Repair of complex aortic aneurysms such as those involving the thoracoabdominal and pararenal aorta presents a formidable challenge for surgeons with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. A hybrid procedure combining renovisceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm exclusion has been developed as an alternative approach for high-risk patients. This paper reports our initial experience with hybrid repair for these complex aortic diseases in three high-risk patients.

Repair of complex aortic aneurysms such as those involving the thoracoabdominal and pararenal aorta presents a formidable challenge for surgeons with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. A hybrid procedure combining renovisceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm exclusion has been developed as an alternative approach for high-risk patients. This paper reports our initial experience with hybrid repair for these complex aortic diseases in three high-risk patients.
Human ; Male ; Aged: 65-79 yrs old ; Middle Aged: 45-64 yrs old ; aorta ; aortic aneurysm ; endovascular procedures

BACKGROUND

Endovascular technique has replaced open repair as primary treatment for different aortic disease indications and was associated with low perioperative mortality and acceptable short-, mid-, and long-term survival. Locally, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was not widely practiced until year 2017. This study aims to determine the predictors of in-hospital and short-term outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome in a single center and how it compares with local and international data.

This study is a retrospective analysis of 52 adult patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic syndrome. Demographic and clinical data, diagnostic imaging, and procedural details were obtained via inpatient charts at the medical records section and hospital system database archiving. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year postprocedure were obtained through telephone follow-up after attaining verbal consent.

Gathered data were analyzed as to association of different variables with or without the presence of complications. Outcomes reported included in-hospital mortality rate, presence of major adverse events (MAEs), 30-day and 1-year survival rates, and rate of freedom from reintervention.

The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.69% (n = 4/52), and complication rate was 32% (n = 20/52), with a survival rate of 92.31% and 87.76% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The rates of overall freedom from reintervention were 83.33% and 100% at 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The independent predictors for in-hospital mortality and development of MAEs were increasing weight (odds ratio [OR], 1.0588; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.003–1.208), preexisting chronic kidney disease (OR, 10.33; 95% CI, 1.1069–96.462), and TEVAR with debranching done as a single procedure (OR, 3.6667; 95% CI, 1.1154–12.054), whereas an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 49.05 ± 19.25 (OR, 0.9402; 95% CI, 0.9019–0.9801) and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure (OR, 0.1624; 95% CI, 0.0321–0.8225) statistically decrease the risk for development of in-hospital mortality and MAEs (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively).

In this single-center study, indications for TEVAR were fusiform and saccular aneurysm, high-risk intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer, complicated acute type B dissection, chronic complicated type B dissection with high-risk feature, and aortic rupture. The outcome of this study shows comparable results with other international studies with an acceptable in-hospital mortality rate, complication rate, short-term survival rate, and rate freedom from reintervention at 30 days and 1 year. Increasing weight, preexisting chronic kidney disease, and TEVAR with debranching done as a single setting are independent predictors for developing in-hospital mortality and MAEs, whereas a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate and TEVAR with debranching done as a staged procedure decrease the risk; hence, careful planning and scheduling of procedure among elective and amenable cases could further reduce complication rates of future TEVAR procedures.

BACKGROUND

Takayasu Arteritis (TA) is a rare, primary large-vessel vasculitis frequently leading to stenosis and less commonly, aneurysm formation. Saccular aneurysms of the aortic arch in patients with TA are fatal, have rarely been reported and represent a significant technical challenge due to the difficult anatomical location and need for protection of the cerebral circulation. Concomitant intracerebral aneurysms in patients with TA are extremely uncommon and have mostly been documented in very few case reports in literature.

We present a case of a 31 year-old Filipino female with recurrent chest and neck pain radiating to the upper back. Computed tomographic (CT) angiography demonstrated a large saccular aortic arch aneurysm without branch stenosis. CTA of the cerebral circulation likewise demonstrated multiple, saccular, intra-cerebral aneurysms. She underwent hybrid thoracic arch repair with supra-aortic debranching via mini-sternotomy and proximal ligation of the left common carotid artery and staged endovascular aortic arch replacement with coil embolization of the ostial-to-proximal left subclavian artery segment. Post-operative aortogram showed optimal repair with thrombosed aneurysmal sac, optimal graft position, no endoleaks and preservation of cerebral circulation. Patient improved symptomatically post-procedure and remained symptom-free during follow-up after six months. Careful review of local literature suggests that this is the first Philippine TA case with a saccular aortic arch aneurysm successfully managed in this manner.

Saccular aortic arch aneurysms in patients with Takayasu are unusual and presence of concomitant multiple cerebral saccular aneurysms have rarely been reported in literature. This case highlighted that hybrid endovascular arch repair in patients with TA is feasible, minimally invasive and effective.

Humans ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ; Stents ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Aortic Dissection/surgery* ; Endovascular Procedures ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Retrospective Studies

Humans ; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ; Endovascular Procedures ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications ; Risk Factors ; Aortic Rupture/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: To explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of female patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective study. Consecutive patients diagnosed with Stanford type B aortic dissection in General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from June 2002 to August 2021 were enrolled, and grouped based on sex. According to the general clinical conditions and complications of aortic dissection tear, patients were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair, surgery, or optimal medication. The clinical characteristics and aortic imaging data of the patients at different stages were collected, adverse events including all-cause deaths, stroke, and occurrence of aortic-related adverse events were obtained during hospitalization and within 30 days and at 1 and 5 years after discharge. According to the time of death, death was classified as in-hospital death, out-of-hospital death, and in-hospital death was divided into preoperative death, intraoperative death and postoperative death. According to the cause of death, death was classified as aortic death, cardiac death and other causes of death. Aortic-related adverse events within 30 days after discharge included new paraplegia, post-luminal repair syndrome, and aortic death; long-term (≥1 year after discharge) aortic-related adverse events included aortic death, recurrent aortic dissection, endoleak and distal ulcer events. The clinical characteristics, short-term and long-term prognosis was compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between different clinical factors and all-cause mortality within 30 days in female and male groups separately. Results: A total of 1 094 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection were enrolled, mean age was (53.9±12.1) years, and 861 (78.7%) were male and 233 (21.3%) were female. (1) Clinical characteristics: compared with male patients, female patients were featured with older average age, higher proportion of aged≥60 years old, back pain, anemia, optimal medication treatment, and higher cholesterol level; while lower proportion of smoking and drinking history, body mass index, calcium antagonists use, creatine kinase level, and white blood cell count (all P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in dissection tear and clinical stage, history of coronary heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, and cerebrovascular disease between female and male patients (all P>0.05). (2) Follow-up result: compared with male patients, female patients had a higher rate of 30-day death [6.9% (16/233) vs. 3.8% (33/861), P=0.047], in-hospital death (5.6% (13/233) vs. 2.7% (23/861), P=0.027), preoperative death (3.9% (9/233) vs. 1.5% (12/861), P=0.023) and aorta death (6.0% (14/233) vs. 3.1% (27/861), P=0.041). The 1-year and 5-year follow-up results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in death, cerebrovascular disease, and aorta-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). (3) Prognostic factors: the results of the univariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index>24 kg/m² (HR=1.087, 95%CI 1.029-1.149, P=0.013), history of anemia (HR=2.987, 95%CI 1.054-8.468, P=0.032), hypertension (HR=1.094, 95%CI 1.047-1.143, P=0.040) and troponin-T>0.05 μg/L (HR=5.818, 95%CI 1.611-21.018, P=0.003)were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality within 30 days in female patients. Conclusions: Female patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection have specific clinical characteristics, such as older age at presentation, higher rates of anemia and combined back pain, and higher total cholesterol levels. The risk of death within 1 month is higher in female patients than in male patients, which may be associated with body mass index, hypertension, anemia and troponin-T, but the long-term prognosis for both female and male patients is comparable.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Prognosis ; Hospital Mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Troponin T ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery* ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome ; Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects* ; Aortic Dissection ; Hypertension/complications* ; Cholesterol ; Risk Factors

Objective: To investigate the influence of blood pressure control after discharge on prognosis of patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS) complicated with hypertension who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: This is a retrospective case analysis. Patients diagnosed with AAS complicated with hypertension and undergoing TEVAR in Northern Theater Command General Hospital from June 2002 to December 2021 were consecutively enrolled. Average systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the occurrence of endpoint events were recorded at one month, one year and every 2 years after TEVAR. According to the patients' average SBP, patients with average SBP<140 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) or<150 mmHg were divided into the target blood pressure achievement group, and the others were divided into target blood pressure non-achievement group. Endpoint events included all-cause death, aortic death, stroke, renal insufficiency, aortic related adverse events and a composite of these events (overall clinical adverse events), and re-accepting TEVAR. The incidence of endpoint events was compared between the two groups at each follow-up period. Results: A total of 987 patients were included, aged (55.7±11.7) years, including 779 male (78.9%). When the cutoff value was 140 mmHg, the rate of average target SBP achievement was 71.2% (703/987) at one month, 66.7% (618/927) during 1st to 12th month and 65.1% (542/832) from the first year to the third year after TEVAR. The proportion of patients taking≥2 antihypertensive agents was higher in the group of target blood pressure non-achievement group than the target blood pressure achievement group after TEVAR at 1 month (74.3% (211/284) vs.65.9% (463/703), P=0.010) and during 1st to 12th month (71.5% (221/309) vs. 63.6% (393/618), P=0.016). There were no statistical differences in the all-cause deaths, stroke, aortic related adverse events, and repeat TEVAR between the two groups (All P>0.05) during above follow-up periods. When the cutoff value was 150 mmHg, the rate of target SBP achievement was 89.3% (881/987) at one month, 85.2% (790/927) during 1st to 12th month and 85.6%(712/832) from the first year to the third year after TEVAR. The incidence of clinical total adverse events (8.8% (12/137) vs. 4.2% (33/790), P=0.021) and repeat TEVAR (4.4% (6/137) vs. 1.0% (8/790), P=0.003) in target blood pressure non-achievement group were significantly higher than the target blood pressure achievement group during 1st to 12th month after TEVAR. The incidence of all-cause deaths (5.8% (7/120) vs. 2.4% (17/712), P=0.037) in the target blood pressure non-achievement group was significantly higher than the target blood pressure achievement group from the first year to the third year follow-up period, but there were no statistical differences in the incidence of clinical total adverse events between the two group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Among TEVAR treated AAS patients complicated with hypertension, the average SBP more than 150 mmHg post discharge is associated with increased risk of adverse events. Ideal blood pressure control should be encouraged to improve the outcome of these patients.
Humans ; Male ; Blood Pressure ; Acute Aortic Syndrome ; Retrospective Studies ; Aftercare ; Treatment Outcome ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects* ; Aortic Dissection ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery* ; Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects* ; Patient Discharge ; Hypertension ; Prognosis ; Stroke ; Hospitals

Endovascular treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection (type B dissection) has been widely used. There will be complications such as aortic dilatation, which will lead to poor prognosis of some patients. With more in-depth researches, it was found that there was a possible correlation between the prognosis of type B dissection and tears, such as the increasing of aortic diameter would be faster with longer tears, and the location of the tear will affect the thrombosis of the false lumen. Studies on hemodynamics have also found that different characteristics of tears of aortic dissection can cause changes in the pressure, blood flow rate and blood capacity in the true and false lumens recently. The hemodynamic changes can be used to predict the prognosis of type B dissection. The main characteristics of tears included the size, position, number of tears, residual tears and stent graft induced new entry. Describing the effect of tear characteristics on the development of type B dissection, can provide the basis for the clinical treatment and further research of type B dissection.
Humans ; Aortic Dissection/surgery* ; Hemodynamics ; Prognosis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects* ; Thrombosis/etiology* ; Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects* ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery* ; Stents/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVES: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a pathological condition in which the abdominal aorta is dilated beyond 3.0 cm. The surgical options include open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after OSR is helpful for decision-making during the postoperative phase. To find a more efficient method for making a prediction, this study aims to perform tests on the efficacy of different machine learning models. METHODS: Perioperative data of 80 OSR patients were retrospectively collected from January 2009 to December 2021 at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. The vascular surgeon performed the surgical operation. Four commonly used machine learning classification models (logistic regression, linear kernel support vector machine, Gaussian kernel support vector machine, and random forest) were chosen to predict AKI. The efficacy of the models was validated by five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: AKI was identified in 33 patients. Five-fold cross-validation showed that among the 4 classification models, random forest was the most precise model for predicting AKI, with an area under the curve of 0.90±0.12. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning models can precisely predict AKI during early stages after surgery, which allows vascular surgeons to address complications earlier and may help improve the clinical outcomes of OSR.
Humans ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/complications* ; Endovascular Procedures/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects* ; Acute Kidney Injury/etiology* ; Machine Learning ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications/etiology* ; Risk Factors