OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes (TD) in patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 27.5 kg/m. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent LRYGB surgery from March, 2012 to June, 2018 in the General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command and Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. The changes in the parameters of glucose metabolism and physical indicators of the patients in the first, second and third years after the surgery were analyzed in patients in low BMI group and high BMI group. RESULTS: All the 74 patients underwent LRYGB successfully without conversion to open surgery. One year after the surgery, fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting C-peptide, BMI, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with their preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). At 2 years after the operation, FBG, HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, HOMA-IR, BMI, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). In the third year, FBG, HOMA-IR, fasting C-peptide, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters of glucose metabolism and islet function between low BMI group and high BMI group at different stages. No serious complications occurred in these patients after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS LRYGB is effective for treatment of T2D in Chinese patients with a BMI < 27.5. After the surgery, the patient show reduced waistline without significant weight loss. The long-term results of the surgery still require further investigations with a larger samples and longer follow-up.
Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Gastric Bypass ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

ObjectiveTo determine whether a short interval (≤2 weeks) between 12-core prostate biopsy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) affects perioperative parameters and the outcome of surgery.

METHODSThis retrospective study included 102 cases of prostate cancer treated by LRP after 12-core prostate biopsy from January 2012 to December 2016. Based on the interval between prostate biopsy and LRP, we divided the patients into three groups: ≤2 wk (n = 35), >2－6 wk (n = 21), and >6 wk (n = 46). The patients averaged 69.87 (59－84) years in age, 24.99 (15.62－33.14) kg/m2 in the body mass index (BMI), 24.41 (0.41－111.78) μg/L in the baseline PSA level, 56.05 (15.97－216.52) ml in the prostate volume, and 7.51 (6－9) in the Gleason score. We analyzed the clinical data, perioperative parameters and outcomes of surgery, and compared them among the three groups of patients.

RESULTSOperations were completed successfully in all the 102 cases without transferring to open surgery. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups of patients in age, BMI, baseline PSA level, prostate volume, Gleason score, or T stage, nor in the operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, intestinal injury, positive incision margin rate, or urinary continence rate at 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONSLaparoscopic radical prostatectomy at ≤2 weeks after 12-core prostate biopsy is safe and effective in the treatment of prostate cancer and does not affect the perioperative parameters and outcomes of surgery.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Operative Time ; Prostate ; pathology ; surgery ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatectomy ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Traditional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a treatment choice in many developing countries and regions for most patients with localized prostate cancer; however, no system for predicting surgical difficulty and risk has been established. This study aimed to propose a simple and standard preoperative classification system of prostate cancer using preoperative data to predict surgical difficulty and risk and to evaluate the relationship between the data and postoperative complications. We collected data from 236 patients and divided them into three groups to evaluate and validate the relationships among preoperative, operative, and postoperative data. This new scoring system is based on the body mass index, ultrasonic prostate volume, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, middle lobe protrusion, and clinical stage. In the scoring group, we classified 89 patients into two groups: the low-risk group (score of <4) and high-risk group (score of ≥4), and then compared the postoperative data between the two groups. The positive surgical margin rate was higher in the high-risk group than low-risk group. The results in validation Groups A and B were similar to those in the scoring group. The focus of our scoring system is to allow for preliminary assessment of surgical difficulty by collecting the patients' basic information. Urologists can easily use the scoring system to evaluate the surgical difficulty and predict the risks of a positive surgical margin and urinary incontinence in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Period ; Prostate/diagnostic imaging* ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis* ; Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Risk Assessment ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has become the mainstream surgical operation due to its stability and feasibility. Even for liver surgery, the laparoscopic approach has become an integral procedure. According to the recent international consensus meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) might be a new standard of care for left lateral surgical lesions. This study was designed to compare open LLS to laparoscopic LLS. METHODS: In total, 82 patients who had undergone LLS at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 59 patients underwent open LLS and 23 underwent laparoscopic LLS. These two groups were compared according to general characteristics and operative outcomes. RESULTS: The data analysis results showed that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection in terms of the amount of bleeding during the operation and the duration of hospital stay. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time (p value=0.747). The amount of bleeding during the operation was 145.5±149.4 ml on average for the laparoscopic group and 320±243.8 ml on average for the open group (p value=0.005). The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.7±5.8 days for the laparoscopic surgery group and 12.2±5.1 days for the open surgery group (p value=0.003). CONCLUSION: This study showed that laparoscopic LLS is safe and feasible, because it involves less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. For left lateral lesions, laparoscopic LLS might be the first option to be considered.
Consensus ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Jeollanam-do ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Liver ; Standard of Care ; Statistics as Topic

Through continuous development, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has become widely recognized in academic and medical circles. In China, the volume of MBS operations has increased year by year. Therapeutic goals of MBS have evolved from treating obesity to treating Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and further to treating a series of obesity-associated metabolic diseases (including conditions in the endocrine system, circulatory system, respiratory system, reproductive system, and etc). Surgical approach of MBS has also been evolving continuously. Currently the common surgical procedures include laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). All surgical procedures have pros and cons, and the choice of surgical procedures should be based on the conditions of patients, the surgeon's technical ability, and benefits and operative risks. With the development of MBS, the proportions of different surgical procedures also changed in China. In recent five years, the proportion of AGB has decreased continuously and LAGB is no longer a common procedure. The proportion of LSG has increased rapidly, rising from 9% in 2010 to 55% in 2015. The proportion of RYGB has increased from 57% to 64% between 2010 and 2013, and remained at 45% afterwards. Since 2010, most MBS operations are laparoscopic surgery. 3D Laparoscopic surgery, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and da Vinci Robotic Surgery have also been introduced in MBS. This review discusses the status quo and changes of MBS in china, as well as the new technology in MBS, aiming to strengthen the information and comprehension of MBS in china.
Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Biliopancreatic Diversion ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; China ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Disease Management ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Gastrectomy ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Gastric Bypass ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Metabolic Diseases ; surgery ; Obesity ; surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; statistics & numerical data ; trends

OBJECTIVETo systematically assess the safety and efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (HALG) versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer.

METHODSChinese or English literature regarding comparison of HALG and ODG were collected by searching in databases (such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang database) between January 1996 and September 2016. The data of operative time, incision length, blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, time to flatus, hospital stay, postoperative complication morbidity and long-term outcomes were compared between the two procedures. Then funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias and sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the stability of the results. All these data analyses were performed using the Meta for or Meta package of R version 3.3.1.

RESULTSA total of 7 studies with 835 patients (323 cases in HALG group and 512 cases in ODG group) were included. Compared with ODG, HALG had a longer operative time (WMD=28.93 minutes, 95%CI=9.59 to 48.28, Z=2.93, P=0.000), a shorter incision length (WMD=-10.31 cm, 95%CI=-14.01 to -6.62, Z=-5.47, P=0.000), less blood loss (WMD=-140.08 ml, 95%CI=-215.07 to -65.09, Z=-3.66, P=0.000), faster gastrointestinal recovery (WMD=-1.23 days, 95%CI=-1.89 to -0.56, Z=-3.62, P=0.000), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=-3.24 days, 95%CI=-5.47 to -1.02, Z=-2.85, P=0.000). In subgroup analysis, 3 studies published before 2013 vs. 4 studies published afterwards, the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD=-0.78, 95%CI=-2.05 to 0.50, Z=-1.19, P=0.235) and postoperative complication morbidity (RR=1.02, 95%CI=0.43 to 2.44, Z=0.05, P=0.961) did not differ significantly between two groups. Compared with ODG, the RR(95%CI) of ileus of HALG was 0.43 (0.07 to 2.82), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.383). One study reported the 5-year overall survival rates of HALG and ODG were 81.0% vs 67.5%, and the tumor recurrence rates were 7.1% vs 22%, respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant(all P>0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that the above results were stable. The funnel plots of the lymph nodes and postoperative complication morbidity did not present significant publication bias.

CONCLUSIONSHALG has the advantages of minimal invasiveness such as shorter incision length and quicker recovery. Furthermore, the short-term efficacy of HALG is similar to conventional open surgery. However, the long-term efficacy is lack of support from multicenter long-term follow-up results.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Gastrectomy ; methods ; Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Node Excision ; statistics & numerical data ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; epidemiology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Postoperative Period ; Recovery of Function ; Stomach Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; Survival Rate ; Time ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) versus open repair (OR) for perforated peptic ulcers.

METHODSFrom January 2010 to June 2014, in Shanghai Tongji Hospital, 119 patients who were diagnosed as perforated peptic ulcers and planned to receive operation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into LR (58 patients) and OR(61 patients) group by computer. Intra-operative and postoperative parameters were compared between two groups. This study was registered as a randomized controlled trial by the China Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ChiCTR-TRC-11001607).

RESULTSThere was no significant difference in baseline data between two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences of operation time, morbidity of postoperative complication, mortality, reoperation probability, decompression time, fluid diet recovery time and hospitalization cost were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to OR group, LR group required less postoperative fentanyl [(0.74±0.33) mg vs. (1.04±0.39) mg, t=-4.519, P=0.000] and had shorter hospital stay [median 7(5 to 9) days vs. 8(7 to 10) days, U=-2.090, P=0.001]. In LR group, 3 patients(5.2%) had leakage in perforation site after surgery. One case received laparotomy on the second day after surgery for diffuse peritonitis. The other two received conservative treatment (total parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition). There was no recurrence of perforation in OR group. One patient of each group died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) 22 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONLR may be preferable for treating perforated peptic ulcers than OR, however preventive measures during LR should be taken to avoid postopertive leak in perforation site.

China ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; Enteral Nutrition ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; rehabilitation ; Laparotomy ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Multiple Organ Failure ; epidemiology ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; Parenteral Nutrition, Total ; Peptic Ulcer Perforation ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Peritonitis ; therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; therapy ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODSClinical data of 133 patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014 in the General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force were retrospectively analyzed. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter, incidence of postoperative urinary retention, and time to re-insert indwelling catheter were recorded. Risk factors of urinary retention were analyzed.

RESULTSOf 133 patients, 70 were males and 63 were females, with a median age of 62 (20-79) years old. Distance from tumor lower margin to anal verge were ≤5 cm in 58 patients, >5 cm to 10 cm in 41 patients, and >10 cm to 15 cm in 34 patients. The postoperative TNM stage was recorded in 35 patients with stage I(, 34 with stage II(, 59 with stage III( and 5 with stage IIII(. Surgical procedures included anterior resection (AR) for 92 patients, abdominoperineal resection (APR) for 25 patients and intersphincteric resection (ISR) for 16 patients. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 89 patients compared with open operation in 44 patients. Time to the first removal of urinary catheter was 2-7 days after operation (median, 5 days) and 36 (27.1%) patients developed urinary retention. All the 36 patients achieved spontaneous voiding by re-inserting urinary catheter for 2-28 days (median, 6 days). Univariate analysis showed that elderly (>65 years) and laparoscopic approach had significantly higher incidence of urinary retention [37.5%(21/56) vs. 19.5%(15/77), χ=5.333, P=0.021; 34.8%(31/89) vs. 11.4%(5/44), χ=8.214, P=0.004; respectively]. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that old age(OR=3.949, 95%CI:1.622 to 9.612, P=0.002), laparoscopic approach (OR=5.665, 95%CI:1.908 to 16.822, P=0.002), and abdominoperineal resection (OR=3.443, 95%CI:1.199 to 9.887, P=0.022) were independent risk factors of urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery.

CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing rectal cancer surgery have a high risk of postoperative urinary retention. More attention should be paid to the old patients, especially those undergoing laparoscopic procedure or abdominoperineal resection, to prevent postoperative urinary retention and urinary dysfunction.

Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; classification ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Catheterization ; statistics & numerical data ; Urinary Retention ; epidemiology ; Urination ; physiology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility of segmental pylorus-reservation gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer.

METHODA retrospective cohort study on clinical data of 6 patients strictly met the criteria of early gastric cancer locating in the middle of the stomach undergoing laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy from January 2014 to April 2016 at Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital was carried out. Preoperative clinical staging revealed T1N0M0 for all the cases. One case received endoscopic mucosa resection(EMR) first, and postoperative pathology showed moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma invading substratum of mucosa, so a complementary laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy was performed. Surgical procedure was laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymph node dissection. Vagus nerve was not reserved during lymph node dissection in lesser curvature side. Number of resected lymph node, postoperative complication and long-term gastric function were observed.

RESULTOf 6 cases, 3 were male and 3 were female with age ranging from 55 to 59 years old. The distal resection margin was (4.6±0.5) cm away from pylorus. The average number of resected lymph node was 18.3±7.5 without metastasis. Follow-up time was 1 to 29 months for all the 6 cases and no relapse or metastasis was found during the follow-up. In 4 cases with follow-up beyond 1 year, 3 cases had slight distension in superior belly after meal and dyspepsia; another one case had vomiting nocturnal occasionally. Gastroscope examination one year after operation found food residue in all the cases. Images indicated the decrease of stomach size in all the cases. Two cases had esophagogastric reflux. All the patients had delayed gastric emptying symptoms after operations and were relieved within one year.

CONCLUSIONSIt is technically feasible to perform laparoscopic segmental gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. Whether vagus nerve should be reserved requires further investigation.

Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Gastroparesis ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagus Nerve ; surgery ; Vomiting ; epidemiology ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility and efficacy of clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 19 cases who underwent the laparoscopic clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer (clockwise group) from July 2016 to September 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy included the fixed operative order, detailed procedure and requirement of lymphadenectomy, which mainly reflected in assisting the exposure of operative field and dissection of lymph nodes through suspending the liver and banding the greater omentum, as well as proposing the requirements and attentions for the dissections of each station of lymph nodes to facilitate the quality control of lymphadenectomy. The operative time, intraoperative complications, intraoperative estimate blood loss, number of total harvested lymph nodes, morbidity and postoperative recovery, were compared with the data of another 19 cases who received traditional lymphadenectomy from January 2016 to June 2016 (control group).

RESULTSThe baseline data were comparable between two groups. All the patients were performed successfully by laparoscopy without conversion and intraoperative complications. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss and number of total harvested lymph node were (278.4±29.9) min, (91.1±41.6) ml and 38.2±15.1 in clockwise group, and were (296.7±30.3) min, (102.2±32.2) ml and 37.0±12.3 in control group without significant differences (all P>0.05). However, the mean number of retrieved No.11p lymph nodes was 2.2±1.8 in clockwise group, which was significantly higher than that in control group (0.8±1.0) (P=0.013). Four patients in each group suffered from pulmonary infections, who were cured by conservative therapies. There was no anastomotic leakage, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, intraperitoneal infection or intestinal obstruction in each group.

CONCLUSIONThe clockwise modularized lymphadenectomy can contribute to the facilitation of the retraction and exposure, decrease of the surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss, and radicalization of lymph node dissection, especially for the lymph nodes dissection around the celiac trunk.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; prevention & control ; statistics & numerical data ; Convalescence ; Gastrectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Nodes ; surgery ; Operative Time ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome