Application of point-of-care cardiopulmonary ultrasound in mechanical ventilation of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20220317-00180
- VernacularTitle:重症心肺超声评估新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气的应用价值
- Author:
Lili ZUO
1
;
Xiaoqing CHEN
;
Jie ZHOU
;
Ling LI
;
Jin LIU
;
Qi YAN
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院儿科，南京 210029
- Keywords:
Point-of-care ultrasound;
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome;
Mechanical ventilation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2022;31(11):953-959
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the value of point-of-care cardiopulmonary ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of modifying mechanical ventilation and weaning timing of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).Methods:A total of 82 infants with RDS received invasive mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2019 to October 2020 were enrolled.Endotracheal tube was extubated after getting in line with the clinical weaning standard. According to the results of ventilator withdrawal, infants were divided into successful group and failure group. POCUS were performed within half hour of intubation and extubation. Lung ultrasound score (LUS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), left ventricular eccentricity index (LVEI) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) were recorded also with the arterial blood gas, ventilator parameters, duration of mechanical ventilation and oxygen therapy. The above indexes were compared between two groups to evaluate the predictive value of POCUS for mechanical ventilation evacuation.Results:The gestational age [(28.6±4.2)W vs (32.5±3.7)W], body weight [(1 289±790)g vs (1 969±771)g], initial ventilation PaO 2 [(41.2±8.5)mmHg vs (50.1±12.2)mmHg], LVEF of ventilator withdrawal[(62.7±3.9)% vs (66.9±3.1)%] of the failed weaning group were lower than those of successful group (all P<0.05). LUS at ventilator withdrawal[(13.7±1.0) points vs (11.1±1.6) points], PASP [(40.5±7.2)mmHg vs (32.9±6.2)mmHg] and the duration of mechanical ventilation [(5.4±4.7)d vs (3.6±2.3)d], duration of oxygen therapy [(48.5±25.0)d vs (24.5±18.5)d] were higher than those of successful group (all P<0.05). The initial LUS of mechanical ventilation was positively correlated with the duration of mechanical ventilation ( r=0.188, P<0.01), and TAPSE was negatively correlated with the duration of mechanical ventilation ( r=-0.344, P<0.01). LUS was positively correlated with X-ray grading and mean airway pressure at the initial and withdrawal time ( rs=0.790, P<0.01 and rs=0.686, P<0.01; r=0.383, P<0.01 and r=0.548, P<0.01). To assess LUS prediction of weaning failure, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.922, and the combined ΔLUS (change of pre- and post-LUS ) ≤7 points and ΔPASP (change of pre- and post-PASP) ≤9.5 mmHg predicted AUC was 0.912. Prediction of AUC by using LUS combining PASP and LVEF was 0.937, Youden index was 0.736, the cut-off value was 0.185, with sensitivity 89.5% and the specificity 84.1%. LUS≥13 points, PASP≥43 mmHg and LVEF≤60% were related to weaning failure by using the Logistic regression analysis (all P<0.05). Conclusions:Bedside POCUS can effectively evaluate the application of mechanical ventilation process and predict the weaning of infants with RDS. POCUS is practical, real-time, accurate, and worthy of clinical application.
