Discussion on countermeasures of medical research integrity governance: Analysis of medical research integrity cases based on the notification of ministry of science and technology
10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20220901-00176
- VernacularTitle:医学科研诚信治理对策探讨
- Author:
Yunshui LI
1
;
Hao GONG
;
Luojing ZHOU
Author Information
1. 扬州大学公共卫生学院 225009
- Keywords:
Scientific research integrity;
Governance;
Scientific research integrity cases;
Disciplinary measures;
Ministry of Science and Technology
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2023;36(1):13-17
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To study the characteristics and patterns of medical research integrity cases reported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, and to explore the countermeasures to strengthen the management of medical research integrity.Methods:20 batches of 555 cases of scientific research integrity cases publicly reported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China from June 2021 to May 2022 were taken as the research objects, and the papers involved, regional distribution, scientific research dishonesty and disciplinary measures were classified and analyzed.Results:Data falsification was the most common problem of scientific research dishonesty, accounting for 47.39%. Shandong Province was the province with the most reported cases, accounting for 50.81%. 27.67% of the corresponding authors received 5 disciplinary measures, and 26.28% of the first authors received 6 disciplinary measures. Among the disciplinary measures, the proportion of suspension of applications for various scientific research projects was the highest, with 87.60% of corresponding authors and 91.42% of first authors receiving this punishment. The corresponing authors with 5 years suspension accounted for 49.24% of all years, and the first authors accounted for 57.48%.Conclusions:To promote the integrity governance of medical research, we should strengthen the supervision of medical journals, promote regional exchanges, encourage active error correction, and improve the construction of scientific research integrity database.
