Results and analysis of national personal dose monitoring intercomparison in 2021
10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2022.06.002
- VernacularTitle:2021 年国家级个人剂量监测能力比对结果与分析
- Author:
PIn GAO
1
;
Yanqiu DING
1
;
Kaiyi WANG
1
;
Aiying HU
1
;
Wen GUO
1
Author Information
1. Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, China CDC, National Institute for Radiological Protec- tion, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Personal dose;
Monitoring service institution;
Class-based intercomparison
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
2022;31(6):651-654
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To improve radiation testing institutions’ ability and levels of personal dose monitoring for external
exposure and standardize monitoring work.
Methods:According to Testing Criteria of Personnel Dosimetry Performance
for External Exposure (GBZ 207—2016), the intercomparison programme was made, the 2021 class-based personal dose
monitoring intercomparison were organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention and provincial monitoring institutions.
Results:A total of 150 institutions participated in the 2021
national intercomparison of personal dose monitoring capability. Of them, 143 (95.3%) passed the assessment, including 51
excellent institutions (excellent rate, 34.0%), and 7 (4.7%) failed to pass the assessments.
Conclusion:The 2021 national
personal dosimetry performance intercomparison showed great improvements in the pass rate and excellent rate compared
with previous national assessments. However, still seven institutions failed to pass this assessment, including four institu-
tions with class A qualifications. The testing institutions need to find out the reasons to increase their testing ability. This
class-based intercomparison improved the point-to-plane relationship between the organizing and testing institutions, help-
ing the organizing institution focus on improving the testing ability of provincial testing institutions and class A radiation
health service institutions.