EGFR gene mutations and environmental exposure factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Bazhong City
10.3969/j.issn.1006-2483.2023.04.030
- VernacularTitle:巴中市非小细胞肺癌患者EGFR基因突变情况及环境暴露因素分析
- Author:
Man ZHAO
1
;
De ZHU
1
;
Hongyang ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Oncology, Bazhong Central Hospital , Bazhong , Sichuan 636000 , China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Non-small cell lung cancer;
EGFR gene mutation;
Environmental exposure factors
- From:
Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
2023;34(4):128-131
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the EGFR gene mutations and environmental exposure factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Bazhong City, and to provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC patients. Methods A total of 356 NSCLC patients admitted to Bazhong Hospital from 2019 to 2020 were selected. All patients underwent EGFR gene detection and were divided into mutant group (n=171) and wild-type group (n=185) according to EGFR gene mutation. Environmental exposure data of patients were collected, including smoking status, smoking index, frequent frying of food, etc. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze the environmental risk factors of EGFR gene mutations in NSCLC patients. Results A total of 171 EGFR gene mutations were detected in 356 NSCLC patients, and the mutation rate was 48.03%. The mutation rate of EGFR gene in females was significantly higher than that in males (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in EGFR gene mutation rate between patients aged ≥60 years and patients aged <60 years (P>0.05). The mutation rate of EGFR gene in patients with adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that in patients without adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in EGFR gene mutation rate between patients with tumors ≥3cm and patients with tumors <3cm (P>0.05). Among the 356 NSCLC patients, there were 171 cases with EGFR gene mutations (48.03%), including 335 single mutations, 181 exon 19 mutations, 129 exon 21 L858R mutations, 12 exon 21 L861Q mutations, 8 exon 20 insertion mutations, and 5 Exon 18 mutations. There were 18 cases carrying double mutations and 3 cases carrying triple mutations. There were significant differences between the two groups in smoking status, smoking index, use of coal stove, use of smoke extraction equipment, cooking fumes, fried food intake, and family history of cancer (P<0.05). Non-smoking (OR=3.19), not using smoke exhaust equipment (OR=3.58), and using coal stove (OR=2.19) were the environmental exposure factors of EGFR mutation in NSCLC patients (P<0.05). Conclusion The EGFR gene mutation rate is high in NSCLC patients in Bazhong City, and most of them are female non-smoking patients. EGFR gene detection should be performed in NSCLS patients without smoke exhaust equipment and using coal stoves to improve the detection rate of EGFR mutation.
