Effect of electroacupuncture at different time points on postoperative urination function in patients with mixed hemorrhoids surgery.
10.13703/j.0255-2930.20220506-k0006
- Author:
Yu-Hai HE
1
;
Kai LAN
2
;
Dan XIE
3
;
Xing-Xian HUANG
4
;
Chang-Yin LU
3
;
Juan LI
3
;
Feng-Yan SHEN
3
;
Zeng-Ping HUANG
3
;
Hai-Bo YU
4
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesia, 3Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shenzhen TCM Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China; Guangzhou University of CM, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province.
2. Guangzhou University of CM, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province.
3. Department of Anesthesia, Shenzhen TCM Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China.
4. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shenzhen TCM Hospital, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
electroacupuncture;
mixed hemorrhoids;
postoperative dysuria;
randomized controlled trial (RCT);
timing of intervention
- MeSH:
Humans;
Electroacupuncture;
Hemorrhoids/surgery*;
Urination;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting;
Acupuncture Points
- From:
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
2023;43(4):422-426
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To observe the effect of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative electroacupuncture (EA) intervention on postoperative urination function in patients with mixed hemorrhoid surgery.
METHODS:A total of 240 patients with mixed hemorrhoid surgery under lumbar anesthesia were randomly divided into an EA preconditioning group (group A, 60 cases, 9 cases dropped off), an intraoperative EA group (group B, 60 cases, 4 cases dropped off), a postoperative EA group (group C, 60 cases, 6 cases dropped off), and a non-acupuncture group (group D, 60 cases, 3 cases dropped off). In the groups A, B and C, EA was exerted at Zhongliao (BL 33) and Huiyang (BL 35) , with disperse-dense wave, 4 Hz/20 Hz in frequency, and lasting 30 min, at 30 min before lumbar anesthesia, immediately after lumbar anesthesia and 6 h after surgery, respectively. No EA intervention was performed in the group D. The postoperative urination smoothness score in each group was observed 24 h after surgery. The first urination time, first urination volume, urine residual volume after first urination were recorded, and incidence of indwelling catheterization, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, number of remedial analgesia, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were observed in each group.
RESULTS:In the groups A, B and C, the postoperative urination smoothness scores were superior to the group D (P<0.05), and the time of first urination was earlier than the group D (P<0.05). In the group C, the time of first urination was earlier than the group A and the group B (P<0.05), the first urination volume was higher than the group D (P<0.05), and the urine residual volume after first urination was lower than the group D (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of indwelling catheterization and postoperative nausea and vomiting among the 4 groups (P>0.05). The VAS scores of the group A, B and C were lower than that in the group D (P<0.05), and the number of remedial analgesia cases was lower than that in the group D (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:EA intervention could promote the recovery of urination function and relieve postoperative pain in patients with mixed hemorrhoids surgery. Early postoperative EA intervention is more conducive to the recovery of urination function.
