Application of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of 50 liver cirrhosis patients with esophagogastric varices during follow-up
10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20220729-00367
- VernacularTitle:可分离式牵线磁控胶囊内镜在50例肝硬化合并食管胃静脉曲张患者内镜治疗后随访评估中的应用
- Author:
Wei WU
1
;
Duowu ZOU
;
Ye CHU
Author Information
1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院消化科，上海 200025
- Keywords:
Liver cirrhosis;
Gastroesophageal varices;
Endoscopic treatment;
Detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy;
Follow-up and assessment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestion
2022;42(11):764-769
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the value of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (DS-MCE) in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of liver cirrhosis patients with gastroesophageal varices during follow-up, and conventional electronic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was used as the gold standard.Methods:From July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, 50 follow-up patients with gastroesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis and had a past medical history of endoscopic treatment in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were selected. DS-MCE and EGD were performed in turn. The 2 endoscopic examination methods were compared and analyzed in the assessment of detecting gastroesophageal varices, grading of diameter of esophageal varices and classification of bleeding risk factors (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value), diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy and its severity, and the patients′ satisfaction (pre-procedural perceptual and post-procedural satisfaction). Kruskal-Wallis test and Kappa test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices were 100.0% (43/43), 85.7%(6/7), 97.7% (43/44) and 100.0%(6/6), respectively.The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating the grading of esophageal varices was 86.0% (43/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.797 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors were 94.4% (34/36), 100.0%(14/14), 100.0% (34/34) and 87.5%(14/16), respectively. The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors was 94.0% (47/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.862 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of gastric varices were 85.7% (18/21), 93.1% (27/29), 90.0% (18/20) and 90.0% (27/30), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy were all 100.0% (50/50). The consistency of DS-MCE and EGD in the severity grading of portal hypertensive gastropathy was good, the Kappa value was 0.962 ( P<0.001). The results of pre-procedural perceptual analysis showed that patients′ psychological tension before examination and expected pain before examination of DS-MCE were better than those of EGD ( H=16.04 and 23.74, both P<0.001). The results of satisfactory analysis after examination indicated that DS-MCE was better than EGD in the degree of difficulty in swallowing, pain and discomfort during examination, pain and discomfort after examination, comfort degree during examination, convenience of the procedure and willingness of receiving such examination again as gastric examination method ( H=17.28, 30.88, 44.68, 34.66, 48.05, 22.74, 13.03 and 17.19, all P<0.001). Conclusions:With EGD as the gold standard, DS-MCE can accurately evaluate gastroesophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastroenteropathy after endoscopic treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices, and it is a safe and comfortable method. DS-MCE can be an efficient alternative method in endoscopic follow-up of such patients.
