On October 21, 2021, the National Medical Products Administration issued and implemented the Self-examination Management Regulations for Medical Device Registration. The regulations clarify the specific requirements of the registration applicants in the process of self-examination, and put forward detailed requirements from the aspects of self-examination ability, self-examination report, declaration materials and responsibility requirements, so as to ensure the orderly development of the self-examination of medical device registration. Based on the actual verification work of in vitro diagnostic reagent, this study briefly discussed the understanding of the relevant contents of the regulations, aiming to provide some reference for enterprises and related supervision departments that have the requirement of registered self-examination.
Medical Device Legislation ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards*

Through the analysis of laws and policies related to registration self-inspection, visiting and researching enterprises, holding symposiums, and issuing nationwide questionnaires, the risks in the registration self-inspection process were summarized, analyzed, and evaluated. From the aspects of regulatory departments and manufacturing enterprises, we suggest to improve China's medical device registration regulations system and reduce the risks of all parties in the registration self-inspection work.
Risk Management ; Commerce ; Medical Device Legislation

OBJECTIVE: To interpret the key contents of the guidance of Personalized Medical Device Regulatory Pathways issued by the IMDRF, and provide reference for the improvement of China's medical device regulatory system. METHODS: The regulatory requirements of personalized medical devices and point-of-care manufacture of medical device were described respectively, and the feasibility of implementing the regulation of point-of-care manufacture of medical device in China was analyzed. RESULTS: The different regulatory pathways of medical devices produced at point-of-care are feasible and have different regulatory risks. CONCLUSIONS In combination with the recommendations provided by the IMDRF guidance and the clinical and regulatory realities in China, we should accelerate the improvement of the regulations and supporting documents for point-of-care manufacture of medical device in China.
Commerce ; Medical Device Legislation ; China

In recent years, emerging technology medical devices have developed rapidly. How to more scientifically and more efficiently regulate these novel medical devices so as to improve access to advanced medical technology while ensuring safety and effectiveness is a new challenge faced by regulatory authorities, and is also the core topic of regulatory science. New tools, new standards and new methods are important means to achieve regulatory science. "Medical Device Development Tool" proposed by the U.S. FDA is a novel medical device regulatory science tool, which can help medical device developers to predict and evaluate product performance more efficiently. It is also helpful for regulatory authorities to make regulatory decisions more efficiently. This study introduces the concept, qualification process, role of MDDT in medical device regulation and MDDT examples, and makes some discussion on the device evaluation from the perspective of reliability and validity. MDDT can facilitate the developing of novel medical device.
United States ; Medical Device Legislation ; Reproducibility of Results ; United States Food and Drug Administration ; Technology ; Device Approval

Type inspection is a necessary precondition of technical evaluation of medical device. The implementation of The Provisions for Administration of Self-Test for Medical Device Registration facilitates the registration pathway for applicants. How to improve the effectiveness of registration self-test has drawn attention from many stakeholders. In this study, we analyzed and discussed the factors affecting the validity of registration self-test from technical evaluation perspective, and proposed suggestions for improvement accordingly. The aim of this article is to boost the reliability and effectiveness of registration self-test and offer a reference for applicants to carry out registration self-test.
Medical Device Legislation

This paper studies the necessity of the current legislation on the supervision of medical devices in China from the perspectives of strengthening administration according to law, protecting public health, perfecting the legal system of medicine and promoting the development of the medical device industry. This study analyzes and summarizes the legislative experiences and forms in the field of medical device regulation in the United States, the European Union, Japan and other countries and regions, at present, the conditions of carrying out the legislation of medical device supervision in China are quite mature, and some policy suggestions are put forward for the enactment of the law of medical device management in China.
Equipment and Supplies ; European Union ; Feasibility Studies ; Industry ; Medical Device Legislation ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration

The traditional regulation mode on medical devices has invalid and negative effect problems. In order to more effectively ensure safety and efficacy of medical devices, promote healthy industrial development, this paper puts forward the innovative concept of smart regulation on the basis of problem orientation. Compared with traditional regulatory mode, smart regulation focus on effectiveness, and pays attention to relationship between effective regulation with self-discipline and industrial development, has characteristics of improving pertinence, effectiveness, accuracy, speed and efficiency of regulation. This paper further elaborates implementation approaches and attentions of smart regulation, by the ways of strengthening credit management, intelligent regulation, professional regulation, promoting self-discipline and encouraging innovation.
Humans ; Medical Device Legislation

The rapid developments of science and technology in China over recent decades, particularly in biomedical research, have brought forward serious challenges regarding ethical governance. Recently, Jian-kui HE, a Chinese scientist, claimed to have "created" the first gene-edited babies, designed to be naturally immune to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The news immediately triggered widespread criticism, denouncement, and debate over the scientific and ethical legitimacy of HE's genetic experiments. China's guidelines and regulations have banned germline genome editing on human embryos for clinical use because of scientific and ethical concerns, in accordance with the international consensus. HE's human experimentation has not only violated these Chinese regulations, but also breached other ethical and regulatory norms. These include questionable scientific value, unreasonable risk-benefit ratio, illegitimate ethics review, invalid informed consent, and regulatory misconduct. This series of ethical failings of HE and his team reveal the institutional failure of the current ethics governance system which largely depends on scientist's self-regulation. The incident highlights the need for urgent improvement of ethics governance at all levels, the enforcement of technical and ethical guidelines, and the establishment of laws relating to such bioethical issues.
CRISPR-Cas Systems ; China ; Consent Forms/ethics* ; Ethics, Medical ; Female ; Gene Editing/legislation & jurisprudence* ; Gene Knockout Techniques/ethics* ; HIV Infections/prevention & control* ; Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence* ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Professional Misconduct/ethics* ; Receptors, CCR5/genetics*

BACKGROUND: The active involvement of anesthesiologists in chronic pain management has been associated with an increase in the number of related medical dispute cases. METHODS: Using the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists Legislation Committee database covering case files from July 2009 to June 2016, we explored injuries and liability characteristics in a subset of cases involving chronic pain management. RESULTS: During the study period, 58 cases were eligible for final analysis. There were 27 cases related to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), many of them involving problems with financial compensation (24/27, 88.9%). The CRPS cases showed male dominance (22 males, 5 females). In a disproportionately large number of these cases, the causative injury occurred during military training (n = 5). Two cases were associated with noninvasive pain managements, and 29 cases with invasive procedures. Of the latter group, procedures involving the spine (both neuraxial and non-neuraxial procedures) resulted in more severe complications than other procedures (P = 0.007). Seven of the patients who underwent invasive procedures died. The most common type of invasive procedures were lumbosacral procedures (16/29, 55.2%). More specifically, the most common damaging events were inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection of local anesthetics (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Several characteristics of medical disputes related to chronic pain management were identified: the prevalence of injury benefit claims in CRPS patients, higher severity of complications in procedures performed at the spine or cervical region, and the preventability of inadvertent intravascular or intrathecal injection of local anesthetics.
Anesthetics, Local ; Chronic Pain* ; Compensation and Redress ; Dissent and Disputes* ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Legislation, Medical ; Male ; Malpractice ; Military Personnel ; Pain Management ; Prevalence ; Spine

OBJECTIVES: Confidentiality of health information is an important aspect of the physician patient relationship. The use of digital medical records has made data much more accessible. To prevent data leakage, many countries have created regulations regarding medical data accessibility. These regulations require a unique user ID for each medical staff member, and this must be protected by a password, which should be kept undisclosed by all means. METHODS: We performed a four-question Google Forms-based survey of medical staff. In the survey, each participant was asked if he/she ever obtained the password of another medical staff member. Then, we asked how many times such an episode occurred and the reason for it. RESULTS: A total of 299 surveys were gathered. The responses showed that 220 (73.6%) participants reported that they had obtained the password of another medical staff member. Only 171 (57.2%) estimated how many time it happened, with an average estimation of 4.75 episodes. All the residents that took part in the study (45, 15%) had obtained the password of another medical staff member, while only 57.5% (38/66) of the nurses reported this. CONCLUSIONS: The use of unique user IDs and passwords to defend the privacy of medical data is a common requirement in medical organizations. Unfortunately, the use of passwords is doomed because medical staff members share their passwords with one another. Strict regulations requiring each staff member to have it's a unique user ID might lead to password sharing and to a decrease in data safety.
Confidentiality ; Electronic Health Records* ; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ; Health Records, Personal ; Humans ; Legislation, Medical ; Medical Records ; Medical Staff ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Prevalence* ; Privacy ; Social Control, Formal