Establish an evaluation index system for the conclusion of basic and clinical application scientific research projects
10.3760/cma.j.cn113565-20220211-00020
- VernacularTitle:建立基础、临床科研项目结题评价体系及其应用
- Author:
Zhuo CHEN
1
;
Wentao YUE
;
Chenghong YIN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院 100026
- Keywords:
Delphi method;
Weighted average method;
Hospital;
Classified evaluation;
Index;
Scientific research management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
2022;35(4):286-292
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Delphi method and weighted average method are used to establish the evaluation index system of basic and clinical scientific research projects respectively, to provide support for screening high-quality projects, to avoid the disadvantages of " one size fits all" , and promote the transformation of project management from quantity and restatement to quality and results, in order to release the innovative vitality of talents and produce more high-quality results.Methods:Using the methods of literature review and expert interview, form the questionnaire of evaluation indicators for the conclusion of basic and clinical scientific research projects, then carry out two rounds of expert consultation with Delphi method, evaluate the authority of experts with authority coefficient, form the second round of questionnaire after analysis and discussion according to the results from the first round of expert consultation, screen and determine the evaluation indicators again in the same way. After two rounds of discussion, the evaluation index system of basic and clinical scientific research projects was developed, and the weighted average method and product method were used to calculate the weight and combination weight.Results:After two rounds of consultation, the evaluation index system for the conclusion of basic scientific research projects was finally established, with 2 first-class indicators, 12 second-class indicators and 33 third-class indicators, and the evaluation index system for the conclusion of clinical scientific research projects had 2 first-class indicators, 10 second-class indicators and 33 third-class indicators. In the second round, the authority coefficient of basic and clinical experts was 0.8, indicating that the authority of experts in this study was high. 29 basic and clinical projects concluded from 2018 to 2020 were selected to verify the index system.Conclusions:The index system formed in this study will be used to classify and evaluate the conclusion evaluation of basic scientific research projects and clinical scientific research projects. In the next step, the weight of the index system will be adjusted to make it more realistic and highlight high-quality achievements, guide the project leader to pay more attention to quality and results, and conduct follow-up evaluation at different stages.
