A network meta-analysis of 5 Chinese patent medicines combined with conventional western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety and depression
10.3760/cma.j.cn115398-20210915-00210
- VernacularTitle:5种中成药联合西医常规疗法治疗冠心病合并焦虑抑郁的网状meta分析
- Author:
Liping ZENG
1
;
Jianbin ZENG
;
Chanjun WAN
;
Cong DING
Author Information
1. 江西中医药大学附属医院 国家中医心血管病临床医学研究中心分中心，南昌 330000
- Keywords:
Chinese patent medicine;
Coronary heart disease;
Anxiety;
Depression;
Network meta-analysis
- From:
International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2023;45(4):472-480
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of five different Chinese patent medicines combined with conventional western medicine therapy in the treatment of coronary heart disease with anxiety and depression.Methods:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese patent medicine combined with conventional western medicine therapy and conventional western medicine therapy in the treatment of coronary heart disease with anxiety and depression were retrieved from China Academic Journal Database (Wanfang Data), China Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (Chongqing VIP), Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020. The Jadad score and Cochrane bias risk assessment tool were used to assess the bias risk of the included literature. The RevMan 5.3, Stata 16.0 and GeMTC 14.3 software were used for network meta-analysis.Results:A total of 32 articles involving 3 494 patients were included. In terms of clinical efficacy, the clinical efficacy of conventional western medicine combined with Zhenyuan Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=16.64 (6.38, 43.44)], Xinkeshu Tablets [ OR (95% CI)=4.67 (3.26, 6.68)], Wuling Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=4.65 (2.48, 8.72)], Guanxinjing Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=2.93 (1.37, 2.64)] weres better than that of conventional western medicine alone. The clinical efficacy of combined Zhenyuan Capsule was better than that of combined Xinkeshu Tablets [ OR (95% CI)=3.56 (1.28, 9.94)], Wuling Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=3.58 (1.13, 11.34)], Guanxinjing Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=5.69 (1.68, 19.32)] or Shugan Jieyu Capsule [ OR (95% CI)=9.29 (2.79, 30.96)]. Compared with Shugan Jieyu Capsule, Xinkeshu Tablets had better clinical efficacy [ OR (95% CI)=2.61 (1.16, 5.87)]. The SUCRA order of the effective rate of clinical efficacy was as follows conventional western medicine treatment combined with Zhenyuan Capsule (SUCRA=99.6)>with Xinkeshu Tablets (SUCRA=67.5) > with Wuling Capsule (SUCRA=65.0) > with Guanxinjing Capsule (SUCRA=41.6) > with Shugan Jieyu Capsule (SUCRA=25.8)>conventional western medicine treatment (SUCRA=0.5). Combined Xinkeshu Tablets [ MD (95% CI)=-8.85 (-14.16, -3.62)] was superior to conventional western medicine in reducing HAMD score. In terms of reducing HAMA score, compared with conventional western medicine therapy, the combination of Wuling Capsule [ MD (95% CI)=-7.61 (-14.82, -0.40)] and Xinkeshu Tablets [ MD=-6.18, 95% CI (-9.78, -2.58)] has better curative effect. The SUCRA of Chinese patent medicine in reducing HAMA of coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety and depression was combined with Wuling Capsule (SUCRA=82.8) > with Xinkeshu Tablets (SUCRA=78.2). In terms of adverse reactions, the safety of combined five Chinese patent medicines was better than that of conventional western medicine. Conclusions:The clinical efficacy and safety of conventional western medicine combined with five kinds of Chinese patent medicines in the treatment of coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety and depression were better than those of conventional western medicine alone. Among them, the combination of Zhenyuan Capsule was the most likely to be the best treatment. The combination of Xinkeshu Tablets was better in reducing HAMD scores, and the combination of Xinkeshu Tablets and Wuling Capsule is better in reducing HAMA scores. More high-quality RCT studies are needed to verify the conclusions.
