Clinical study of sinus tarsal approach combined with Herbert screw and minimally invasive calcaneal locking plate in the treatment of SandersⅡ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.11.004
- Author:
Yu-Bo ZHOU
1
;
Zhen-Yu DONG
1
;
Wen-Yuan XIANG
1
;
Rui FANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Wulumuqi 830000, Xinjiang, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Calcaneus fractures;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Minimal invasive surgical procedures
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Young Adult;
Adult;
Middle Aged;
Aged;
Calcaneus/injuries*;
Blood Loss, Surgical;
Treatment Outcome;
Bone Plates;
Fractures, Bone/surgery*;
Ankle Injuries;
Foot Injuries;
Bone Screws;
Knee Injuries
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2022;35(11):1026-1030
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical effect of the tarsal sinus approach combined with Herbert screw and minimally invasive calcaneal locking plate compared with traditional lateral L-shaped incision approach combined with plate internal fixation in the treatment of SandersⅡ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.
METHODS:Total of 110 patients with SandersⅡ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures admitted from March 2018 to March 2020 were selected. There were 66 males and 44 females, ranging in age from 20 to 72 years old, with an average of (48.82±8.03) years old. There were 48 SandersⅡ patients and 62 Sanders Ⅲ patients, including 41 left calcaneal fractures and 69 right calcaneal fractures. According to the surgical approach, the patients were divided into the tarsal sinus approach group and the L-shaped incision approach group, 55 cases in each group. The L-shaped incision approach group was treated with traditional lateral L-shaped incision approach combined with internal fixation plate, while the sinus tarsal approach group was treated with tarsal sinus approach combined with Herbert screw and minimally invasive calcaneal locking plate. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and time of fracture healing were recorded to evaluate the surgical effect. The B?hler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal length and width of the patients before and after surgery were examined by X-ray and the surgical reduction was highly evaluated. Foot function recovery was evaluated by American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Maryland Scale, and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS:All patients were followed up to 12 months after surgery, the operation time and hospitalization time of patients in the sinus tarsal approach group were shorter than those in the L-shaped incision approach group (P<0.05), and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was lower than that in the L-shaped incision approach group(P<0.05). One year after surgery, B?hler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneus length and height were increased(P<0.05), calcaneus width was decreased (P<0.05). One year after the operation, the Maryland scores of the two groups were increased(P<0.05). During the follow-up period, the incidence of postoperative complications (incision infection, joint pain, soft tissue injury) in the sinus tarsalapproach group was lower than that in the L-shaped incision approach group(P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:The traditional lateral L-shaped incision approach and the tarsal sinus approach are both good for the treatment of SandersⅡand Ⅲ calcaneal fractures, but the latter can shorten the surgical treatment time and reduce the incidence of complications.
