Efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20200620-01101
- VernacularTitle:经皮后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
- Author:
Zhiyong FANG
1
;
Yong LI
;
Yanguo WANG
Author Information
1. 滨州市中心医院骨外科，滨州 251700
- Keywords:
Osteoporosis;
Fractures,compression;
Kyphoplasty;
Bone density;
Bone cement;
Time;
Postoperative complications;
Comparative effectiveness research;
Aged
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2022;29(8):1184-1188
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) versus percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of single-segment osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in the older adult patients. Methods:A total of 117 older adult patients with single-segment OVCF who received treatment in Binzhou Central Hospital from January 2016 to March 2018 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo either PVP (observation group, n = 60) or PKP (control group, n = 57). Therapeutic effects, treatment cost and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results:In the observation group, the amount of bone cement, operative time, treatment cost and the amplitude of increase in vertebral height post-operation relative to preoperative vertebral height were (4.69 ± 1.94) mL, (27.59 ± 5.81) minutes, (6 537.24 ± 898.36) yuan, (2.54 ±1.37) mm, respectively, and they were (5.78 ± 2.04) mL, (38.63 ± 8.17) minutes, (24 371.85 ± 2 365.54) yuan, (8.65 ± 1.48) mm, respectively in the control group. There were significant differences in these indices between the two groups ( t = 6.18, 9.25, 10.26, 7.23, all P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in Cobb angle and vertebral compression rate between the two groups (both P > 0.05). After treatment, Cobb angle of injured vertebrae in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group [(9.25 ± 2.36)° vs. (20.38 ± 3.87)%, t = 10.25, P < 0.05]. Vertebral compression rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group [(20.06 ± 3.53)% vs. (24.76 ± 5.35)%, t = 6.23, P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups [26.67% (16/60) vs. 17.54% (10/57), χ2 = 8.92, P < 0.05). Conclusion:PVP is more simple and less expensive in the clinical treatment of OVCF than PKP, but PKP is more effective and has lower incidence of complications than PVP. PKP can be preferred if there is no concern about economic and medical conditions.
