Objectives: This study aimed to describe the clinical outcomes related to theintroduction of Paliperidone Palmitate in a specialty hospital in the Philippines. Methodology: Cross-sectional study among patients with Schizophrenia seen at thepsychiatry service of a specialty hospital catering to war veterans who were initiated onPaliperidone Palmitate. We reviewed and abstracted baseline patient data from themedical record of eligible patients. Outcome of treatment was collected through a one-time objective assessment of the patient by a third-party psychiatrist using theStructured Clinical Interview for Symptoms of Remission (SCI-SR) tool. Results: A total of 30 patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 and June2021, the majority of whom were males (80%), residents of the National Capital Region(50%) and single (20%). The median duration from schizophrenia diagnosis to initiation of Paliperidone treatment was 19.50 years (IQR: 16.60 – 33.50). In eight patients (22.67%),other antipsychotic drugs were discontinued following initiation of Paliperidonetreatment; in the remaining 22 participants (73.33%), Paliperidone was taken concurrentlywith other antipsychotic drugs. The median duration from the initiation of Paliperidonetreatment to follow-up assessment was 27.20 months (IQR: 24.73 – 30.50), with allparticipants having at least 6 months of treatment. At follow-up assessment, allparticipants were classified to be in remission. Conclusion In this study among patients with schizophrenia seen in a specialtyhospital in the Philippines, we found evidence that clinical outcomes with PaliperidonePalmitate were comparable to those given a combination of oral and long- actingantipsychotics.
Paliperidone Palmitate ; Schizophrenia

The paper by Bernal-Sundiang et al.1 in this issue of Acta Medica Philippina provides one of the more extensive and in-depth empirical discussion of governance in the health sector. Utilizing data collected over a one-year period as part of the Philippine Primary Care Studies in urban, rural, and remote settings, the authors reported on challenges their team encountered in project implementation as it relates to leadership and governance. One strength of the paper is that it situates leadership and governance as a health system keystone that links to all the other components of infrastructure and supply chains, information system, health workforce, financing, and stakeholder engagement, and monitoring and evaluation. This harks back to the framework posited in the World Health Report 20002, highlighting the interaction between governance and the other system elements. Despite this critical role of governance, however, it has been characterized as being poorly understood, and often difficult to operationalize, not least because of poor capacities of different institutions and actors to bring to the fore the good governance agenda.3 For instance, it has been suggested that good governance, regardless of the sector, is “accountable, transparent, responsive, equitable and inclusive, effective and efficient, participatory, consensus-oriented and follows the rule of law.”4 This characterization assumes the existence of traditions and institutions that places the common good front and center, something which may not be present, if not willfully disregarded, in many jurisdictions. Another set of related buzzwords for governance is that it entails a “whole-of-government” and “whole-of-society” approaches, which means the mobilization of public agencies, on the one hand, and private sector and civil society organizations, on the other, towards the realization of shared goals.5 Aside from the need for conceptual and operational clarity on these two terms, the reality of token participation and siloed working environments remain barriers to achieving true multisectoral approaches in health and other areas. Relatedly, I wish to bring to the discussion one insight from our case study of tuberculosis program implementation.6 In this research, we identified facilitating and hindering factors to the successful implementation of the tuberculosis prevention and control program in cities and municipalities, and we posited that these factors were rooted in a common source of governance for health. We further extended the argument by stating that focusing on the local chief executive as the responsible entity for good governance is a myopic view of the issue as it only covers the levels that can be labelled as “broader governance environment” and “public policies.”7 The more fine-grained institutional or sectoral governance is within the ambit of the local health officer, while what we propose to refer to as “program-level” governance is the realm of the program coordinator. The scope and specificity of governance as exercised across these levels, and consequent access to precise information, differ, which highlights the shared responsibility of these three principal actors at the local level in so far as exercise of good governance is concerned. Good governance in health has been an aspirational goal for many decades, and was identified as an important constituent in our quest for better health and sustainable development. The recommendations outlined by Bernal-Sundiang et al.1 provide a starting point on how we can gradually improve the health sector to come closer to this ambition. However, embedding good governance in institutions and society at large will be critical in sustaining such gains moving forward.

Voluntary blood donation is a key strategy in improving availability of, and access to, a life-saving product for populations requiring blood transfusion for a variety of medical conditions.1 In the Philippines, the value of voluntary blood donation is recognized by the state through Republic Act No. 7719, enacted nearly three decades ago.2 Among others, this piece of legislation aims to encourage citizens to donate blood through educational and advocacy activities that will “instill public consciousness of the principle that blood donation is a humanitarian act.” But is this appeal to altruism sufficient? The repeated calls for action by the Department of Health (DOH), through its National Voluntary Blood Services Program, may indicate otherwise. For instance, it was noted that in 2009, about one in four blood units collected were from replacement donation (i.e., blood donation from family and friends in exchange for stored blood used by a patient).3 The low voluntary blood donation rates were further exacerbated by the pandemic situation amidst a constant demand for blood transfusion, hence the DOH taps its regular donors such as uniformed personnel.4 Stakeholders particularly appealed to the youth to donate blood to boost supply.5,6 But how do the youth fare? In the paper by Mappala et al.7 in this issue of the Acta Medica Philippina, the authors reported that among a sample of relatively young, educated, internet-savvy, and urban-dwelling respondents, only about one in three ever donated blood, and of this number, about two-thirds either donated blood only when needed, or just did the practice once. Most of the respondents have a relatively high knowledge and awareness of blood donation, and were motivated to donate blood for altruistic and pro-social purposes. From this data alone, appealing to humanitarian and civic duty, the very heart of the current national policy and program, appears to be not enough to encourage the practice of blood donation, at least in so far as this population segment is concerned. Other results from the same survey, however, point to one other area that stakeholders in the voluntary blood donation program can focus on to increase uptake by the population, and this is with respect to the availability and accessibility of the service to the target population. Participants rated highly the statements pertaining to the geographic proximity of the facility, attitude of staff towards blood donors, and availability of communication lines for addressing queries, as motivators for blood donation. From a management perspective, these align with the value chain strategic service delivery model, which can be considered by stakeholders in designing the voluntary blood donation service and facility.8 More specifically, blood donation services can look into incorporating value-adding service delivery strategies in their design of their offering, considering the experience of the service user before, during, and after the service has been rendered. These strategies are described in detail elsewhere, and I will just attempt to list down some considerations specific to the blood donation service. Pre-service strategies include market analysis (including market segmentation and differentiation, in this case possibly developing different approaches and messages for target donors such as the youth, older adults, etc.), pricing (while voluntary blood donation is free, some facilities are authorized to charge a fee for the processing of the donated blood), location (of the blood donation facilities, and deciding whether these should be fixed post or mobile units), and promotion (among others, how to inform the target donors about the service). Point-of-service considerations, meanwhile, pertain to the totality of the donor experience from the time they arrive, and eventually leave, the blood donation facility, and encompasses all aspects of clinical operations, quality assurance, process innovation, and patient satisfaction. Lastly, after-service strategies will have to include aspects on how to encourage a person who donated blood once to become a regular donor, as well as an advocate and ambassador for blood donation who can encourage and influence family and friends to likewise donate blood in a voluntary manner (i.e., as part of follow-up and follow-on activities). I write this Editorial on the eve of the 29th year since Republic Act No. 7719 was promulgated. Given the evolving characteristics of the target blood donor pool, this may be the opportune time to shift from focusing purely on promotion of the pro-social value of blood donation, and incorporate service-improving strategies in the blood donation system, to bring us closer to the policy vision of mobilizing “all sectors of the community to participate in mechanisms for voluntary and nonprofit collection of blood.”

Midwives are primarily considered as professionals with expertise in assisting women before, during, and after childbirth. Thus, the competencies for midwifery as defined by the International Confederation of Midwives revolve principally around assessment and provision of care to women and the fetus/newborn/infant during the pre-pregnancy and antenatal periods, labor and birth, postnatal/postpartum periods.1 The availability of skilled midwives in communities has allowed women, especially those who belong to lower income groups, to access professional services around childbirth, as reflected in responses from the National Demographic and Household Survey.2 For instance, while 50% of all women surveyed received antenatal care from a midwife, it is notable that 70% of those who belonged to the lowest wealth quintile were seen by a midwife during the antenatal period. Furthermore, midwives assisted 30% of deliveries reported by respondents, while roughly a little over a third of deliveries for each of the three lowest quintiles were attended by a midwife. Furthermore, in the Philippine setting, midwives are recognized as the first professional point of contact for most members of a community, especially in rural and remote places, as midwives are the ones deployed to manage Barangay Health Stations. Elaborating the scope of the practice of midwifery in relation to the provision of “primary health care services in the community” as stipulated in Republic Act No. 73923, the Board of Midwifery of the Professional Regulation Commission, in a primer for the profession, stated that midwives are expected to, among others, (a) implement government health programs in accordance with policies and guidelines of the Department of Health; (b) supervise barangay health workers; and (c) manage a Barangay Health Station.4 Stated differently, midwives, given the scope of work that they do and the areas where they are deployed, serve as the face and touchpoint of the health sector in our communities. They are the embodiment of the different health policies and programs enacted at the national and local levels through which Filipinos experience, individually and collectively, the drive for better health (or lack thereof ) advanced by different agencies, personalities, and stakeholders. However, as pointed out by Felipe-Dimog et al.5 in this issue of Acta Medica Philippina, midwives, especially those working in the public health sector, may take on roles beyond that contemplated by law. For instance, in the course of my professional practice during which I was deployed briefly in a rural health unit, and worked with an urban health department, I have encountered midwives who were tasked to work as program coordinators (or assistant coordinators), sanitation inspectors, field epidemiologists, and supply managers, among others, because of scarcity in the overall staff complement of health departments. Given their close ties with their areas of assignments, midwives are also expected to be community coordinators, if not organizers. The extent to which midwives are assigned these additional tasks depend on their professional relationship with their immediate supervisor; the level of trust and confidence reposed on them by their superiors; in some instances, their attendance to specific training workshops; as well as the availability of more qualified personnel (or lack thereof ) in the locality. Yet despite all these – placement in remote, if not hardship posts; additional assignments beyond their job description – midwives receive salaries that may not be commensurate after consideration of the job context. Staff midwife positions (i.e., Midwife I to III) in government institutions are remunerated at Salary Grades 9 to 13 (i.e., approximate gross pay of PHP 21,000 to PHP 31,000, based on the fourth tranche of the Salary Standardization Law, but may be lower depending on the income classification of the local government unit6). Additional compensation and benefits under special laws may not always be provided as this will depend on the paying capacity of the employing agency. Furthermore, midwives – especially those who completed the two-year program under the previous policy – also must contend with issues concerning their professional status. I have personally encountered community members who do not consider midwives as professionals in the same league as nurses or physicians, or who view midwives as “assistants” or “subordinates” of nurses and physicians, forgetting that a certain degree of independent practice is allowed each professional licensed by the Republic of the Philippines. Midwives play a crucial role in caring for Filipinos not only around childbirth – this is their primary professional duty – but throughout the lifespan – especially for midwives working in local health departments. Stakeholders must not forget to give due recognition to the value and worth contributed by midwives in shaping the health and well-being of each generation of Filipinos.
midwives

Objective: Although interagency collaboration in drug treatment and rehabilitation has been substantially studied, a lack of consensus on the nomenclature and definition of collaboration remains an unresolved issue in public health policy and practice. To facilitate further consensus, this review analyses previously used definition, conceptualization, and theorization on interagency collaboration in the field of drug rehabilitation. Methods: We conducted evidence synthesis using a scoping review approach. This review is based on searches using the MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, and PsychINFO databases and used the protocol proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. Results: A total of 6,259 papers were retrieved from database and citation searches, 33 of which were eligible for inclusion in the analysis after screening and evaluation. Although the definitions varied, the common elements included (a) the presence of at least two entities, which were either services, programs or organizations; (b) these entities collaborated or shared resources; (c) partnership went through a development process; and (d) the intent of collaboration was to achieve a common purpose. There were five means of conceptualizing collaboration: (a) degrees, or level of intensity and formality; (b) elements, or the constitutive structure and activities; (c) stages, or the development of partnership over time; (d) levels, or the focus of the collaborative; and (e) type, or a distinction between collaboration on in policy and practice. Conclusion Scholarship in this field can benefit from studies that conceptualize collaboration not only crosssectionally through the description of degrees, elements, levels, and type, but also by considering the stages dimension of collaboration (i.e., evolution of collaboration initiative over time). Countries or jurisdictions may need to formalize a term and definition for collaboration as it applies to initiatives within their territories.
Intersectoral collaboration ; review

Background: Workplace bullying is defined as frequent, ongoing, and detrimental incidence of unreasonable acts/behaviors directed towards an individual. The consequences of bullying to individuals often lead to absenteeism, resignation, job dissatisfaction, and suicidal ideation making it a major public health concern. This organizational issue, when not addressed, will greatly affect the workflow in any organization. There is a paucity of literature on this problem in the Southeast Asian countries Objective: This study aimed to describe the extent of workplace bullying among employees of a public higher education institution. Methodology: The researchers used a descriptive, cross-sectional study design. Survey questionnaires in Google Form were emailed to all employees with a 35.96% participation rate. The survey instrument asked participants to indicate their awareness about any bullying behavior in their unit and to specify the typical profile of bullies and victims they know of. Responses to quantitative variables were summarized using the mean and standard deviation, while qualitative variables were reported as frequency and percentage distribution. The software used for analysis were Microsoft Excel and EpiInfo 7. Results: At least one-third (36.94%) of survey respondents indicated that they witnessed a form of bullying in the workplace with more awareness seen among faculty members and permanent employees. The most common type of bullying observed in the workplace was criticism in public. Notably, this type of bullying was similar across employee categories. The predominant reactions of victims of bullying include feeling of fear and loss of trust, and confiding to a friend or co-worker. Conclusion The phenomenon of bullying has been witnessed by the employees and reported to have adverse effects on victims. Informational campaigns coupled with anti-bullying policy and programs are necessary to promote employee well-being.
Occupational Stress ; Universities ; Occupational Stress ; Philippines

Background: 'Inter-organizational collaboration' and 'partnership' have been emphasized in drug treatment and rehabilitation over the decades. Nevertheless, the synthesis of knowledge of related arrangements has been limited in scope. This study fills a gap by systematically reviewing the features, outcomes, facilitators, and barriers of inter-organizational collaborations in drug rehabilitation to propose insights to improve policy and practice. Methodology: This review is based on searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, and PsychINFO databases. All retrieved papers were independently screened and underwent quality assessment based on the protocol proposed by Peters et al. (2017). Data charting from the included sources was performed using NVivo. Results: A total of 5,631 unique records were retrieved, of which 54 were included in the analysis. Most of the papers were published between 2011 and 2019, and primarily described, or tested, a collaborative activity from a case study or survey research. Treatment services were often partnered with public health, primary care, or social service organizations. The outcomes of initiatives were commonly about the increase in service utilization or the enhancement of service provision. Facilitators and barriers to collaboration were reported by two-thirds of the papers, which primarily pertained to contextual or organizational dimensions. Conclusion This piece of evidence provides good descriptive content on what, how, and how well the interorganizational collaborations have been conducted in drug treatment and rehabilitation. Implications for promoting good practices that range from University education, staff exchange, and incentives to support by governments are discussed.
Intersectoral Collaboration ; Substance-Related Disorders ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers

Objectives: The Pharmacy DOTS Initiative (PDI) was relaunched on a larger scale in 2014 through the Innovations and Multi-Sectoral Partnerships to Achieve Control of Tuberculosis (IMPACT) project. This paper aimed to assess the PDI program through IMPACT by identifying the facilitating and hindering factors in its implementation. The identified factors are classified as to the affected stakeholders or processes.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the PDI Program Manager and four NTP coordinators from selected project sites. Thematic analysis was done to determine the recurring facilitating and hindering factors as identified by the key informants.

Results: Facilitating factors identified include cooperation of the stakeholders, capability-building and a good referral system. The barriers to the implementation were grouped into patient-related, pharmacy-related, health center-related, program-related as well as external factors.

Conclusion: The referral system created through PDI facilitated the flow of referrals starting from the pharmacy. This enabled presumptive patients to have access to health facilities for TB. Hindering factors contributed to the inability of the engaged pharmacies to sustain their consistency and commitment in conducting the PDI interventions.

Key Words: barriers, facilitators, tuberculosis, directly observed therapy, program evaluation, pharmacy

Background and Objectives: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a public health problem in the Philippines despite trends indicating a decline in the burden of disease. Persons who use drugs who are confined in government-retained drug abuse treatment and rehabilitation centers (DATRCs) face an increased risk for TB because of the congestion in the facility coupled with the absence of guidelines on TB management specific to DATRCs. Thus, this study was conducted to document the current case finding and case holding practices as well as TB treatment pathway in six (6) Luzon-based, government-retained DATRCs.

Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted with DATRC personnel involved in TB diagnosis and management in six selected DATRCs in Luzon, Philippines. Interviews were transcribed and coded for thematic analysis. We compared the DATRC practices with the provisions of the 2014 National TB Control Program (NTP) Manual of Procedures. Results were validated through a workshop with (a) a group of physicians and rehabilitation practitioners assigned in other DATRCs; and (b) a group of experts who have experience in managing or overseeing DATRCs in the country.

Results: Two physicians and four nurses participated in the interviews. Variations in case finding and case holding practices in six DATRCs have been found. National guidelines exist for congregate settings but are more specific to jails/prisons, which are administratively and operationally different from DATRCs.

Conclusion: Development of special guidelines for TB case finding and case holding in DATRCs as well as staff training on the latest NTP Manual of Procedures are recommended. However, gaps and inequities posed by the current set-up underscore the need to address health system-wide factors affecting the practice and performance of these facilities.

Key Words: tuberculosis, case finding, case holding, drug abuse treatment and rehabilitation centers, Philippines

Objective: This paper aims to characterize existing financial assistance available to patients with schizophrenia. Specifically, we described (1) the funding mechanisms for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia; (2) the process for accessing financial assistance; and (3) the experiences of consumers of services of these support mechanisms.

Methods: We employed qualitative techniques using key informant interviews (KII) and focus group discussion (FGD). Key informants were officials from institutions providing or offering financial assistance for patients with any health-related concerns, including schizophrenia. Focus group participants were support group members or caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for both providers and consumers of financial assistance or scheme. Topic guides for KII and FGD were used for data collection. Thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data gathered from the informants and focus group participants.

Results: Securing financial assistance for schizophrenia followed a generally similar process, whether the source is from government offices or civil society organizations, and can be grouped into three main stages: (a) pre-application, (b) application, and (c) post-application. While the process of seeking financial assistance appears to be straightforward, issues were encountered in all of the stages by both providers and recipients alike, namely: (a) Financial assistance as an augmentation to patient resources; (b) Mismatch between demand and service capability; (c) Measures of organizational effectiveness; (d) Health professionals and support groups as "bridges" / "facilitators" to financial assistance providers; (e) Financial and non-financial costs incurred by caregivers in applying for financial assistance; and (f) Recipient-provider relationship as a barrier to the feedback process.

Conclusion: This study provides a glimpse of available financial and other relevant assistance to clients, including clients suffering from schizophrenia. More extensive research covering more organizations, support groups, and caregivers from different parts of the country is recommended.