Application of modified alternate negative pressure drainage instrument after posterior lumbar fusion.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.008
- Author:
Yan-Ning LI
1
;
Xiao-Sheng YANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Spine Surgery, Aviation General Hospital, China Medical University, Beijing 100012, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Posterior lumbar fusion;
Alternate negative pressure;
Drainage
- MeSH:
Humans;
Retrospective Studies;
Prospective Studies;
Spinal Fusion;
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery*;
Drainage;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2023;36(5):436-439
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of modified alternate negative pressure drainage on postoperative outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.
METHODS:This was a prospective study involving 84 patients who underwent PLIF surgery between January 2019 and June 2020. Of these patients, 22 had single-segment surgery and 62 had two-segment surgery. Patients were grouped by surgical segment and admission sequence:the observation group included patients with a single-segment surgery, and the control group included patients with a two-segment surgery. Natural pressure drainage was given to 42 patients in the observation group (modified alternate negative pressure drainage group) after surgery, which was then changed to negative pressure drainage after 24 hours. In the control group, 42 patients were given negative pressure drainage after surgery, which was then changed to natural pressure drainage after 24 hours. The total drainage volume, drainage time, maximum body temperature at 24 hours and 1 week after surgery, and drainage-related complications were observed and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:There was no significant difference in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. The postoperative total drainage volume was significantly lower in the observation group (456.69±124.50) ml than in control group (572.36±117.75) ml, and the drainage time was significantly shorter in the observation group (4.95±1.31) days than in the control group (4.00±1.17) days. Maximum body temperature at 24 hours after surgery was similar in both groups (37.09±0.31)°C in the observation group and (37.03±0.33)°C in the control group, while on the 1st week after surgery, it was slightly higher in the observation group (37.05±0.32)°C than in the control group (36.94±0.33)°C, but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in drainage-related complications, with one case(2.38%) of superficial wound infection in the observation group and two cases(4.76%) in control group.
CONCLUSION:Modified alternate negative pressure drainage after posterior lumbar fusion can reduce the drainage volume and shorten the drainage time without increasing the risk of drainage-related complications.
