One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
- Author:
Kyung Suk LEE
1
;
Gi Cheol DO
;
Jae Bong SHIN
;
Min Hyung KIM
;
Jun Sik KIM
;
Nam Gyun KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Archives of Craniofacial Surgery 2022;23(4):171-177
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures.
Methods:In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points—the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height—using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods.
Results:All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance.
Conclusion:Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation.
