Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory factors and immune function during laparoscopic surgery in patients with gynecological malignant tumors
10.3760/cma.j.cn115355-20220425-00248
- VernacularTitle:不同剂量右美托咪定对妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜手术患者炎性因子和免疫功能的影响
- Author:
Jie LI
1
;
Dongyan GAO
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学麻醉学院，太原 030001
- Keywords:
Laparoscopes;
Genital neoplasms, female;
Dexmedetomidine;
Inflammatory factors;
Immune function
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2023;35(1):13-17
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on inflammatory factors and immune function in patients with gynecological malignant tumors who underwent laparoscopic surgery.Methods:A total of 60 patients with gynecological malignant tumors who underwent laparoscopic surgery from January 2021 to December 2021 in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were selected as the research objects. All patients were divided into the control group, low-dose DEX group (group D1) and high-dose DEX group (group D2) by using random number table method, 20 cases in each group. Patients in D1 and D2 groups were intravenously pumped DEX 0.5 μg/kg and 1.0 μg/kg 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia, and then maintained with DEX 0.5 μg·kg -1·h -1 and 1.0 μg·kg -1·h -1 until 30 minutes before the end of operation; and patients in the control group were given the same amount of Nacl solution. The 10 ml peripheral venous blood were collected at 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia (T 1), 1 h after pneumoperitoneum relief (T 2) and 24 h after pneumoperitoneum relief (T 3). The changes of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), the proportion of CD4 +, the proportion of CD8 + and CD4 +/CD8 + ratio of the three groups were compared, and the cases of bradycardia and hypotension in perioperative period and the time of first exhaust after operation were recorded. Results:At T 1,T 2 and T 3, the expression level of IL-6 in the control group was (7.95±0.26) pg/ml, (8.30±0.24) pg/ml and (8.35±0.28) pg/ml, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F = 14.14, P < 0.001); the expression level of IL-10 in the control group was (38.9±2.6) pg/ml, (44.5±6.6) pg/ml and (46.3±4.6) pg/ml, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F = 12.45, P < 0.001); the proportion of CD4 + in the control group was (38.5±2.1)%, (29.5±4.6)% and (29.6±3.5)%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F = 40.82, P < 0.001); the ratio of CD8 + in the control group was (30.1±3.7)%, (35.1±6.3)% and (40.3±8.2)%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F = 13.02, P < 0.001); the CD4 +/CD8 + ratio in the control group was 1.29±0.14, 0.84±0.09 and 0.75±0.14, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F = 99.94, P < 0.001). The expression level of IL-6 in group D1 and group D2 was (8.10±0.32) pg/ml and (8.01±0.30) pg/ml at T 2, and (8.12±0.35) pg/ml and (8.05±0.34) pg/ml at T 3,which were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The expression level of IL-10 in group D2 was (40.6±3.5) pg/ml at T 2, which was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). At T 3, the expression level of IL-10 in group D1 and group D2 was (43.7±3.5) pg/ml and (42.4±3.9) pg/ml, which were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). At T 2, the proportion of CD4 + in group D2 was (34.5±4.3)%, which was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). At T 3, the proportion of CD4 + in group D1 and group D2 was (32.1±4.2)% and (33.7±2.8)%, which were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). At T 2, the proportion of CD8 + in group D2 was (30.7±5.5)%, which was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). At T 3, the proportion of CD8 + in group D1 and group D2 was (35.4±5.8)% and (32.5±5.1)%, which were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The CD4 +/CD8 + ratio in group D1 and D2 was 0.99±0.17 and 1.14±0.16 at T 2, 0.93±0.19 and 1.05±0.16 at T 3, which were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Meanwhile, 1 case of hypotension occurred in the the control group and group D1, respectively; 3 cases of bradycardia and 2 cases of hypotension occurred in the group D2. The time of exhaust in the control group was later than that in group D1 and D2, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Conclusions:DEX can inhibit the inflammatory reaction during laparoscopic surgery in patients with gynecological malignant tumors, reduce immune damage. The anti-inflammatory action and immune protection of high-dose of DEX is more significant compared with low-dose of DEX, while high dose of DEX is more likely to cause hemodynamic fluctuations in perioperative period.
