2.Construction of multi-epitope vaccine against the Rhipicephalus microplus tick: an immunoinformatics approach
Younas, M. ; Ashraf, K. ; Ijaz, M. ; Suleman, M. ; Chohan, T.A. ; Rahman, S.U. ; Rashid, M.I.
Tropical Biomedicine 2024;41(No.1):84-96
Rhipicephalus microplus, known as the hard tick, is a vector for the parasites Babesia spp. and
Anaplasma marginale, both of which can cause significant financial losses to the livestock industry.
There is currently no effective vaccine for R. microplus tick infestations, despite the identification of
numerous prospective tick vaccine candidates. As a result, the current research set out to develop
an immunoinformatics-based strategy using existing methods for designing a multi-epitope based
vaccination that is not only effective but also safe and capable of eliciting cellular and humoral immune
responses. First, R. microplus proteins Bm86, Subolesin, and Bm95 were used to anticipate and link B
and T-cell epitopes (HTL and CTL) to one another. Antigenicity testing, allergenicity assessment, and
toxicity screening were just a few of the many immunoinformatics techniques used to identify potent
epitopes. Multi-epitope vaccine design was chosen based on the antigenic score 0.935 that is promising
vaccine candidate. Molecular docking was used to determine the nature of the interaction between TLR2
and the vaccine construct. Finally, molecular dynamic simulation was used to assess the stability and
compactness of the resulting vaccination based on docking scores. The developed vaccine was shown
to be stable, have immunogenic qualities, be soluble, and to have high expression by in silico cloning.
These findings suggest that experimental investigation of the multi-epitope based vaccine designed in
the current study will produce achievable vaccine candidates against R. microplus ticks, enabling more
effective control of infestations.
3.Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: A Decade of Abiraterone Clinical Trials
Matthew RASHID ; Eli OLDHAM ; Griffin K. HUGHES ; Andriana M. PEÑA ; Chase LADD ; Brooke GARDNER ; Ryan MCINTIRE ; Bradley JOHNSON ; Jordan TUIA ; Alyson HASLAM ; Vinay PRASAD ; Matt VASSAR
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2024;22(3):211-223
Purpose:
Our study aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of clinical trials using abiraterone in cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods:
A comprehensive search was conducted on May 24, 2023, using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted data on adverse events, progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to assess risks, while ORR and PSA-RR were used to assess benefits. Trials were categorized as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their safety profiles and efficacy outcomes.
Results:
Nearly all clinical trials testing abiraterone in prostate cancer showed promising outcomes with 89% of studies meeting their endpoint. Our study supports abiraterone’s use in prostate cancer, its only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indication to treat, with a median ORR of 20.0% and a median PSA-RR of 42.0%. However, when looking at the 3 novel indications tested, the risk-to-benefit profile was similar to that of its original approval. Even though most novel indications failed to meet their primary endpoint, the overall toxicity profile was similar to that found in prostate cancer.
Conclusion
Abiraterone showed an overall risk-to-benefit portfolio that supports the use of its treatment in prostate cancer. Although the primary endpoints in ovarian and breast cancer trials were not met, the use was appropriate when assessing how the mechanism of action for abiraterone could be beneficial in patients with these types of cancers.
4.Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: A Decade of Abiraterone Clinical Trials
Matthew RASHID ; Eli OLDHAM ; Griffin K. HUGHES ; Andriana M. PEÑA ; Chase LADD ; Brooke GARDNER ; Ryan MCINTIRE ; Bradley JOHNSON ; Jordan TUIA ; Alyson HASLAM ; Vinay PRASAD ; Matt VASSAR
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2024;22(3):211-223
Purpose:
Our study aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of clinical trials using abiraterone in cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods:
A comprehensive search was conducted on May 24, 2023, using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted data on adverse events, progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to assess risks, while ORR and PSA-RR were used to assess benefits. Trials were categorized as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their safety profiles and efficacy outcomes.
Results:
Nearly all clinical trials testing abiraterone in prostate cancer showed promising outcomes with 89% of studies meeting their endpoint. Our study supports abiraterone’s use in prostate cancer, its only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indication to treat, with a median ORR of 20.0% and a median PSA-RR of 42.0%. However, when looking at the 3 novel indications tested, the risk-to-benefit profile was similar to that of its original approval. Even though most novel indications failed to meet their primary endpoint, the overall toxicity profile was similar to that found in prostate cancer.
Conclusion
Abiraterone showed an overall risk-to-benefit portfolio that supports the use of its treatment in prostate cancer. Although the primary endpoints in ovarian and breast cancer trials were not met, the use was appropriate when assessing how the mechanism of action for abiraterone could be beneficial in patients with these types of cancers.
5.Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: A Decade of Abiraterone Clinical Trials
Matthew RASHID ; Eli OLDHAM ; Griffin K. HUGHES ; Andriana M. PEÑA ; Chase LADD ; Brooke GARDNER ; Ryan MCINTIRE ; Bradley JOHNSON ; Jordan TUIA ; Alyson HASLAM ; Vinay PRASAD ; Matt VASSAR
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2024;22(3):211-223
Purpose:
Our study aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of clinical trials using abiraterone in cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods:
A comprehensive search was conducted on May 24, 2023, using databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We extracted data on adverse events, progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR). The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were used to assess risks, while ORR and PSA-RR were used to assess benefits. Trials were categorized as positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their safety profiles and efficacy outcomes.
Results:
Nearly all clinical trials testing abiraterone in prostate cancer showed promising outcomes with 89% of studies meeting their endpoint. Our study supports abiraterone’s use in prostate cancer, its only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indication to treat, with a median ORR of 20.0% and a median PSA-RR of 42.0%. However, when looking at the 3 novel indications tested, the risk-to-benefit profile was similar to that of its original approval. Even though most novel indications failed to meet their primary endpoint, the overall toxicity profile was similar to that found in prostate cancer.
Conclusion
Abiraterone showed an overall risk-to-benefit portfolio that supports the use of its treatment in prostate cancer. Although the primary endpoints in ovarian and breast cancer trials were not met, the use was appropriate when assessing how the mechanism of action for abiraterone could be beneficial in patients with these types of cancers.
6.The Osseous Pathology of Purpura Fulminans in a TwoYear-Old Child: A Case Report
Mohd-Razali S ; Ahmad-Affandi K ; Ibrahim S ; Abdul-Rashid AH ; Abdul-Shukor N
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2023;17(No.1):180-183
Purpura fulminans (PF) is a severe clinical manifestation of
Neisseria meningitides infection that is associated with high
mortality rates in children. Survivors are frequently left with
debilitating musculoskeletal sequelae. There is a paucity of
reports on the musculoskeletal pathology of purpura
fulminans. We report on a 2-year-old boy with purpura
fulminans due to meningococcemia. The child developed
distal gangrene in both the upper and lower limbs.
Amputations were done for both lower limbs. Histological
examination of the amputated specimens showed an
inflammatory process and features of osteonecrosis. The
latest follow-up at the age of 6 years showed a right knee
valgus due to asymmetrical growth arrest of the proximal
tibia. PF and its complications are challenging to treat and
may require a multidisciplinary approach to improve
patient’s functional ability.
7.Bilateral Tibial Tuberosity Periosteal Sleeve Fracture in an Adolescent: A Case Report
Luqman M ; Rasid AF ; Jamil K ; Abd-Rashid AH
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2023;17(No.3):84-87
Tibial tuberosity avulsion fracture is a rare injury, and
bilateral occurrence is more uncommon. Periosteal sleeve
fracture is a unique fracture pattern which was first described
in the lower pole of patella in children. We are reporting a
rare case of bilateral tibial tuberosity sleeve fracture in a
teenage boy which occurred while sprinting. The patient
underwent open reduction, pull through suture fixation of the
bilateral tibial tuberosity and screw fixation of left tibial
tuberosity. Post-operative rehabilitation included gradual
increment of range of motion with hinged brace and
quadriceps muscle strengthening. Close follow-up was done
to monitor the progression of his recovery. At six months
follow-up, the patient recovered well. Both knees had full
range of motion with an intact extensor mechanism.
8.Molecular prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in ruminants and Rhipicephalus ticks in northern Pakistan
Ali, S. ; Hasan, M. ; Ahmad, A.S. ; Ashraf, K. ; Khan, J.A. ; Rashid, M.I.
Tropical Biomedicine 2023;40(No.1):7-13
Anaplasma marginale is the most prevalent tick-borne haemoparasite of cattle and causes huge
economic losses to the dairy industry worldwide. This study aimed to determine the occurrence of A.
marginale infection in blood and tick samples collected from livestock animals in the districts located
in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. A total of 184 blood and 370 tick samples were included in this
study. It has never been reported that sheep, goats, and cattle in Tank, Ghulam Khan, Birmil and Miran
Shah areas were infected with A. marginale. All samples of blood and ticks were collected through
random sampling from March 2021 to January 2022 from cattle, sheep and goats and screened through
PCR for anaplasmosis by using primer pairs of Anaplasma spp. Three hundred and seventy ticks were
collected from infested hosts (120/184, 64.21%). Among the four morphologically identified tick species,
the highest occurrence was recorded for Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n=138, 37.29%), followed by
Rhipicephalus microplus (n=131, 35.4%), Rhipicephalus annulatus (n=40, 10.81%), Hyalomma anatolicum
(n=31, 8.37%), and Hyalomma marginatum (n=30, 8.1%). The occurrence of female tick was highest
(n=160, 43.24%), followed by nymphs (n=140, 37.38%) and males ticks (n=70, 18.9%). Among these ticks,
A. marginale was detected in female ticks of R. microplus, and R. sanguineus. Molecular identification
of A. marginale was confirmed in 120 out of 184 blood samples and 6 out of 74 tick samples. Overall,
occurrence of A. marginale in blood and tick samples was found to be 65.21% and 8.1% respectively.
Species-wise occurrence in blood samples of goats were 71.11% followed by sheep 68.31% and cattle
50%. Specie-wise occurrence of A. marginale in tick samples of cattle were 12.5% followed by goats
6.89%. The obtained sequence showed similarity with A. marginale reported from Kenya and USA. We
report the first PCR based detection of A. marginale infection in blood samples and in R. sanguineus
ticks of goats simultaneously.
9.Global Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cerebral Venous Thrombosis and Mortality
Thanh N. NGUYEN ; Muhammad M. QURESHI ; Piers KLEIN ; Hiroshi YAMAGAMI ; Mohamad ABDALKADER ; Robert MIKULIK ; Anvitha SATHYA ; Ossama Yassin MANSOUR ; Anna CZLONKOWSKA ; Hannah LO ; Thalia S. FIELD ; Andreas CHARIDIMOU ; Soma BANERJEE ; Shadi YAGHI ; James E. SIEGLER ; Petra SEDOVA ; Joseph KWAN ; Diana Aguiar DE SOUSA ; Jelle DEMEESTERE ; Violiza INOA ; Setareh Salehi OMRAN ; Liqun ZHANG ; Patrik MICHEL ; Davide STRAMBO ; João Pedro MARTO ; Raul G. NOGUEIRA ; ; Espen Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN ; Georgios TSIVGOULIS ; Virginia Pujol LEREIS ; Alice MA ; Christian ENZINGER ; Thomas GATTRINGER ; Aminur RAHMAN ; Thomas BONNET ; Noémie LIGOT ; Sylvie DE RAEDT ; Robin LEMMENS ; Peter VANACKER ; Fenne VANDERVORST ; Adriana Bastos CONFORTO ; Raquel C.T. HIDALGO ; Daissy Liliana MORA CUERVO ; Luciana DE OLIVEIRA NEVES ; Isabelle LAMEIRINHAS DA SILVA ; Rodrigo Targa MARTÍNS ; Letícia C. REBELLO ; Igor Bessa SANTIAGO ; Teodora SADELAROVA ; Rosen KALPACHKI ; Filip ALEXIEV ; Elena Adela CORA ; Michael E. KELLY ; Lissa PEELING ; Aleksandra PIKULA ; Hui-Sheng CHEN ; Yimin CHEN ; Shuiquan YANG ; Marina ROJE BEDEKOVIC ; Martin ČABAL ; Dusan TENORA ; Petr FIBRICH ; Pavel DUŠEK ; Helena HLAVÁČOVÁ ; Emanuela HRABANOVSKA ; Lubomír JURÁK ; Jana KADLČÍKOVÁ ; Igor KARPOWICZ ; Lukáš KLEČKA ; Martin KOVÁŘ ; Jiří NEUMANN ; Hana PALOUŠKOVÁ ; Martin REISER ; Vladimir ROHAN ; Libor ŠIMŮNEK ; Ondreij SKODA ; Miroslav ŠKORŇA ; Martin ŠRÁMEK ; Nicolas DRENCK ; Khalid SOBH ; Emilie LESAINE ; Candice SABBEN ; Peggy REINER ; Francois ROUANET ; Daniel STRBIAN ; Stefan BOSKAMP ; Joshua MBROH ; Simon NAGEL ; Michael ROSENKRANZ ; Sven POLI ; Götz THOMALLA ; Theodoros KARAPANAYIOTIDES ; Ioanna KOUTROULOU ; Odysseas KARGIOTIS ; Lina PALAIODIMOU ; José Dominguo BARRIENTOS GUERRA ; Vikram HUDED ; Shashank NAGENDRA ; Chintan PRAJAPATI ; P.N. SYLAJA ; Achmad Firdaus SANI ; Abdoreza GHOREISHI ; Mehdi FARHOUDI ; Elyar SADEGHI HOKMABADI ; Mazyar HASHEMILAR ; Sergiu Ionut SABETAY ; Fadi RAHAL ; Maurizio ACAMPA ; Alessandro ADAMI ; Marco LONGONI ; Raffaele ORNELLO ; Leonardo RENIERI ; Michele ROMOLI ; Simona SACCO ; Andrea SALMAGGI ; Davide SANGALLI ; Andrea ZINI ; Kenichiro SAKAI ; Hiroki FUKUDA ; Kyohei FUJITA ; Hirotoshi IMAMURA ; Miyake KOSUKE ; Manabu SAKAGUCHI ; Kazutaka SONODA ; Yuji MATSUMARU ; Nobuyuki OHARA ; Seigo SHINDO ; Yohei TAKENOBU ; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO ; Kazunori TOYODA ; Takeshi UWATOKO ; Nobuyuki SAKAI ; Nobuaki YAMAMOTO ; Ryoo YAMAMOTO ; Yukako YAZAWA ; Yuri SUGIURA ; Jang-Hyun BAEK ; Si Baek LEE ; Kwon-Duk SEO ; Sung-Il SOHN ; Jin Soo LEE ; Anita Ante ARSOVSKA ; Chan Yong CHIEH ; Wan Asyraf WAN ZAIDI ; Wan Nur Nafisah WAN YAHYA ; Fernando GONGORA-RIVERA ; Manuel MARTINEZ-MARINO ; Adrian INFANTE-VALENZUELA ; Diederik DIPPEL ; Dianne H.K. VAN DAM-NOLEN ; Teddy Y. WU ; Martin PUNTER ; Tajudeen Temitayo ADEBAYO ; Abiodun H. BELLO ; Taofiki Ajao SUNMONU ; Kolawole Wasiu WAHAB ; Antje SUNDSETH ; Amal M. AL HASHMI ; Saima AHMAD ; Umair RASHID ; Liliana RODRIGUEZ-KADOTA ; Miguel Ángel VENCES ; Patrick Matic YALUNG ; Jon Stewart Hao DY ; Waldemar BROLA ; Aleksander DĘBIEC ; Malgorzata DOROBEK ; Michal Adam KARLINSKI ; Beata M. LABUZ-ROSZAK ; Anetta LASEK-BAL ; Halina SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ ; Jacek STASZEWSKI ; Piotr SOBOLEWSKI ; Marcin WIĄCEK ; Justyna ZIELINSKA-TUREK ; André Pinho ARAÚJO ; Mariana ROCHA ; Pedro CASTRO ; Patricia FERREIRA ; Ana Paiva NUNES ; Luísa FONSECA ; Teresa PINHO E MELO ; Miguel RODRIGUES ; M Luis SILVA ; Bogdan CIOPLEIAS ; Adela DIMITRIADE ; Cristian FALUP-PECURARIU ; May Adel HAMID ; Narayanaswamy VENKETASUBRAMANIAN ; Georgi KRASTEV ; Jozef HARING ; Oscar AYO-MARTIN ; Francisco HERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ ; Jordi BLASCO ; Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-VÁZQUEZ ; Antonio CRUZ-CULEBRAS ; Francisco MONICHE ; Joan MONTANER ; Soledad PEREZ-SANCHEZ ; María Jesús GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ ; Marta GUILLÁN RODRÍGUEZ ; Gianmarco BERNAVA ; Manuel BOLOGNESE ; Emmanuel CARRERA ; Anchalee CHUROJANA ; Ozlem AYKAC ; Atilla Özcan ÖZDEMIR ; Arsida BAJRAMI ; Songul SENADIM ; Syed I. HUSSAIN ; Seby JOHN ; Kailash KRISHNAN ; Robert LENTHALL ; Kaiz S. ASIF ; Kristine BELOW ; Jose BILLER ; Michael CHEN ; Alex CHEBL ; Marco COLASURDO ; Alexandra CZAP ; Adam H. DE HAVENON ; Sushrut DHARMADHIKARI ; Clifford J. ESKEY ; Mudassir FAROOQUI ; Steven K. FESKE ; Nitin GOYAL ; Kasey B. GRIMMETT ; Amy K. GUZIK ; Diogo C. HAUSSEN ; Majesta HOVINGH ; Dinesh JILLELA ; Peter T. KAN ; Rakesh KHATRI ; Naim N. KHOURY ; Nicole L. KILEY ; Murali K. KOLIKONDA ; Stephanie LARA ; Grace LI ; Italo LINFANTE ; Aaron I. LOOCHTAN ; Carlos D. LOPEZ ; Sarah LYCAN ; Shailesh S. MALE ; Fadi NAHAB ; Laith MAALI ; Hesham E. MASOUD ; Jiangyong MIN ; Santiago ORGETA-GUTIERREZ ; Ghada A. MOHAMED ; Mahmoud MOHAMMADEN ; Krishna NALLEBALLE ; Yazan RADAIDEH ; Pankajavalli RAMAKRISHNAN ; Bliss RAYO-TARANTO ; Diana M. ROJAS-SOTO ; Sean RULAND ; Alexis N. SIMPKINS ; Sunil A. SHETH ; Amy K. STAROSCIAK ; Nicholas E. TARLOV ; Robert A. TAYLOR ; Barbara VOETSCH ; Linda ZHANG ; Hai Quang DUONG ; Viet-Phuong DAO ; Huynh Vu LE ; Thong Nhu PHAM ; Mai Duy TON ; Anh Duc TRAN ; Osama O. ZAIDAT ; Paolo MACHI ; Elisabeth DIRREN ; Claudio RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ ; Jorge ESCARTÍN LÓPEZ ; Jose Carlos FERNÁNDEZ FERRO ; Niloofar MOHAMMADZADEH ; Neil C. SURYADEVARA, MD ; Beatriz DE LA CRUZ FERNÁNDEZ ; Filipe BESSA ; Nina JANCAR ; Megan BRADY ; Dawn SCOZZARI
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):256-265
Background:
and Purpose Recent studies suggested an increased incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated the volume of CVT hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 171 stroke centers from 49 countries. We recorded COVID-19 admission volumes, CVT hospitalization, and CVT in-hospital mortality from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. CVT diagnoses were identified by International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes or stroke databases. We additionally sought to compare the same metrics in the first 5 months of 2021 compared to the corresponding months in 2019 and 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04934020).
Results:
There were 2,313 CVT admissions across the 1-year pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic year (2020); no differences in CVT volume or CVT mortality were observed. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT volumes compared to 2019 (27.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.2 to 32.0; P<0.0001) and 2020 (41.4%; 95% CI, 37.0 to 46.0; P<0.0001). A COVID-19 diagnosis was present in 7.6% (132/1,738) of CVT hospitalizations. CVT was present in 0.04% (103/292,080) of COVID-19 hospitalizations. During the first pandemic year, CVT mortality was higher in patients who were COVID positive compared to COVID negative patients (8/53 [15.0%] vs. 41/910 [4.5%], P=0.004). There was an increase in CVT mortality during the first 5 months of pandemic years 2020 and 2021 compared to the first 5 months of the pre-pandemic year 2019 (2019 vs. 2020: 2.26% vs. 4.74%, P=0.05; 2019 vs. 2021: 2.26% vs. 4.99%, P=0.03). In the first 5 months of 2021, there were 26 cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), resulting in six deaths.
Conclusions
During the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT hospitalization volume and CVT in-hospital mortality did not change compared to the prior year. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with higher CVT in-hospital mortality. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT hospitalization volume and increase in CVT-related mortality, partially attributable to VITT.
10.In-Silico Analysis of Chromatin Modifiers and Profiling of Histone Deacetylases (HDAC’s) in Human Oral Cancer
Anand K. SAJNANI ; Sanket G. SHAH ; Mudasir RASHID ; Abhiram NATU ; Poonam B. GERA ; Sanjay GUPTA
Chonnam Medical Journal 2021;57(3):176-184
Histone modifications have been demonstrated to play a significant role in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) epigenetic regulation. An in-silico analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of various histone acetyl transferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) suggested that HATs do not differ between normal and tumor samples whereas HDAC2 and HDAC1 change maximally and marginally respectively between normal and tumor patients with no change being noted in HDAC6 expression. Hence, this investigation was carried out to validate the expression states of HDAC 1, 2 and 6 mRNAs in buccal mucosa and tongue SCC samples in an Indian cohort. Buccal mucosa and tongue squamous cell carcinoma tissues with intact histopathology were processed for RNA isolation followed by cDNA synthesis which was then subjected to q-PCR for HDACs. The average RNA yield of the tongue tissue sample was ∼2 μg/mg of tissue and the A260/280 ratios were between 2.03 and 2.06. The average RNA yield of buccal mucosa tissue sample was ∼1 μg/mg of tissue and the A260/280 ratio were between 2.00 and 2.08. We have demonstrated that HDAC2 was overexpressed in tongue and buccal mucosa samples. Over-expression of HDAC2 imply potential use of HDACi along with standard chemotherapeutic drug in oral cancer treatment.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail