Ethical Issue of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
10.14475/jhpc.2023.26.2.95
- Author:
Myung Ah LEE
1
Author Information
1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:Brief Communication
- From:Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
2023;26(2):95-100
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
With the implementation of Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on LifeSustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life, interests of the general public on selfdetermination right and dignified death of patients have increased markedly in Korea.However, “self-determination” on medical care is misunderstood as decision not to sustain life, and “dignified death” as terminating life before suffering from disease in terminal stage. This belief leads that physician-assisted suicide should be accommodated is being proliferated widely in the society even without accepting euthanasia. Artificially terminating the life of a human is an unethical act even though there is any rational or motivation by the person requesting euthanasia, and there is agreement thereof has been reached while there are overseas countries that allow euthanasia. Given the fact that the essence of medical care is to enable the human to live their lives in greater comfort by enhancing their health throughout their lives, physician-assisted suicide should be deemed as one of the means of euthanasia, not as a means of dignified death. Accordingly, institutional organization and improvement of the quality of hospice palliative care to assist the patients suffering from terminal stage or intractable diseases in putting their lives in order and to more comfortably accept the end of life physically, mentally, socially, psychologically and spiritually need to be implemented first to ensure their dignified death.
