Purpose/Significance To solve the problem that regional clinical research data are difficult to integrate efficiently,and to promote"Chinese evidence"and"Chinese protocol"in the global clinical research community.Method/Process Based on the standard-ization theory,the data standardization system is proposed,and the construction and application methods of the regional clinical research data platform are explored with the integration of multi-center clinical research data as the starting point.Result/Conclusion The theo-retical framework of the regional clinical research data platform has been preliminarily established,and the clinical research capabilities of tertiary hospitals in Shanghai have been significantly improved.

Objective:To constructe an evaluation index system for clinical research innovation in medical institutions, for references for enhancing the research and innovation capabilities of medical institutions and formulating policies related to clinical research innovation.Methods:From March 2022 to May 2023, relevant literature and policies on the evaluation system of scientific and technological innovation at home and abroad were analyzed to establish the preliminary screening clinical research innovation indicators. Two rounds of Delphi method were used to construct a clinical research innovation index evaluation system, analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of each indicator.Results:The effective response rates of the two rounds of consultation questionnaires were both 100.00%, with expert authority coefficients of 0.95 and Kendall coordination coefficients of 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. The clinical research innovation index evaluation system ultimately established 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 42 tertiary indicators. The first level indicators included infrastructure construction, innovation support environment, clinical research activity, and innovation effectiveness, with weight coefficients of 18.00%, 21.00%, 30.00%, and 31.00%, respectively.Conclusions:The clinical research innovation evaluation index system constructed in this study covered the investment, environment, and output aspects of research innovation, and could comprehensively and objectively reflect the clinical research innovation ability of medical institutions.

Effective supervision of the clinical research management department can guarantee and improve the quality of the investigator initiated trials(IIT). The authors analyzed relevant clinical research regulations and literature and summarized the current situation of risk-based IIT project process quality management. On such basis, they determined the risk-based IIT project process quality management method in combination with the previous research of the research group.From 2021 to 2022, this method was used to implement process quality management for 353 IIT projects in Shanghai′s tertiary hospitals. More than 3 000 risk points were identified through centralized supervision, and then on-site supervision was carried out to correct the problems found. As proven by the results, the method could find existing problems in time and define the risk level of the project, and also formulate an individualized risk supervision plan accordingly, so as to effectively ensure the data reliability and scientific results. It is suggested that the clinical research management department implement risk based management for the whole process of IIT projects, increase funding and staffing, and implement hierarchical management for the projects by research types, so as to promote the sustainable development of IITs.

By comparing the training status of clinical research methods between United States and China, this article introduces comprehensive training system in the United States in and after the university, and discusses the problems in clinical research methodology training in China. These issues include that when medical students at school do not receive the training of professional clinical research courses, and after they go to the work, they also lack professional and accurate clinical research methodology training, which make it difficult for doctors to independently conduct clinical research. Therefore, it is recommended that Chinese medical schools should systematically establish clinical research methodology courses for undergraduates and graduate students to cultivate the clinical research capabilities of medical students. Secondly, according to the clinical research levels of doctors, different training models are proposed in the study. The existing social resources should be scientifically guided. We hope our work would provide some references for the improvement of clinical research methodology in China, to promote clinicians to be independently responsible for conducting clinical research, and improve the national medical level.

Objective:To assess possible risk factors and their respective levels in the whole process of investigator initiated trial(IIT)projects proposed in the proposal stage, for reference in formulation of risk management plans.Methods:Through literature analysis and research group discussions, the risk factors of IIT projects and risk level assessment criteria were preliminarily identified, and a consultation questionnaire was developed as a result. Delphi method was used to further optimize the risk factors and determine their risk levels. Data obtained from the consulfation were analysied by descriptive.Results:The recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation were both 100%, and the degree of expert authority was 0.942. The survey finalized 38 risk factors, including extremely high risk, high risk, medium risk, low risk and very low risk factors of 17(44.7%), 15(39.5%), 3(7.9%), 2(5.3%) and 1(2.6%) respectively.Conclusions:This study determined a risk evaluation system of IIT projects in the proposal stage. This system can identify risks of IIT projects at an early stage, facilitating early intervention of problems existing in such projects, and minimize risks to the rights and safety of patients.

Objective:Investigator Initiated Trials (IIT) play a key role in promoting comprehensively the development and homogeneity of clinical diagnosis and treatment, thus, this article aims to explore a set of recommendations for the construction and management of clinical research institutes that support IIT.Methods:Through the combination of literature review and institutional construction practice cases, based on the experience of domestic and foreign universities and well-functioning medical institutions in building clinical research centers, as well as summarizing the construction cases of the clinical research institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, to discuss the construction and management plan of such centers.Results:Propose recommendations for the construction and management standards of clinical research centers that support IIT, covering the principles of center construction, basic settings, organizational structure, functional departments, basic platforms, staffing, document management and institutional evaluation.Conclusions:We hope this study can provide reference to universities and medical institutions for the construction of the clinical research institute.

Objective:To explore the application of information management platform for Investigator Initiated clinical trials (IIT).Methods:Elaborate the design and application of Clinical Information Management Platform (CIMP). Discuss the obstacles in platform development.Results:Compared with regions where clinical research is more developed, there is still a lack of standardized and efficient information management methods in China. Through the construction of the IIT information management platform, the scientific management of the IIT and the SWOT analysis of the use of the platform have been conducted. Further exploration and improvement are needed in terms of the collaboration of the information platform, data standardization, and information sharing security.Conclusions:The management efficiency can be improved by applying CIMP, which will also promote the smooth implementation of IITs.

Objective To improve clinical research capability and quality,this study aims to explore the methodological support system of Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs).Methods By comparing the clinical research supporting system between commercial and academic organization at home and abroad,this study summarized their characteristics and make systematic analysis combined with IITs.Results Compared with international level,there is an urgent need to improve of domestic,professional support for clinical research.Academic clinical research supporting academic system could better satisfy the requirement of IITs in China.Taking Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine as an example,this paper introduces the a collaborative construction model,namely Multiple-center Academic Clinical Research Organization (MACRO),based on two levels of clinical research institutes in university and affiliated hospitals.At universities level,we focused on development of clinical research,top-level study design,clinical research methodology,clinical research professionals and standardized clinical research platform.At hospitals level,project process management can be emphasized,and which will be the main implementation content to build an applied clinical research technology center in MACRO.Conclusions With the construction of MACRO,the functional module paradigms of academic clinical research centers in university can be effectively linked to affiliated hospitals.This will be conducive for establishing collaborative support system,which is centered on academic research and complementary functions with multiple centers,improving full-time technical team and further enhancing the scientific validity and research quality of IITs.

Objective :To compare therapeutic effect of propafenone and amiodarone on paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and their safety .Methods : A total of 90 PSVT patients ,who were treated in our hospital from Jan 2013 to May 2018 ,were selected .Patients were randomly and equally divided into propafenone group and amio—darone group ,each group received corresponding medication based on routine treatment for 24h.Blood pressure , heart rate ,cardiac function indexes :LVEDV ,LVESV and LVEF before and after treatment ,cardioversion time , successful cardioversion rate within 60 min and incidence of adverse reactions during treatment were observed and compared between two groups .Results : There was no significant difference in successful cardioversion rate (propafenone group 91.11% vs.amiodarone group 93.33%, P＝1.000) between two groups .Compared with be—fore treatment ,on 24h after treatment ,there were significant reductions in blood pressure and heart rate in two groups , P＝0. 001 all ;but there was no significant difference between two groups before and after treatment , P＞0.05 all.Cardioversion time of propafenone group was significantly shorter than that of amiodarone group [ (12. 66 ± 2.06) min vs .(22. 80 ± 2.28 ) min ] , P＝ 0. 001 .Compared with propafenone group on 24h after treatment , there was significant rise in LVEF [ (63. 24 ± 3.67)% vs.(66. 83 ± 4.01)%] ,significant reductions in LVEDV [ (96.65 ± 5.24) ml vs.(92. 09 ± 4.37) ml] and LVESV [ (38.40 ± 2.87) ml vs.(30. 13 ± 7.34) ml] in amioda—rone group , P＝ 0. 001 all.Total incidence rate of adverse reactions in amiodarone group was significantly lower than that of propafenone group (8.89% vs.24. 44%) , P＝0. 048. Conclusion : Propafenone and amiodarone possess significant therapeutic effect on PSVT .Propafenone possesses shorter cardioversion time ,while amiodarone posses— ses less adverse reactions and improve cardiac function .Therefore ,medication should be selected properly according to patient′s specific condition in clinic .

Objective With the fast development of Investigator-Initiated Trials (IIT),more and more resources from the national and local governments,universities and hospitals were invested.It is important to clarify the content and methodologies of quality evaluation of the IITs at the early approval stage to assure more complete and systematic quality assessment,improve resource allocation,enhance the research ability,as well as the protection of human subject.Methods This article summarized the content and related safeguarding measures of quality assessment during the early stage of project setup.Discussed relative practice and experiences of our center.Results The contents of quality evaluation include research topic,study protocol,research team and qualifications,quality assurance plan and risk management.The organizing work and attention of the research administrative department,qualified departments and experts,as well as information platform are the required safeguarding measures for effective assessment.Conclusions Quality evaluation of IITs at the early approval stage is critical segment of study quality assurance.More attention should be paid to make every effort counts.