion of extranodal invasion (21.7% vs 12.3%, P=0.672) in non-IgM LPL group were higher. Eighteen patients were tested for MYD88 gene mutation, and the overall mutation rate of MYD88 was 55.6%. In the non-IgM LPL group, a total of 17 patients received treatment, which had a comparable proportion (94.4% vs 92.7%, P=0.488) to the WM group. Sixteen patients were evaluated for efficacy, and the overall remission rate of the first-line treatment was 87.5%. The median follow-up time was 33.9 (3.5-125.1) months, and the median PFS and OS were both not reached. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 71.4% and 68.9%, respectively. In the WM group, the median PFS was 66.2 months and the median OS was 78.1 months. Compared with the WM group, in the non-IgM group no significant differences in PFS ( P=0.340) and OS ( P=0.544) were seen. Conclusion:The clinical and biological characteristics of the non-IgM LPL and WM patients were similar. However, the proportion of women and extranodal involvement were higher in the non-IgM LPL group. The survival and prognosis of the non-IgM LPL patients were similar to those of the WM patients.

Objective:To summarize the phenotype and genotype of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) patients, and compare the phenotype and genotype characteristics between children and adult patients.Methods:The comprehensive clinical data of 30 patients with X-ALD admitted to Beijing Jingdu Children′s Hospital and the First Medical Center of People′s Liberation Army General Hospital from August 2012 to December 2019 were analyzed, including their clinical manifestations and the results of gene test, biochemical test and magnetic resonance imaging examination, etc.Results:Among the 30 patients, 15 (50.0%) were childhood cerebraI ALD (CCALD, onset age 5－10 yeas, mean 7 years), 13 (43.3%) were adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN, onset age 21－41 yeas, mean 29 years). One (3.3%) was adult cerebral ALD (onset age 29 yeas), one (3.3%) was pure Addison disease (onset age 3.5 yeas). Most common clinical phenotype in children was CCALD and the first symptoms were inattention, learning ability decline, vision and hearing impairment. Otherwise the most common type in adult was AMN and the first symptoms were mainly progressive weakness of the lower limbs, muscle spasm, and abnormal gait. These patients came from 29 different families, among whom, 25 patients conducted gene test and 22 different types of ABCD1 gene mutations were found. Missense mutation was the main gene mutation type. Patients with different clinical types had no specificity in gene mutation types.Conclusions:In China, the most common clinical classification of X-ALD in children is CCALD, and AMN in adults. No clear correlation has been found between genotype and phenotype.