Expression and clinical significance of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53 and p16 protein in endometrial carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20220113-00031
- VernacularTitle:雌激素受体、孕激素受体、p53蛋白、p16蛋白在子宫内膜癌组织中的表达及其临床意义
- Author:
Caiyun ZHOU
1
;
Weichun LI
Author Information
1. 滁州市第一人民医院病理科，滁州 239000
- Keywords:
Endometrial neoplasms;
Immunohistochemistry;
Pathology, clinical;
Receptors, estrogen;
Genes, p53;
Genes, p16
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2022;29(9):1341-1344
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the expression and clinical significance of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53 and p16 protein in endometrial carcinoma.Methods:The endometrial tissue of 57 patients with endometrial carcinoma who received surgery in The First People's Hospital of Chuzhou between January 2017 and May 2021 was harvested as the study group. The normal endometrial tissue of 30 patients with endometrial hyperplasia was selected as the control group. Envision immunohistochemical staining was performed to determine the expression of ER, PR, p53 and p16 protein in endometrial tissue and analyze their expression with clinical pathological characteristics.Results:ER, PR, p16 protein expression rates in the endometrial tissue in the study group were 70.2%, 61.4%, 38.6%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 90.0%, 86.7%, 93.3% in the control group ( χ2 = 4.36, 5.98, 24.09, all P < 0.05). p53 expression rate in the endometrial tissue was significantly higher in the study group than that in the control group (52.6% vs. 13.3%, χ2 = 12.75, P < 0.001). ER and PR expression were significantly different between endometrial carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis and those without and among those with different histological grades and those at different pathological stages (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in p53 protein expression among patients with different pathological stages of endometrial carcinoma, between patients who suffered endometrial carcinoma at different ages, and between patients with different degrees of myometrial invasion (all P > 0.05). p16 protein expression rate differed among patients with different pathological stages of endometrial carcinoma, among those with different histological grades and between patients with different degrees of myometrial invasion (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in p16 protein expression rate between endometrial carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis and those without ( P > 0.05). Conclusion:Abnormal expressions of ER, PR, p53 and p16 protein in endometrial tissue may be related to the occurrence, development and transformation of the disease. Combined detection of ER, PR, p53 and p16 protein is helpful for the clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis assessment of endometrial carcinoma.
