Accuracy of two different registration methods of dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20220506-00240
- VernacularTitle:动态导航下种植手术U型管配准与牙尖配准方法的精度比较
- Author:
Fei Fei MA
1
;
Tai WEI
1
;
Feng SUN
1
;
Yu MA
1
Author Information
1. First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100034, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods*;
Dental Implants;
Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods*;
Mandible/surgery*;
Imaging, Three-Dimensional;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Computer-Aided Design
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2022;57(12):1225-1229
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To compare cusp and U-tube registration methods of dynamic navigation system in dental implant placement. Methods: Twenty resin mandible models and 40 implants were utilized, with implants being placed by a single researcher using one of the two registration methods selected at random. Accuracy was measured through the superimposition of the final and planned implant positions. Angular deviation, three-dimensional (3D) entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation were analyzed. Results: The 3D entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation and angular deviation of cusp group and U-tube group were (1.07±0.46) and (0.93±0.54) mm, (1.16±0.55) and (1.03±0.53) mm, 2.06°±0.98°and 1.62°±0.97°. No significant differences (t=0.91, P=0.368; t=0.79, P=0.436; t=1.42, P=0.164) were observed when comparing these two registration methods. Conclusions: Both the cusp and U-tube registration methods are highly accurate when implemented in vitro. The cusp registration technique can also overcome several of the limitations of the U-tube approach, and it is convenient for clinic.
