Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics* ; Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/genetics* ; Gene Rearrangement ; Translocation, Genetic ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics*

Humans ; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics* ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/pathology* ; Mutation ; ErbB Receptors/genetics* ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; Gene Rearrangement

Humans ; Clinical Relevance ; Receptor, trkA/genetics* ; Neoplasms ; Digestive System Neoplasms/genetics* ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; Gene Fusion

Humans ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics* ; Lung Neoplasms/pathology* ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics* ; Gene Fusion ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics*

Humans ; Receptor, trkA/genetics* ; Neoplasms/genetics* ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Gene Rearrangement ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics*

Gene fusion is one of the mechanisms that promote tumor development. It is also an important cause for the poor prognosis of patients. The detection of gene fusion is crucial for the recognition of tumor biomarker, cancer subtype classification, and clinical medication guidance. Appropriate methods can help the early diagnosis and avoid ineffective medication. Traditional tests include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), reverse transcription of PCR (RT-PCR), and next generation sequencing (NGS). The next generation sequencing (NGS) mainly includes: whole genome sequencing (WGS), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) and target sequencing (hybridization capture method/amplicon method). In clinical concomitant diagnostic applications, some factors such as operability, time/money costs, and the level of expertise required for data analysis should be considered. This article concludes with a discussion of the technical principles of different detection methods and advantages/limitations. Meanwhile, it provides reference opinions for the detection methods of gene fusion.
Humans ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods* ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Neoplasms/genetics* ; Gene Fusion ; Technology ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis*

Objective: To investigate the frequency of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene variations in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and to analyze the feasibility of detecting tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) proteins using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to predict the fusion variation of NTRK. Methods: A cohort of 848 PTC cases was collected at the Department of Pathology, Shenzhen People's Hospital from June 2017 to June 2020. The expression levels of TRK proteins were detected using IHC in 848 PTC samples, and the DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to detect NTRK rearrangements in 150 PTCs. Results: There were 242 males and 606 females, with an age range of 9-83 years. In 120 cases with TRK expression detected by IHC, 13 cases were confirmed to harbor a NTRK gene fusion by NGS. The frequency of NTRK fusion in PTC was 1.5% (13/848). The sensitivity and specificity of TRK-IHC positivity for screening NTRK fusion in PTC were 100% and 21.9%, respectively. The specificity of weak-, moderate- and strong-positive stains of TRK IHC were 23.8%, 76.9% and 93.8%, respectively. The specificity of NTRK gene fusion was predicted to increase with the enhanced intensity of IHC staining. In BRAF V600E negative PTC samples, the specificity of weak-and moderate-positive stains of TRK IHC increased to 62.5% and 96.8%, respectively. Seven NTRK fusion partners were found in the PTC, including EML4, ETV6, CDH1, GJD2, TPR, TFG and SQSTM1. Conclusions: There is a low variation frequency of NTRK gene fusion in PTC. TRK IHC can be used as a screening method for NTRK fusion variation in PTC. The specificity of TRK IHC predicting NTRK fusion can be further enhanced by increasing the cutoff value of the positive cell number and staining intensity of TRK-IHC staining, or being combined with BRAF V600E negativity.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Female ; Gene Fusion ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics* ; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics* ; Receptor, trkA/genetics* ; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/genetics* ; Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology* ; Young Adult

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG), and to analyze DMG's prognostic factors, and subsequently, to study the possibility of using NTRK as a therapeutic target for DMG. Methods: A total of 232 DMG diagnosed at the Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China from July 2016 to March 2021 were collected. Their clinical, radiological and pathological features, the ratio of MGMT promoter methylation, expression of NTRK, and characteristics of NTRK gene fusion were analyzed. The prognostic values of different factors were also studied, including age, tumor location, histological grade, gene and protein expression of NTRK, and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Results: Among the 232 DMG cases, there were 8 patients with both primary and relapse tumors on the record. Thus, a total of 224 patients were analyzed, including 118 males and 106 females. There were 126 adults (>18 years of age) and 98 children (≤18 years of age). Notably, the most frequent location was thalamus (41/126, 32.5%) in adults, but brainstem (59/96, 60.2%) in children. The lesions showed T1 hypointensity or isointensity, and T2 hyperintensity. However, contrast enhancement patterns of the tumors varied, with many tumors lacking contrast-enhancing. The histological grades included grade 2 (9/224, 4.0%), grade 3 (41/224, 18.3%) and grade 4 (174/224, 77.7%). Two hundred and twenty-four DMGs were diffusely positive for H3K27M and negative for H3K27me3. The ratio of MGMT promoter methylation was low (1/45, 2.2%). One hundred and seventy-seven of the 224 cases (177/224, 79.0%) were positive for NTRK. Fifty cases were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Among them, five DMGs (positive rate, 10.0%) were NTRK fusion positive. This study showed that there were no differences between adult and pediatric DMGs in histological grading, expression of NTRK, and NTRK gene fusion. One hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in the follow-up analysis (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, 109/159 patients (69.6%) died of the disease, with a median survival time of 12 months (range 1 to 55 months). Univariate log-rank analysis showed that age, location, surgical procedure and postoperative adjuvant therapy were associated with overall survivals of the DMG patients (P<0.05). Conclusions: The prognosis of DMG is poor overall. There are differences between adult and pediatric DMGs in anatomic location and prognosis, but not in other features. NTRK1 gene fusion is detected in 10.0% of the tumors. It suggests that TRK inhibitor might be a choice for treating DMG.
Adult ; Male ; Female ; Humans ; Child ; Aged, 80 and over ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Glioma/pathology* ; Prognosis ; Gene Fusion ; Promoter Regions, Genetic

Brain Neoplasms/surgery* ; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein ; Gene Fusion ; Humans ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; RNA-Binding Protein EWS/genetics*

Gene Fusion ; Gene Rearrangement ; Humans ; Neoplasms/genetics* ; Nuclear Proteins/genetics*