Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Immunoglobulins ; Granulocytes ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

Objective: To explore the stem cell collection rate and efficacy and safety of patients aged 70 and below with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with the VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone) regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: Retrospective case series study. The clinical data of 123 patients with newly diagnosed MM from August 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Suzhou Hopes Hematology Hospital, who were eligible for VRD regimen sequential ASCT, were collected. The clinical characteristics, efficacy after induction therapy, mobilization regimen of autologous stem cells, autologous stem cell collection rate, and side effects and efficacy of ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of the 123 patients, 67 were males. The median patient age was 56 (range: 31-70) years. Patients with IgG, IgA, IgD, and light-chain types accounted for 47.2% (58/123), 23.6% (29/123), 3.2% (4/123), and 26.0% (32/123) of patients, respectively. In addition, 25.2% (31/123) of patients had renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance rate<40 ml/min). Patients with Revised-International Staging System (R-ISS) Ⅲ accounted for 18.2% (22/121) of patients. After induction therapy, the rates of partial response and above, very-good partial response (VGPR) and above, and complete response (CR)+stringent CR were 82.1% (101/123), 75.6% (93/123), and 45.5% (56/123), respectively. Overall, 90.3% (84/93) of patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide+granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 8 patients with G-CSF or G-CSF+plerixafor due to creatinine clearance rate<30 ml/min and one of them was mobilized with DECP (cisplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)+G-CSF for progressive disease. The rate of autologous stem cell collection (CD34⁺cells≥2×10⁶/kg) after four courses of VRD regimen was 89.1% (82/92), and the rate of collection (CD34⁺cells≥5×10⁶/kg) was 56.5% (52/92). Seventy-seven patients treated with the VRD regimen sequential ASCT. All patients had grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Among the nonhematologic adverse events during ASCT, the highest incidence was observed for gastrointestinal reactions (76.6%, 59/77), followed by oral mucositis (46.8%, 36/77), elevated aminotransferases (44.2%, 34/77), fever (37.7%, 29/77), infection (16.9%, 13/77) and heart-related adverse events (11.7%, 9/77). Among the adverse events, grade 3 adverse events included nausea (6.5%, 5/77), oral mucositis (5.2%, 4/77), vomiting (3.9%, 3/77), infection (2.6%, 2/77), elevated blood pressure after infusion (2.6%, 2/77), elevated alanine transaminase (1.3%, 1/77), and perianal mucositis (1.3%, 1/77); there were no grade 4 or above nonhematologic adverse events. The proportion of patients who achieved VGPR and above after VRD sequential ASCT was 100% (75/75), and the proportion of patients who were minimal residual disease-negative (<10^-4 level) was 82.7% (62/75). Conclusion: In patients aged 70 and below with newly diagnosed MM treated with VRD induction therapy, the collection rate of autologous stem cells was good, and good efficacy and tolerability were noted after follow-up ASCT.
Male ; Humans ; Female ; Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Creatinine ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Dexamethasone/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Bortezomib/therapeutic use* ; Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use* ; Stomatitis/etiology*

Objective: To evaluate the advantages and safety of Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization of lymphoma. Methods: Lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone were obtained. The clinical data, the success rate of stem cell collection, hematopoietic reconstitution, and treatment-related adverse reactions between the two groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 184 lymphoma patients were included in this analysis, including 115 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (62.5%) , 16 cases of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (8.7%) , 11 cases of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (6.0%) , 10 cases of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (5.4%) , 6 cases of mantle cell lymphoma (3.3%) , and 6 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 6 cases of NK/T-cell lymphoma (3.3%) , 4 cases of Burkitt's lymphoma (2.2%) , 8 cases of other types of B-cell lymphoma (4.3%) , and 2 cases of other types of T-cell lymphoma (1.1%) ; 31 patients had received radiotherapy (16.8%) . The patients in the two groups were recruited with Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF or G-CSF alone. The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were basically similar. The patients in the Plerixafor in combination with the G-CSF mobilization group were older, and the number of recurrences and third-line chemotherapy was higher. 100 patients were mobilized with G-CSF alone. The success rate of the collection was 74.0% for one day and 89.0% for two days. 84 patients in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were recruited successfully with 85.7% for one day and 97.6% for two days. The success rate of mobilization in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was substantially higher than that in the group of G-CSF alone (P=0.023) . The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the mobilization group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was 3.9×10(6)/kg. The median number of CD34(+) cells obtained in the G-CSF Mobilization group alone was 3.2×10(6)/kg. The number of CD34(+) cells collected by Plerixafor combined with G-CSF was considerably higher than that in G-CSF alone (P=0.001) . The prevalent adverse reactions in the group of Plerixafor combined with G-CSF were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal reactions (31.2%) and local skin redness (2.4%) . Conclusion: The success rate of autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in lymphoma patients treated with Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is significantly high. The success rate of collection and the absolute count of CD34(+) stem cells were substantially higher than those in the group treated with G-CSF alone. Even in older patients, second-line collection, recurrence, or multiple chemotherapies, the combined mobilization method also has a high success rate of mobilization.
Humans ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Heterocyclic Compounds/adverse effects* ; Lymphoma/drug therapy* ; Lymphoma, T-Cell/therapy* ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression and its relative mechanism of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α(HIF-1α) in bone marrow(BM) of mice during G-CSF mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) . METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to detect the proportion of Lin^-Sca-1⁺ c-kit⁺ (LSK) cells in peripheral blood of C57BL/6J mice before and after G-CSF mobilization. And the expression of HIF-1α and osteocalcin (OCN) mRNA and protein were detected by RQ-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The number of osteoblasts in bone marrow specimens of mice was counted under the microscope. RESULTS: The proportion of LSK cells in peripheral blood began to increase at day 4 of G-CSF mobilization, and reached the peak at day 5, which was significantly higher than that of control group (P<0.05). There was no distinct difference in the expression of HIF-1α mRNA between bone marrow nucleated cells and osteoblasts of steady-state mice (P=0.073), while OCN mRNA was mainly expressed in osteoblasts, which was higher than that in bone marrow nucleated cells (P=0.034). After mobilization, the expression level of HIF-1α increased, but OCN decreased, and the number of endosteum osteoblasts decreased. The change of HIF-1α expression was later than that of OCN and was consistent with the proportion of LSK cells in peripheral blood. CONCLUSION The expression of HIF-1α in bone marrow was increased during the mobilization of HSC mediated by G-CSF, and one of the mechanisms may be related to the peripheral migration of HSC induced by osteoblasts inhibition.
Mice ; Animals ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology* ; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/metabolism* ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism* ; Osteocalcin/metabolism* ; RNA, Messenger/metabolism*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of plerixafor combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: The clinical data of lymphoma patients who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization using plerixafor combined with G-CSF from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients received 3 kinds of mobilization regimens: front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization. The acquisition success rate, excellent rate of collection, and incidence of treatment-related adverse reaction were counted. The influence of sex, age, disease remission status, bone marrow involvement at diagnosis, chemotherapy lines, number of chemotherapy, platelet count and number of CD34⁺ cells on the day before acquisition in peripheral blood on the collection results were analyzed to identify the risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with lymphoma were enrolled, including 7 cases who received front-line steady-state mobilization, 19 cases who received preemptive intervention, and 17 cases who received recuse mobilization. The overall acquisition success rate was 58.1% (25/43) after use of plerixafor combined with G-CSF, and acquisition success rate of front-line steady-state mobilization, preemptive intervention, and recuse mobilization was 100%, 57.9%(11/19), and 41.2%(7/17), respectively. The excellent rate of collection was 18.6%(8/43). A total of 15 patients experienced mild to moderate treatment-related adverse reactions. The number of CD34⁺ cells < 5 cells/μl in peripheral blood on the day before collection was an independent risk factor affecting stem cell collection. CONCLUSIONS Plerixafor combined with G-CSF is a safe and effective mobilization regimen for patients with lymphoma. The number of CD34⁺ cells in peripheral blood on the day before collection is an predictable index for the evaluation of stem cell collection.
Humans ; Antigens, CD34/metabolism* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Lymphoma/drug therapy* ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of plerixafor (PXF) combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (PXF+G-CSF) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) combined with G-CSF (Cy+G-CSF) in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: The clinical data of 41 MM patients who underwent PBSC mobilization using PXF+G-CSF (18 cases) or Cy+G-CSF (23 cases) in Shanxi Bethune Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including the count of collected CD34⁺ cells, acquisition success rate, failure rate, and optimal rate. The correlation of sex, age, disease type, DS staging, ISS staging, number of chemotherapy cycle, disease status before mobilization, and mobilization regimen with the collection results was analyzed, and the adverse reactions, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs were compared between the two mobilization regimens. RESULTS: The 41 patients underwent 97 mobilization collections, and the median number of CD34⁺ cells collected was 6.09 (0-34.07)×10⁶/kg. The acquisition success rate, optimal rate, and failure rate was 90.2%, 56.1%, and 9.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that sex, age, disease type, and disease stage had no significant correlation with the number of CD34⁺ cells collected and acquisition success rate (P >0.05), but the patients with better disease remission than partial remission before mobilization were more likely to obtain higher CD34⁺ cell count (P <0.05). The PXF+G-CSF group had a larger number of CD34⁺ cells and higher acquisition success rate in the first collection than Cy+G-CSF group (both P <0.05), and had lower infection risk and shorter length of hospital stay during mobilization (both P <0.05), but the economic burden increased (P <0.05). CONCLUSION PXF+G-CSF used for PBSC mobilization in MM patients has high first acquisition success rate, large number of CD34⁺ cells, less number of collection times, and short length of hospital stay, but the economic cost is heavy.
Humans ; Antigens, CD34/metabolism* ; Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cells/metabolism* ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) regimen for mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (APBSCs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: The clinical data of 48 MM patients who received APBSC transplantation (APBSCT) in Department of Hematology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2015 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The mobilization success rate and mobilization optimal rate of EC regimen were counted, and its effect on transplant efficacy, adverse reactions, hematopoietic reconstitution after transplantation, and survival time of MM patients were analyzed. RESULTS: APBSCs were collected on day 14 (10-19) after EC administration. The median of collected CD34⁺ cells was 6.82 (1.27-22.57)×10⁶/kg, and the median number of apheresis session was 2 (1-4). The mobilization success rate (collecting CD34⁺ cells≥2×10⁶ cells/kg after completion of apheresis) was 98% (47/48), and mobilization optimal rate (collecting CD34⁺ cells≥5×10⁶ cells/kg after completion of apheresis) was 71% (34/48). The depth of remission were improved after APBSCT, and the complete remission (CR) rate increased from 45.8% before transplantation to 87.5% after transplantation (P <0.01). There was no transplant-related death, no blood transfusion during mobilization, and no mucositis occurred in the patients. The most common complication was neutropenia, with an incidence of 75.0% (36/48). After transplantation, all the patients successfully achieved hematopoietic reconstitution. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 (9-26) days, and median time to platelet engraftment was 10 (8-33) days. By the end of follow-up, both the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) time were not reached. The 5-year estimated PFS rate and OS rate was 53.8% and 82.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION The EC regimen for mobilization of APBSC has a high acquisition success rate and controllable adverse reactions, which can be an effective and safe mobilization regimen in MM patients.
Humans ; Multiple Myeloma/therapy* ; Etoposide/therapeutic use* ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors influencing collection of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells in lymphoma patients. METHODS: Clinical data of 74 patients who received autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells mobilization and collection in the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA from April 2009 to April 2021 were collected. The effects of gender, age, disease type, stage, course of disease, chemotherapy cycle number, relapse, radiotherapy, disease status and blood routine indexes on the day of collection on peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell collection were analyzed. RESULTS: The success rate of collection was 95.9%(71/74), and the excellent rate of collection was 71.6%(53/74). There was a significantly statistical differentce in the number of CD34⁺ cells in grafts collected from patients with chemotherapy cycle ≤6 and >6 ［(9.1±5.2)×10⁶/kg vs (6.4±3.7)×10⁶/kg, P=0.031］. The number of CD34⁺ cells in the first collection was positively correlated with WBC count, hemoglobin, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count and hematocrit value on the day of collection ( r value was 0.424,0.486,0.306,0.289,0.353,0.428,0.528, respectively). WBC count, hemoglobin, monocyte count and hematocrit value have higher predictive value for the first collection of CD34⁺ cells. The area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.7061,0.7845,0.7319,0.7848, respectively. CONCLUSION Low dose CTX and VP16 chemotherapy combined with G-CSF can effectively mobilize autologous peripheral blood stem cells. The cycle number of chemotherapy relates to the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells. After mobilization, the success of the first collection can be better predicted by the blood routine indexes.
Humans ; Antigens, CD34/metabolism* ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ; Lymphoma/drug therapy* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells ; Hemoglobins ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in elderly patients (≥65 years old) with multiple myeloma (MM) . Methods: From June 1, 2006 to July 31, 2020, 22 MM patients (≥65 years old) who were diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University and received novel drug induction followed by auto-HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were evaluated for important organ functions before transplantation, and the International Myeloma Working Group frail score was used in 2016 to screen out transplant-eligible patients. Results: The median (interquartile range, IQR) age at the time of transplantation of the 22 patients was 66.75 (IQR 4.50) years. A total of 20 patients received stem cell mobilization. The median number of mononuclear cells collected was 4.53×10(8)/kg, that of CD34(+) cells was 3.37×10(6)/kg, and the median number of apheresis procedures performed was 2. After stem cell transfusion, the median time of neutrophil implantation was 11 days, that of platelet implantation was 13 days, and the treatment-related mortality was 0 at 100 days after transplantation. The median follow-up was 48.7 months. The median time to progression time was not reached, and the median overall survival time was 111.8 months. Conclusion: Auto-HSCT is a safe and effective treatment for selected elderly patients of 65 years or older with MM.
Aged ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous/methods* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore the related factors affecting of autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with single center lymphoma and multiple myeloma. METHODS: The clinical total of 30 patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and transplantation in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from March 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including the patients' age, gender, disease type, chemotherapy course, mobilization scheme, collection times, CD34⁺ cell count, adverse events, days of neutrophil and platelet implantation after transplantation. The related factors affecting to the mobilization efficiency of peripheral blood stem cells was analyzed. RESULTS: The mobilization scheme had a significant effect on the mobilization success rate of CD34⁺ cells. The mobilization success rate and optimal mobilization rate of intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF were higher than that of high-dose VP-16+G-CSF (P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of patients with previous chemotherapy courses ≤4 was higher than that of patients with chemotherapy courses >4 (100% vs 72.22%, P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of lymphoma patients was lower than that of myeloma patients (66.67% vs 94.44%, P<0.05); the mobilization success rate of lymphoma patients who received intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF was higher than that received high-dose VP-16+G-CSF patients (100% vs 42.86%, P<0.05). Patients' gender, age, time from diagnosis to mobilization and disease status had no significant effect on the efficiency of stem cell mobilization. Fifteen patients (50%) had febrile neutropenia during stem cell mobilization. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia between the two mobilization schemes (P>0.05); the incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in intermediate-dose VP-16+G-CSF group was higher than that in high-dose VP-16+G-CSF group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the time of granulocyte implantation and platelet implantation after stem cell transplantation in patients with different mobilization schemes (P>0.05). CONCLUSION Mobilization regime, the number of previous chemotherapy course and disease type affect the mobilization efficiency of stem cells. Intermediate dose VP-16+G-CSF can improve the mobilization efficiency of stem cell in lymphoma patients, but should pay attention to the risk of bleeding.
Humans ; Etoposide ; Febrile Neutropenia ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization ; Lymphoma/therapy* ; Multiple Myeloma/therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female