Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.

Objective:To explore the role of using methacholine challenge test（MCT）to detect airway responsiveness in standardized drug treatment management of asthma in children and adolescents.Methods:A total of 64 children diagnosed with moderate to severe persistent asthma from August 2010 to May 2021 at the Pediatric Asthma Clinic of the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University，who received standardized pharmacotherapy for 2 years，were selected and divided into a discontinued group（31 cases）and a continued group（33 cases）.The clinical value of lung function indicators，fractional exhaled nitric oxide（FeNO）values，and MCT results for evaluating and predicting the treatment effect of asthma in children and adolescents before and after treatment were analyzed.Results:The percentage of the expected value of forced expiratory volume in one second（FEV 1）before treatment discontinued group was higher than that in the continued group，and the difference was statistically significant（ F=7.283， P=0.009）.After standardized treatment for 6 months，1 year，and 2 years，the percentage of the expected value of FEV 1 in the discontinued group（ F=3.045， P=0.036）and continued group（ F=17.485， P<0.001）was significantly higher than that before treatment.There was no statistically significant difference in FeNO between the two groups before treatment（ F=0.298， P=0.587）.By treated for 6 months（ F=6.568， P=0.013），1 year（ F=4.317， P=0.042），and 2 years（ F=8.737， P=0.004），the FeNO levels of continued group were significantly higher than those of the discontinued group，with statistical significance.After treatment for 2 years，the PD 20 of the discontinued group was（1.702 ± 0.906）mg，while the PD 20 of the continued group was（1.184 ± 0.924）mg.The result was a significant difference between the two groups（ t=2.263， P=0.027）. Conclusion:Airway hyperresponsiveness of asthma patients persists，and the time for asthma to achieve clinical symptom control and inflammation improvement is earlier than that when airway responsiveness reaches the ideal level.In the long-term treatment and management of asthma，the clinical value of airway responsiveness assessment is relatively important.

Allergen immunotherapy(AIT)is an effective treatment for allergic diseases that have been used for more than a century.At present, AIT is administered in two main ways: subcutaneous immunotherapy(SCIT)and sublingual immunotherapy(SLIT), which aims to induce immune tolerance to allergens and provide long-term clinical benefit to patients.The effectiveness of AIT has been confirmed and the research on its mechanism has been deepened, and AIT combined with biological agents has been widely used in clinical practice.

Objective:To analyze the efficacy and safety of Omalizumab (OMA) combined with allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on children with allergic asthma.Methods:Clinical data of 43 children with allergic asthma from the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between August 2018 and October 2022, who were managed by OMA combined with double mite subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) were retrospectively analyzed, including 30 males and 13 females with the age of 5-15 years.Twenty children with allergic asthma who were managed by the monotherapy for SCIT during the same period, including 16 males and 4 females with the age of 4-13 years were included in the control group(group1: conventional immunotherapy; group2: cluster immunotherapy). Among the 43 cases managed by OMA combined with SCIT, 20 were treated with OMA, followed by AIT (OMA-AIT group), and 23 were treated with AIT, followed by OMA (AIT-OMA group). Notably, 6 cases in AIT-OMA group who were additionally given OMA due to the difficulty in increasing doses were subgrouped in AO1 group, and 17 who were additionally given OMA due to poor control of asthma or comorbidities during the course of AIT and frequent adverse events were subgrouped in AO2 group.The number of asthma exacerbations within 1 year and during the combination therapy, the Childhood Asthma Control Test/Asthma Control Test (C-ACT/ACT) findings, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for grading rhinitis, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosage converted to budesonide equivalent, the Total Medication Score (TMS), comorbidities, lung function [percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV 1% pred), percent-predicted peak expiratory flow(PEF%pred), percent-predicted maximal mild-expiratory flow(MMEF%pred)], exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), completion of the initial SCIT and adverse effects [local adverse reactions (LRs) and systemic adverse reactions (SRs)] were analyzed for assessing the efficacy and safety of OMA combined with AIT on children with allergic asthma.The t-test of two independent samples was used for comparison of measurement data that followed normal distribution.Wilcoxon′s test was used for non-normally distributed between-group comparisons.The χ2 test was used for the between-group comparison of counting data. Results:(1)Baseline comparison showed that the male ratio (17/20 cases vs.13/23 cases) and the proportion of moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (18/20 cases vs.18/23 cases) in the OMA-AIT group were significantly higher than those of the AIT-OMA group (all P<0.05). (2)Efficacy: ①In OMA-AIT group, all children reached the AIT maintenance treatment stage successfully after combination therapy.At the maintenance treatment stage, the C-ACT/ACT, VAS and TMS scores(26.0±1.25 vs.24.55±2.28, 1.50±1.24 vs.2.55±1.70, 3.60±1.47 vs.5.45±1.19)were significantly improved from baseline(all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in lung function indexes FEV 1%pred, PEF%pred, and MMEF%pred ( P>0.05), and FeNO level did not change significantly than baseline.After the combination treatment, ICS dosage significantly decreased from 240.00 (160.00, 380.00) μg/d at baseline to 140.00 (80.00, 300.00) μg/d ( P<0.05). Comorbidities, including allergic rhinitis, food allergy, atopic dermatitis and angioedema were improved.Five cases (25.00%) had once asthma exacerbation during the treatment.The duration of maintenance dose of conventional (22.70±7.10 vs.15.20±1.32) and cluster immunotherapy (13.00±4.97 vs.7.30±1.06) were longer than those of the corresponding control group(all P<0.05). ②AIT-OMA group: In AO1 group, the C-ACT/ACT score were improved from baseline( P<0.05), and VAS score, TMS score decreased from 3.00(1.75, 3.00), (4.67±1.97) points at baseline to 1.00(0, 1.00), (2.83±1.60) points by the maintenance dose in AO1 group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the FEV 1%pred, PEF%pred, MMEF%pred and FeNO compared with baseline in AO1 group.ICS dosage in AO1 group significantly decreased from (180.00±78.99) μg/d at baseline to (88.88±26.23) μg/d ( P<0.05). In AO2 group, the C-ACT/ACT, VAS and TMS scores at the completion of OMA treatment[26.53±0.94 vs.25.06±2.05, 1.00 (0, 2.00) vs.2.00(2.00, 3.50), 3.41±0.94 vs.5.53±1.23]were significantly improved from baseline (all P<0.05). PEF%pred[(106.47±22.37)% vs.(94.47±26.39)%] significantly increased than baseline ( P<0.05), and the remaining lung function indexes and FeNO were not significantly improved.ICS dosage significantly decreased from 240.00(160.00, 400.00) μg/d at baseline to 80.00 (20.00, 160.00) μg/d ( P<0.05). During the combination treatment, 1 case (5.88%) had once asthma exacerbation, and all 8 cases with food allergy or atopic dermatitis or conjunctivitis had improved comorbidities.(3)Safety: adverse events during OMA injection were not reported.①In OMA-AIT group, a total of 165 OMA injections were performed in the initial treatment stage of the conventional immunotherapy group, with 13 (7.88%) reported LRs and 2 (1.21%) grade-1 SRs.A total of 143 OMA injections were performed in the initial treatment stage of the cluster immunotherapy group, with 19(13.29%) reported LRs and none of SRs.②In AIT-OMA group, there were 6 cases of adverse events in the initial treatment stage of AIT who were successfully reached the maintenance treatment stage after the addition of OMA in AO1 group.In AO2 group, children who were additionally given OMA due to adverse events in the maintenance treatment phase did not report adverse events during the combination therapy. Conclusions:OMA combined with AIT not only expands the scope of AIT, improves allergic and asthma symptoms in children, reduces the use of drugs, but also enhance the safety of AIT and compliance, reduces adverse events during AIT treatment, and even shortens the time of initial treatment.

Bronchial asthma(asthma)is a common chronic airway inflammatory disease in children, most of which are allergic asthma.Allergen immunotherapy can change the natural course of asthma, and has certain efficacy in controlling asthma symptoms, reducing airway hyperresponsiveness and reducing the use of control drugs.It is the treatment for the cause.The most common allergen immunotherapy treatments are subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy.This article reviews the effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy in the treatment of children with asthma, and focuses on the effective evaluation indicators and potential biomarkers that can be used as reference in clinical practice.

Objective:To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of Omalizumab for treating pediatric allergic asthma in real world in China.Methods:The clinical data of children aged 6 to 11 years with allergic asthma who received Omalizumab treatment in 17 hospitals in China between July 6, 2018 and September 30, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Such information as the demographic characteristics, allergic history, family history, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, specific IgE levels, skin prick test, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, eosinophil (EOS) counts, and comorbidities at baseline were collected.Descriptive analysis of the Omalizumab treatment mode was made, and the difference in the first dose, injection frequency and course of treatment between the Omalizumab treatment mode and the mode recommended in the instruction was investigated.Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) analysis was made after Omalizumab treatment.The moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation rate, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose, lung functions were compared before and after Omalizumab treatment.Changes in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) results from baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 52 weeks after Omalizumab treatment were studied.The commodity improvement was assessed.The adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE) were analyzed for the evaluation of Omalizumab treatment safety.The difference in the annual rate of moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation and ICS reduction was investigated by using t test.The significance level was set to 0.05.Other parameters were all subject to descriptive analysis.A total of 200 allergic asthma patients were enrolled, including 75.5% ( n=151) males and 24.5% ( n=49) females.The patients aged (8.20±1.81) years. Results:The median total IgE level of the 200 patients was 513.5 (24.4-11 600.0) IU/mL.Their median treatment time with Omalizumab was 112 (1-666) days.Their first dose of Omalizumab was 300 (150-600) mg.Of the 200 cases, 114 cases (57.0%) followed the first Omalizumab dosage recommended in the instruction.After 4-6 months of Omalizumab treatment, 88.5% of the patients enrolled ( n=117) responded to Omalizumab.After 4 weeks of treatment with Omalizumab, asthma was well-controlled, with an increased C-ACT score [from (22.70±3.70) points to (18.90±3.74) points at baseline]. Four-six months after Omalizumab administration, the annual rate of moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation had a reduction of (2.00±5.68) per patient year( t=4.702 5, P<0.001), the median ICS daily dose was lowered [0 (0-240) μg vs. 160 (50-4 000) μg at baseline] ( P<0.001), the PAQLQ score was improved [(154.90±8.57) points vs. (122.80±27.15) points at baseline], and the forced expiratory volume in one second % predicted (FEV 1%pred) was increased [(92.80±10.50)% vs. (89.70±18.17)% at baseline]. In patients with available evaluations for comorbidities, including allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis or eczema, urticaria, allergic conjunctivitis and sinusitis, 92.8%-100.0% showed improved symptoms.A total of 124 AE were reported in 58 (29.0%) of the 200 patients, and the annual incidence was 0(0-15.1) per patient year.In 53 patients who suffered AE, 44 patients (83.0%) and 9 patients (17.0%) reported mild and moderate AE, respectively.No severe AE were observed in patients.The annual incidence of SAE was 0(0-1.9) per patient year.Most common drug-related AE were abdominal pain (2 patients, 1.0%) and fever (2 patients, 1.0%). No patient withdrew Omalizumab due to AE. Conclusions:Omalizumab shows good effectiveness and safety for the treatment of asthma in children.It can reduce the moderate-to-severe asthma exacerbation rate, reduce the ICS dose, improve asthma control levels, and improve lung functions and quality of life of patients.

Objective:To observe the role of Huaiqihuang Granules (HQ) in the long-term management of bronchial asthma in young children, and the effective effect on concomitant rhinitis.Methods:A prospective real-world multicenter study was conducted in children aged 2-5 years with asthma diagnosed in the outpatient department (from April 2016 to March 2019)who received either inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA)(control group); inhaled ICS/LTRA plus HQ(combination group), or HQ alone(HQ group). All patients were followed up at week 4, 8, 12 after treatment. The number of days with asthma symptoms, the frequency of severe asthma attacks, the level of asthma control, and the days with rhinitis symptoms in the last 4 weeks were recorded. Differences before and after treatment, and those among groups after treatment were compared using Kruskal- Wallis H test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results:A total of 2 234 eligible patients were recruited, and 2 147 cases completed followed-up visits, including 477, 1 374 and 296 cases in the control group, combination group, and HQ group, respectively. After the treatment, all 3 groups showed significant declines in the days with asthma symptoms, frequency of severe asthma attack and the days with rhinitis symptoms (all P<0.01), and the rate of well-controlled asthma increased significantly ( P<0.01). It lasted until the end of follow-up. Among groups, patients in the combination group showed significantly less days of asthma symptoms than those of the other 2 group at week 8 and 12[0(0, 0.9) d vs.0(0, 0.3) d, P<0.05; 0(0, 0.1) d vs. 0(0, 1.0) d, P<0.01]. Patients in the combination group and HQ group showed a significantly lower rate of severe asthma attacks than that of the control group at week 12 [0(0, 1), 0(0, 1), 0(0, 2), all P<0.05]. The well-controlled rate of asthma in the combination group was significantly higher than that of the control group and HQ group at week 8 and 12 (89.6% vs. 85.9% vs.82.1%, H=15.28; 90.9% vs. 84.1% vs. 81.8%, χ2=29.32, all P<0.01). Conclusions:HQ can significantly alleviate symptoms of asthma and rhinitis, severe attack of asthma, and increase the control rate of asthma when used as an additional treatment or used alone.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Dupilumab on the treatment of asthma combined with atopic dermatitis (AD) and other type 2 inflammatory co-morbidities in children.Methods:Clinical data of children with asthma combined with AD, allergic rhinitis (AR) type 2 inflammatory co-morbidities who received Dupilumab treatment for 16 weeks or longer in the Pediatric Asthma and Allergy Clinic of the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from April 1, 2021 to September 1, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.The efficacy and safety of Dupilumab on the treatment of asthma combined with AD and AR in children were assessed by comparing clinical symptoms before and after 16 weeks of treatment, changes in the dosage of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) count, and the incidence of adverse events, respectively.The correlation between the efficacy on AD, AR and asthma was assessed.Quantitative indicators that were normally distributed were compared by the paired samples t-test; otherwise, they were compared by rank- sum test.The correlation between different indicators was compared by Spearman rank correlation test. Results:(1) Ten children with asthma combined with AD, AR were recruited, including 8 males and 2 females, with the mean age of 9 (4-14) years.Three children were previously treated with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) prior to Dupilumab treatment, and 1 child was transferred to Dupilumab treatment because of a poor responsiveness to Omalizumab.(2) Improvement of asthma: after 16 weeks of treatment, asthma symptoms were well controlled in the 10 children, and none of them had acute asthma attacks.The childhood asthma control test for children and asthma control questionnaire findings were significantly improved from baseline (all P<0.05). Forced expiratory volume in the first second to the predicted value was significantly improved from baseline ( P<0.05). The dosage of ICS [all converted to Beclomethasone Dipropionate, 0 (0, 125.00) μg/d vs.400.00 (200.00, 400.00) μg/d] and FeNO level [11.00(9.00, 19.25)×10 -9vs.38.00(18.25, 56.75)×10 -9] significantly decreased from baseline (all P<0.05). Serum T-IgE testing before and after treatment were performed in 3 children, which were significantly reduced at 16 weeks of treatment compared with baseline (case 1: 2 759 kU/L vs.>5 000 kU/L; case 2: 1 432 kU/L vs.3 546 kU/L; case 3: 655 kU/L vs.1 000 kU/L, all P<0.05). (3) Improvement of asthma co-morbidities: The scoring atopic dermatitis scores, and patient-oriented eczema measure scores at each time point of follow-up decreased significantly compared with baseline (all P<0.001). The overall peripheral blood EOS count increased during the treatment period compared with baseline[1.18(0.62, 1.51)×10 9/L vs.1.01(0.54, 1.90)×10 9/L, P=0.444], although no significant difference was detected.Visual analog scale and total rhinitis medication scores decreased significantly compared with baseline (all P<0.05). (4) There was a positive correlation between baseline AD severity and the therapeutic efficacy on asthma ( r=0.697, P=0.025). (5) Safety: during the treatment, one case developed bilateral conjunctivitis and one developed bilateral bulbar conjunctival hemosiderosis, both of whom were improved after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions:Dupilumab treatment significantly improves clinical symptoms of asthma, AD and AR in children with asthma combined with AD, AR type 2 inflammatory co-morbidities, which also reduces ICS dosage, FeNO level, rhinitis medication and serum T-IgE level, and improve pulmonary function, with a good safety profile.It is a promising treatment to children with type 2 inflammatory disease who have a poor Omalizumab efficacy, and its combination with SCIT is a favorable etiologic treatment.

This clinical data of 3 cases of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who had no remission after taking to-pical glucocorticoids and antihistamines were collected retrospectively.The patients were treated with Dupilumab in the Department of Pediatrics, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from April to October 2021.All 3 cases developed eczema-like rashes with strong itching and sleep disturbance within the first year after their birth.The children′ quality of life was seriously impaired.All the cases were combined with allergic rhinitis, 2 cases of whom were simultaneously complicated with bronchial asthma.After 14-18 weeks of treatment, the rash, pruritic symptoms and quality of life were significantly improved.Meanwhile, rhinitis symptoms were reduced, asthma control scores and lung function were improved to varying degrees.No serious adverse reactions occurred during the injection period.

Objective:To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of pulse oximetry among pediatric healthcare providers in China and analyze the factor influencing the KAP.Methods:A self-developed questionnaire was used for an online research on the KAP of 11 849 pediatric healthcare providers from 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities of China from March 11 to 14, 2022.The factors influencing the KAP of pulse oximetry among pediatric healthcare providers were examined by Logistic regression. Results:The scores of KAP, of pulse oximetry were 5.57±0.96, 11.24±1.25 and 11.19±4.54, respectively.The corresponding scoring rates were 69.61%, 74.95%, and 55.99%, respectively. Logistic regression results showed that the gender and working years of pediatric healthcare providers, the region they were located, and whether their medical institution was equipped with pulse oximeters were the main factors affecting the knowledge score (all P<0.05). Main factors influencing the attitude score of pediatric healthcare providers included their knowledge score, gender, educational background, working years, region, medical institution level, and whether the medical institution was equipped with pulse oximeters (all P<0.05). For the practice score, the main influencing factors were the knowledge score, gender, age, and whether the medi-cal institution was equipped with pulse oximeters (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Chinese pediatric healthcare providers need to further improve their knowledge about and attitudes towards pulse oximetry.Pulse oximeters are evidently under-used.It is urgent to formulate policies or guidelines, strengthen education and training, improve knowledge and attitudes, equip more institutions with pulse oximeters, and popularize their application in medical institutions.